Speaker Ryan Criticises Trump's Pardon of Arpiao

So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
So you have just responded to actual facts with your "opinion"...lol.


In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court
An Arizona judge has ruled that Joe Arpaio, who calls himself "America's toughest sheriff," is in civil contempt of court. Judge G. Murray Snow says Arpaio has repeatedly and knowingly disobeyed his orders to cease policing tactics against Latinos that he says amount to systemic racial profiling.
In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court

You must enjoy being made a fool of...


Folks get pulled over all the time. Can't prove it's b/c of race.
So you have no facts to rebut the article or my statement???...o.k.
 
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
So you have just responded to actual facts with your "opinion"...lol.


In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court
An Arizona judge has ruled that Joe Arpaio, who calls himself "America's toughest sheriff," is in civil contempt of court. Judge G. Murray Snow says Arpaio has repeatedly and knowingly disobeyed his orders to cease policing tactics against Latinos that he says amount to systemic racial profiling.
In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court

You must enjoy being made a fool of...

You are correct. Arpaio violated the United States Constitution, Arpaio committed racial profiling and other violations of the 14th Amendment right to equal protection of the law.
Or, is this one of those times, when the Constitution is wrong/doesn't matter? If so, Trumpsters certainly are not even close to being patriots. Hell, they are worshiping an Autocrat, who has done almost everything he can to veer away from our country's forefathers' vision of America.
 
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...
It's clear you didn't read any of the Arizona papers concerning the issue and you don't have a clue about what is going on.

Nice. Way to make an ass of yourself.
Nice to see an absence of facts to rebut the facts I listed...lol.
Calling you stupid would be an understatement...


Prosecution, defense rest their cases in Joe Arpaio's criminal contempt trial
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news...joe-arpaio-criminal-contempt-trial/441674001/
"The order stated that deputies could not detain any individuals solely because they were suspected of being in the country without authorization and were not accused of a crime.

Deputies continued to detain these individuals, turning them over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or the Border Patrol, until the order became permanent in May 2013.

Prosecutors from the U.S. Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section said the practice led to at least 171 victims illegally detained."

<snip>

"The defense moved through its case quickly. Its most notable witnesses Thursday included a Border Patrol agent and former lieutenant of the agency’s immigration unit.

One of the cornerstones of Arpaio’s defense was that it was federal agents who instructed deputies to detain immigrants in the country without authorization, to be turned over to ICE or the Border Patrol.

Defense attorneys said Snow’s order wasn’t clear enough if his intent was to stop correspondence with Border Patrol."

Naturally, the upshot is, if the Administration and ICE were enforcing the Constitution and the law of the land, there never would have been any miscommunication between the federals and the local sheriff, right?



 
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
So you have just responded to actual facts with your "opinion"...lol.


In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court
An Arizona judge has ruled that Joe Arpaio, who calls himself "America's toughest sheriff," is in civil contempt of court. Judge G. Murray Snow says Arpaio has repeatedly and knowingly disobeyed his orders to cease policing tactics against Latinos that he says amount to systemic racial profiling.
In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court

You must enjoy being made a fool of...

You are correct. Arpaio violated the United States Constitution, Arpaio committed racial profiling and other violations of the 14th Amendment right to equal protection of the law.
Or, is this one of those times, when the Constitution is wrong/doesn't matter? If so, Trumpsters certainly are not even close to being patriots. Hell, they are worshiping an Autocrat, who has done almost everything he can to veer away from our country's forefathers' vision of America.

Illegal immigrants don't have any right to the 14th amendment or any equal protection.
 
How do some people get the notion that the US Constitution applies to every person on the planet?

Do they also believe that everyone in the world gets a vote for president? I think some Canadians believe they should have a vote. . . .
 
Trump's pardon of the old sheriff in Arizona is a passing 24-48 hour Liberal/Bolshevik Trump Hysteria...Meaning he will have done something else that's puts these turds into an apoplectic hissy fit by then.

But this one is worth examining a bit.

No sane person questions the absolute right of the President to grant a pardon; its in the Constitution; it has been used by every President...many times.

Generalizing this really trivial issue---involving one old man....it comes down to whether you are an Open Borders Man; or a Closed the Borders Man.

Can there be any doubt...from watching how Trump campaigned...that he would pardon Arpaio if it ever came to that?

Trump campaigned on Closing the Borders to the illegal invasion that Mexico is presently involved in; he Trump got elected on that very issue; and Arpaio spent his life fighting for exactly what Trump said he was fighting for.

Was it not obvious, even to the poorly educated of the rotting cities of the North, what Trump would do?

Would he have not been a traitor to the people who elected him if he had let the crusty old sheriff spend his last months in a prison?

So, this ass & pussy Paul Ryan should be bitching if Trump had, in effect, BROKEN a Republican Campaign Promise....instead of, in effect, kept one. Fuck him.

God Bless Trump for pardoning the old sheriff....and fuck Paul Ryan for inserting himself into the matter, which he did because he is because he is scared shit-less of the New York Media....just like, most of the rest of the Republican Caucus in Congress....which has more Pussies than 50 Bunny Ranches.
____________________________________________

Aw, Ryan is just butthurt at the magnitude of his fail vs Trump.
 
Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
So you have just responded to actual facts with your "opinion"...lol.


In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court
An Arizona judge has ruled that Joe Arpaio, who calls himself "America's toughest sheriff," is in civil contempt of court. Judge G. Murray Snow says Arpaio has repeatedly and knowingly disobeyed his orders to cease policing tactics against Latinos that he says amount to systemic racial profiling.
In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court

You must enjoy being made a fool of...

You are correct. Arpaio violated the United States Constitution, Arpaio committed racial profiling and other violations of the 14th Amendment right to equal protection of the law.
Or, is this one of those times, when the Constitution is wrong/doesn't matter? If so, Trumpsters certainly are not even close to being patriots. Hell, they are worshiping an Autocrat, who has done almost everything he can to veer away from our country's forefathers' vision of America.

Illegal immigrants don't have any right to the 14th amendment or any equal protection.
Do I have to continue to make you look stupid???


It is true that the Constitution does not give foreigners the right to enter the U.S. But once here, it protects them from discrimination based on race and national origin and from arbitrary treatment by the government. Immigrants work and pay taxes; legal immigrants are subject to the military draft. Many immigrants have lived in this country for decades, married U.S. citizens, and raised their U.S.-citizen children. Laws that punish them violate their fundamental right to fair and equal treatment. The Immigrants' Rights Project of the ACLU was established in 1985 to challenge unconstitutional laws and practices, and to counter the myths upon which many of these laws are based. The Project has become one of the nation's leading advocates for the rights of immigrants, refugees and non-citizens.

IMMIGRATION: MYTHS AND FACTS
The Rights of Immigrants -ACLU Position Paper


Francesca Menes, director of policy and advocacy for the Florida Immigrant Coalition, disagreed with Eagle.

"As an undocumented immigrant, you do have constitutional rights here in the United States," she said, "and that has been said over and over in the courts, that they do have constitutional rights."

We found that undocumented immigrants do have constitutional rights -- but not all of the rights of citizens.



Truth: Undocumented immigrants DO have legal rights under the U.S. Constitution and federal statute.
As far back as 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that:

“The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution is not confined to the protection of citizens. It says: ’Nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.’ These provisions are universal in their application to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to any differences of race, of color, or nationality; and the equal protection of the laws is a pledge of the protection of equal laws.” 2

All persons in the U.S., therefore, have constitutional rights. Among these are the right to equal protection of the law and the right to due process.

Also, undocumented persons have a constitutional right under the Fourth Amendment to deny any officer from entering their residence without consent, absent a search warrant.

Further, the Supreme Court has held that all children, regardless of their immigration status, are entitled to free public education, as required under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 3
 
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
So you have just responded to actual facts with your "opinion"...lol.


In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court
An Arizona judge has ruled that Joe Arpaio, who calls himself "America's toughest sheriff," is in civil contempt of court. Judge G. Murray Snow says Arpaio has repeatedly and knowingly disobeyed his orders to cease policing tactics against Latinos that he says amount to systemic racial profiling.
In Racial Profiling Lawsuit, Ariz. Judge Rules Sheriff Arpaio In Contempt Of Court

You must enjoy being made a fool of...


Was it ever proven that Arpaio's deputies were "systematically racially profiling" when pulling criminals over? Nope, it was just a batshit crazy Judge's opinion. There was absolutely no way to determine how the Sheriff deputies could comply to such an idiotic order. How did the Judge determine that police "tactics" were being used against Latinos?
 
Was it ever proven that Arpaio's deputies were "systematically racially profiling" when pulling criminals over? Nope, it was just a batshit crazy Judge's opinion.
Rather it was his ruling that Arpaio's deputies were "systematically racially profiling" when pulling innocent people over.
 
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
You both have it wrong.

Arpairo's office was holding over illegals that were found innocent of all other charges for ICE, even after Obama issued an order telling them that he didn't want ICE to keep them if they had committed no other offenses other than illegal entry.

When a court told Apario's office not to hand them over, but he didn't listen, he was held in contempt.

If you don't read, the TV and radio is apt to lie to you.

Did you guys even read the issue?


The Feds cannot tell a local state or county law enforcement agency what laws to enforce or ignore, or what to do with their criminals.
A federal judge cannot tell a state or county authority to not enforce a particular federal law. The Judge was in the wrong in the beginning and still is.
 
Generalizing this really trivial issue---involving one old man....it comes down to whether you are an Open Borders Man; or a Closed the Borders Man.
I don't think that assertion is accurate except in the case of individuals who care about nothing other than "open borders" and related matters. For example, individuals who place the sanctity of the 4th Amendment over "whatever" having to do with immigration almost certainly, and notwithstanding their strident demand for "closed" (far less open?) borders.

In my mind, some U.S. laws and rights do and others do not accrue to anyone who happens to be in the U.S. (or a U.S. territory). Also, there is the matter of federal law's supremacy over state, local or individual judgments about the legitimacy of enacted laws. Lastly there is the matter of whether a law enforcement official can unilaterally and arbitrarily ignore a court's instruction that a given law be enforced.
The matter, AFAIC, has nothing to do with what I think about border control; the Arpaio issue is merely one that pertains to border control and immigration, but the legal principles that guide my position are "bigger" than immigration or any other topical application of those legal principles. As goes "Arpaio," my concern has nothing to do with whether the man is or isn't in jail, but rather the impact of Trump's pardon on the rule of law as we expect it be upheld in the U.S.

One's morals and ethics can agree and disagree with all manners of laws, but at the end of the day, one must follow/uphold the law as it is currently written by legislatures and and interpreted by jurists. IMO, the only acceptable variance from that comes about in the instance of jury nullification, and I find that acceptable only because jury nullification is not a unilateral act.

As for the specifics of Trump's pardoning of Arpaio, I'm sorry, but Trump has no legal foundation and regarding the matter, he didn't even consult with the Office of the Pardoning Attorney. That he didn't smacks of royal fiat, not presidential pardoning.
 

Attachments

  • Are Foreign Nationals Entitled to the Same Constitutional Rights.pdf
    2 MB · Views: 31
So, to sum up your illogical, childish and basically stupid rant, let's look at the facts...
Illegals: Came into the country illegally and while here many followed the law, built lives, had families, started businesses, graduated college and committed less crimes than Americans born here.

Arpaio: Took an Oath to uphold the law and broke that Oath. Illegally violated the Rights of many innocent people while conducting the illegal practice of racial profiling. Illegally continued to break the law even when ordered to cease by a duly authorized court Judge.

So as usual, conservatives are 100% law and order except when they have to follow the law and then applauds the undermining of law and order from an individual that uses the WH as his personal enrichment platform...

Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
You both have it wrong.

Arpairo's office was holding over illegals that were found innocent of all other charges for ICE, even after Obama issued an order telling them that he didn't want ICE to keep them if they had committed no other offenses other than illegal entry.

When a court told Apario's office not to hand them over, but he didn't listen, he was held in contempt.

If you don't read, the TV and radio is apt to lie to you.

Did you guys even read the issue?


The Feds cannot tell a local state or county law enforcement agency what laws to enforce or ignore, or what to do with their criminals.
A federal judge cannot tell a state or county authority to not enforce a particular federal law. The Judge was in the wrong in the beginning and still is.

So, you are completely clueless about the Constitution or what?
Local law enforcement are most definitely bound by the Constitution. It's been that way for over 200 years.
 
Wrong. Arpaio upheld the law and enforced it. The corrupt Hussein administration used its influence to undermine Arpaio. President Trump merely put an end to that political witch hunt.
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
You both have it wrong.

Arpairo's office was holding over illegals that were found innocent of all other charges for ICE, even after Obama issued an order telling them that he didn't want ICE to keep them if they had committed no other offenses other than illegal entry.

When a court told Apario's office not to hand them over, but he didn't listen, he was held in contempt.

If you don't read, the TV and radio is apt to lie to you.

Did you guys even read the issue?


The Feds cannot tell a local state or county law enforcement agency what laws to enforce or ignore, or what to do with their criminals.
A federal judge cannot tell a state or county authority to not enforce a particular federal law. The Judge was in the wrong in the beginning and still is.

So, you are completely clueless about the Constitution or what?
Local law enforcement are most definitely bound by the Constitution. It's been that way for over 200 years.

That's precisely why he kept enforcing federal laws.
 
I see that I have to dumb it down for you...here goes.
Did Arpaio illegally use racial profiling against innocent people because they appeared to be of a certain race???
Is racial profiling illegal???
Did a duly appointed Judge order him to cease his illegal activity???
Did he cease the illegal activity???
Is disobeying the lawful judgement illegal???
Yes, he broke the law and is a criminal, too bad your intellectual dishonesty won't allow you to admit the facts...

Wrong again dumbass.

This Judge ordered him to stop "targeting Latino drivers", whatever the fuck that means. Arizona deputies are supposed to never pull over someone just because they look "Latino" now? The order was nonesense and there was no way to comply with it.

Arizona law enforcement was never found guilty of "racial profiling".
Arpaio and his deputies were never doing anything illegal in the first place, so there was nothing to "cease".
According to liberals, arresting a Latino for any crime would be considered "violating the Judge's orders".
Sorry, but the LEOs aren't going to stop arresting people just because of their skin color.
You both have it wrong.

Arpairo's office was holding over illegals that were found innocent of all other charges for ICE, even after Obama issued an order telling them that he didn't want ICE to keep them if they had committed no other offenses other than illegal entry.

When a court told Apario's office not to hand them over, but he didn't listen, he was held in contempt.

If you don't read, the TV and radio is apt to lie to you.

Did you guys even read the issue?


The Feds cannot tell a local state or county law enforcement agency what laws to enforce or ignore, or what to do with their criminals.
A federal judge cannot tell a state or county authority to not enforce a particular federal law. The Judge was in the wrong in the beginning and still is.

So, you are completely clueless about the Constitution or what?
Local law enforcement are most definitely bound by the Constitution. It's been that way for over 200 years.

That's precisely why he kept enforcing federal laws.

And while doing so, spit on the 14th Constitutional Amendment and then there's the millions dollars his actions cost Maricopa County taxpayers.
Just keep on defending the bigoted tunnel visioned poor excuse of a law enforcer.

Taxpayer costs of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's profiling case: Another $13M on top of $41M
Taxpayer costs of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's profiling case: Another $13M on top of $41M
Now go back and continue your Trumpster ass-kissing.
 
I find it interesting that the left has a cow over Trump pardoning an old man who may have stepped outside the boundary of the law (let's not talk about how many leftists do so without consequence), yet they remained silent or outright defensive when Obama let go, what was it, 85; very evil men from Gitmo who are as of this moment, still working, planning and killing American soldiers.
 
Arpaio never spent a day in prison nor was he likely to - his case had yet to go to appeal where it may have been reversed.

Trump's actions were premature and bizarre.
___________

"Premature and Bizarre" are not valid responses in a political discussion. They are unsupported personal conclusions.

You are either uneducated, and don't know better; or you are an idiot, and don't know better.



______

Or maybe...you have issues since you don't seem capable of addressing the discussion and focus instead on me :dunno:

Either way, I gave my reasoning for why it's premature. And I'll add another - it presumes GUILT. If he had waited for the appeals process to work it's way through court - it might have been overturned. Pardoning him now sets "guilty" in stone.

It's bizarre because it indicates the President hasn't a clue as to how the pardon process really works.
 
I find it interesting that the left has a cow over Trump pardoning an old man who may have stepped outside the boundary of the law (let's not talk about how many leftists do so without consequence), yet they remained silent or outright defensive when Obama let go, what was it, 85; very evil men from Gitmo who are as of this moment, still working, planning and killing American soldiers.

Prisoner swaps are common. That's not the same as pardoning but feel free to stretch.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top