So, What Was The Bottom Line To The Chat Group Security Flub?

The staff member who added the lib journalist could be an obama-biden mole
From the snippets of this nonsense I've followed, it was evidently one Waltz' staffers. Don't know where he/she came from.
 
The staff member who added the lib journalist could be an obama-biden mole
Just keep making shit up jerk off

Beyond the fact that one of these assholes actually invited a journalist to the chat
Have you ever BEEN on a group chat?

I have. Dozens and dozens of them. Of course none as important as this one but oddly… I knew every person on those chats.

Every time. All of them.

How did they not realize that one of the people on that chat was not only a stranger but a reporter?

Total incompetence

Fucking amateur hour
 
So you have zero actual evidence to base that claim on.

Fuck off
I have as much as you do

You are a very unhappy person

And I dont feel sorry for you at all

Libs deserve it
 
How did they not realize that one of the people on that chat was not only a stranger but a reporter?
If you dont know then you have nrver been in a group chat
 
And just like that, a narrative is born.
:spinner:
It's not a narrative Seaman SeaMajor. It's a fact. This is the biggest mass of incompetence to inhabit DC in our lifetime.
You have actual retards running the show now. A drunk at DOD. A vaccine denier at HHS. A complete waste of space at DNI. An enforcer at the head of DOJ (she does look good in a bikini).

All bowing and....erm..well..."kissing" the....yikes....(find a happy place, find a happy place) of the savior. :auiqs.jpg:
 
If you dont know then you have nrver been in a group chat
Again… I’ve been on dozens and dozens of them and never once was on one where I didn’t know all the participants
 
Again… I’ve been on dozens and dozens of them and never once was on one where I didn’t know all the participants
Only if they have something to say

It appears that all the lib journalist did was lurk and listen
 
Only if they have something to say

It appears that all the lib journalist did was lurk and listen
Obviously you have never been on a group chat

All attendees are listed
 
Only if they have something to say

It appears that all the lib journalist did was lurk and listen
He thought he was being pranked. Set up. Which is exactly what I would have thought. Given this regime's behavior so far, it wouldn't have been much of a stretch. But let's face it, after the first text, somebody at DOD should have wised up.
Wasn't this the same fucking crew who tried to crucify Clinton for having an email server that they thought was insecure? :auiqs.jpg:

This is why you don't appoint hacks and billionaires to run government agencies. Because running government...isn't like running a business. :)
 
Don't get snared in their little trap. Their ploy is to force us in to a position where we have to defend President Trump.

Just ignore them.

It sounds like you don't like the prospect of defending the indefensible. I wouldn't either. Trump is a clown and so is the rest of his circus.
 
It's not a narrative Seaman SeaMajor. It's a fact. This is the biggest mass of incompetence to inhabit DC in our lifetime.
You have actual retards running the show now. A drunk at DOD. A vaccine denier at HHS. A complete waste of space at DNI. An enforcer at the head of DOJ (she does look good in a bikini).

All bowing and....erm..well..."kissing" the....yikes....(find a happy place, find a happy place) of the savior. :auiqs.jpg:
You're denying that it's a NARRATIVE by barraging me with a STREAM OF NARRATIVES.
Self-awareness much?
:cuckoo:
 
Military plans in an unsecured channel is not a narrative; it’s a fact.
Some asshole got linked to the chat. It wasn't breached or otherwise compromised.
Military OUTCOMES were discussed, not PLANS.
Signal is approved by the CIA.
FACTS, not narratives.
GFY
:dev3:
 
It's not a narrative Seaman SeaMajor. It's a fact. This is the biggest mass of incompetence to inhabit DC in our lifetime.
You have actual retards running the show now. A drunk at DOD. A vaccine denier at HHS. A complete waste of space at DNI. An enforcer at the head of DOJ (she does look good in a bikini).

All bowing and....erm..well..."kissing" the....yikes....(find a happy place, find a happy place) of the savior. :auiqs.jpg:
Some asshole got linked to the chat. It wasn't breached or otherwise compromised.
Military OUTCOMES were discussed, not PLANS.
Signal is approved by the CIA.
FACTS, not narratives.
GFY
:fu:
 
Some asshole got linked to the chat. It wasn't breached or otherwise compromised.
Military OUTCOMES were discussed, not PLANS.
Signal is approved by the CIA.
FACTS, not narratives.
Plans were discussed. Review the texts. It was all done on an unsecured app. Hegseth and Gabbard need to go. They’re a danger to our security, regardless of what the flacks say.
 
Back
Top Bottom