RandallFlagg
PROUD Tea Party Member
- Dec 5, 2012
- 8,578
- 2,335
- 280
Is the Owl concerned that women should be beaten regularly by men and put in their place?
Nope. Only YOU should be beaten regularly. Might wise your dumbass up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the Owl concerned that women should be beaten regularly by men and put in their place?
No, it doesn't surprise me. Almost nothing these RWNJs say surprises me any longer.I wasn't talking to you. The OP takes a woman being attacked and uses it, drumrolllllllllllllllllllll....to attack women.I like them just fine. Why do you hate them? I'm all for equality.You don't much like women, do you little man?Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
This surprises you? Last night some tard was on here arguing that I hated women because I don't think a man should ever hit one.
They should. But the NFL is full of hypocrites.Will any NFL player who assaults someone receive the same punishment as Rice ?
Will any NFL player who assaults someone receive the same punishment as Rice ?
As do I. I even am starting, more and more, to support conscripted service. I didn't when I was in the service, but now that I'm retired and working in the "real" world, I'm leaning more and more towards it. Young folks these days, I swear...
If Rice's fiancee had military training and a gun, he would not have been able to deck her like he did. Your argument is a Fail Argument.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?![]()
So you are arguing FOR concealed carry now?
Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
Wait....what do penises have to do with anything?Women are women...no matter what the LIBTARDS say. Stop trying to give them penises. Rice fucked up but it should not take his life away.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
==========If Rice's fiancee had military training and a gun, he would not have been able to deck her like he did. Your argument is a Fail Argument.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?![]()
Usually sexist men like yourself secretly know you are not capable of being on a battlefield. You're a wuss and you lash out on an entire gender to not feel like one.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
He's 67 years old, but yeah.Or George W. Bush?That's stupid but par for the course. Very few soldiers are combat-ready troops, even males. Can you imagine Bradley Manning, or whatever he's calling herself now, on the front line.Then you just admitted that females can be soldiers, since the main requirement to surviving the battlefield is the ability to kill before being killed..
I agree.
As do I. I even am starting, more and more, to support conscripted service. I didn't when I was in the service, but now that I'm retired and working in the "real" world, I'm leaning more and more towards it. Young folks these days, I swear...
I never ever have argued AGAINST it. I'm a 2nd amendment support and multiple gun owner.If Rice's fiancee had military training and a gun, he would not have been able to deck her like he did. Your argument is a Fail Argument.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?![]()
So you are arguing FOR concealed carry now?
^ @bodecea
respond please
that's a good question. should the NFL take a zero tolerance stance towards all assault charges... i think that would be a good move. there's no reason for a football player to get in a fight anywhere.Will any NFL player who assaults someone receive the same punishment as Rice ?
i could physically subdue my wife.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
Usually sexist men like yourself secretly know you are not capable of being on a battlefield. You're a wuss and you lash out on an entire gender to not feel like one.
i could physically subdue my wife.Women do not belong on any battlefield, and standards should not be lowered in order to get women to be firefighters, cause women are simply weaker on average than men.
Right?
she's also a better soldier on her worst day than i would ever be.
i'm curious, how many soldiers do you think got in fist fights with the enemy in iraq and afghanistan?
that's a good question. should the NFL take a zero tolerance stance towards all assault charges... i think that would be a good move. there's no reason for a football player to get in a fight anywhere.Will any NFL player who assaults someone receive the same punishment as Rice ?