Special Counsel Jack Smith has withdrawn his case

Actual evidence, testimony, under oath from the FBI agent involved said consent to search the boxes was never actually sought.
Was this agent at Mar a Lago on June 3rd?
 
Nope, Trump was charged because he was running against Xiden.

If he didn't, he wouldn't have been charged. We don't charge people actively working with the NARA, that shows lack of intent.
We charge people who hide classified government documents and don’t comply with subpoenas.
 
You think Trump declassified “all” those documents. Only a moron would think that.
Actually only a moron would care about a nothing Burger such as this. It was all partisan politics by an illegitimate dishonest regime. Unprecedented
 
Actually only a moron would care about a nothing Burger such as this. It was all partisan politics by an illegitimate dishonest regime. Unprecedented
National security is nothing to you.
 
Was this agent at Mar a Lago on June 3rd?
The FBI did not first seek consent to effectuate the search. Mr. D’Antuono recounted a meeting between FBI and Department officials during which the Department assertively pushed for the FBI to promptly execute the search warrant.12 Based upon his over-20-year tenure at the FBI, Mr. D’Antuono testified that he believed that the FBI, prior to resorting to a search warrant, should have sought consent to search the premises. He testified that this outcome would have been “the best thing for all parties” involved— “[f]or the FBI, for former President Trump, and for the country . . . .” Mr. D’Antuono indicated a belief that either you or Director Christopher Wray made the decision to seek a search warrant, despite opposition from the line agents working this case in the WFO. Following that meeting, Mr. D’Antuono described how Justice Department counterintelligence official George Toscas—who also reportedly worked on the “Crossfire Hurricane and Clinton email investigations”—told him that FBI agents were ready to execute the warrant.16 Mr. D’Antuono pushed back on the Department for trying to unilaterally allocate FBI resources.
 
We charge people who hide classified government documents and don’t comply with subpoenas.
well that's not what the law requires.

People are allowed to challenge a subpoena.

Moreover, we don't charge people that hide classified documents, as evident that Xiden wasn't charged.
 
And yet, no one has yet even proposed a nefarious purpose that Trump might have had for keeping these documents, which he had the power to declassify before they were removed from Federal property.

As with all other cases against Trump, civil and criminal, they are all bullshit.
 
well that's not what the law requires.

People are allowed to challenge a subpoena.

Moreover, we don't charge people that hide classified documents, as evident that Xiden wasn't charged.
Then why didn’t Trump challenge the subpoena?
 
The FBI did not first seek consent to effectuate the search. Mr. D’Antuono recounted a meeting between FBI and Department officials during which the Department assertively pushed for the FBI to promptly execute the search warrant.12 Based upon his over-20-year tenure at the FBI, Mr. D’Antuono testified that he believed that the FBI, prior to resorting to a search warrant, should have sought consent to search the premises. He testified that this outcome would have been “the best thing for all parties” involved— “[f]or the FBI, for former President Trump, and for the country . . . .” Mr. D’Antuono indicated a belief that either you or Director Christopher Wray made the decision to seek a search warrant, despite opposition from the line agents working this case in the WFO. Following that meeting, Mr. D’Antuono described how Justice Department counterintelligence official George Toscas—who also reportedly worked on the “Crossfire Hurricane and Clinton email investigations”—told him that FBI agents were ready to execute the warrant.16 Mr. D’Antuono pushed back on the Department for trying to unilaterally allocate FBI resources.
You don’t answer the question. Was he at Mar a Lago on Jun 3rd?
 
And yet, no one has yet even proposed a nefarious purpose that Trump might have had for keeping these documents, which he had the power to declassify before they were removed from Federal property.

As with all other cases against Trump, civil and criminal, they are all bullshit.
Because he’s a selfish, narcissistic asshole.
 
Then why didn’t Trump challenge the subpoena?

Because challenging the subpeona if he'd declassified the documents would have made since. If he had declassified them there would have been no classified documents to return.

But he didn't challenge it because he knew that if he tried to claim in court that he had declassified them, them the prosecution could have challnged it under oath.

Trump would not have withstood a close examination and the additional perjury charge.

WW
 
15th post
We don’t know because they’re classified.

If they were declassified, we’d know.
I think the FBI has them, they have turned out to be corrupt. Partly because of people like you
 
I think the FBI has them, they have turned out to be corrupt. Partly because of people like you
Trump had them but kept them to himself. The public had a right to know their contents since he declassified the information.
 
Trump had them but kept them to himself. The public had a right to know their contents since he declassified the information.
Maybe we will find out now that Trump is president . He seems to be a fairly transparent individual , much better than what we have now. How about Biden's classified documents. Did we all have a right to know what was in those? How about Obama's classified documents?
 
Maybe we will find out now that Trump is president . He seems to be a fairly transparent individual , much better than what we have now. How about Biden's classified documents. Did we all have a right to know what was in those? How about Obama's classified documents?
We only have a right to know what’s in unclassified documents.

If Trump doesn’t release the documents, then we know he never declassified them. The only question is whether you’ll admit it.
 
Back
Top Bottom