Spend Billions to Build a Wall OR Spend Billions to Fix Infrastructure?

Spend Money on a Wall at the southern border or Spend the money to fix the nation's infrastructure?

  • The wall! Make it 50 foot tall!

    Votes: 12 54.5%
  • Let's fix what Ike started. Highways and Bridges need some love.

    Votes: 7 31.8%
  • Why not both? My kid's kid's will be the ones paying for it.

    Votes: 3 13.6%

  • Total voters
    22
Which should be the more important thing to do? Spend billions to build a wall that most citizens don't want and even most experts including John Kelly said we don't need, or spend the money to fix the countries cracking infrastructure of bridges and highways that claim the lives of hundreds of people every single day?
Infrastructure is a State Issue.
That's not the fed's job.
 
Hahaha

Americans aren't going to do the work.
LOL do you think the fields are filled with just illegal aliens?....how dumb....maybe 30% are but most are as legal as you and I...and they don't like competing with illegal aliens either....
 
Keep in mind, the infrastructure spending will improve no one's lives but the construction workers. Repave a road, rebuild a bridge, and so on. Also, given the perversities of the David Bacon Act, all the construction will cost the taxpayers 25% or so more than it needs to. Building a barrier -strategically placed - will provide just as much benefit,as temporary construction jobs.
 
Which should be the more important thing to do? Spend billions to build a wall that most citizens don't want and even most experts including John Kelly said we don't need, or spend the money to fix the countries cracking infrastructure of bridges and highways that claim the lives of hundreds of people every single day?
Infrastructure is a State Issue.
That's not the fed's job.

So you're against the interstate highway system?
The interstate has always been up to each state. It's why when you have new roads in Idaho but get potholes in Montana. Or you drive on smooth roads in Texas but Louisiana his nothing but old, rundown concrete highways with bumps every 20 ft the entire length of the state.
 
OMFG! Are you sure? Should we mow them all down with machine guns?
No dummy we should send them back home and stop promising that they can get in....that's the cruel thing...tempting them to walk thousands of miles for nothing....are you cruel?....don't you care about them?....why are you providing false hope?....
 
Keep in mind, the infrastructure spending will improve no one's lives but the construction workers. Repave a road, rebuild a bridge, and so on. Also, given the perversities of the David Bacon Act, all the construction will cost the taxpayers 25% or so more than it needs to. Building a barrier -strategically placed - will provide just as much benefit,as temporary construction jobs.

Are you high? Paving and fixing roads and bridges helps everyone that drives on them, and given the amount of goods that is transported on the highways it also keeps down prices on those goods.

There is one very important thing to remember about a well maintained interstate system... it helps the society as a whole. that was proven as far back as the Incas.
 
The only wall youre going to see is the walls of your anus as you keep your head stuck up your ass.
You sound as if you speak from experience...maybe you should close your eyes while your head is shoved up your ass....
 
The interstate has always been paid for by each state. It's why when you have new roads in Idaho but get potholes in Montana. Or you drive on smooth roads in Texas but Louisiana his nothing but old, rundown concrete highways with bumps every 20 ft the entire length of the state.

Most of it was paid for the federal government.

The final estimate of the cost of the Interstate System was issued in 1991. It estimated that the total cost would be $128.9 billion, with a Federal share of $114.3 billion. This estimate covered only the mileage (42,795 miles) built under the Interstate Construction Program. It excluded turnpikes incorporated into the Interstate System within the mileage limitation and the mileage added as a logical addition or connection outside the limitation but financed without Interstate Construction funds.

In all, Federal-aid legislation authorized a total of $119 billion to pay the Federal share of the cost of Interstate construction. (Interstate Construction funds were authorized through Fiscal Year 1996.)​

Interstate Frequently Asked Questions - 50th Anniversary - Interstate System - Highway History - Federal Highway Administration
 
The only wall youre going to see is the walls of your anus as you keep your head stuck up your ass.
You sound as if you speak from experience...maybe you should close your eyes while your head is shoved up your ass....
I do speak from experience. Youre obviously not the first retarded conservative I have spoken to. How do you think I know about it?:rolleyes:
 
Which should be the more important thing to do? Spend billions to build a wall that most citizens don't want and even most experts including John Kelly said we don't need, or spend the money to fix the countries cracking infrastructure of bridges and highways that claim the lives of hundreds of people every single day?
Infrastructure is a State Issue.
That's not the fed's job.

So you're against the interstate highway system?
The interstate has always been up to each state. It's why when you have new roads in Idaho but get potholes in Montana. Or you drive on smooth roads in Texas but Louisiana his nothing but old, rundown concrete highways with bumps every 20 ft the entire length of the state.

You don't know much about the Interstate highway system do you?

AllGov - Departments
 
Which should be the more important thing to do? Spend billions to build a wall that most citizens don't want and even most experts including John Kelly said we don't need, or spend the money to fix the countries cracking infrastructure of bridges and highways that claim the lives of hundreds of people every single day?


The Wall is more important.
 
Building a wall is not the best way to secure the borders dummy. No youre not getting any money for man babys mid life crisis wall
Border agents all across America say you are full of shit...walls do work...do you know better than they do?....
Yes I do know better. Thats why you clowns arent getting a wall. :rolleyes:
If you say so, not going to research it.
I am curious how much longer the French themselves will "uphold" the draconian measures they placed on their own citizens ---- whose string of riots sent a loud message. Global warming is such a waste of extremely valuable resources instead of using it for the great needs of humanity we face now. There we can measure the tangible humane relief. We listen to God.... too many on the left pretend they are god.
 
Last edited:
Which should be the more important thing to do? Spend billions to build a wall that most citizens don't want and even most experts including John Kelly said we don't need, or spend the money to fix the countries cracking infrastructure of bridges and highways that claim the lives of hundreds of people every single day?


The Wall is more important.
No one cares what you think is important. Thats why the repub led Congress never funded the wall in the first two years.
 

Forum List

Back
Top