State Department Employee Fired for Allegedly Helping Illegal Aliens Dodge Deportation

You do not have to be a lawyer to give legal advice.
When a cop arrest you and first reads you your rights, he does not have to be a lawyer.
The cop who reads you your rights is following a court order to do so.

That genius in the video a court-appointed legal adviser for Illegal aliens?

Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest with his job?

Well . . . not any more, I guess

:auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301:
 
The statement from the Department of State came after the O’Keefe Media Group released a video in which Akhtar appears to admit that he has advised illegal migrants, primarily Hispanic, not to speak with the police or “admit the truth.” Akhtar is also heard stating that he is “not a huge fan” of people from Yemen."

Advising people of their rights is now considered a fireable offense?

"Fascism! It's okay if WE do it."
 
The cop who reads you your rights is following a court order to do so.

That genius in the video a court-appointed legal adviser for Illegal aliens?

Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest with his job?

Well . . . not any more, I guess
No, advising people of their rights is not a conflict of interest.

It's the law.
 
Advising people of their rights is now considered a fireable offense?

"Fascism! It's okay if WE do it."
It said he advised them to not tell the truth. Now, he’s out of a job.
 
There is no law requiring that clown to give taxi drivers legal advice.

Stop lying.

He's a government official managing the VISA process. He should be required to inform them of all their rights.

It said he advised them to not tell the truth. Now, he’s out of a job.

"You have the right to remain silent".

Every cop should be out of a job, according to you.
 
He's a government official managing the VISA process. He should be required to inform them of all their rights.



"You have the right to remain silent".

Every cop should be out of a job, according to you.

Did he work for the executive branch charged with enforcing the laws of the US or was he a self-employed lawyer representing illegal aliens?
 

"State Department Employee Fired for Allegedly Helping Illegal Aliens Dodge Deportation​



A Department of State employee was fired after video footage surfaced that appeared to show him admitting he had given illegal migrants advice and helped them dodge deportation.

The O’Keefe Media Group was informed in a statement by the Department of State that Arslan Akhtar, who had worked as a visa specialist for the agency, was “no longer employed by” the State Department.

“The contractor is no longer employed by the U.S. State Department,” an official said. “Upholding the rule of law and protecting the integrity of our immigration system is essential, which is why the Department will launch a new contractor screening and vetting process.”

The statement from the Department of State came after the O’Keefe Media Group released a video in which Akhtar appears to admit that he has advised illegal migrants, primarily Hispanic, not to speak with the police or “admit the truth.” Akhtar is also heard stating that he is “not a huge fan” of people from Yemen."








The Deep State's resistance is real. This guy is out of job now.

Freedom of Speech is under attack by a fascist Trump regime.
 
WHy couldn't he be both? He was a contractor hired to do a job.

By all accounts, he did the job he was required to do.

Who paid him?
 
Last edited:
He's a government official managing the VISA process. He should be required to inform them of all their rights.
Why? Shouldn't they have researched that before they crossed the border?
"You have the right to remain silent".

Every cop should be out of a job, according to you.
For following the law?

Stop lying.
 
Who paid him?

The people.

Including the taxpayers who are undocumented immigrants.
1751804277027.webp
 
15th post
It's too bad we can't deport Democrats.
 
Is he actually an attorney? If they are not, then they are committing a crime and should be fired for doing acting in such away. Was he working with in the guidelines of what he was hired to do? The article is really vague.
 
Is he actually an attorney? If they are not, then they are committing a crime and should be fired for doing acting in such away. Was he working with in the guidelines of what he was hired to do?an attornet. The article is really vague.
No, he is not. He said "we work with attorneys."
 
Back
Top Bottom