Big Blue Machin
Member
I like Star Trek better. There's more of a meaning in Star Trek. During the 60s, Star Trek used and talked about the problems of the sixties (racism, the Vietnam War, etc). Star Wars doesn't do that. On Star Trek, there's Spock (one of the most interesting characters ever created for TV and the movies). In my opinion, William Shatner is a better actor than Mark Hamill (who has not aged gracefully!). Plus C3PO gets annyoing after a while. On special effects, Star Wars always had 4 times the budget for effects than Star Trek did. But Star Trek's effects are great with less money. The Wrath of Khan was created with little money, and still it had great effects. On music, Star Trek is ahead by a nudge. But that's not saying Star Wars's music isn't great too. If you haven't seen a Star Trek movie before, shame on you, and go see Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, it's the best Star Trek action movie. Or if you like slow-thinking ones, go to Star Trek: The Motion Picture.
If you have seen a Star Trek movie, tell me what one(s) and what you thought?
If you have seen a Star Trek movie, tell me what one(s) and what you thought?