Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. President Trump is the first successful third party candidate since Lincoln. The GOP establishment was as opposed to him as the Dems.
2. Demwit moral equivalency arguments are getting tiresome, but it's the only thing they have left.
3. Demwit "solutions" are not solutions at all: Few if any of the recent shootings would have been prevented by their policy prescriptions. The only thing that might have prevented them is armed bystanders.
Kinda like there's no way of knowing how many lives were saved by allowing law abiding citizens to be armed.There is no way to know how many lives have been saved by the background checks we currently have. So If it prevents one mass murder, not allowing firearms to be housed with those who have confirmed mental illnesses is a reasonable restriction.
As for preventing the recent massacres, game planning last week’s defeat is not a winning strategy.
The Democratic Party has lost its marbles, indeed.
.
The same DEM party that won the House last year?
The Democratic Party has lost its marbles, indeed.
I strongly suspect we'd see more Democrats walking away if the alternative were not so repulsive.
When both teams are this unattractive, it's more intellectually honest to shun both.
And that's the problem, whether the Right can see that or not.
.
And if every voter, from both sides of the political spectrum, who felt this way were to vote for a third party candidate, the results would shatter the foundation of Washington politics. Sadly, this is unlikely to happen as too many fear letting the other guy win...
Kinda like there's no way of knowing how many lives were saved by allowing law abiding citizens to be armed.There is no way to know how many lives have been saved by the background checks we currently have. So If it prevents one mass murder, not allowing firearms to be housed with those who have confirmed mental illnesses is a reasonable restriction.
As for preventing the recent massacres, game planning last week’s defeat is not a winning strategy.
If he wanted logic he wouldn’t be a trumpkin moronYou're asking for logic.
Good luck.
Democrats offering solutions? Lol.Yes, that's the one.The same DEM party that won the House last year?The Democratic Party has lost its marbles, indeed.
Being less repulsive than the other tribe probably shouldn't be a source of pride.
.
Well it’s a given considering the current GOP. Our is and will be for the foreseeable future a binary system so if you’re being pragmatic, that is the threshold. It isn’t the goal.
We had another rampage killing yesterday. The GOP will propose nothing. The Democrats will prescribe solutions. If you call that being “less repulsive”...you’re not being intellectually honest.
An actual solution doesn't impede on others rights. Nor does it empower criminals.
So, please, inform of us those "solutions"
More stringent Background checks and keeping weapons out of the hands of the mentally ill don’t impede anyone’s rights.
Now please tell us your solution.
Lol I didn't claim to have one. You claimed the dems did. I'm asking you to back up your claim.What kind of tougher background checks?Democrats offering solutions? Lol.
An actual solution doesn't impede on others rights. Nor does it empower criminals.
So, please, inform of us those "solutions"
More stringent Background checks and keeping weapons out of the hands of the mentally ill don’t impede anyone’s rights.
Now please tell us your solution.
How do you keep guns away from the mentally ill?
Your solution, please. If you have one; which you don’t.
I must assume your post was more political hackery than reality.
Which is what I told Mac; the blob and his supporters have no solutions and are content with weekly massacres.
Trump is the most unsuited man ever to be PresidentThe Democrats have made it clear. They stand for everything that will degrade, undermine and destroy what made America the greatest country in modern civilization. Why would any American support them? Why would you vote for a Party that is dedicated to screwing over your kids and your grand kids so that the Democrats can have a lock on political power? I just don't understand this. And it really is that simple. They are pushing Socialism which cuts against everything America is about. They are pushing for opening the borders to whoever or whatever comes across. When has that EVER been a good idea on ANY LEVEL? Why is it a good idea now?
Here is the debate question: Is your personal hatred of Donald Trump enough to vote for the demise of your country? Or should you #WALKAWAY from the Party of Open borders, Socialism, anti-Cop, anti-White and anti-success? Why or Why not?
Kinda like there's no way of knowing how many lives were saved by allowing law abiding citizens to be armed.There is no way to know how many lives have been saved by the background checks we currently have. So If it prevents one mass murder, not allowing firearms to be housed with those who have confirmed mental illnesses is a reasonable restriction.
As for preventing the recent massacres, game planning last week’s defeat is not a winning strategy.
What we do know is that in other developed nations like the US, not having firearms has not lead to multiple weekly massacres like we have here quite often
Lol you are such a lying hack.You have yet to back up your claim. PatheticYou have yet to back up your claim.
That the Dems have a plan to do something and the blob and his supporters do not? You actually confirmed it.
Your confirmation is quite enough. Thank you.
Like you claiming adam Lanza obtained his weapons legally.
No. But his mom did.
Her son was diagnosed with mental health disorders and lived in a house with an arsenal which resulted in the deaths of 20 kids.
Perhaps we should not allow Arsenal’s to be housed with the mentally ill.
You’re welcome to provide your own solution. Oh wait, you don’t have one do you? And you’re content with weekly massacres.
Lol I didn't claim to have one. You claimed the dems did. I'm asking you to back up your claim.What kind of tougher background checks?More stringent Background checks and keeping weapons out of the hands of the mentally ill don’t impede anyone’s rights.
Now please tell us your solution.
How do you keep guns away from the mentally ill?
Your solution, please. If you have one; which you don’t.
I must assume your post was more political hackery than reality.
Which is what I told Mac; the blob and his supporters have no solutions and are content with weekly massacres.
Do you know what you call someone that complains about a problem yet offers no solutions?
A whiner!
Kinda like there's no way of knowing how many lives were saved by allowing law abiding citizens to be armed.There is no way to know how many lives have been saved by the background checks we currently have. So If it prevents one mass murder, not allowing firearms to be housed with those who have confirmed mental illnesses is a reasonable restriction.
As for preventing the recent massacres, game planning last week’s defeat is not a winning strategy.
What we do know is that in other developed nations like the US, not having firearms has not lead to multiple weekly massacres like we have here quite often
Those other developed nations are nowhere close to us in terms of freedom. If their citizens were armed, their despots would no longer be in power.
Lol you are such a lying hack.You have yet to back up your claim. PatheticThat the Dems have a plan to do something and the blob and his supporters do not? You actually confirmed it.
Your confirmation is quite enough. Thank you.
Like you claiming adam Lanza obtained his weapons legally.
No. But his mom did.
Her son was diagnosed with mental health disorders and lived in a house with an arsenal which resulted in the deaths of 20 kids.
Perhaps we should not allow Arsenal’s to be housed with the mentally ill.
You’re welcome to provide your own solution. Oh wait, you don’t have one do you? And you’re content with weekly massacres.
Her weapons were secured in a safe. Why do you lie?
He killed her to get access to the weapons to carry out his plans.
Lol I didn't claim to have one. You claimed the dems did. I'm asking you to back up your claim.What kind of tougher background checks?
How do you keep guns away from the mentally ill?
Your solution, please. If you have one; which you don’t.
I must assume your post was more political hackery than reality.
Which is what I told Mac; the blob and his supporters have no solutions and are content with weekly massacres.
Do you know what you call someone that complains about a problem yet offers no solutions?
A whiner!
Feel free to offer your solution
What we do know is that in other developed nations like the US, not having firearms has not lead to multiple weekly massacres like we have here quite often
Lol you are such a lying hack.You have yet to back up your claim. Pathetic
Your confirmation is quite enough. Thank you.
Like you claiming adam Lanza obtained his weapons legally.
No. But his mom did.
Her son was diagnosed with mental health disorders and lived in a house with an arsenal which resulted in the deaths of 20 kids.
Perhaps we should not allow Arsenal’s to be housed with the mentally ill.
You’re welcome to provide your own solution. Oh wait, you don’t have one do you? And you’re content with weekly massacres.
Her weapons were secured in a safe. Why do you lie?
He killed her to get access to the weapons to carry out his plans.
Hmmm please quote where I said they weren’t, liar.
Kinda like there's no way of knowing how many lives were saved by allowing law abiding citizens to be armed.There is no way to know how many lives have been saved by the background checks we currently have. So If it prevents one mass murder, not allowing firearms to be housed with those who have confirmed mental illnesses is a reasonable restriction.
As for preventing the recent massacres, game planning last week’s defeat is not a winning strategy.
What we do know is that in other developed nations like the US, not having firearms has not lead to multiple weekly massacres like we have here quite often
Those other developed nations are nowhere close to us in terms of freedom. If their citizens were armed, their despots would no longer be in power.
Wow. That’s hilarious.
What we do know is that in other developed nations like the US, not having firearms has not lead to multiple weekly massacres like we have here quite often
We also know that not having access to firearms has led to China, North Korea, and Cuba
Lol you are such a lying hack.Your confirmation is quite enough. Thank you.
Like you claiming adam Lanza obtained his weapons legally.
No. But his mom did.
Her son was diagnosed with mental health disorders and lived in a house with an arsenal which resulted in the deaths of 20 kids.
Perhaps we should not allow Arsenal’s to be housed with the mentally ill.
You’re welcome to provide your own solution. Oh wait, you don’t have one do you? And you’re content with weekly massacres.
Her weapons were secured in a safe. Why do you lie?
He killed her to get access to the weapons to carry out his plans.
Hmmm please quote where I said they weren’t, liar.
You said there was an arsenal in the house. That is a lie.
