Starmer anti agriculture government under protest by British farmers over the Death Tax

[Mac-7]

garmers seige london at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

Greedy socialists are attacking the famers that feed the nation by imposing a 20% inheritance tax

The farmers do not want to lose their land when they cant afford to pay the tax

I really feel for the Mother Country as it goes through its death throes

 

[MisterBeale]

Starmer and farmers locked in deadlock over tax changes after emotional protest

Hundreds of farmers brought their tractors to Westminster for a day of protest – but the Labour government shows no sign of backing down on its plan to introduce inheritance tax

www.independent.co.uk

LIVE UPDATES: Police arrest farmers for bringing tractors to protest

Our reporters are live on the scene in London for the Farmers to London: Budget Day protest

www.farmersguardian.com

 

[martybegan]

garmers seige london at DuckDuckGo

DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.

duckduckgo.com

Greedy socialists are attacking the famers that feed the nation by imposing a 20% inheritance tax

The farmers do not want to lose their land when they cant afford to pay the tax

I really feel for the Mother Country as it goes through its death throes

Crony Capitalism more than socialism. They open up the farms to be bought and consolidated by friendly Corporations.

Either way, it's shitty.

 

[Marener]

Crony Capitalism more than socialism. They open up the farms to be bought and consolidated by friendly Corporations.

Either way, it's shitty.

Fun fact, people can sell their farms to whomever they want. They don’t have to sell to corporations if they don’t want to.

 

[martybegan]

Fun fact, people can sell their farms to whomever they want. They don’t have to sell to corporations if they don’t want to.

Corporations offer the best deal, and these people have a wealth tax to pay.

Wealth taxes are idiotic when beyond a few percentage points, as they require liquidating assets, and scavengers know they can bully the sellers into taking their offers.

 

[MisterBeale]

Can you answer this for me?

Why would someone ban consumption of red meat when it makes a lot of powerful people rich?
Why would someone ban gas powered vehicles when it makes a lot of powerful people rich?

Both of those are billion dollar businesses. Where is the money in doing this?

I doubt you will accept the answer though.

I tried to imply, with my last post, what the answer was, but you did not get it.

Why would someone ban consumption of red meat when it makes a lot of powerful people rich?

The folks that own the land and resources will become rich off of providing food, no matter what that food is. It has been already proven, Animal based food, will, in the future, be more costly to produce, than plant based food. Meat will be available only to the elites on a regular basis. Subsidies for animal based food will end, and the water, energy and hydrocarbon based fertilizers will go to producing food for human consumption.

Sustainability of plant-based diets: back to the future

ABSTRACT. Plant-based diets in comparison to diets rich in animal products are more sustainable because they use many fewer natural resources and are less taxin

academic.oup.com

Animal-based Foods are More Resource-Intensive than Plant-Based Foods

Like overconsumption of calories, overconsumption of protein widens the food gap. Furthermore, animal-based foods are typically more resource-intensive and environmentally impactful to produce than plant-based foods. Production of animal-based foods accounted for more than three-quarters of...

www.wri.org

Why would someone ban gas powered vehicles when it makes a lot of powerful people rich?

The folks that sit on the boards of these interlocking directorates of the energy companies & others know, that these auto-manufacturers will still make money, regardless of what type of vehicles they sell. . . and the hydro-carbon companies will just re-direct which industries their product goes to. They will make even more money.

Of particular interest? Hydrocarbons are a main chemical in the pharmaceutical industry as well. . . .

Petroleum and Health Care: Evaluating and Managing Health Care's Vulnerability to Petroleum Supply Shifts​

Petroleum and Health Care: Evaluating and Managing Health Care's Vulnerability to Petroleum Supply Shifts - PMC

Petroleum is used widely in health care—primarily as a transport fuel and feedstock for pharmaceuticals, plastics, and medical supplies—and few substitutes for it are available. This dependence theoretically makes health care vulnerable to petroleum ...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A Look Into the Petrochemicals Industry​

A Look Into the Petrochemicals Industry

Petrochemicals are a vital part of our lives, and it is hard to imagine modern existence without them.

www.americanlaboratory.com

Chemistry

Learn about chemical reactions, elements, and the periodic table with these resources for students and teachers.

www.thoughtco.com

The 5 Main Applications of Hydrocarbons

The main applications of hydrocarbons are given in transport, as fuel, and in industry. But they also have numerous uses...

www.lifepersona.com

 

[MisterBeale]

Another Globalist "Simulation" Comes True​

Corbett ReportNov 7, 2021, 10:15:33 PM

Another Globalist "Simulation" Comes True

by James Corbettcorbettreport.comNovember 7, 2021You know how Event 201 was just the most high profile in a string of "simulations" and "sce...

www.minds.com

Another Globalist "Simulation" Comes True | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

You know how Event 201 was just the most high profile in a string of "simulations" and "scenarios" (including Clade X, Crimson Contagion, Lock Step and SPARS) that just happened to predictively program the fear of a global coronavirus pandemic into the minds of the global political and managerial class?

And you know how those "exercises" (like the multiple war games that just happened to coincide with the catastrophic, catalyzing events of 9/11) not only anticipated our current predicament, but, more importantly, laid the groundwork for the current global governmental response to the scamdemic—the creation of vaccine passports, the erection of the biosecurity grid, the crackdown on the "infodemic" of online "disinformation," etc.?

Now, what if I were to tell you that there have been a number of simulations that have taken place in recent years that have similarly spelled out the globalists' game plan for the post-scamdemic world in black-and-white?

Well, brace yourself. The global planners have been crafting simulations, war games and exercises to simulate our responses to the crises they are intending to create in the coming decade. And, as serious as all of the above-named simulations were, these ones foretell of an even darker vision for humanity in the years to come. . . .

The Players Set the Stage

In November of 2015—as you can learn from an official press release on the Cargill website—"65 international policymakers, academics, business and thought leaders gathered at the World Wildlife Fund’s headquarters in Washington DC to game out how the world would respond to a future food crisis." Over the course of two days, the participants in this "Food Chain Reaction" crisis simulation role played a response to a number of converging and overlapping crises in the 2020s, including "two major food crises, with prices approaching 400 percent of the long term average; a raft of climate-related extreme weather events; governments toppling in Pakistan and Ukraine; and famine and refugee crises in Bangladesh, Myanmar, Chad and Sudan."

Among the expected corporate platitudes and blather about "staying ahead of the curve" in order to "get it right," the World Wildlife Fund highlights the key takeaway from this exercise: "Only by stopping agricultural expansion, augmenting agricultural production, increasing resource-use efficiency, and reducing food waste, can we provide the food and nourishment we need, while ensuring we are conserving nature for future generations."

I'll let you stew on the implications of that statement on your own time, but the game—which, we are assured, "was built over the course of months, with maximal realism in mind"—went on to envision some very specific scenarios that look like they are on track to becoming stone cold reality, like "a steep price spike with looming global food shortages in 2022" that prompted the EU players to impose a tax on meat. But here's the kicker: this "game" ended with the imposition of a global carbon tax.. . .

<snip>

" . .. As I write, soaring natural gas prices are resulting in a nitrogen fertilizer shortage, which in turn is helping to fuel food price inflation. This has led Russia to impose nitrogen fertilizer export quotas, exacerbating problems in the agricultural sector, which is already reeling from China's September decision to halt all exports of phosphate, another key ingredient of commercial fertilizers. The pinch is already being felt by farmers around the world, with the Brazilian Agriculture and Land Reform Commission taking up the issue as a major food security threat and the Indian Air Force helping to secure fertilizer shipments to Sri Lanka.

But that's not all. The stories of woe are coming from farmers all across the globe as the world plunges into an unprecedented series of food crises.

Historic droughts have hit California growers hard even as the container ship backlog is leaving farmers struggling to export what little they have managed to harvest. In Canada, a shakeup at one of the country's main rail carriers have left farmers wondering if they'll be able to ship their grain as usual this year. Two cases of mad cow disease in Brazil prompted China to halt Brazilian meat imports and Brazil, in return, has partially halted beef production. And a new round of virtual false flag threats on American agribusiness have US Senators on edge about the possible national security implications of cyber attacks.

Yes, once the pieces of this puzzle are put together, there can be no doubt that we are entering into a generated food crisis exactly like the Food Chain Reaction "predicted" for this all-important 2020—2030 period. And it's about to get even worse.. . "

Global Emissions Surveillance & Digital Product Passports

Climate TRACE tracks emissions from over 660 million sources in near real-time. That data is already flowing into supply chains, digital product passports, and carbon scoring systems, enabling enfo…

www.iceagefarmer.com

 

[Marener]

Corporations offer the best deal, and these people have a wealth tax to pay.

Wealth taxes are idiotic when beyond a few percentage points, as they require liquidating assets, and scavengers know they can bully the sellers into taking their offers.

That’s true, corporations probably will pay the most.

That still doesn’t mean you have to sell to them.

It’s not as though the inheritors are under some kind of stress. They’re getting free money either way.

 

[martybegan]

That’s true, corporations probably will pay the most.

That still doesn’t mean you have to sell to them.

It’s not as though the inheritors are under some kind of stress. They’re getting free money either way.

It's not "free money" you fucktard.

They have to sell their inheritance and lose said inheritance

The people with complaints are the ones that want to keep the farm but can't afford to due to lack of liquid assets to pay a bullshit inheritance tax.

 

[Marener]

It's not "free money" you fucktard.

They have to sell their inheritance and lose said inheritance

The people with complaints are the ones that want to keep the farm but can't afford to due to lack of liquid assets to pay a bullshit inheritance tax.

The tax rate is like, what, 20%? They sell 20% of the inheritance and keep 80%.

80% free is still free.

 

[MisterBeale]

The tax rate is like, what, 20%? They sell 20% of the inheritance and keep 80%.

80% free is still free.

If a person's family has built a successful business, giving it to children to continue is NOT free.

It was earned by families' working and putting in their labor, it is the birthright of their children.

 

[Marener]

If a person's family has built a successful business, giving it to children to continue is NOT free.

It was earned by people working, it is the birthright of their children.

It’s free to the kids. They didn’t pay for it. That’s why it’s GIVEN to them. The kids didn’t earn it.

 

[martybegan]

The tax rate is like, what, 20%? They sell 20% of the inheritance and keep 80%.

80% free is still free.

They lose the land, asshole.

And then they pay sales tax on it. and then income tax on it.

 

[martybegan]

It’s free to the kids. They didn’t pay for it. That’s why it’s GIVEN to them. The kids didn’t earn it.

"You don't own that"

"You didn't make that"

What a ******* collectivist shill you are.

 

[Marener]

They lose the land, asshole.

And then they pay sales tax on it. and then income tax on it.

The inheritors never had the land that is sold to pay the taxes. The estate does that.

So they get land, just slightly less than they wanted.

There’s no income tax on inherited property and no sales tax on real estate.

 

[Marener]

"You don't own that"

"You didn't make that"

What a ******* collectivist shill you are.

Okay have it your way. Wed get the landed gentry and the peasants.

We already are most of the way to the aristocracy. Why not just go all the way?

 

[martybegan]

The inheritors never had the land that is sold to pay the taxes. The estate does that.

So they get land, just slightly less than they wanted.

There’s no income tax on inherited property and no sales tax on real estate.

They more than likely lived on it and worked on it, you moron.

You do know this is England right?

 

[martybegan]

Okay have it your way. Wed get the landed gentry and the peasants.

We already are most of the way to the aristocracy. Why not just go all the way?

These people are what's left of the ******* peasants, you idiot.

OK Comrade.

You ***** about "aristocracy" yet support collectivist policies run by bureaucrats who answer to no one.

 

[MisterBeale]

It’s free to the kids. They didn’t pay for it. That’s why it’s GIVEN to them. The kids didn’t earn it.

And the government has even less right to the fruits of their parent's labor than the children do. . . .

The government doesn't pay for it either.

I'd say I can't believe you are this dumb, and this in favor of authoritarians. . . but meh, we all know what a silly communist piece of shit you are.

I have always been against the type of atrocities Pinochet did, but rhetoric like yours makes it clear why folks resort to that sort of violence.

I really hope stoopid folks like you are never the majority in this nation.

 

[Marener]

These people are what's left of the ******* peasants, you idiot.

OK Comrade.

You ***** about "aristocracy" yet support collectivist policies run by bureaucrats who answer to no one.

The **** they are. These people own massive amounts of productive land. Family farms these days have assets in the tens of millions and they keep growing because their margins are so much higher than everyone else. Their so flush with cash that they can gobble up any new land that comes for sale and drive prices way up.

You want to see the peasants? They’re renting the land from rich inheritors which reduces their margins so much they can barely stay afloat and never have enough capital to buy land of their own.