Sally Vater
Senior Member
- Sep 24, 2015
- 788
- 134
- 45
Chief Justice Roberts said the Constitution had nothing to do with it. What's your constitutional education?Au contraire...the Constitution was followed. That's always refreshing to see. And the cool part, they get appointed for life and I'm sure they don't really give a fig about the names some people call them in petulance.I agree. Two liberal males, two lezbos, and the town drunk made a corrupt decision. Chief Justice Roberts and the other three constitutionalists were outnumbered. As Chief Justice Roberts said, celebrate the decision, but the constitution had nothing to do with it.Which prevails...the decision of 5 Justices in the majority or Chief Justice Roberts?Two liberal males, two lezbos, and the town drunk vs four constitutionalists including Chief Justice Roberts. You're making my point that the USSC has corrupt leftist activists.And yet....5 Justices (the majority) voted to strike down state restrictions that disallow SSM. Now...according to the Constitution, which prevails....the decision of 5? or Chief Justice Roberts?Ss
Says you and five activists. Chief Justice Roberts is a lot smarter than the two male liberals, two lezbos, and the town drunk.