State Offers Reward For Benghazi Terrorists

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
State Department Offers $10 Million Reward For Benghazi Jihadists, Says Ansar Al-Sharia “Involved” In Attack…



Wait, didn’t the NY Times recently claim there were no terrorists involved?

Via Weekly Standard:

The State Department today publicly announced a $10 million reward “for information leading to the arrest or conviction of any individual responsible for the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attacks.” The announcement for the reward is posted onrewardsforjustice.net.
The State Department also today designated three Ansar al-Sharia groups as terrorist entities.

The State Department today designated three Ansar al Sharia organizations, as well as three of their leaders, as terrorist entities. The State Department reports that Ansar al Sharia in Derna was “involved” in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi. Former Guantanamo detainee Sufian Ben Qumu, who long served al Qaeda, is named as “the leader” of Ansar al Sharia in Derna.
But not to worry, folks. The New Yawk Slimes has assured us..... There was no al Qaeda involvement in the spontaneous attack that Susan Rice was so forthright about in the attack on Benghazi.

Because, you know, protesters are so well trained in fire and maneuver drills and can hit a 100 sq meter target from 2 miles away with an 82mm Mortar 3 out of 5 times and can engage and kill former Navy SEALs who are just a bunch of pussies anyway, right?

But the news world is all aflutter about some over-zealous Christie staffer closing a few lanes of traffic.

Yeah, gotta admit.... Compared to 4 Americans being murdered, that is some big news
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
Uh.... Guys? Gals?

This is important stuff, here.

This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie.

:dunno:
 

LoneLaugher

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
60,529
Reaction score
8,978
Points
2,040
Location
Inside Mac's Head
State Department Offers $10 Million Reward For Benghazi Jihadists, Says Ansar Al-Sharia “Involved” In Attack…



Wait, didn’t the NY Times recently claim there were no terrorists involved?

Via Weekly Standard:

The State Department today publicly announced a $10 million reward “for information leading to the arrest or conviction of any individual responsible for the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attacks.” The announcement for the reward is posted onrewardsforjustice.net.
The State Department also today designated three Ansar al-Sharia groups as terrorist entities.

The State Department today designated three Ansar al Sharia organizations, as well as three of their leaders, as terrorist entities. The State Department reports that Ansar al Sharia in Derna was “involved” in the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi. Former Guantanamo detainee Sufian Ben Qumu, who long served al Qaeda, is named as “the leader” of Ansar al Sharia in Derna.
But not to worry, folks. The New Yawk Slimes has assured us..... There was no al Qaeda involvement in the spontaneous attack that Susan Rice was so forthright about in the attack on Benghazi.

Because, you know, protesters are so well trained in fire and maneuver drills and can hit a 100 sq meter target from 2 miles away with an 82mm Mortar 3 out of 5 times and can engage and kill former Navy SEALs who are just a bunch of pussies anyway, right?

But the news world is all aflutter about some over-zealous Christie staffer closing a few lanes of traffic.

Yeah, gotta admit.... Compared to 4 Americans being murdered, that is some big news
"Wait, didn’t the NY Times recently claim there were no terrorists involved?"

Nope. Thread fail.
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
73,941
Reaction score
10,185
Points
2,030
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
Lying scumbag....

Watch:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgkw6o3Zg_Q]Susan Rice Caught Lying About Benghazi - Rep. Trey Gowdy Whistleblower Questioning - YouTube[/ame]
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
73,941
Reaction score
10,185
Points
2,030
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
Lying scumbag....

Watch:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgkw6o3Zg_Q]Susan Rice Caught Lying About Benghazi - Rep. Trey Gowdy Whistleblower Questioning - YouTube[/ame]
Do you know what date this video occurred?
 

G.T.

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
73,941
Reaction score
10,185
Points
2,030
I watched the Benghazi hearings, and the IRS hearings.

There's no there there. There's really not.

The Fast and furious one would be way more fruitful to pursue.
 
OP
Edgetho

Edgetho

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2012
Messages
12,506
Reaction score
2,635
Points
280
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
Lying scumbag....

Watch:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgkw6o3Zg_Q]Susan Rice Caught Lying About Benghazi - Rep. Trey Gowdy Whistleblower Questioning - YouTube[/ame]
Do you know what date this video occurred?
the cocksucker lied. Even the leftist WaPo called him out for lying....

Obama?s claim he called Benghazi an ?act of terrorism? - The Washington Post

 

Jarhead

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
20,670
Reaction score
2,378
Points
245
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
GT...

Lets just say for arguments sake that it was the film...

Obama would have most certainly referred to it as an act of terror...because a group of people attacking another group of people unprovoked is an act of terror.

So if you recall, he spoke of the film; talked about how it incited people; and then referred to the attack on Benghazi as an act of terror.

It was well played by him. He did not admit that it was a "terrorist attack"....but at the same time had some parsed words to fall back on if it came back to bite him.

and yes, there is a big difference between an act of terror and a terrorist attack.

An act of terror defines the act itself.....one who commits an act of terror is not necessarily a terrorist by layman definition. A drunk driver is committing an act of terror....but is not a terrorist as we use the term.

A terrorist attack defines the person committing the act....
 

Jarhead

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
20,670
Reaction score
2,378
Points
245
I watched the Benghazi hearings, and the IRS hearings.

There's no there there. There's really not.

The Fast and furious one would be way more fruitful to pursue.
GT...why is the IRS thing not an issue?
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,113
Points
190
I watched the Benghazi hearings, and the IRS hearings.

There's no there there. There's really not.

The Fast and furious one would be way more fruitful to pursue.
GT...why is the IRS thing not an issue?
Because no one suffered any loss. And most Americans have now figured out that the Tea Party is dangerous and not to be trusted.
 

zeke

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2012
Messages
8,272
Reaction score
1,113
Points
190
Sorry, Didn't mean to act like I was speaking for GT.
 

Jarhead

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
20,670
Reaction score
2,378
Points
245
I watched the Benghazi hearings, and the IRS hearings.

There's no there there. There's really not.

The Fast and furious one would be way more fruitful to pursue.
GT...why is the IRS thing not an issue?
Because no one suffered any loss. And most Americans have now figured out that the Tea Party is dangerous and not to be trusted.
what are you?

A child?
 

Vox

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2013
Messages
10,937
Reaction score
867
Points
138
The Administration isn't the NYT.

The Administration has called it a terrorist attack. For quite some time now, so your comment "This is the administration admitting there were terrorists involved.

IOW, they're admitting that everything they've told us to this point has been a lie."


is just partisanship. You can find quotes of Obama on video calling it an act of terror. Mighta shoulda googled that.
so, NYT LIED?

I am shocked. Not :D
 

kaz

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
59,661
Reaction score
9,552
Points
2,040
Location
Kazmania
State Department Offers $10 Million Reward For Benghazi Jihadists, Says Ansar Al-Sharia “Involved” In Attack…
Analogous to OJ offering a reward for the murderer of his wife...

It's not quite the same since OJ did it and State just doesn't want them, but certainly it's analogous in that neither is sincere in the slightest and both want cheap, unearned brownie points.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top