So Long Melissa Harris-Perry

She's a common idiot. The perfect politically-correct professor for today's modern universities.
 
"Harris-Perry announced earlier in the week that she wouldn’t appear on her program Saturday morning, saying she felt “worthless” to the network."

Well, she did get something right.
 
She's a common idiot. The perfect politically-correct professor for today's modern universities.
She was too strident for me, the couple of times I watched her when she was on weekdays. But I never found her as blatantly idiotic as say, Steve Doocy or Bair jerk and Gretchen on Fox. They are a daytime lineup so in-your-face. it's enough to gag a maggot. However they have a faithful audience, just as Perry did, hence the flap about Perry. The article makes it sound like Perry threw a hissy-fit, fought the network and the network won. Hmmm..can we put that to music?

Hey billy, read this and tell me if you see it as I do (That'll be the day!). I read a headline that is completely belied by the body of the article. There is nothing there to hang an indictment on. No order, just a line saying Stevens was re-assessing. Nothing to do with the accusation. What do you see?

John Bolton: Stevens Email Shows Hillary, Staff Knew What They Were Doing
 
She's a common idiot. The perfect politically-correct professor for today's modern universities.
She was too strident for me, the couple of times I watched her when she was on weekdays. But I never found her as blatantly idiotic as say, Steve Doocy or Bair jerk and Gretchen on Fox. They are a daytime lineup so in-your-face. it's enough to gag a maggot. However they have a faithful audience, just as Perry did, hence the flap about Perry. The article makes it sound like Perry threw a hissy-fit, fought the network and the network won. Hmmm..can we put that to music?

Hey billy, read this and tell me if you see it as I do (That'll be the day!). I read a headline that is completely belied by the body of the article. There is nothing there to hang an indictment on. No order, just a line saying Stevens was re-assessing. Nothing to do with the accusation. What do you see?

John Bolton: Stevens Email Shows Hillary, Staff Knew What They Were Doing

Statements or not, Hillary and her staff knew exactly what they were doing. Intel analysis has a strong indication that the server was hacked by the Russians. For all I know Hillary and State intentionally had the info on server to provide easy access.

John Bolton's a good and tres-smart guy. I'd offer him STATE were it my decision.
 
She's a common idiot. The perfect politically-correct professor for today's modern universities.
She was too strident for me, the couple of times I watched her when she was on weekdays. But I never found her as blatantly idiotic as say, Steve Doocy or Bair jerk and Gretchen on Fox. They are a daytime lineup so in-your-face. it's enough to gag a maggot. However they have a faithful audience, just as Perry did, hence the flap about Perry. The article makes it sound like Perry threw a hissy-fit, fought the network and the network won. Hmmm..can we put that to music?

Hey billy, read this and tell me if you see it as I do (That'll be the day!). I read a headline that is completely belied by the body of the article. There is nothing there to hang an indictment on. No order, just a line saying Stevens was re-assessing. Nothing to do with the accusation. What do you see?

John Bolton: Stevens Email Shows Hillary, Staff Knew What They Were Doing

Statements or not, Hillary and her staff knew exactly what they were doing. Intel analysis has a strong indication that the server was hacked by the Russians. For all I know Hillary and State intentionally had the info on server to provide easy access.

John Bolton's a good and tres-smart guy. I'd offer him STATE were it my decision.
Then you agree that the headline is NOT supported by the article? Your reply is filled with implications from other sources, and I can guess from where by your own implication that the server was probably set up to make it easy for Russian hackers. Bolton? Why not Rumsfeld or Wolfowitz? They are all interchangeable to me. Although, I really would like to see some real class, like Powell back in the job. I know all the flak about him, but I really liked the guy and doubt he will ever get snookered by his loyalty to any person again.

My apologies for going OT.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
So long Melisa...don't let the door hit you in your racist ass on the way out.
 
She may be gone, but we'll always have tampon earrings to remember her by.
 
Yanno.............I'm kinda sorry to see her go.

She wanted to speak about the things that were going on in the world, and not just the political soup we are currently in.

I mean.............yeah.................I like to watch politics as much as the next person, but I would also like to see actual news sprinkled in.

How hard would it be to lead in with the first segment (15 min) being politics, with the second segment being what is actually happening in the world, or the country?

I mean, we've had several shootings (which would have dominated the news cycle if politics were not involved), as well as a stabbing and other things that don't involve the candidates.

Yeah, she served her network well, too bad they fired her for doing her job.
 
Looking forward to Rachael Maddows going away party....

As well as Sean Hannity's.

They all suck.

Melisa Perry sucked...and not the way her boyfriends enjoyed.
 
She should have been fired a long time ago when she started promoting the collective to raise our children.
 
I am sorry

But who is Melissa-Perry again? She's too racist for Fox?

Your posts are just a little confusing. Can you tell me who she was an why they(was it FOX?) let her go?
 
She should have been fired a long time ago when she started promoting the collective to raise our children.

She was just echoing Hillary Clinton there. Hillary thinks the state should have the primary role in raising our children and that the parent's role should be secondary. Of course, many losers think it's the responsibility of society to fund their child's upbringing. Tax payers foot the bill and the state indoctrinates the children to ensure future generations of people who feel entitled.

The radicals just don't trust independent, intelligent parents since they teach their children old fashioned values and morals before the state can get a hold of them. Schools and colleges don't like dealing with students who come with a different view than their liberal bullshit. This is why safe spaces are needed.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top