So When will We Bomb Korea?

Geaux4it

Intensity Factor 4-Fold
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
22,873
Reaction score
4,322
Points
290
Location
Tennessee
I hope by 1430 hours tomorrow. Or at least, put a bullet in the tyrants head

-Geaux
 
Or 60 to 100 percent wall in South USA for US troops philosofy get right.
 
I am surprised this isn't getting more talk. NK murders one of our citizens and we are doing nothing? I expect that from Obama but I expected something more from Trump.

What more I am not sure, I certainly do not want another war.

What was the guy doing in NK?
 
Yes. We should attack NK if Trump don't wanted the wall begin of 2018.

South strenght needs the wall.

More US Marines for Navy reserve some I said in Military forum.

600.000 US Marines in Navy reserve.
 
The demo-lites who voted for Trump are afraid of NK is why.
 
The demo-lites who voted for Trump are afraid of NK is why.
No reason to be afraid of NK on our side of the water, but we've got a shit load of Americans sitting on the South Korean border and a bunch more in Japan, not to mention those people are our friends. So rather than "afraid," maybe we should use another word to describe why we hesitate to bomb NK for killing a hostage?
 
Maybe 500.000 South Korea troops.

Maybe 30.000 Japanese troops.

Maybe 17.000 US Army troops.

Wants to attacking NK's troops.
 
Last edited:
The demo-lites who voted for Trump are afraid of NK is why.
No reason to be afraid of NK on our side of the water, but we've got a shit load of Americans sitting on the South Korean border and a bunch more in Japan, not to mention those people are our friends. So rather than "afraid," maybe we should use another word to describe why we hesitate to bomb NK for killing a hostage?

"Biding time" in the hope that one of his own generals will gut him.

Hell, a quick ball-point pen through the orbital socket would do it.
 
Maybe Trump's plannes are war in NK or at home if the wall is clear jobs.
 
The demo-lites who voted for Trump are afraid of NK is why.
No reason to be afraid of NK on our side of the water, but we've got a shit load of Americans sitting on the South Korean border and a bunch more in Japan, not to mention those people are our friends. So rather than "afraid," maybe we should use another word to describe why we hesitate to bomb NK for killing a hostage?

"Biding time" in the hope that one of his own generals will gut him.

Hell, a quick ball-point pen through the orbital socket would do it.
Ick. Sure would work, though, but at this point I think it's pretty hopeless to expect NK to do it to him. Where's the sneaky, criminal CIA when you need it? Insisting they be "transparent" and act like boyscouts was the stupidest damned thing we've ever done.
 
We should do another fake surgical strike to kill Kim-Fat, like we did for Osama.
 
We should do another fake surgical strike to kill Kim-Fat, like we did for Osama.

According me we can kill Lill Kim if we go to nukes war if NK trying to alert on enemy side we can destroy for NK.
 
Poor beer. Is this the best Google translate can do?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom