Speech : Trump should be at 100% of the vote

historic because? he's the first presidential candidate to promise he will sue all the women who accused him of sexual harassment?
 

Nate Silver, a Fabian socialist that went to the London School of Economics is credible to only idiots such as yourself. If Hitlery was such a "shoo-in", there wouldn't have been any need to hire people to disrupt Trump rallies or bus people from polling place to polling place like Project Veritas revealed. It will take a Herculean effort by the globalists and their minions to pull this election fraud off. It's a good thing that the Diebold machines and software are owned by the very international bankers/globalists that have selected her to be their next puppet. In independent polls, Trump is winning in a landslide...not that it matters because like Stalin said (and I am paraphrasing) "I'm more interested in the ones that count the votes than I am the ones voting". We live in a banana republic and we have for some time...but you are too stupid to see it because you like being stupid.
 
Last edited:
historic because? he's the first presidential candidate to promise he will sue all the women who accused him of sexual harassment?

Sexual harassment is incomparable to raping, isn't it?

upload_2016-10-24_1-33-14.png


BTW, Trump's alleged sexual harassment has never been proved. But Monica must be still keeping her famous dress.
 

Nate Silver, a Fabian socialist that went to the London School of Economics is credible to only idiots such as yourself. If Hitlery was such a "shoo-in", there wouldn't have been any need to hire people to disrupt Trump rallies or bus people from polling place to polling place like Project Veritas revealed. It will take a Herculean effort by the globalists and their minions to pull this election fraud of. It's a good thing that the Diebold machines and software are owned by the very international bankers/globalists that have selected her to be their next puppet. In independent polls, Trump is winning in a landslide...not that it matters because like Stalin said (and I am paraphrasing) "I'm more interested in the ones that count the votes than I am the ones voting". We live in a banana republic and we have for some time...but you are too stupid to see it because you like being stupid.

Yep, say it enough and it will become true... only that doesn't work...
 
No, people should vote for the party that represents them
AND BE HELD FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POLICIES AND COSTS OF THAT PARTY'S PLATFORMS

We should organize the tax base by party membership,
and require parties to pay for their own policies and programs for the memberships represented by those respectively.

The Greens have it right, with proportional representation by party. the only thing I would add is separating budgets and tax choices where citizens are free to fund the social programs of their choice, in keeping with their religious and political beliefs.

People should vote for whomever represents them
WHERE THEY AGREE TO PAY FOR AND LIVE UNDER THOSE POLICIES!!!

 
Trump may make history if he continues to campaign after the election, to influence political leaders and reform, and create business solutions to problems "outside of govt" and prove that better reforms can come from the people directly. Which is what conservatives have been preaching all this time anyway.

historic because? he's the first presidential candidate to promise he will sue all the women who accused him of sexual harassment?
 
RCP, Nate Silver, etc., are credible.

The far right, alt right, and unhinged doinks on the Board are not credible.
 
RCP, Nate Silver, etc., are credible.

The far right, alt right, and unhinged doinks on the Board are not credible.


Jake, anyone that believes in the organic constitution and the Bill of Rights are "extremists" or "far right wingers" in your little world. Maoists like you see anyone that doesn't conform to communism as a threat and on that you are correct because we are not going to stand for it. Have you ever researched the London School of Economics and the principles that it teaches? I have and I know more than you....infinitely more. How you can even defend that corrupt piece of shit and the DNC given what has been revealed doesn't say much about you.....but then the communist creed has always been "The ends justifies the means".......by hook or crook, eh, comrade? You will be giving up anyone that you know that you suspect of not being a loyal commie to the authorities so you can curry favor with them...you see
14680567_1720212368305274_3697607090316475456_n.jpg
, that is what they always do before they take over...and a gutless piece of shit like you will be singing like a canary.

(snicker)
 
No, people should vote for the party that represents them
AND BE HELD FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POLICIES AND COSTS OF THAT PARTY'S PLATFORMS

We should organize the tax base by party membership,
and require parties to pay for their own policies and programs for the memberships represented by those respectively.

The Greens have it right, with proportional representation by party. the only thing I would add is separating budgets and tax choices where citizens are free to fund the social programs of their choice, in keeping with their religious and political beliefs.

People should vote for whomever represents them
WHERE THEY AGREE TO PAY FOR AND LIVE UNDER THOSE POLICIES!!!



You're basically advocating a split in the country. Why not just let the South leave?
 
I wish this were not so, but I cannot bring myself to watch two hours plus of video of Donald Trump talking. I also wouldn't listen to video of Mrs. Clinton or any other candidate talking nonstop for that long. Maybe he doesn't actually talk for that long, but that's what's shown as the duration of the video posted in the OP.
 
RCP, Nate Silver, etc., are credible.

The far right, alt right, and unhinged doinks on the Board are not credible.


Jake, anyone that believes in the organic constitution and the Bill of Rights are "extremists" or "far right wingers" in your little world. Maoists like you see anyone that doesn't conform to communism as a threat and on that you are correct because we are not going to stand for it. Have you ever researched the London School of Economics and the principles that it teaches? I have and I know more than you....infinitely more. How you can even defend that corrupt piece of shit and the DNC given what has been revealed doesn't say much about you.....but then the communist creed has always been "The ends justifies the means".......by hook or crook, eh, comrade? You will be giving up anyone that you know that you suspect of not being a loyal commie to the authorities so you can curry favor with them...you seeView attachment 95011 , that is what they always do before they take over...and a gutless piece of shit like you will be singing like a canary.

(snicker)

Assuming all people just want a concrete wasteland to live in.
 
Dale Smith is barely sentient and does not understand our system, the law, the constitution, and most of all, that Trump is every bit as dangerous, or more, than Clinton.
 
No, people should vote for the party that represents them
AND BE HELD FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POLICIES AND COSTS OF THAT PARTY'S PLATFORMS

We should organize the tax base by party membership,
and require parties to pay for their own policies and programs for the memberships represented by those respectively.

The Greens have it right, with proportional representation by party. the only thing I would add is separating budgets and tax choices where citizens are free to fund the social programs of their choice, in keeping with their religious and political beliefs.

People should vote for whomever represents them
WHERE THEY AGREE TO PAY FOR AND LIVE UNDER THOSE POLICIES!!!



You're basically advocating a split in the country. Why not just let the South leave?

Easier to just let a handful of plantation cities leave on the east and west coasts.....they will shrivel up and die and we would be done with them.....
 
No, people should vote for the party that represents them
AND BE HELD FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POLICIES AND COSTS OF THAT PARTY'S PLATFORMS

We should organize the tax base by party membership,
and require parties to pay for their own policies and programs for the memberships represented by those respectively.

The Greens have it right, with proportional representation by party. the only thing I would add is separating budgets and tax choices where citizens are free to fund the social programs of their choice, in keeping with their religious and political beliefs.

People should vote for whomever represents them
WHERE THEY AGREE TO PAY FOR AND LIVE UNDER THOSE POLICIES!!!



You're basically advocating a split in the country. Why not just let the South leave?

Easier to just let a handful of plantation cities leave on the east and west coasts.....they will shrivel up and die and we would be done with them.....

maybe Hillary should be asking "Why Am I Wearing Two Cath Bags" may you ask!
 
Dale Smith is barely sentient and does not understand our system, the law, the constitution, and most of all, that Trump is every bit as dangerous, or more, than Clinton.


Jake Smarmy, my understanding of where have have been i.e our real history, where we actually are and what is coming towards us is light years ahead of what you believe to be "reality". You are simply one of the rainbow demcrat flag waving sheeple. You have no understanding of the pseudo laws that are nothing but acts, statutes, codes and ordinances passed by corporate officers that you call "politicians". Hitlery is a globalist and she is the candidate of choice for the banking oligarchs that run this debt slavery system. It's a fact and not even disputable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top