ReillyT
Senior Member
I agree with that. I know that the USSC is the decider of how the Const. is interpreted. But that doesn't mean that they've interpreted it correctly. As what happened in the Plessy v. Ferguson decision. I guess my point is that there is nothing wrong with questioning their decisions. Where my opinons really don't matter when it comes to the law...decided by the USSC, I am entitled to question their actions, and in this case, I think their decision was a politically driven decision that did not correctly cite the Constitution.
If you are just questioning whether the decision was the right one, then by all means continue. I may have misunderstood your focus. As for the decision itself, one would have to look back at what the founders intended and hope there is something there. Otherwise, I think you make very strong arguments.