First you prove human activity has no link to our changing climate. Then I'll post more links to NOAA, Scientific American, National Geographic and other credible sources as evidence you and other deniers are full of shit.
Science works the other way silly boy. YOU have to show through empirical data that mankind is having an effect. Not a computer model and the links to your pet agencies merely go to their OPINION statements. Not data. For someone who claims to be so smart how is it that you can't figure out the difference between fiction and fact...
Silly boy has concluded you're a punk and an asshole. SB also wonders why the crazy right wing hates the earth, and posits a conclusion based their local weather report.
Yes, it may be cold outside, but that is the dumbest comment of some of the stupidest people. Science creates models and tests theories; fools turn on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh and parrot the bullshit which protects polluters. I suppose the reason people like you deny the theory that climate change is a product of human activity is a product of how successful the propaganda is on the minds of biddable people.
In 300 pages not one denier has made a credible argument that human activity does not impact our changing climate. The prevailing theory by the fools is tens of thousands of scientists provided data manipulated so as to garner more government money to add to their lavish lifestyle.
How silly is that, boy!
I don't give a crap what a silly boy like you thinks about me. What I do care about is the perversion of science that you asshats have allowed to occur because you are so ******* stupid you don't know even the basics. The scientific method, which your faithers violate at every turn DEMANDS that if YOU make the claim it is YOU that has to support it. Not us. All we have to do is present factual data that you are wrong. Which we have done with every stupid claim about AGW that you imbeciles have ever made.
In 300 pages there has not been one shred of empirical data that SUPPORTS the idea that man has an impact. In fact there are THOUSANDS of pieces of empirical data that shows you are all full of shit. You no longer rely on facts, silly boy, you rely on faith. Faith is religious not scientific.
Learn the difference.
Really? Post 10 of the "THOUSANDS of pieces of empirical data that shows you are all full of shit."
Show me anything which contradicts with credible evidence the facts in the link here:
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Causes
Otherwise I will conclude you are a member of the Ostrich Party, shown below:
Shows beyond doubt that CO2 LAGS temperature. ONE.
Shows beyond doubt that long wave IR can only penetrate microns deep into the very ocean that it is supposed to warm.. TWO
Shows beyond doubt that 90% of the glacial retreat has occurred BEFORE the year 1900. THREE
Shows beyond doubt that the Arctic ice is greater than in 2007 despite claims it would be gone by 2013. FOUR
Shows beyond doubt that the Antarctic sea ice level is still at near record level (even though it is summer there) and the claim by your faithers was that it would be the canary in the coal mine and be at LOW levels. FIVE
In 2008 the IPCC claimed that by 2010 there would be between 30 and 50 million climate refugees from islands in the Carribean and the pacific ocean. The reality is their populations have INCREASED. Then the UN tried to disappear that claim and even failed to do that properly......SIX.
What happened to the climate refugees?
The PAUSE continues... The black line is reality, the green lines are the models....SEVEN
The Recent Slowing in the Rise of Global Temperatures | Remote Sensing Systems
Trenberth claims that the ocean ate the heat. ARGO shows no increase in temperature in either the mid or deep ocean temps. EIGHT
AGW propagandists tell us that the non existent ocean warming is bleaching the corals. New studies show that the real cause is the chemicals in sunscreen.... NINE
Sunscreen Chemical Threatens Coral Reefs
Additive used in personal-care products since the 1960s to protect against ultraviolet light
Sunscreen Chemical Threatens Coral Reefs
The claim that snow would become a thing of the past as early as 2013! All claims made by AGW faithers, all sucked up by morons like you, and all shown to be wrong to the point that they disowned those claims and now proclaim with a straight face that global warming causes more snow. TEN
1. “Due to global warming, the coming winters in the local regions will become milder.”
Stefan Rahmstorf, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, University of Potsdam, February 8, 2006
****
2. “Milder winters, drier summers: Climate study shows a need to adapt in Saxony Anhalt.”
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Press Release, January 10, 2010.
****
3. “More heat waves, no snow in the winter… Climate models… over 20 times more precise than the UN IPCC global models. In no other country do we have more precise calculations of climate consequences. They should form the basis for political planning… Temperatures in the wintertime will rise the most… there will be less cold air coming to Central Europe from the east…In the Alps winters will be 2°C warmer already between 2021 and 2050.”
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, September 2, 2008.
106. June 8, 1972, Christian Science Monitor: “Arctic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000.”
****
107. May 15, 1989, Associated Press: “Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide [USA] two degrees by 2010.”
The big list of failed climate predictions
The big list of failed climate predictions
