Something Weird Is Going on in Fulton County, Where Trump Is Expected to Be Indicted

[scruffy]

At some point there will be nasty people who will run for office. Nastier than any Prog. And because it is Democracy from what Progs push and promote and even with attempts to destroy any who run, they will win. And they will grow in numbers.

Wow. Someone gets it.

Human dynamics.

Y'know... the Founders came along right about the time the human race was learning about dynamics. Right around the time Coulomb came up with his law of electrostatics, and it was only 50 years till they had the whole thing figured out.

Dynamics was the hot science topic of the day, and the Founders were hip to it (that's probably why Ben Franklin was out there playing with a kite lol).

Coupled oscillators. Pendulums which when set near each other, "entrain" themselves.

It's 18th Century science by now, but these laws are physical.they can't be "disobeyed". They'll happen as surely as night follows day.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

That's right Joe Biden was a VP, a household name and carried with it a solid brand.

That's not illegal, or even unethical, so what's your point?

Well simp why were hunter associates visiting Jo Biden as VP?

 

[AntonToo]

Well simp why were hunter associates visiting Jo Biden as VP?

So no, you can't explain what's illegal about having a good brand described in what you quoted.

As to your new q? I have one for you too: Why do cats have two tails?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why would the crack head retard adding nothing to a business yet collecting millions call his dad the US VP during business meetings. Man that’s a tough nut to crack. Why would that happen?

Obviously it is as you remain unable to move past speculation and present any evidence supporting your narrative.

 

[Billiejeens]

Taking legal steps to try to overturn the apparent result of an election is not illegal. That is what Al Gore did. It is what Stacey Abrams did. It is how Al Franken got into the Senate.

 

[Billiejeens]

There are some felonious allegations, but they have nothing to do with Trump. One involved a perjury allegation, while the other centered on access to a voting machine. If true, what’s been reported about these incidents are crimes, but the infractions don’t call for impaneling a grand jury.

On some counts, the criticism from the January 6 indictment from Special Counsel Jack Smith has leeched into these charges: they’re attacks on free speech. And, as noted above, asking for a review of the votes or a recount isn’t illegal, though the new Democratic Party line is that pursuing such a course of action is a crime when it is most decidedly not.

 

[justoffal]

Read the Yellow King's post.

Then if you still don't get it, you're obviously a partisan bot who doesn't give one wit about the rule of law.

Democrat party has no law at all....GOP not much better.
Trump is stupid...but this prosecution is a sham. Beware this Genie....it is now permanently out of the bottle.

 

[Billiejeens]

Here is an odd one.

Overt act 6:

On or about the 21st day of November, 2020, MARK RANDALL MEADOWS sent a text message to United States Representative Scott Perry from Pennsylvania and stated, “Can you send me the number for the Speaker and the leader of PA legislature. POTUS wants to chat with them.” This was an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

But again, so what? Taking legal steps to try to overturn the apparent result of an election is not illegal.

 

[Soupnazi630]

lol

That's like blaming the Republicans for J6.

Both irrefutably true

 

[Billiejeens]

Fulton County jail, where Trump is supposed to surrender, is under DOJ investigation​

Ought oh.

 

[Billiejeens]

Obviously it is as you remain unable to move past speculation and present any evidence supporting your narrative.

The facts are that $20 Million (plus or minus) was given to various members of the Biden family, some through shell companies.
The members of the Biden family benefited from this money.

Correct so far?

 

[AntonToo]

Fulton County jail, where Trump is supposed to surrender, is under DOJ investigation​

Ought oh.

Aaand? What exactly do you think is the implication?

 

[AntonToo]

The facts are that $20 Million (plus or minus) was given to various members of the Biden family, some through shell companies.
The members of the Biden family benefited from this money.

Correct so far?

Yes, correct.

Point being what? That it's illegal for relatives of Joe Biden to get paid?

Never mind his family, while being a POSTUS Trump HIMSELF was being paid DIRECTLY by all kinds of countries where he himself stated he had conflict of interest. His foreign policy advisor has even stated that Trump's foreign policy was skewed by these conflicts of interest (see Turkey for example and his backstabing of our long time Kurdish allies).

But when it comes to Joe all of a sudden it's a crime from someone in his family to get paid? How about even an ounce of consistency?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Here is an odd one.

Overt act 6:

On or about the 21st day of November, 2020, MARK RANDALL MEADOWS sent a text message to United States Representative Scott Perry from Pennsylvania and stated, “Can you send me the number for the Speaker and the leader of PA legislature. POTUS wants to chat with them.” This was an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.

But again, so what? Taking legal steps to try to overturn the apparent result of an election is not illegal.

“So what”?

^ There’s your problem.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The facts are that $20 Million (plus or minus) was given to various members of the Biden family, some through shell companies.
The members of the Biden family benefited from this money.

Correct so far?

You have yet to show criminality or that Joe was involved. You’re simply speculating.

 

[Billiejeens]

Yes, correct.

Point being what? That it's illegal for relatives of Joe Biden to get paid?

If you would - Read the statute: you would see that it is in fact illegal for biden to use his VP influence or gravitas to enrich his family, as he would indirectly benefit.

This could take multiple forms, corruption, bribery, influence peddling.

The point being is that all the USMBlawyers (eyeroll) that keep saying that there is no direct link to Joe, are making a point that may or may not be true, but certainly is not relevant.

 

[Billiejeens]

“So what”?

^ There’s your problem.

This is your problem.

Taking legal steps to try to overturn the apparent result of an election is not illegal.

 

[Billiejeens]

You have yet to show criminality or that Joe was involved. You’re simply speculating.

I am simply understanding what is being reported.

 

[MagicMike]

You have zero problem with a prosecutor who files an indictment while the jury is still out, but he's the one in denial.

Yeah, makes perfect sense.

Nobody filed an indictment while the jury is still out.
That is fake news.
The document that appeared briefly online was a test template that lacked the clerk's official seal or the disposition of the indictment.
Nothing was "filed" at that point. The template popped up on a screen...and then was promptly deleted.
It's another nothingburger

 

[AntonToo]

If you would - Read the statute: you would see that it is in fact illegal for biden to use his VP influence or gravitas to enrich his family, as he would indirectly benefit.

This could take multiple forms, corruption, bribery, influence peddling.

The point being is that all the USMBlawyers (eyeroll) that keep saying that there is no direct link to Joe, are making a point that may or may not be true, but certainly is not relevant.

You don't know wtf you are talking about. Unless you can show a specific act, done for specific agreed to personal gain, you have nothing.

Turkey was DIRECTLY paying Trump. Trump himself stated that he has a conflict of interest there. And sure enough Turkey got plenty of Trump favorable foreign policy that reversed America's prior stance and screwed our long time Kurdish allies. Trump foreign policy advisor straight up admitted that Trump's finances were steering his foreign policy.

This is WAAAAAY more damning than anything you fools have on Joe and yet Trump never faced prosecution for this because AGAIN, there has to be specific quid pro quo established, not just speculation about someone getting paid and favorable policy provided.