The formula or calculations should be full proof for it's survival, otherwise it should be calculated in a manor that allows it to ride the roller coaster of life in order to survive by way of the full proof formula that was created, and this regardless of any type of movement in population whether it be a lack there of or in a growth period.
The problem allegedly began when the democraps or maybe others that might be involved in nefarious ways, had begun their campaigns of replacement theories and/or of theft in order to fuel their theories in order to manipulate the system and retain power by way of abusing every system we have had or still have in order to do so. Nothing is safe !!
The numbers don't lie, and the formula should be full proof in it's design if not abused and/or stolen from. We are seeing numbers right now concerning what the Democraps and other's were doing that was killing and abusing every system we have had in hopes to keep power and abuse that power by way of.
M.S-S.G.A is my idea, and it can be done immediately through the removal of governments grimey paws in ways that it has been conducting our affairs recklessly in derelict of it's duties. We need to have new reps placed over these programs that will gaurd them and keep them solvent in hopes to stop other's from stealing from it or abusing said programs.
When anyone saves money or starts a plan of action to save money for that Rainey day fund, then they create the plan around their finances and future outlook. Of course the formula they implement will allow them to save alot of money sometimes, and then not so much at other times, but regardless the goal is to make positive contributions regardless of the amount every time. So the key is to save at a steady pace, and this regardless of the amount of input while navigating the ups and downs that might be encountered along the way. It must be done in a way that in the end the money is going to be there for the withdrawal based on the steadfast way of working the thing throughout the year's.
We've had individual Americans that have been experts at taking nothing and making huge gains out of that nothing, but our government acts as a rebellious teenager with our money, otherwise by sneaking into the system and robbing it where next they tell the parent/senior dad or mom "hey I don't know what happened to the money it's just gone".
Many Americans when decide enough is enough after working for 40+year's in life, and had decide to retire from a grueling hard career where they then draw their check under penalty due to the age that getting out of the career was decided on is there option to take. Even so they still might want to change to an easier profession that allows them to stay busy, and also to help their new employer to be prosperous by working full time with that new employer (whats wrong with this ? nothing), even though already drawing their earned retirement check they are in a new easier more workable job that keeps them busy in life, and although not making the money that they were, it matters not because between the two revenues being received drawing and working still it's a win win for everybody involved. Even though the retiree has decided to draw at 62, if he or she still works a full time but way easier Job on life, then he or she is still a contributor to the SS and income tax system. If caps remain on allowed income after receiving SS, then the incentive for the person to work gets removed, and the person might fall into poverty where they become a bigger burden on they system as they become more and more dependent on the check while their health declines rapidly at this point.
Remove the caps now !!!
My idea to take the income caps away, and to allow the recipient at any level to stay working at full capacity if chooses to do so is a positive thing IMHO, so thereby he or she continues to pay into the SS and income tax system onward therefore being an add to it instead of being a negative drain on it. This would inject those new revenues back into the program for it's solvency if were allowed to do so.
To make the program financially solvent and ensure long-term sustainability, a multifaceted approach is required, focusing on managing the program properly, diversifying revenue, controlling costs or theft, and shoring up (by amending some areas it if need be), to insure the sound financial planning or calculative formula already built into the program.
