Speaker With Suck Up Experience Needed

[Flanders]

This is not hard to understand:

Republicans more than anything want somebody who will not embarrass them on the national stage, and McCarthy’s gaffe raised doubts on that question. “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” he told Hannity. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s un-trustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened . . . ”

McCarthy Withdraws from Speaker Race, Postpones Election
By Eliana Johnson, Rich Lowry & Alexis Levinson — October 8, 2015

Kevin McCarthy's House Speaker Bid -- It's Over | National Review Online​

It was Republicans who dumped McCarthy because he mentioned Hillary in relation to Benghazi. That is hardly worth mentioning until you realize that establishment Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

Incidentally, Paul Ryan lies like a Democrat every time he talks about the TPP. I have to wonder what else he lies about. He went so far as to:​

Paul Ryan Channels Pelosi on the TPP – You Have to Pass Obamatrade to See What’s in Obamatrade
Michael Krieger | Posted Thursday Jun 11, 2015 at 3:32 pm

Paul Ryan Channels Pelosi on the TPP – You Have to Pass Obamatrade to See What’s in Obamatrade​

David Rockefeller’s Birthday Present | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Instead of giving Paul Ryan the benefit of the doubt try to imagine a speaker who starts out with revulsion and contempt for Hillary! That is what Republicans should require from the next speaker in the event the next president is Hillary Clinton. Should she get a honeymoon that lasts longer than three seconds after she is sworn in guarantees more immigrants, more United Nations, more unemployment, more betrayals, more foreign policy disasters, and a lot worse than the sewer rat did to the country.

Oh well, the Benghazi Committee still has one job that far outweighs Hillary Clinton’s importance: Find out who issued the stand down?

 

[Flanders]

Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

Get down on your knees and pray this is true:

“While I am grateful for the encouragement I’ve received, I will not be a candidate,” said Ryan, the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, in a statement released Thursday afternoon.​

McCarthy exit exposes GOP leadership's weak bullpen
Posted By Douglas Ernst On 10/08/2015 @ 8:59 pm

McCarthy exit exposes GOP leadership’s weak bullpen​

 

[Flanders]

If this is not enough for conservatives:

Eagle Forum founder and chairman Phyllis Schlafly, a decades-long conservative movement leader with tons of influence on Capitol Hill, is making explicit that in no way should Paul Ryan even be considered for the House speakership.

“Tryouts for Speaker continue,” Schlafly said in a statement on Friday.​

this should get conservatives started on building the barricades:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/10/ryan-gutierrez-640x480.jpg

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)18% is endorsing Paul Ryan for Speaker of the House of Representatives. Gutierrez, perhaps the most extreme open-borders advocate in Congress, was interviewed on MSNBC.​

Live Updates From Inside the Chaos: House Speaker’s Race Heating Up as Donor Class Tries To Draft Paul Ryan
by Breitbart News
9 Oct 2015

Live Updates From Inside the Chaos: House Speaker’s Race Heating Up as Donor Class Tries To Draft Paul Ryan - Breitbart​

 

[Flanders]

The NYT should not taunt us poor old dudes with visions of Sugar Plums dancing in our noggins:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/10/Mike-Lee-Constitution-Alex-Brandon-AP-640x480.jpg

New York Times columnist Ross Douthat wants Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT)100% to be Speaker of the House.

New York Times Columnist: Make Mike Lee the Speaker
by Patrick Howley10 Oct 2015

New York Times Columnist: Make Mike Lee the Speaker​

 

[Meathead]

Wasserman-Shultz is not an option.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"It was Republicans who dumped McCarthy because he mentioned Hillary in relation to Benghazi. That is hardly worth mentioning until you realize that establishment Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience."

Ignorant, ridiculous, unfounded, delusional, hateful partisan lies and idiocy.

 

[Meathead]

"It was Republicans who dumped McCarthy because he mentioned Hillary in relation to Benghazi. That is hardly worth mentioning until you realize that establishment Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience."

Ignorant, ridiculous, unfounded, delusional, hateful partisan lies and idiocy.

If it were having your head up Obama's ass and suck up experience, you would be a contender. You know, you don't have to be a House rep btw.

 

[Flanders]

Wasserman-Shultz is not an option.

To Meathead: She is if she can pull Pelosi’s nose out!

 

[Flanders]

Here’s a lady I’d like to hear more about if numbers mean anything:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/01/marsha-blackburn-sunday-shows-ap-640x480.jpg

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) would make a great conservative Speaker of the House, suggests the American Conservative Union’s member scorecard.

The American Conservative Union’s (ACU) Executive Director Daniel Schneider joined guest host Matthew Boyle on Breitbart News Sunday on SiriusXM, expressing that, out of the names that have been thrown out there for Speaker of the House, he thinks Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) has the highest score by the ACU.

ACU: Marsha Blackburn Has Highest Score on Conservative Member Scorecard for Speaker of the House
by Alex Swoyer
11 Oct 2015

ACU: Marsha Blackburn Has Highest Score on Conservative Member Scorecard for Speaker of the House - Breitbart
​

I’d love to see a conservative woman become the next speaker. Another woman has nothing to fear from a media backlash when she bitch-slaps Typhoid Nancy into silence, while a man cannot, or will not, do it for obvious reasons.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Here’s a lady I’d like to hear more about if numbers mean anything:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/01/marsha-blackburn-sunday-shows-ap-640x480.jpg

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) would make a great conservative Speaker of the House, suggests the American Conservative Union’s member scorecard.

The American Conservative Union’s (ACU) Executive Director Daniel Schneider joined guest host Matthew Boyle on Breitbart News Sunday on SiriusXM, expressing that, out of the names that have been thrown out there for Speaker of the House, he thinks Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) has the highest score by the ACU.

ACU: Marsha Blackburn Has Highest Score on Conservative Member Scorecard for Speaker of the House
by Alex Swoyer
11 Oct 2015

ACU: Marsha Blackburn Has Highest Score on Conservative Member Scorecard for Speaker of the House - Breitbart
​

I’d love to see a conservative woman become the next speaker. Another woman has nothing to fear from a media backlash when she bitch-slaps Typhoid Nancy into silence, while a man cannot, or will not, do it for obvious reasons.

Cool, she can have Michelle Bachmann as her Chief of Staff and double down on the suicidal decisions by the current GOP members of the H. of Rep. Of course a few RINO's still remain, but they are on the endangered species list.

 

[Flanders]

Maybe establishment Republicans should eliminate the middleman and just make Luis Gutierrez the next speaker of the house:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/10/Ryan-Gutierrez-FB-640x480.jpg

Paul Ryan’s Open Borders Push With Luis Gutierrez Exposed in 2013 Video
by Julia Hahn17 Oct 2015Washington D.C.

Paul Ryan's Open Borders Push With Luis Gutierrez Exposed in 2013 Video - Breitbart​

 

[whitehall]

Republicans dumped McCarthy because the mainstream media pounced on a statement he made. It's ironic that the media was outraged by a one liner by McCarthy but not by the deaths of a U.S. Ambassador and two former Navy Seals. The mainstream media is the secret to the democrat party's success. If all the investigative reporters in the mainstream media hadn't retired and if they investigated the cover up of the murder of a U.S. Ambassador the same way they investigated a 3rd rate burglary during the Nixon administration, Obama would have been laughed out of town a long time ago and Hillary would be in federal prison.

 

[Flanders]

Republicans dumped McCarthy because the mainstream media pounced on a statement he made. It's ironic that the media was outraged by a one liner by McCarthy but not by the deaths of a U.S. Ambassador and two former Navy Seals. The mainstream media is the secret to the democrat party's success. If all the investigative reporters in the mainstream media hadn't retired and if they investigated the cover up of the murder of a U.S. Ambassador the same way they investigated a 3rd rate burglary during the Nixon administration, Obama would have been laughed out of town a long time ago and Hillary would be in federal prison.

To whitehall: Exactly so.

Everything that is wrong with this country went wrong because of television. Print press could never have done the damage that television has been doing since 1960.

“You cannot put the genie back in the bottle” has been said about nuclear weapons. That is doubly true of television, but with television the genie can be driven away from the public trough simply by eliminating the advertising tax deduction. Let television pay corporate taxes instead of passing advertising costs onto the backs of the rest of us.

Bottom line: If the relationship between press and government is not antagonistic there is no reason for a free press.

Anyway, these three threads are for anybody who is fed up with the evils of a constitutionally protected free press. The American people will be just fine with freedom of speech; they do not need television turd-maggots selling government policies.

Did Pravda’s Reporters Spy For Us? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Call It A Communist Bias | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Media Turd-Maggots | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[Flanders]

Conservative voters refusing to believe that Romneycare was not socialized medicine is why Romney & Ryan lost the election:

Failed GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney lamented that the demise of traditional media is empowering Republican “insurgents” and preventing establishment Republicans from compromising more with Democrats.​

You might say that there is no other side when the media lies like hell to promote big government. There are facts, and there are media facts:

Now, according to Romney, people “get their news on the web” and “they tend to read those things which they agree with.” He said people are “not seeing the other side” and “not even getting the same facts” while “we have commentators” on left-leaning and right-leaning cable news channels “who are hyperbolic in expressing their views on issues.”

Mitt Romney: Demise of Legacy Media Empowering Conservative ‘Insurgents,’ Preventing More ‘Collaborative Action’
by Tony Lee
20 Oct 2015

Mitt Romney: Demise of Legacy Media Empowering Conservative ‘Insurgents,’ Preventing More ‘Collaborative Action’ - Breitbart​

Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

Romney’s pal already has the support of the MSM; nevertheless, Ryan knows he better get “conditions” before the public votes next year. Every member of the House has to be reelected every two years. Ryan can do a whole lot of “compromising” between now and November 2016. Then kicking his sorry ass out like Boehner's “resignation” starts all over again. Any conservative who gives that sharpshooter carte blanche deserves to be booted out in the next election.

Tea Party Caucus chair: Ryan's conditions 'entirely unreasonable'
By Susan Ferrechio
10/20/15 10:18 PM

Tea Party Caucus chair: Ryan's conditions 'entirely unreasonable'​

Finally, it is not a matter of standing firm on a few no-retreat issues. It comes down to a speaker who will not roll over for the Democrats or the president. Instead of running scared every time television’s turd-maggots tell them that shutting down the government is a losing strategy, conservatives need to bring home one message: Doing nothing is better than bipartisan legislation that never gives Constitution-loving Americans a damn thing. President Coolidge said it this way:

It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones. Calvin Coolidge​

 

[bodecea]

If this is not enough for conservatives:

Eagle Forum founder and chairman Phyllis Schlafly, a decades-long conservative movement leader with tons of influence on Capitol Hill, is making explicit that in no way should Paul Ryan even be considered for the House speakership.

“Tryouts for Speaker continue,” Schlafly said in a statement on Friday.​

this should get conservatives started on building the barricades:

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/10/ryan-gutierrez-640x480.jpg

Democratic Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL)18% is endorsing Paul Ryan for Speaker of the House of Representatives. Gutierrez, perhaps the most extreme open-borders advocate in Congress, was interviewed on MSNBC.​

Live Updates From Inside the Chaos: House Speaker’s Race Heating Up as Donor Class Tries To Draft Paul Ryan
by Breitbart News
9 Oct 2015

Live Updates From Inside the Chaos: House Speaker’s Race Heating Up as Donor Class Tries To Draft Paul Ryan - Breitbart​

Since when does Phyllis Schlafly matter at all?

 

[Meathead]

As opposed to Pelosi with sucssion experience?

 

[Flanders]

Any conservative who gives that sharpshooter carte blanche deserves to be booted out in the next election.

I still do not know if conservatives in the House are caving in. The first article seems to say that Paul Ryan did not get the carte blanche he is after:

So, heading into the meeting with Ryan—which began just after 4 p.m. on Wednesday—there was near-unanimous opposition to Ryan in the House Freedom Caucus. Like Breitbart News, Fox News’ Chad Pergram reported that it was “unlikely” that Ryan received the endorsement of the Freedom Caucus. Almost every member, save for a few like Reps. Rep. Mark Sanford (R-SC) and Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-IN) opposed a Ryan Speakership—and they were agreeing to the meeting simply to be fair.

Exclusive: Paul Ryan Sold House Freedom Caucus a Bill of Goods in Private Meeting on Capitol Hill
by Matthew Boyle
21 Oct 2015

Exclusive: Paul Ryan Sold House Freedom Caucus a Bill of Goods in Private Meeting on Capitol Hill - Breitbart​

On the other hand the New York Times said it was a done deal:

A strong majority of anti-establishment conservatives in the House Freedom Caucus voted on Wednesday night to support Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin for House speaker, assuring that he will have the votes to secure the post next week and averting a leadership crisis for Republicans.

Freedom Caucus Majority Backs Paul Ryan for House Speaker
By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN and EMMARIE HUETTEMAN
OCT. 21, 2015

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/22/us/politics/paul-ryan-house-speaker-freedom-caucus.html​

The one thing that stands at with people like Ryan, Hillary Clinton the Chicago sewer rat et al. is the media tells us how smart they are. To me, it is not smart when liars lie knowing there is no penalty getting caught lying. The sewer cannot open his mouth without lying (I think this pic is photoshopped. Nobody has wind sails that big):

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2015-10/195424_5_.jpg

The Fifth Amendment is needed by everybody except government officials who lie with impunity. Everybody in government lies under oath, while Ryan is taking all the best of it because he was not sworn in. Hillary’s lies are not hampered by an oath:

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/sk102215dAPR20151021084553.jpg

p.s. You can bet that Hillary Clinton will take the Fifth if she ever ends up in a criminal court.

 

[Flanders]

The suck up is now the speaker:

Incidentally, Paul Ryan lies like a Democrat every time he talks about the TPP.

Paul Ryan was pushing the TPP months ago:

Paul Ryan Channels Pelosi on the TPP – You Have to Pass Obamatrade to See What’s in Obamatrade
Michael Krieger | Posted Thursday Jun 11, 2015 at 3:32 pm

Aside from Curtis Ellis’ headline, please, please, please, read this article to learn about a few items the new suck up agrees with:

Obamatrade hands over U.S. sovereignty to international panel
Posted By Curtis Ellis On 11/05/2015 @ 2:07 pm

Obamatrade hands over U.S. sovereignty to international panel​

NOTE: Surprise, surprise, the filthy traitor also has his nose right up the president’s ass.

Secretary of State John Kerry says China and Russia could also join the pact. Thailand, Taiwan and the Philippines also have expressed interest in signing up.​

p.s. The filthy piece of garbage dare not mention that his pals in Communist Vietnam will be welcomed with open arms as soon as possible.

 

[Flanders]

Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/12/AP_543948283316-420x315.jpg

Ryan’s nose up the president’s ass will get excrement over his beard. Wags are sure to call him SHIT-FACE.

Paul Ryan Betrays America: $1.1 Trillion, 2,000-Plus Page Omnibus Bill Funds ‘Fundamental Transformation of America’
by Stephen K. Bannon & Julia Hahn
16 Dec 2015

Paul Ryan Betrays America: $1.1 Trillion, 2,000-Plus Page Omnibus Bill Funds 'Fundamental Transformation of America' - Breitbart​

 

[Wry Catcher]

It seems a small minority of members are dead set against all Democrats and the "establishment Republicans" This minority dominates the discussion / debate on most issues, usually echoing each other or some claimed authority.

Most are anti government, seem to be followers of Grover Norquist and would like to see government shrunk to a size he and they could drown it in a bathtub.

[I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.]

Most oppose taxes, gun control, Obamacare, abortion, equal rights for women and minorities, including gays and lesbians, liberals and progressives and claim to be conservatives.

So what is a conservative in the US in the 21st Century? What do they want, what do they hope to destroy?