YoursTruly
Platinum Member
- Dec 21, 2019
- 10,437
- 6,412
- 940
- Thread starter
- #161
That is the point though, I AGREE with the fact that they should not get special treatment HOWEVER, do you actually agree with DeSantis targeting a specific company and trying to punish them for speech?
Their speech? I think it was more about the millions they funneled to attorneys and special interest to fight something the parents of these children were asking for. The victims were the children. Anyone doing anything to children, especially against the parents wants & wishes, should be punished. In any way, shape or form. DeSantis did it within the law.
It's a damn shame there's very little actual punishment for those who (IMO) abuse children this way. Especially if they have billions of $$$ to throw around.
"Freedom of speech," I get that. But I'll never side with people who are trying to normalize trannies and their push to educate young children on that lifestyle. The rights of the parents override Disney's free speech, IMO.
Would you feel the same when a left wing politician targets gun companies with legal action? How about if Biden shuts down Truth Social? Where does this core political stance lead because from where I sit it just looks like a double standard where you sacrifice core values in the pursuit of political power. That does NOT lead to better outcomes.
These are adult issues, that involve only adults. We can work out (or fight about) problems that we create. Just leave the children out of it. Their adult fights are coming soon enough.
This is exactly the same thing as sacrificing a little freedom for a little security:
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin
I know that quote well. And I agree with it. But the security that DeSantis and his legislature was fighting for was for the parents, to ensure that those (government paid) teachers weren't overstepping into the parents territory.
Absolutely not.
Cops lie. That is just a fact. Give them that power and they will abuse it. Cops are not there to judge, they are there to enforce public peace and catch the criminals. They should be authorized to use necessary force and that is it.
Why do you think the most powerful governmental power exercised over the people, police, is somehow immune from the rampant corruption of power that I think you recognize is rife through the rest of the government? I do not trust the government to run a shrimp stall, there is no way in hell I would trust them to decide if I deserve a brutal beating. The judicial system is directly set up to give me the ability to answer charges against me and is generally, effective. We already have the tools to deal with these people.
I have been robbed at gunpoint exactly one time in my life and it was not by a random guy in the street. It was by a cop. They are necessary but they do not need more power. They need the ability to exercise the power they have and there is a serious problem with policing and the left right now but they certainly do not need any encouragement to beat the public.
Have you read green mile? That is exactly the type of situation that the justice system can deal with but the police absolutely cannot.
Good, I agree with that.
That does not negate the authoritarian policies and actions he generally supports. Most right wing pols are for firing lax prosecutors but I am not willing to vote for an authoritarian to get rid of bad prosecutors. I can shoot a moron that tries to break into my house. I cant do shit against a government official.
This cop issue is a deep dark one. It's a spiderweb of incidences, issues, attitudes..... physical & mental. I completely understand there's bad cops out there. But I guarantee you, there's a LOT more bad citizens out there than cops. And because this country is so lax on prosecuting and punishing people, it only creates more.
One only has to look at places like San Francisco and Chicago. San Fran decriminalized drugs, and they got more druggies. They decriminalized theft, up to a certain dollar amount. So they got more thieves.
Almost ALL of those involves an innocent victim. Be it physically, mentally or financially. The justice system and so many people seem to be more concerned with protecting the rights of the criminal, than their victims. The victims should be #1 on the list of priorities.
Who knew the name of the woman that George Floyd robbed and beat at gun point? Who knew the name of the clerk that refused to accept his fake money? Who knew the names of the children Floyd refused to pay child support for? Hardly anyone. But everyone knows George Floyd and the cop who held him down.
Civil & constitutional rights are important for suspects. But for those who committed a crime, they gave up their rights as soon as they committed the crime. Not when the judge hands down his/her sentencing.
We don't live in a perfect society. And we don't have robot LEO's. But we could be a LOT better off if criminals weren't babysat by the justice system.
BTW, I also believe our prison system is whack. It's retarded to sentence anyone, especially violent criminals to a set amount of time. They were unfit for society when they went in. And should not be released until they are fit for society.
But with that said, prisons should have a tiered system to group those who are trying to better themselves with each other and away from those who are not.
I wrote a whole thing on this, a couple of years ago. It's missing some details. But I think it would be a good idea. And almost tax free.