Starbucks sacks woman who refused to wear pride shirt

[Canon Shooter]

How did they "push" her to do anything?

By attacking her religious beliefs

if you know god hating liberals you know they love to mock Christians

They didn't attack her religious beliefs. In fact, they deferred to them by saying she didn't have to wear the shirt...

 

[22lcidw]

Only Starbucks says that she was harassing employees by saying the word “Jesus”

And their opinion is really the only one that matters.

Starbuck's anti-discrimination policy is pretty clear (whether you agree with it or not is another matter):

https://globalassets.starbucks.com/assets/261b1daeb66b493d9e6758cdd720cb5c.pdf

If the girl was walking around telling people they need to find Jesus (and that appears to be the case), then she ran afoul of established norms at Starbuck's and, as such, was subject to however Starbuck's decided to handle it.

Again, she should've just shut the fuck up...

Anti discrimination? Bwaaaahhhaaaaaa.....Maybe the store did the right thing, but the employee was sure an idiot...

Starbucks employee fired for writing ‘Defund the police’ on drink order

A Starbucks employee in Houston has been fired after writing the message “Defund the police” on a customer’s order, according to a report. Photos of the three drinks — which had l…

nypost.com

What is the cost each to society of a Christian,, a non Christian and person who says they are Christian, a person of another religious denomination who says they are that, a person of another religious denomination who are that, and anyone who does what they want in a society.

 

[danielpalos]

That employee was "proselytizing" and raised an ethical concern.

The company proselytized to her first by telling her to wear the shirt

and she explained why to the KGB agent who called

Company policy is not the same as private individual policy. She is no religious authority.

A business cannot force its beliefs on others. A Christian company cannot force its social beliefs on an individual. Nor can a Starbucks force its social beliefs on an individual.

It is not about religious beliefs but about equality and equal protection of the laws.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

As an employer you are not allowed to discriminate against race, skin color, sexual preference or religion. Starbucks was forcing to do something she was not hired or required at the time she was hired. They are discriminating against her and singling her out. The question is what was her part and at this point the story is unclear.

I agree to disagree. The subjective value of morals must be personal for an individual. Management policy was not illegal. Equality through equal protection of the laws is guaranteed in our several Constitutions.

She was proselytizing and management needed a good excuse. For comparison and contrast, that employee could have worked at some other store that day or out of site of customers for the duration.

If she was proselytizing, I would agree, however that is Starbucks side. If they asked her to wear a shirt, and that was the reason for the firing, then the employer has no right and it has no relation to equal protection. The right of religious freedom is paramount in this case.

Did you read the article?

Yes, did you?

Of course, why do you believe I reached the conclusion I did?

We shall see, it will go to court, like I said if it is what she claims, she will win on grounds of religious discrimination and if Starbucks wins it will be on grounds that she was proselytizing.

When I owned my business, religion and politics were two subjects that were off limits for me and my employees while on my clock. I did not want to get sued over such silliness. That is why my company would never have such stupid t-shirts.

Why does the right wing complain about a lack of free speech on twitter?

 

[danielpalos]

Christian barista files lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was forced to wear a rainbow t-shirt

A Christian barista has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was fired after refusing to wear a rainbow Pride t-shirt.

www.pinknews.co.uk

She is suing the coffee chain for her hurt snowflake feelings. How long is this nonsense going to drag on for before the forces of darkness learn to respect their fellow man.

If the forces of darkness would stop persecuting people who don't sign on to the gay agenda, it would end pretty quickly......

Only the Right Wing has a problem with the Law.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Yes, citizens, not illegal immigrants.

Wrong thread.

 

[Papageorgio]

That employee was "proselytizing" and raised an ethical concern.

The company proselytized to her first by telling her to wear the shirt

and she explained why to the KGB agent who called

Company policy is not the same as private individual policy. She is no religious authority.

A business cannot force its beliefs on others. A Christian company cannot force its social beliefs on an individual. Nor can a Starbucks force its social beliefs on an individual.

It is not about religious beliefs but about equality and equal protection of the laws.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

As an employer you are not allowed to discriminate against race, skin color, sexual preference or religion. Starbucks was forcing to do something she was not hired or required at the time she was hired. They are discriminating against her and singling her out. The question is what was her part and at this point the story is unclear.

I agree to disagree. The subjective value of morals must be personal for an individual. Management policy was not illegal. Equality through equal protection of the laws is guaranteed in our several Constitutions.

She was proselytizing and management needed a good excuse. For comparison and contrast, that employee could have worked at some other store that day or out of site of customers for the duration.

If she was proselytizing, I would agree, however that is Starbucks side. If they asked her to wear a shirt, and that was the reason for the firing, then the employer has no right and it has no relation to equal protection. The right of religious freedom is paramount in this case.

Did you read the article?

Yes, did you?

Of course, why do you believe I reached the conclusion I did?

We shall see, it will go to court, like I said if it is what she claims, she will win on grounds of religious discrimination and if Starbucks wins it will be on grounds that she was proselytizing.

When I owned my business, religion and politics were two subjects that were off limits for me and my employees while on my clock. I did not want to get sued over such silliness. That is why my company would never have such stupid t-shirts.

Why does the right wing complain about a lack of free speech on twitter?

I don’t know, nor do I care, you need to go ask them.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Only Starbucks says that she was harassing employees by saying the word “Jesus”

And their opinion is really the only one that matters.

Starbuck's anti-discrimination policy is pretty clear (whether you agree with it or not is another matter):

https://globalassets.starbucks.com/assets/261b1daeb66b493d9e6758cdd720cb5c.pdf

If the girl was walking around telling people they need to find Jesus (and that appears to be the case), then she ran afoul of established norms at Starbuck's and, as such, was subject to however Starbuck's decided to handle it.

Again, she should've just shut the fuck up...

Anti discrimination? Bwaaaahhhaaaaaa.....Maybe the store did the right thing, but the employee was sure an idiot...

Starbucks employee fired for writing ‘Defund the police’ on drink order

A Starbucks employee in Houston has been fired after writing the message “Defund the police” on a customer’s order, according to a report. Photos of the three drinks — which had l…

nypost.com

What is the cost each to society of a Christian,, a non Christian and person who says they are Christian, a person of another religious denomination who says they are that, a person of another religious denomination who are that, and anyone who does what they want in a society.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

 

[BS Filter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I spent 20 years in the Navy. 7-Eleven is gourmet to me...

 

[Papageorgio]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

 

[BS Filter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

Having a Sumatra now. Yes, really good.

 

[Papageorgio]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

Having a Sumatra now. Yes, really good.

Damn, I ran out yesterday, I’m drinking Costco dark roast.

 

[BS Filter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

Having a Sumatra now. Yes, really good.

Damn, I ran out yesterday, I’m drinking Costco dark roast.

It's not bad. It's made by Starbucks.

 

[Papageorgio]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

Having a Sumatra now. Yes, really good.

Damn, I ran out yesterday, I’m drinking Costco dark roast.

It's not bad. It's made by Starbucks.

True but it’s not Sumatra. There is a brand of coffee made in Alaska Kaladi Bros. that I am going to try. It is supposed to be really good.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I love Starbucks coffee, but I hate their business.

They've got really good hot chocolate, but that raspberry-mint-creme-girlie-boy-foo-foo-bullshit coffee's gotta' go...

Just straight black coffee for me.

I like a strong dark roast. Their Sumatra blend is really good.

Having a Sumatra now. Yes, really good.

Damn, I ran out yesterday, I’m drinking Costco dark roast.

It's not bad. It's made by Starbucks.

True but it’s not Sumatra. There is a brand of coffee made in Alaska Kaladi Bros. that I am going to try. It is supposed to be really good.

There's something about the after taste of Starbuck's coffee that I don't care for.

I should also say that they make a damn good chai latte, but I only order that when I feel pretty...

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They are promoting a better world. Why does that threaten you ?

It takes an extreme left wrong-wing piece of subhuman shit to think that promoting sexual degeneracy and perversion is promoting a “better world”.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Christian barista files lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was forced to wear a rainbow t-shirt

A Christian barista has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was fired after refusing to wear a rainbow Pride t-shirt.

www.pinknews.co.uk

She is suing the coffee chain for her hurt snowflake feelings. How long is this nonsense going to drag on for before the forces of darkness learn to respect their fellow man.

It's PinkNews, a blatantly pro-faggot site, so just from that, we can know that the story is most likely complete bullshit. And then, to top it off, the story is hidden behind a “disable your adblocker” wall, further proof that it is nothing but bullshit.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Pride is not a partisan political issue. Its just about wanting a better and more tolerant world.

Tolerance of evil, madness, and degeneracy is not a virtue, and does not make a better world.

 

[Canon Shooter]

Christian barista files lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was forced to wear a rainbow t-shirt

A Christian barista has filed a lawsuit against Starbucks, claiming she was fired after refusing to wear a rainbow Pride t-shirt.

www.pinknews.co.uk

She is suing the coffee chain for her hurt snowflake feelings. How long is this nonsense going to drag on for before the forces of darkness learn to respect their fellow man.

It's PinkNews, a blatantly pro-faggot site, so just from that, we can know that the story is most likely complete bullshit. And then, to top it off, the story is hidden behind a “disable your adblocker” wall, further proof that it is nothing but bullshit.

Would you be more comfortable if it was from Fox News?

Starbucks fired NJ barista for refusing to wear 'Pride' shirt, lawsuit claims


How about NBC News?

Starbucks barista says she was fired for refusing to wear Pride shirt

 

[Mac-7]

How did they "push" her to do anything?

By attacking her religious beliefs

if you know god hating liberals you know they love to mock Christians

Only when they complain about taxes because they are not moral enough to bear true witness to Ten simple Commandments.

Ten simple Commandments from God not the Expense of Government on Earth!

If you are expecting Christians to be perfect while you can indulge in any sin that appeals to you thats a misimpression

Christians are sinners too