So much for the mantra of LESS federal government intrusion....

[saveliberty]

Just holding up a mirror to your hypocrisy, right wingers..........When a county does not want a pipeline through their land, what should the government do then???

You might want to start a new thread, instead of deflecting on this one. The one you lost badly on, because you have no grasp of facts.

 

[saveliberty]

If States were allowed to dictate immigration policy, each ones individual preferences would impact other States that may not want the same level of immigration, due to States not being able to control their own internal borders.

true, like restriction of gun sales and open-carry laws?

Deflection. guns are protected under the Constitution moron.

 

[Weatherman2020]

One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Why is cutting off funding intrusion?

 

[kaz]

One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Naturalization laws are an enumerated power of the Federal Government in the Constitution. No one is arguing the Federal Government should not be able to exercise actually enumerated Federal authority

[/thread]

 

[P@triot]

One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Not in the least. It's the requirement of the federal government to enforce constitutional federal laws. Federal laws trump state and local ordinances when they are constitutional. And our immigration laws are 100% constitutional.

Next?

 

[P@triot]

One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Naturalization laws are an enumerated power of the Federal Government in the Constitution. No one is arguing the Federal Government should not be able to exercise actually enumerated Federal authority

[/thread]

You beat me to it Kaz!

 

[P@triot]

One of Trump's proposed action will eliminate "sanctuary cities" -- cities that do not deport undocumented immigrant.....Sounds good, but does it not smack just a bit of MORE federal government intrusion on local control?

Just asking.....LOL

Here you go snowflake. Take a close look at your insane hypocrisy...

What happened to the progressive false narrative about the federal government?

 

[martybegan]

If States were allowed to dictate immigration policy, each ones individual preferences would impact other States that may not want the same level of immigration, due to States not being able to control their own internal borders.

true, like restriction of gun sales and open-carry laws?

Unlike immigration, RKBA is enshrined in the constitution, and shall not be infringed.

 

[P@triot]

name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.

Bwahahahaha! Wait...is it your position that we don't have immigration laws on the books?

 

[P@triot]

name.....specifically.....the LAW that states that "sanctuary cities" are illegal.....Go on, look it up, learn something.

Here you go, stupid....

2474. Elements Of Aiding And Abetting
The elements necessary to convict under aiding and abetting theory are
1. That the accused had specific intent to facilitate the commission of a crime by another;

2. That the accused had the requisite intent of the underlying substantive offense;

3. That the accused assisted or participated in the commission of the underlying substantive offense; and

4. That someone committed the underlying offense.

United States v. DePace, 120 F.3d 233 (11th Cir. 1997); United States v. Chavez, 119 F.3d 342 (5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Powell, 113 F.3d 464 (3d Cir. 1997); United States v. Sayetsitty, 107 F.3d 1405 (9th Cir. 1997); United States v. Leos-Quijada, 107 F.3d 786 (10th Cir. 1997); United States v. Stands, 105 F.3d 1565 (8th Cir.), cert. denied (October 6, 1997) (No. 96-9541); United States v. Pipola, 83 F.3d 556 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 117 S.Ct. 183, 136 L.Ed.2d 122 (1996); United States v. Chin, 83 F.3d 83 (4th Cir. 1996); United States v. Lucas, 67 F.3d 956, 959 (D.C. Cir. 1995); United States v. Spinney, 65 F.3d 231 (1st Cir. 1995); United States v. Spears, 49 F.3d 1136 (6th Cir. 1995).

2474. Elements Of Aiding And Abetting | USAM | Department of Justice

See...coming to the U.S. illegally is a crime. And a "sanctuary city" is helping that criminal with their crime. Thanks for playing nat4900. I can always count on you to prove you are one of the dumbest people in America!

 

[nat4900]

Naturalization laws are an enumerated power of the Federal Government in the Constitution. No one is arguing the Federal Government should not be able to exercise actually enumerated Federal authority

this is the part of the Constitution you're alluding to....Tell us WHERE it addresses making "sanctuary cities": unlawful regarding federal law (and avoid that "free white person" bullshit):

Congress passed the first "uniform Rule of Naturalization" under the new Constitution in March 1790. It allowed "any alien, being a free white person" and "of good character" who had resided in the United States for two years to become a "citizen of the United States" by taking an oath in court "to support the constitution of the United States."

 

[saveliberty]

If States were allowed to dictate immigration policy, each ones individual preferences would impact other States that may not want the same level of immigration, due to States not being able to control their own internal borders.

true, like restriction of gun sales and open-carry laws?

Deflection. guns are protected under the Constitution moron.

I see you funnied that post, which apparently means you caught me again. Yes I did.

 

[saveliberty]

Naturalization laws are an enumerated power of the Federal Government in the Constitution. No one is arguing the Federal Government should not be able to exercise actually enumerated Federal authority

this is the part of the Constitution you're alluding to....Tell us WHERE it addresses making "sanctuary cities": unlawful regarding federal law (and avoid that "free white person" bullshit):

Congress passed the first "uniform Rule of Naturalization" under the new Constitution in March 1790. It allowed "any alien, being a free white person" and "of good character" who had resided in the United States for two years to become a "citizen of the United States" by taking an oath in court "to support the constitution of the United States."

Not even a decent strawman there moron.

 

[g5000]

It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.

That's funny. I remember the pseudocons hero worshipping sheriffs who said they would not enforce certain federal laws.

Immigration law is federal law. Let the feds enforce it. Making cities pay the cost of enforcing federal law is bullshit.

Pseudocons only bleev in "states rights" when it suits them.

Why doesn't Trump crack down on WHOLE STATES which are currently not enforcing our federal drug laws?

Hmmmmm...

 

[saveliberty]

It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.

That's funny. I remember the pseudocons hero worshipping sheriffs who said they would not enforce certain federal laws.

Immigration law is federal law. Let the feds enforce it.

Pseudocons only bleev in "states rights" when it suits them.

Why doesn't Trump crack down on WHOLE STATES which are currently not enforcing our federal drug laws?

Hmmmmm...

Feds went after him too didn't they? Thanks for making our point.

 

[kaz]

Naturalization laws are an enumerated power of the Federal Government in the Constitution. No one is arguing the Federal Government should not be able to exercise actually enumerated Federal authority

this is the part of the Constitution you're alluding to....Tell us WHERE it addresses making "sanctuary cities": unlawful regarding federal law (and avoid that "free white person" bullshit):

Congress passed the first "uniform Rule of Naturalization" under the new Constitution in March 1790. It allowed "any alien, being a free white person" and "of good character" who had resided in the United States for two years to become a "citizen of the United States" by taking an oath in court "to support the constitution of the United States."

"I" said it's "in the" Constitution, "white" boy, as a "Federal" Government "power." Picking "a" particular law "doesn't" change "that"

 

[g5000]

Remember this?

Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce Laws on Gun Control

 

[kaz]

It is enforcement of laws which those cities are ignoring. Government intrusion on criminals, pretty funny stuff there.

That's funny. I remember the pseudocons hero worshipping sheriffs who said they would not enforce certain federal laws.

Immigration law is federal law. Let the feds enforce it.

Pseudocons only bleev in "states rights" when it suits them.

Why doesn't Trump crack down on WHOLE STATES which are currently not enforcing our federal drug laws?

Hmmmmm...

Feds went after him too didn't they? Thanks for making our point.

Also, naturalization is in the Constitution as a Federal power. Drug laws are just a law that are actually a violation of the Constitution as there is no Constitutional authority for drug laws. Regardless they are just laws, not an enumerated power like immigration. The comparison is absurd

 

[saveliberty]

"I" said it's "in the" Constitution, "white" boy, as a "Federal" Government "power." Picking "a" particular law "doesn't" change "that"

He's going to need a link, because he's too stupid to understand the Constitution.

 

[nat4900]

BTW, right wing nitwits, did you know that sanctuary cities include such "liberal" enclaves as Houston, Dallas, El Paso, Miami and Atlanta???