Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,106
- 245
What? You cannot conclusively prove that? Are not these your very words?
"As I have already conclusively proven, sexual orientation is not genetic. That leaves you with the burden of proof if you insist that children are born that way to explain how it happens, not me."
This is what it's like trying to have a rational discussion with you. You keep changing what you're saying to the point of absurdity.
I keep changing the subject? Maybe it would help if you explained what you think the subject is? How is stating that homosexuality is not genetic conflating two different things? Is the problem here really that you are stupid beyond words?
Nope, and that's completely irrelevant to what I stated.
You stated that me saying that the choice is between genetic science and magic is a false dilemma, now you are stating that is not what you said. Want to explain how that works?
No, it does not 'conclusively prove' that whatsoever and it doesn't debunk any study that came before that. You are reading into that information what you so desperately want to be there, and again you're presenting everything in a binary context w/zero justification for doing so.
It doesn't? What theory of genetics allows people with identical genetic material to have different genetic material? Is the problem that you think genetics is something that changes to fit your theory?
** Facepalm x1000 **
There are not only two choices, scientifically illiterate child.
Your inability to remain consistent with what you say and you intellectual dishonesty precludes the chance of any meaningful exchange.
Go ahead and have the last word. I'll let your nonsensical babbling speak for itself.
Lets see, I can chose between accepting our current understanding of genetics, dismissing it, or...
What exactly is the other choice?