SOS Rubio Grinds Democrat Senator into Dust

wait... so we achieved our goals? List them out Nostradumbass

Goals
1. Secured Iran's Nuclear Arsenol - NO
2. Secured Regime change - NO
3. Twarted Iran's support of terrorism - NO
4. Improved upon the JCPOA deal - NO
5. Freed Iranians from oppression - NO
6. Protected regional trade from disruptions - NO


Achievements
1. Got the strait of Hormuz closed with the President claiming no one knew they would do that
2. Killed school girls
3. Got all of the middle east showered in missiles
4. Allowed Iran to decimate nearly ALL of our bases in the region
5. Got 13 Americans dead
6. Blew up a underground nuke facility that did not stop them from making nukes apparently
7. Blew up 50 year old boats and equipment we gave them while losing $100B in equipment incl 47 aircraft the most since WWII
Wait, Iran has nukes? I thought the big squeal was all about how they never had, never tried to make them and never wanted to have them. Did somebody get the narrative wrong?
 
OMFG THE MASSIVE LOSSES for OVER 20,000 hits

OUR GREATEST GENERATION WOULD COWER IN FEAR

WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE

SH.IT MAN WE LOST CARL OMFG LETS ALL HIDE WE LOST CARL.

OMFG WE KILLED 120,000 IRANIANS

BUT BUT BUT CARL DIED MAN FU.CK IT LETS SURRENDER

View attachment 1264635
Killing people isnt an accomplishment you ghoul. Jesus Christ.

Stopping a terrorist regime is an accomplishment (failed)

Retrieving nuclear arsenal is an accomplishment (failed)

Freeing oppressed citizens is an accomplishment (failed)

But killing people is NOT an accomplishment.
 
Killing people isnt an accomplishment you ghoul. Jesus Christ.

Stopping a terrorist regime is an accomplishment (failed)

Retrieving nuclear arsenal is an accomplishment (failed)

Freeing oppressed citizens is an accomplishment (failed)

But killing people is NOT an accomplishment.
So now you retreat CARL

hmmmm

1780497996966.webp
 
Vance would have to get something out of it. He is smart. Perhaps a Supreme Court seat.
I imagine the nominee would be Vance. I'm sure he wants it and Rubio said that if Vance runs, he wouldn't, which probably means Rubio would get something out of it, as in the VP. Might be good enough but I personally think if Rubio were the nominee democrats wouldn't have a chance in hell of winning, which is what I want, democrats with no chance in hell of winning. If you are a democrat, how do you campaign against a Hispanic?
 
I imagine the nominee would be Vance. I'm sure he wants it and Rubio said that if Vance runs, he wouldn't, which probably means Rubio would get something out of it, as in the VP. Might be good enough but I personally think if Rubio were the nominee democrats wouldn't have a chance in hell of winning, which is what I want, democrats with no chance in hell of winning. If you are a democrat, how do you campaign against a Hispanic?
They would just do the same thing they would do against a black nominee, completely forget that they champion minorities and attack with the same vitriol and ferocity they have Clarence Thomas. Quid Pro Joe famously went after Thomas and it didn't hurt him in democrat politics at all.
 
I imagine the nominee would be Vance. I'm sure he wants it and Rubio said that if Vance runs, he wouldn't, which probably means Rubio would get something out of it, as in the VP. Might be good enough but I personally think if Rubio were the nominee democrats wouldn't have a chance in hell of winning, which is what I want, democrats with no chance in hell of winning. If you are a democrat, how do you campaign against a Hispanic?
They both handle themselves well. Progressives in their perma attack modes with a lot of crazy in it give them good training.
 
They would just do the same thing they would do against a black nominee, completely forget that they champion minorities and attack with the same vitriol and ferocity they have Clarence Thomas. Quid Pro Joe famously went after Thomas and it didn't hurt him in democrat politics at all.
Which is why I said with Rubio as the nominee, we have an easy win. Hispanic voters would not take too kindly to Democrats running a Hispanic down. Same thing if the nominee was a woman or a black. The good part is, Republicans have several of these possibilities who would actually be good picks and not a DEI appointment.
 
Which is why I said with Rubio as the nominee, we have an easy win. Hispanic voters would not take too kindly to Democrats running a Hispanic down. Same thing if the nominee was a woman or a black. The good part is, Republicans have several of these possibilities who would actually be good picks and not a DEI appointment.
Oh, it would certainly rebound against them, but they would have no problem doing it. Just look at how they treat ANY minority or woman who rises in Republican politics.
 
Oh, it would certainly rebound against them, but they would have no problem doing it. Just look at how they treat ANY minority or woman who rises in Republican politics.
Yup. They pretty much openly call right wing blacks "Uncle Toms" and "white supremacists" and I'd love to see them claim that women want to take women's rights away.
 
Yup. They pretty much openly call right wing blacks "Uncle Toms" and "white supremacists" and I'd love to see them claim that women want to take women's rights away.
Is that kind of like calling black people DEI hires?
 
Is DEI good or bad for black folks?

A simple yes or no question you won’t answer.
Yes! If it weren’t for DEI there wouldn’t hardly be any prominent black republicans.
 
Yes! If it weren’t for DEI there wouldn’t hardly be any prominent black republicans.
Ok, so if DEI is good for blacks Hiw is it racist to point out someone is a DEI hire?
 
Ok, so if DEI is good for blacks Hiw is it racist to point out someone is a DEI hire?
You only assume they’re a DEI hire because of their race.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom