SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

[OldLady]

Not surprising. The self-professed 'All-in' Media is trying to discourage Trump supporters into not showing up at the polls. During the primaries the GOP was setting new voting records while Democratic party attendance was lower than it was in 2014, when Democrats suffered an historic, record-setting loss. The only way yo counter both trends was / is to engage in this propaganda campaign of mis-information. If true I would not be surprised at all.

Normal people, Easy, would make a bigger effort to vote if they felt their candidate was behind by a few points. Go out there and flood the ballot box! Why would saying Trump is a few points behind going to discourage anyone? Are Trumpsters that abnormal?

 

[leftwinger]

If you add up all the FED STATE LOCAL GOVT workers, negro, mexican, illegals, well that is pretty good head start. It is "takers" vs. "makers" plain and simple.

Then you add up all the ignorant commie hate-america loons........many right here, well you see what Trump is up against. An ADDICT must hit rock bottom before they turn.

Police, Military and Border employees seem to have turned solidly to Trump.......maybe.

 

[Ozone]

LOL RWNJ Trumpsters......no wonder they love the King of Birthers

what's a birther? no really, explain this one. first tell us all what exactly is a birth certificate, who invented it and by what philosophy was the inventor influenced or inspired? make sure we're all on the same page about the need for everyone to be represented as cargo on a shipping manifest signed by a docketor. if you're unwilling to go that deep with the argument, then really you're just a bigot, and ''birther'' is just a word you're using hoping to hurt someone else in some way.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Only fools believe the polls are not rigged. They are almost all run by liberals, aren't they?

SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

There’s no doubt about it — the liberal media’s polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this?

Simple — social media. Trump’s following on the major social media networks absolutely blow Clinton out of the water.

Allow me to prove it:

Facebook

Trump: 10,174,358 Likes

Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes

Trump nearly doubles the amount of Likes than Clinton Now — some people follow Trump who don’t like him, so let’s look at some posts. Here’s the stats for his latest Facebook live stream:

Trump Live Stream Post — 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views

Clinton Live Stream Post — 25 hours ago: 11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Since Clinton has zero shares, here’s the next best original post I could find from Clinton, albeit it’s not a live stream post:

Clinton post — 30 hours ago: 22,000 Likes, 7241 Shares, 773,000 views

Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook — you’ll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the the top comments on Trump’s page are hardcore supporters only.

Twitter

Trump: 10.6 million followers

Hillary: 8.1 million followers

Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

Hillary’s “twitter army” is likely made up of dead voters and illegals.​

So the LA Times is a conservative paper now?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Only fools believe the polls are not rigged. They are almost all run by liberals, aren't they?

SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

There’s no doubt about it — the liberal media’s polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this?

Simple — social media. Trump’s following on the major social media networks absolutely blow Clinton out of the water.

Allow me to prove it:

Facebook

Trump: 10,174,358 Likes

Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes

Trump nearly doubles the amount of Likes than Clinton Now — some people follow Trump who don’t like him, so let’s look at some posts. Here’s the stats for his latest Facebook live stream:

Trump Live Stream Post — 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views

Clinton Live Stream Post — 25 hours ago: 11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Since Clinton has zero shares, here’s the next best original post I could find from Clinton, albeit it’s not a live stream post:

Clinton post — 30 hours ago: 22,000 Likes, 7241 Shares, 773,000 views

Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook — you’ll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the the top comments on Trump’s page are hardcore supporters only.

Twitter

Trump: 10.6 million followers

Hillary: 8.1 million followers

Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

Hillary’s “twitter army” is likely made up of dead voters and illegals.​

My best friend is a Trump Tard and he tried to convince me of the same thing. Show me the scientific evidence that likes or follows on social media have dick to do with who wins an election.

 

[Syriusly]

LOL RWNJ Trumpsters......no wonder they love the King of Birthers

what's a birther? no really, explain this one. first tell us all what exactly is a birth certificate, who invented it and by what philosophy was the inventor influenced or inspired? make sure we're all on the same page about the need for everyone to be represented as cargo on a shipping manifest signed by a docketor. if you're unwilling to go that deep with the argument, then really you're just a bigot, and ''birther'' is just a word you're using hoping to hurt someone else in some way.

Birther: a liar like Donald Trump

 

[Mac1958]

LOL Here we go again, unskewed polls. How did they work out for you last time? But they will be good fun for reminding you of your idiocy just like 2012. LOL

It's just this kind of hard hitting, scientific, subjective, empirical, statistical analysis that we have all come to expect from TheTruthDivision.com!


.

 

[bripat9643]

Only fools believe the polls are not rigged. They are almost all run by liberals, aren't they?

SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

There’s no doubt about it — the liberal media’s polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this?

Simple — social media. Trump’s following on the major social media networks absolutely blow Clinton out of the water.

Allow me to prove it:

Facebook

Trump: 10,174,358 Likes

Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes

Trump nearly doubles the amount of Likes than Clinton Now — some people follow Trump who don’t like him, so let’s look at some posts. Here’s the stats for his latest Facebook live stream:

Trump Live Stream Post — 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views

Clinton Live Stream Post — 25 hours ago: 11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Since Clinton has zero shares, here’s the next best original post I could find from Clinton, albeit it’s not a live stream post:

Clinton post — 30 hours ago: 22,000 Likes, 7241 Shares, 773,000 views

Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook — you’ll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the the top comments on Trump’s page are hardcore supporters only.

Twitter

Trump: 10.6 million followers

Hillary: 8.1 million followers

Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

Hillary’s “twitter army” is likely made up of dead voters and illegals.​

My best friend is a Trump Tard and he tried to convince me of the same thing. Show me the scientific evidence that likes or follows on social media have dick to do with who wins an election.

I never claimed it's scientific. However, it does give an indication, and only a fool trusts polls by lying liberals.

 

[BettyYeti]

Only fools believe the polls are not rigged. They are almost all run by liberals, aren't they?

SPREAD THIS: Media RIGGING The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

There’s no doubt about it — the liberal media’s polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this?

Simple — social media. Trump’s following on the major social media networks absolutely blow Clinton out of the water.

Allow me to prove it:

Facebook

Trump: 10,174,358 Likes

Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes

Trump nearly doubles the amount of Likes than Clinton Now — some people follow Trump who don’t like him, so let’s look at some posts. Here’s the stats for his latest Facebook live stream:

Trump Live Stream Post — 21 hours ago: 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views

Clinton Live Stream Post — 25 hours ago: 11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Since Clinton has zero shares, here’s the next best original post I could find from Clinton, albeit it’s not a live stream post:

Clinton post — 30 hours ago: 22,000 Likes, 7241 Shares, 773,000 views

Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook — you’ll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the the top comments on Trump’s page are hardcore supporters only.

Twitter

Trump: 10.6 million followers

Hillary: 8.1 million followers

Trump has 30% more Twitter followers — and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

Hillary’s “twitter army” is likely made up of dead voters and illegals.​

My best friend is a Trump Tard and he tried to convince me of the same thing. Show me the scientific evidence that likes or follows on social media have dick to do with who wins an election.

I never claimed it's scientific. However, it does give an indication, and only a fool trusts polls by lying liberals.

Your desperation for any better than usual news about Trump is understandable. It's pathetic but understandable.

 

[Mr Natural]

God bless the media!

 

[Sundance508]

Obama's former doctor: Clinton should have neurological exam