Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So it's "government" land, not public land.Hate to break it to you but land that is labeled "public land" is often owned by states or the federal government and is said to be held in trust for the general public.
.Public and Private Land Percentages by US States : Facts & Information : SummitPost
Public and Private Land Percentages by US States : SummitPost.org : Climbing, hiking, mountaineeringwww.summitpost.org
So it's "government" land, not public land.
LOL Any more lies to tell us? Solar is now the least expensive way to generate electricity."The Biden administration has approved a massive solar power project in California that will produce enough power to electrify 90,000 homes. That’s the good news. The bad news is that producing the solar panels in China using coal-fired electrical power plants to generate electricity will produce almost as much CO2 as the fossil fuel plants the solar power is supposed to replace."
I've often heard it takes a lot of coal to make solar panels. Now, this article sheds some light on just how 'dirty' so-called 'clean energy' is.
"Manufacturing solar panels is a dirty business. Starting with the raw mineral quartz, the refining process produces the highly toxic substance, silicon tetrachloride, that some manufacturers simply end up dumping. Huge amounts of power and heat must be used to manufacture the photovoltaic cells."
"Solar power is still far more expensive than power generated by natural gas and oil."
LOL Almost all Forest Service and BLM land is free for anyone to roam over, provided they follow some common sense rules. You can hunt on those lands, fish on the rivers on them, hike and mountain climb on them. They belong to us all, and should remain that way forever."Public land" is a misnomer. If these lands were free for public use they would quickly be 'developed' or destroyed, thus the need for government control of 'public' lands.
Of course not. Nuclear reactors are all 100% failsafe, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima all proved that.Yet, nothing you say could happen. Not with all the safeguards in place. Purely impossible.
Ivanpah was an experiment, it demonstrated that it was far more expensive than photovoltaics, and is not the future of solar power.Ivanpah is a failure on many levels.
It destroyed 6 square miles of nature and all the life the land supported in a fragile ecosystem
Ivanpah burns natural gas to make up for its failure as a solar power source.
Ivanpah fries countless birds in midair as they fly through the death ray created.
Ivanpah is an eyesore, heavy industry in pristine wilderness
www.greentechmedia.com
"The Biden administration has approved a massive solar power project in California that will produce enough power to electrify 90,000 homes. That’s the good news. The bad news is that producing the solar panels in China using coal-fired electrical power plants to generate electricity will produce almost as much CO2 as the fossil fuel plants the solar power is supposed to replace."
How much does solar energy cost at night? And also, as a homework, try to calculate a solar power plant with real generation (not installed) of 1 GWh in 24/7/360 mode.LOL Any more lies to tell us? Solar is now the least expensive way to generate electricity.
Three Mile Island, zero injuries.Of course not. Nuclear reactors are all 100% failsafe, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima all proved that.
You are a lousy filthy liar.. ivanpah financed by Google, declared a shining example of what solar can do by Obama himself, is not an experiment.Ivanpah was an experiment, it demonstrated that it was far more expensive than photovoltaics, and is not the future of solar power.
America’s Concentrated Solar Power Companies Have All but Disappeared
SolarReserve, one of America’s last remaining CSP developers, appears to have ceased operations — just as some global markets may be warming up.
libs believe that the only solution to our energy needs is government subsidized alternative energyIvanpah is a failure on many levels.
It destroyed 6 square miles of nature and all the life the land supported in a fragile ecosystem
Ivanpah burns natural gas to make up for its failure as a solar power source.
Ivanpah fries countless birds in midair as they fly through the death ray created.
Ivanpah is an eyesore, heavy industry in pristine wilderness
Produce enough power (on a sunny day)....."The Biden administration has approved a massive solar power project in California that will produce enough power to electrify 90,000 homes. That’s the good news. The bad news is that producing the solar panels in China using coal-fired electrical power plants to generate electricity will produce almost as much CO2 as the fossil fuel plants the solar power is supposed to replace."
I've often heard it takes a lot of coal to make solar panels. Now, this article sheds some light on just how 'dirty' so-called 'clean energy' is.
"Manufacturing solar panels is a dirty business. Starting with the raw mineral quartz, the refining process produces the highly toxic substance, silicon tetrachloride, that some manufacturers simply end up dumping. Huge amounts of power and heat must be used to manufacture the photovoltaic cells."
"Solar power is still far more expensive than power generated by natural gas and oil."
Not to mention the lucrative leases for oil, gas, grazing, mining, timber, etc.LOL Almost all Forest Service and BLM land is free for anyone to roam over, provided they follow some common sense rules. You can hunt on those lands, fish on the rivers on them, hike and mountain climb on them. They belong to us all, and should remain that way forever.
We really need to examine how we consume energy more closely. Lots of opportunities for conservation. Also lots of renewable energy sources going to waste; food waste, biomass. The biggest waste involves our wasteful lifestyle.
"The Biden administration has approved a massive solar power project in California that will produce enough power to electrify 90,000 homes. That’s the good news. The bad news is that producing the solar panels in China using coal-fired electrical power plants to generate electricity will produce almost as much CO2 as the fossil fuel plants the solar power is supposed to replace."
I've often heard it takes a lot of coal to make solar panels. Now, this article sheds some light on just how 'dirty' so-called 'clean energy' is.
"Manufacturing solar panels is a dirty business. Starting with the raw mineral quartz, the refining process produces the highly toxic substance, silicon tetrachloride, that some manufacturers simply end up dumping. Huge amounts of power and heat must be used to manufacture the photovoltaic cells."
"Solar power is still far more expensive than power generated by natural gas and oil."
Laws must be enforced in order to do any good. But sometimes the laws are counterproductive. We just got notice that we must build a fence around our dumpster. This will require a smaller dumpster and thus more 'pickups' per month, as well the truck driver will have to spend more time, and fuel, maneuvering his huge truck, opening and closing the gates, etc. And the dumpster isn't an eyesore to begin with. It's nonsense. In fact the dumpsters themselves can be made to look better instead of requiring an expensive 'building' be constructed to hide them.Already a major area of discussion and research for the past thirty some years. Numerous laws are based on attempts to create a more sustainable lifestyle.
You might want to look into subjects like "sustainable development" where lifestyle is one of the key areas of research and law.
.
Laws must be enforced in order to do any good. But sometimes the laws are counterproductive. We just got notice that we must build a fence around our dumpster. This will require a smaller dumpster and thus more 'pickups' per month, as well the truck driver will have to spend more time, and fuel, maneuvering his huge truck, opening and closing the gates, etc. And the dumpster isn't an eyesore to begin with. It's nonsense. In fact the dumpsters themselves can be made to look better instead of requiring an expensive 'building' be constructed to hide them.
you are right, your lifestyle is a waste, you can end it now and save us your carbon footprintWe really need to examine how we consume energy more closely. Lots of opportunities for conservation. Also lots of renewable energy sources going to waste; food waste, biomass. The biggest waste involves our wasteful lifestyle.
Those little things add up to some really big things. The dumpster ordinance applies to all outdoor dumpsters in my city. Big waste of extra time and fuel for those trucks (those trucks are huge).Dumpsters are the key to saving energy??? WTF?
Seems you are caught up in issues that have very little to do with energy savings or sustainable development but I can appreciate that local ordinances are often focused on esthetics and can be nonsensical. Making a beautiful dumpster however is not a top priority on anyone's list.....except you of course.
.
