Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We the people have the right to important information on political figures. A single media outlet sequestering those stories from we the people, prevents us from getting the information needed to freely make informed opinions on those politicians.You typically do not have solid opinions.
You are claiming that Cohen in 2018 when he plead guilty he was doing so because the DOJ was trying to make Trump unelectable. What is my misrepresentation?Of course you have mischaracterized what I said.
Hilarious.We the people have the right to important information on political figures. A single media outlet sequestering those stories from we the people, prevents us from getting the information needed to freely make informed opinions on those politicians.
NDA's were not illegal
Stormy Daniels signed the Non Disclosure Agreement in 2006!!!!!!
Any payment made, was ten years before Trump became president.
10 years!
I'm sure that this will be hilarious, but I'm going to bite.
Why, in your opinion, was the payment for this particular NDA not legal.
Holy fuck, are you retarded. Again... the misdemeanor becomes a felony for covering up a crime. I never said he was charged with a misdemeanor.
The Hush Money not a "crime" happened 18 years ago!Show where she signed an NDA in 2006...
The Hush Money not a "crime" happened 18 years ago!
The Hush Money not a "crime" happened 18 years ago!
Sure it was Captain. Sure it was.Because it was an excessive campaign contribution in violation of the law.
The Hush Money not a "crime" happened 18 years ago!
Stormy Daniels signed the Non Disclosure Agreement in 2006!!!!!!
Spoiler Alert: 23 Apr 2024 ~~ By Victoria Taft
Prosecutors' Tortuous Trump Case Is 'Confusing' to Nearly Everyone
The first witness in Donald Trump's trial for alleged "criminal" bookkeeping errors came with National Enquirer-worthy titillations about what a hot commodity the former president was back in the day. Prosecutors thought they'd burst out of the gate with a little razzle-dazzle and T&A, hoping that jurors would believe the witness had anything to do with the actual charges in the case. This is because — spoiler alert — the prosecutors' actual case is a "confusing" distraction. It's the "Seinfeld" of legal cases.
But since a Manhattan jury will likely convict the former president because Orange Man Bad, here's what happened in court with the opening witness on truncated court sessions Monday and Tuesday.
David Pecker, the former publisher of the National Enquirer, testified that he worked with Trump's lawyer to kill stories that hurt Trump's reputation or would be hurtful to his wife and family. This is the so-called catch-and-kill scheme, wherein sources would approach the Enquirer with an unflattering story about Trump (this applies to Hollywood stars and big shots), offer money to the people telling it, and then make the story disappear.
And it went something like this:
All of the above is legal.
- Pecker reportedly would alert Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, about the titillating story.
- Cohen got three sources to sign a non-disclosure agreement for a sum of money.
- Trump paid his legal bills, which covered Cohen's incurred costs plus more.
~Snip~
~Snip~
The media have called this case a "hush money" case, but one of our crafty commenters called it the Hush Trump case. Touché. When a judge shuts up the defendant but not the other trial participants, you can't help but wonder if the fix is in. Where else will you read that in this censorious media world that we're living in?
Commentary:
Remembering when The Los Angeles Times “caught and killed” the story of Barack Obama’s banquet speech for Rashid Khalidi, which was on video. I bet that video is more damaging than sex with a stripper and had a bigger impact on the 2008 election than Daniels did in 2016. Nobody was prosecuted. Few even complained. The video is still in the vault.
THAT is not illegal. “Go away” settlements and NDAs are extremely common. The lying whorebag human toilet tried to milk a few dollars more out of him two weeks before the election.
130k to Trump is akin to me flipping a nickel to a bum who is annoying customers coming into my business. It’s a ridiculously small amount she accepted. That amount was offered because her lawyer knew it was so low no sane person would take it to court if they could make it go away for that trivial sum.
Nothing even slightly illegal about it.
The Secret Sources for ‘Bombshell’: Why Ex-Fox News Staffers Broke Their NDAs for Filmmakers
In order to paint a vivid picture of the network's culture, 'Bombshell's' makers spoke to about 20 people with a connection to Fox, including multiple women bound by confidentiality agreements, a task that sent the filmmakers into territory usually left to investigative journalists.www.hollywoodreporter.com
**********
4 things you should know about non-disclosure agreements
Learn more about how NDAs are handled in the workplace, including when they are enforceable and their benefits.legal.thomsonreuters.com
Sure it was Captain. Sure it was.
The Hush Money not a "crime" happened 18 years ago!
from where are you getting 2006??
Bullshit.Because it was an excessive campaign contribution in violation of the law.
Nope, the payment to Daniels was not legal. It was an illegal campaign contribution, for which Cohen was convicted and incarcerated. That means he wasn’t performing a legal service.
Bullshit.
Trump paid a doorman $30,000. That wasn't a campaign contribution.
Trump paid Karen McDougle $150,000. That wasn't a campaign contribution.
Trump and Pecker had a personal agreement way before the 2016 election.
Spoiler Alert: Bragg's case falls apart.
Bullshit.
Trump paid a doorman $30,000. That wasn't a campaign contribution.
Trump paid Karen McDougle $150,000. That wasn't a campaign contribution.
Trump and Pecker had a personal agreement way before the 2016 election.
Spoiler Alert: Bragg's case falls apart.
