I am an Environmental Engineer that knows quite a bit about pollution and the effects of human activity on the earth.
So, you're confirming you have zero background in the topic being discussed, which is climate.
What I know is that this AGW hypothesis is nothing more than bullshit.
Just as flat-earthers "know" the round-earth theory is bullshit. The certitude of your crazy belief does not make that belief any less crazy.
Climate change and global warming is real. It has been going on since the end of the last ice age. However, there are absolutely no real facts to prove that man has affected the climate of the earth to any significant or even measurable degree.
Nonsense. The directly measured stratospheric cooling, increase in backradiation, and decrease in outgoing longwave in the GHG bands have no natural explanation. That means it's not part of a natural cycle, and your belief there is wrong. And if you didn't know about such things -- and you clearly don't -- you shouldn't be bothering the grownups. You know so little about the topic, you're unaware of how little you know.
In contrast, we on the reason based side are very well informed. We keep up on the propaganda from the conspiracy blogs that you rely on, which is why we can debunk it so quickly.
There is not even any proof that CO2 is a greenhouse gas
That's complete detachment from reality. If you'd like, I can point to a list of of hundreds of references from the HITRAN database which quantify the IR absorption spectrum of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
In fact there have been times in the history of the earth when the CO2 levels were much higher than today and the earth much cooler.
And if anyone ever said that CO2 was the only thing driving climate, that might be a valid point. Since nobody has said that, it just looks dumb and desperate.
There have also been times when the CO2 levels were lower and the temperatures warmer. In fact all the credible data indicates that CO2 emission lags temperature changes.
And that all fits in with standard climate theory nicely. CO2 is both a forcing and a feedback.
The fact that the real science does not support the AGW theory
But it does. If someone told you otherwise, they lied to you. In contrast, your theory fails completely at explaining past climate. Your theory, for example, can't explain why earth melted out of the snowball earth phase. Being that reality contradicts your theory, your theory is conclusively disproved.
is the reason we get all this fabricated data out of the Environmental Wackos.
In the same way as that, Flat-earthers will claim all the round-earth data is faked. It's normal for fringe cult extremists to invoke a conspiracy to explain why all the data disagrees with their extremist fringe cult.
As far as the sun is concerned. It takes a real moron to make the claim that the changes in the output of the sun does not effect the climate of the earth.
As I never said or implied such a thing, and nobody in the science has ever said or implied such a thing, you got some 'splainin to do. Did you say that out of stupidity or dishonesty?
Your insult rant there reminded me of how Scientologists react when it's pointed out how they believe in nonsense. At this stage, you're only interesting as an example of the abnormal psychology possessed by hardcore cultists.