Sponsors are dropping rush.

I predict that your prediction will be as accurate as your global warming claims! In other words.......................................... WRONG!

From today's paper:


Rising Sea Levels Seen as Threat to Coastal U.S.

JP-SEALEVEL-articleLarge-v2.jpg

Manteo, N.C., residents navigate streets that were flooded by Hurricane Irene in August. Rising tides are likely to mean more frequent coastal flooding.

About 3.7 million Americans live within a few feet of high tide and risk being hit by more frequent coastal flooding in coming decades because of the sea level rise caused by global warming, according to new research.

If the pace of the rise accelerates as much as expected, researchers found, coastal flooding at levels that were once exceedingly rare could become an every-few-years occurrence by the middle of this century.

By far the most vulnerable state is Florida, the new analysis found, with roughly half of the nation’s at-risk population living near the coast on the porous, low-lying limestone shelf that constitutes much of that state. But Louisiana, California, New York and New Jersey are also particularly vulnerable, researchers found, and virtually the entire American coastline is at some degree of risk.​


But you wingnuts will continue to deny it no matter how much evidence is provided.
C-R-A-P.....
What the fuck does limestone have to do with anything?Furthermore, this has what to do with sponsors of a radio program.
There is no global warming and climate is cyclical.
Deal with it.
Oh, Limbaugh's show added 4 new sponsors over the weekend.
Sucks to be you.

Always proud to broadcast your ignorance, Spoon?

Yep, a bone specialist, for sure.:badgrin:
 
Up until now, radio stations have paid to have Ol' Limp's programs on their stations. Bet that will change in the near future.





I predict that your prediction will be as accurate as your global warming claims! In other words.......................................... WRONG!

From today's paper:


Rising Sea Levels Seen as Threat to Coastal U.S.

JP-SEALEVEL-articleLarge-v2.jpg

Manteo, N.C., residents navigate streets that were flooded by Hurricane Irene in August. Rising tides are likely to mean more frequent coastal flooding.

About 3.7 million Americans live within a few feet of high tide and risk being hit by more frequent coastal flooding in coming decades because of the sea level rise caused by global warming, according to new research.

If the pace of the rise accelerates as much as expected, researchers found, coastal flooding at levels that were once exceedingly rare could become an every-few-years occurrence by the middle of this century.

By far the most vulnerable state is Florida, the new analysis found, with roughly half of the nation’s at-risk population living near the coast on the porous, low-lying limestone shelf that constitutes much of that state. But Louisiana, California, New York and New Jersey are also particularly vulnerable, researchers found, and virtually the entire American coastline is at some degree of risk.​


But you wingnuts will continue to deny it no matter how much evidence is provided.





Yes, everything is a "threat". Unfortunately for them there has been no measurable sea level increase. In fact if one were to be so bold as to look at a map of the coastlines from say 150 years ago and today one would find that the coastlines have advanced for the most part.

There is no place in the US that is in danger other than New Orleans and that is mainly due to the damning and channeling of the rivers so the soil content of the Mississippi has been vastly reduced. The Atchafalaya would have allready captured the Mississippi's water were it not for the Army Corps of Engineers. There is a good book by John McPhee called "The Control of Nature", I suggest you read it.
 
I predict that your prediction will be as accurate as your global warming claims! In other words.......................................... WRONG!

From today's paper:


Rising Sea Levels Seen as Threat to Coastal U.S.

JP-SEALEVEL-articleLarge-v2.jpg

Manteo, N.C., residents navigate streets that were flooded by Hurricane Irene in August. Rising tides are likely to mean more frequent coastal flooding.

About 3.7 million Americans live within a few feet of high tide and risk being hit by more frequent coastal flooding in coming decades because of the sea level rise caused by global warming, according to new research.

If the pace of the rise accelerates as much as expected, researchers found, coastal flooding at levels that were once exceedingly rare could become an every-few-years occurrence by the middle of this century.

By far the most vulnerable state is Florida, the new analysis found, with roughly half of the nation’s at-risk population living near the coast on the porous, low-lying limestone shelf that constitutes much of that state. But Louisiana, California, New York and New Jersey are also particularly vulnerable, researchers found, and virtually the entire American coastline is at some degree of risk.​


But you wingnuts will continue to deny it no matter how much evidence is provided.





Yes, everything is a "threat". Unfortunately for them there has been no measurable sea level increase. In fact if one were to be so bold as to look at a map of the coastlines from say 150 years ago and today one would find that the coastlines have advanced for the most part.

There is no place in the US that is in danger other than New Orleans and that is mainly due to the damning and channeling of the rivers so the soil content of the Mississippi has been vastly reduced. The Atchafalaya would have allready captured the Mississippi's water were it not for the Army Corps of Engineers. There is a good book by John McPhee called "The Control of Nature", I suggest you read it.

http://www.pacinst.org/reports/sea_level_rise/report.pdf

Over the past century, sea level has risen nearly eight inches along the California coast, and general circulation model scenarios suggest very substantial increases in sea level as a
significant impact of climate change over the coming century. This study includes a detailed
analysis of the current population, infrastructure, and property at risk from projected sea‐level rise if no actions are taken to protect the coast. The sea‐level rise scenario was developed by the State of California from medium to high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) but does not reflect the worst‐case sea‐level rise that could occur. We also evaluate the cost of building structural measures to reduce that risk. If development continues in the areas at risk, all of these estimates will rise. No matter what policies are implemented in the future, sea‐level rise will inevitably change the character of the California coast.
 
Science Magazine: Sign In Changing Oceans

THE EVOLVING DISASTER OF THE GULF OF MEXICO OIL SPILL REMINDS US THAT OUR WELFARE
depends on a healthy marine ecosystem and that the oceans are vulnerable to human activities.
The oceans sustain a vast wealth of biological diversity, deliver critical ecosystem services,
supply valuable natural resources, and are a central component of the climate system.
It is therefore critical that the current ocean-observing system be extended to cover a wider
range of ocean properties.
The oceans slow the rate of climate change by absorbing over a quarter of the carbon dioxide
released by the burning of fossil fuels and by storing over 90% of the excess heat accumulating
in the climate system. These two changes, together with nutrient input into the oceans from fertilizer
use and other pollution, are affecting the marine ecosystem by increasing the acidity of
the oceans, decreasing subsurface oxygen concentrations, and increasing coastal nutrient loads.
At the same time, ocean changes affect the terrestrial environment,
being the primary source of the water vapor that drives global rainfall
patterns. Changes in ocean temperatures and currents and in the oceans’
interaction with the atmosphere are already altering the frequency,
intensity, and distribution of storms, droughts, fl oods, heat waves, and
cold spells. And by 2100, rising sea levels from ocean thermal expansion
and increasing ocean mass (from melting glaciers, ice caps, and the
Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets) will expose an additional tens of
millions of people annually to the risk of coastal fl ooding.
 
How do you know? Because Rush tells you that he has 20 million listeners? He also says he has talent on loan from God.

You'll believe anything.

And I'll change that to "I'm sure" that Republican women do not like being called sluts. How's that?


Isn't it amazing how these people hate Rush, but they listen to his show so closely ? This cat Synthaholic ask the questions above that I have bolded, and I will write them again next, in order to answer them. Synthaholic said - "How do you know? Because Rush tells you that he has 20 million listeners" ? Answer: Yeah buddy, and you are one of them, so just start the count first with you, and then go up, up, up, and up from there... I bet you are a closet listener of Rush, and have been for quite a long time, but hey, don't cha think it's time to come on out of that closet finally? :eusa_clap:
No, I don't listen to Rush. :lol:

That is not to say that I haven't heard him. But I get enough of him from MSNBC and Current TV, when they play a clip.

I'm not in my car usually, from 12-3. I have caught much more of that paid liar Sean Hannity than I ever have of Rush. Because I'm in my car more from 3-6.

AND - that's only when NPR is boring me to death, which happens occasionally.

That's my honest answer. :)

The only reason I have that channel as a preset in my car is because they also broadcast Handle On The Law, the home improvement guy, Gary Sullivan, and Art Bell - Coast To Coast (what a hoot!) :)
Lets see now, he knows Rush is on from 12 to 3:00 hmmmmmmm, and then comes the whopper " The only reason I have that channel pre-set in my car" (CHANNEL PRE-SET IN MY CAR) ??????........BAHWAHAHHAHHAH

Care to tell us anymore? No no no no you best stop while your ahead, and just step on out of that closet nice a slowly k, because the bright light won't hurt you, it will only set you free...... B )
 
Isn't it amazing how these people hate Rush, but they listen to his show so closely ? This cat Synthaholic ask the questions above that I have bolded, and I will write them again next, in order to answer them. Synthaholic said - "How do you know? Because Rush tells you that he has 20 million listeners" ? Answer: Yeah buddy, and you are one of them, so just start the count first with you, and then go up, up, up, and up from there... I bet you are a closet listener of Rush, and have been for quite a long time, but hey, don't cha think it's time to come on out of that closet finally? :eusa_clap:
No, I don't listen to Rush. :lol:

That is not to say that I haven't heard him. But I get enough of him from MSNBC and Current TV, when they play a clip.

I'm not in my car usually, from 12-3. I have caught much more of that paid liar Sean Hannity than I ever have of Rush. Because I'm in my car more from 3-6.

AND - that's only when NPR is boring me to death, which happens occasionally.

That's my honest answer. :)

The only reason I have that channel as a preset in my car is because they also broadcast Handle On The Law, the home improvement guy, Gary Sullivan, and Art Bell - Coast To Coast (what a hoot!) :)
Lets see now, he knows Rush is on from 12 to 3:00 hmmmmmmm, and then comes the whopper " The only reason I have that channel pre-set in my car" (CHANNEL PRE-SET IN MY CAR) ??????........BAHWAHAHHAHHAH

I think most everyone who has a passing interest in politics knows that Rush is on from 12-3. It's only been like that for over 20 years now.
icon_rolleyes.gif


And car pre-sets? They are those numbers across your radio, where you press one and it goes to a favorite channel that you have pre-set. For me, NPR is attached to pre-set #1, and the talk radio/college sports station is pre-set #6.

Understand, dumbass? :lol:

Care to tell us anymore? No no no no you best stop while your ahead, and just step on out of that closet nice a slowly k, because the bright light won't hurt you, it will only set you free...... B )

Dopey wingnuts are dopey.
 
Last edited:
From today's paper:


Rising Sea Levels Seen as Threat to Coastal U.S.

JP-SEALEVEL-articleLarge-v2.jpg

Manteo, N.C., residents navigate streets that were flooded by Hurricane Irene in August. Rising tides are likely to mean more frequent coastal flooding.

About 3.7 million Americans live within a few feet of high tide and risk being hit by more frequent coastal flooding in coming decades because of the sea level rise caused by global warming, according to new research.

If the pace of the rise accelerates as much as expected, researchers found, coastal flooding at levels that were once exceedingly rare could become an every-few-years occurrence by the middle of this century.

By far the most vulnerable state is Florida, the new analysis found, with roughly half of the nation’s at-risk population living near the coast on the porous, low-lying limestone shelf that constitutes much of that state. But Louisiana, California, New York and New Jersey are also particularly vulnerable, researchers found, and virtually the entire American coastline is at some degree of risk.​


But you wingnuts will continue to deny it no matter how much evidence is provided.
C-R-A-P.....
What the fuck does limestone have to do with anything?
Furthermore, this has what to do with sponsors of a radio program.
There is no global warming and climate is cyclical.
Deal with it.
Oh, Limbaugh's show added 4 new sponsors over the weekend.
Sucks to be you.

You should study to be a bone specialist - you have the head for it.
THAT is your best effort at a comeback.
Jesus Christ, this is easy.
 
Last edited:
C-R-A-P.....
What the fuck does limestone have to do with anything?
Furthermore, this has what to do with sponsors of a radio program.
There is no global warming and climate is cyclical.
Deal with it.
Oh, Limbaugh's show added 4 new sponsors over the weekend.
Sucks to be you.

You should study to be a bone specialist - you have the head for it.
THAT is your best effort at a comeback.
Jesus Christ, this is easy.
It's enough effort for the likes of you.
 
C-R-A-P.....
What the fuck does limestone have to do with anything?
Furthermore, this has what to do with sponsors of a radio program.
There is no global warming and climate is cyclical.
Deal with it.
Oh, Limbaugh's show added 4 new sponsors over the weekend.
Sucks to be you.

You should study to be a bone specialist - you have the head for it.
THAT is your best effort at a comeback.
Jesus Christ, this is easy.

It sounds more like he's coming on to you, but that's Synthia for you....
 
No, I don't listen to Rush. :lol:

That is not to say that I haven't heard him. But I get enough of him from MSNBC and Current TV, when they play a clip.

I'm not in my car usually, from 12-3. I have caught much more of that paid liar Sean Hannity than I ever have of Rush. Because I'm in my car more from 3-6.

AND - that's only when NPR is boring me to death, which happens occasionally.

That's my honest answer. :)

The only reason I have that channel as a preset in my car is because they also broadcast Handle On The Law, the home improvement guy, Gary Sullivan, and Art Bell - Coast To Coast (what a hoot!) :)
Lets see now, he knows Rush is on from 12 to 3:00 hmmmmmmm, and then comes the whopper " The only reason I have that channel pre-set in my car" (CHANNEL PRE-SET IN MY CAR) ??????........BAHWAHAHHAHHAH

I think most everyone who has a passing interest in politics knows that Rush is on from 12-3. It's only been like that for over 20 years now.
icon_rolleyes.gif


And car pre-sets? They are those numbers across your radio, where you press one and it goes to a favorite channel that you have pre-set. For me, NPR is attached to pre-set #1, and the talk radio/college sports station is pre-set #6.

Understand, dumbass? :lol:

Care to tell us anymore? No no no no you best stop while your ahead, and just step on out of that closet nice a slowly k, because the bright light won't hurt you, it will only set you free...... B )

Dopey wingnuts are dopey.
Wow, you know Rush has been on for 20 years to ? I didn't even know that one....This is just to easy (i.e. keep incriminating your own hypocrytic self), where as if I were a prosecutor on a case, your own testimony would lock you away in cell with Bill Mahr and crew for years.....Charges would be - extreme hypocrisy, and well the other, just being to dumb to mingle with normal people anylonger.......LOL
 
A few sponsors dropped out and others took their places. Ad revenue lost as a result...ZERO. And Rush is still getting under the skin of lefties on a daily basis. Which is a hoot IMO.
 
A few sponsors dropped out and others took their places. Ad revenue lost as a result...ZERO. And Rush is still getting under the skin of lefties on a daily basis. Which is a hoot IMO.

LOL the lies and garbage the far right believe never ceases to amaze me. There was a mass exodus of advertisers leaving Limbaugh. He was down to just airing public service announcements as there was no one advertising!
The boycott cost millions in revenues lost. :eusa_clap:

Rush Limbaugh Ad Boycott Cost Cumulus Radio 'Millions,' CEO Says
 
A few sponsors dropped out and others took their places. Ad revenue lost as a result...ZERO. And Rush is still getting under the skin of lefties on a daily basis. Which is a hoot IMO.

LOL the lies and garbage the far right believe never ceases to amaze me. There was a mass exodus of advertisers leaving Limbaugh. He was down to just airing public service announcements as there was no one advertising!
The boycott cost millions in revenues lost. :eusa_clap:

Rush Limbaugh Ad Boycott Cost Cumulus Radio 'Millions,' CEO Says

What's a few million to Rush, whose net worth is $350 million, skidmark.
 
A few sponsors dropped out and others took their places. Ad revenue lost as a result...ZERO. And Rush is still getting under the skin of lefties on a daily basis. Which is a hoot IMO.

Not to mention that a lot of those so-called sponsors that the left listed never were sponsors in the first place.
But the leftwing nuts(not the left) always have to manipulate the truth
 
To the left, Rush has been driven off the radio. And, obama will win the next election.
 
A few sponsors dropped out and others took their places. Ad revenue lost as a result...ZERO. And Rush is still getting under the skin of lefties on a daily basis. Which is a hoot IMO.

LOL the lies and garbage the far right believe never ceases to amaze me. There was a mass exodus of advertisers leaving Limbaugh. He was down to just airing public service announcements as there was no one advertising!
The boycott cost millions in revenues lost. :eusa_clap:

Rush Limbaugh Ad Boycott Cost Cumulus Radio 'Millions,' CEO Says

What's a few million to Rush, whose net worth is $350 million, skidmark.
Is Rush off the air yet?
it's hard to tell since I have not seen in threads on what Rush has said.

let's see
Rush Radio 94.5 - Triad's Home for Beck-Rush-Hannity | iHeartRadio

Nope well maybe this a prerecorded sound track
 

Forum List

Back
Top