Martin Eden Mercury
VIP Member
- Nov 2, 2015
- 897
- 107
- 80
Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
sorry, facts matter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
Why would she? She has done nothing like what David did.Let's make no mistake about it, Hillary will not receive the punishment that General Patreaus received.
I know it's tough for some people to grasp, depending on what media bubble they exists in, to deal with realities on the ground. But whether you know it or not, there has been no investigation of the Secretary. The investigation has been on the set up of the server, and how it relates to information contained in the emails. To date, there has been NO criminal investigation of former Secretary Clinton. I doubt there will ever be one, regardless of the spin.I provide United States Law - and you claim that she has the "certain authority" to "discuss" classified information (which she does not - unless with individuals with proper Security Clearances). Apparently you know nothing about US law - and in particular, compartmentalized sensitive information. Before you claim things that simply are NOT true - put your pseudo-intellectual mind to work and ask yourself this question: Who the hell said anything whatsoever about "discussing" classified information? No one. It's about receiving classified information on a non-secure server - an act which clearly violates the above mentioned US Code.
So again - read the LAW.
The laws as they apply to dept heads in the executive branch may be beyond your understanding
Why would she? She has done nothing like what David did.Let's make no mistake about it, Hillary will not receive the punishment that General Patreaus received.
Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
sorry, facts matter
Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
sorry, facts matter
FBI formally confirms its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server
02/08/16 05:30 PM—UPDATED 02/08/16 06:58 PM
21 share group 1k
By Pete Williams
In a letter disclosed Monday in a federal court filing, the FBI confirms one of the world’s worst-kept secrets: It is looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
FBI formally confirms its investigation of Hillary Clinton's email server
Did you think it meant the server was the subject of the investigation?
The reasoning is, the FBI is part of the VRWC.Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
Hillary Clinton is not the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?Who else but the Democrats can run a candidate currently the subject of an ongoing FBI investigation?
sorry, facts matter
FBI formally confirms its investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email server
02/08/16 05:30 PM—UPDATED 02/08/16 06:58 PM
21 share group 1k
By Pete Williams
In a letter disclosed Monday in a federal court filing, the FBI confirms one of the world’s worst-kept secrets: It is looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server.
FBI formally confirms its investigation of Hillary Clinton's email server
Did you think it meant the server was the subject of the investigation?
In this case, probably. I have no doubt whatsoever, that Loretta Lynch has made it abundantly clear that the FBI is to find NOTHING. Again, if I had installed my own private, non-secure server in my bathroom and transmitted and received classified information - the investigation would have lasted 24 hours and I would be currently maintaining a cell in Fort Leavenworth - probably for the rest of my natural life. It's a shame that laws don't apply equally - but they don't.
The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas Observer
The Hunting of the President: The Ten-year Campaign to Destroy Hillary and Bill ClintonArkansas Project - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the most disgustingly fascinating political book I’ve ever read. As the subtitle indicates, it is the anatomy of a would-be political murder. I can’t imagine anyone doing a better job of laying out the corpse than Joe Conason and Gene Lyons have done. (Conason is a longtime New York reporter, national correspondent for the Village Voice in the Eighties; Lyons, a former Newsweek editor, wrote Fools for Scandal, about the media’s response to Whitewater.) The Hunting of the President is the “story of the most successful and long-running ‘dirty tricks’ campaign in recent American history, fomented by a handful of professional Republican operatives and corporate lawyers, and funded by a network of wealthy conservatives.”
Evidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
Evidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas ObserverEvidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
I am responding to what you have posted and I even bolded what I posted. If I am wrong then tell me what I said is wrong. Don't imply crap, that is a dishonest what to discuss things.
then enlighten us. this one too please, if you have a few extra words of wisdom laying around. if you're going to be smug, at least be right.The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas ObserverEvidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
I am responding to what you have posted and I even bolded what I posted. If I am wrong then tell me what I said is wrong. Don't imply crap, that is a dishonest what to discuss things.
by Michael King
PublishedFri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:00 am CST
For three years, however, Clinton’s luck held. Starr discovered that, for all his digging, Whitewater was what Hillary said it was: “a never-ending fictional conspiracy that honest-to-goodness reminds me of some people’s obsession with U.F.O.s.” Though he kept telling the press he was “getting close” to a Whitewater breakthrough, he had in fact run into such a wall that one month after Clinton’s second inaugural in 1997, Starr announced that he was resigning to become dean of Pepperdine University Law School (subsidized by that faithful old wacko, Richard Mellon Scaife). The announcement provoked such outrage from his far-right supporters, and denunciations as a “quitter” by Times columnist William Safire and others, that four days later he said he would stay on.
It is not only evident that you have no clue what you are responding to, but your complete ignorance mixed with denial over the Arkansas project, is simply amazing.
Washingtonpost.com: 'Arkansas Project' Led to Turmoil and Rifts
The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas Observer
The Hunting of the President: The Ten-year Campaign to Destroy Hillary and Bill ClintonArkansas Project - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the most disgustingly fascinating political book I’ve ever read. As the subtitle indicates, it is the anatomy of a would-be political murder. I can’t imagine anyone doing a better job of laying out the corpse than Joe Conason and Gene Lyons have done. (Conason is a longtime New York reporter, national correspondent for the Village Voice in the Eighties; Lyons, a former Newsweek editor, wrote Fools for Scandal, about the media’s response to Whitewater.) The Hunting of the President is the “story of the most successful and long-running ‘dirty tricks’ campaign in recent American history, fomented by a handful of professional Republican operatives and corporate lawyers, and funded by a network of wealthy conservatives.”
I call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas ObserverEvidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
I am responding to what you have posted and I even bolded what I posted. If I am wrong then tell me what I said is wrong. Don't imply crap, that is a dishonest what to discuss things.
by Michael King
PublishedFri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:00 am CST
For three years, however, Clinton’s luck held. Starr discovered that, for all his digging, Whitewater was what Hillary said it was: “a never-ending fictional conspiracy that honest-to-goodness reminds me of some people’s obsession with U.F.O.s.” Though he kept telling the press he was “getting close” to a Whitewater breakthrough, he had in fact run into such a wall that one month after Clinton’s second inaugural in 1997, Starr announced that he was resigning to become dean of Pepperdine University Law School (subsidized by that faithful old wacko, Richard Mellon Scaife). The announcement provoked such outrage from his far-right supporters, and denunciations as a “quitter” by Times columnist William Safire and others, that four days later he said he would stay on.
It is not only evident that you have no clue what you are responding to, but your complete ignorance mixed with denial over the Arkansas project, is simply amazing.
Washingtonpost.com: 'Arkansas Project' Led to Turmoil and Rifts
Campaign fraud is a crime. No charges, No crime. Move along.
then enlighten us. this one too please, if you have a few extra words of wisdom laying around. if you're going to be smug, at least be right.The Arkansas Project Unmasked - The Texas ObserverEvidently, you have no clue what you are responding toI call BS for the above bolded words. He was president for 8 years and she is the front runner for the job and SOS. What exactly have they been successful in doing? This sounds like another book that lays out a left wing fairy tale story line then defends it with BS.
I am thinking they channeled Goebbels for this book.
I am responding to what you have posted and I even bolded what I posted. If I am wrong then tell me what I said is wrong. Don't imply crap, that is a dishonest what to discuss things.
by Michael King
PublishedFri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:00 am CST
For three years, however, Clinton’s luck held. Starr discovered that, for all his digging, Whitewater was what Hillary said it was: “a never-ending fictional conspiracy that honest-to-goodness reminds me of some people’s obsession with U.F.O.s.” Though he kept telling the press he was “getting close” to a Whitewater breakthrough, he had in fact run into such a wall that one month after Clinton’s second inaugural in 1997, Starr announced that he was resigning to become dean of Pepperdine University Law School (subsidized by that faithful old wacko, Richard Mellon Scaife). The announcement provoked such outrage from his far-right supporters, and denunciations as a “quitter” by Times columnist William Safire and others, that four days later he said he would stay on.
It is not only evident that you have no clue what you are responding to, but your complete ignorance mixed with denial over the Arkansas project, is simply amazing.
Washingtonpost.com: 'Arkansas Project' Led to Turmoil and Rifts