So if Pelosi's commission Doesn't call the Ashely Babbit shooter does it have any credibility?

[Hutch Starskey]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

 

[sealybobo]

LOLOL

So? You think something I posted doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?? Yeah, I can believe you're that stupid. Too stupid to even use the search feature to test if I'm lying.

Don't have to because you are lying.

And the only reason one of you deranged freaks hasn't plugged that cop yet is because they won't tell you who he is. Never forget this... they're smarter than you.

Already know who he is so what difference does it make to you?

Oh that right it's because you're one of those fearful lying cowards who won't honor their heroes.

View attachment 509755

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

Uh, no, not lying. You're just an idiot who could have found that out for himself if you weren't so mentally lazy.

​

**** you, ya raving lunatic. I condemned the BLM and Antifa riots.​

I've condemned those.​

Dumbfuck, I condemned the violence committed by Antifa, BLM & Trump's insurgents.​

You're an idiot, Marty. I condemned BLM and Antifa violence.​

And BTW, I have condemned the violence and riots by BLM and Antifa.​

Nope, those are not ok and I've condemned them.​

No, dumbfuck, no riots are good. All should be condemned.​

That's a lie, others also condemned the violence committed by BLM and Antifa, myself included.​

You're such a putz, ShortBus. I was able to show I condemned the riots you idiotically doubted I expressed outrage over.​

I have condemned the looting, rioting send murders.​

"Finally, do you condemn BLM and Antifa or not."​

​

Asked and answered.​

I condemn murders committed by BLM.​

I condemn their violence.​

I condemn such attacks.​

I've denounced Antifa.​

I condemn those murders.​

I condemned the violence of BLM and Antifa and never made excuses based on the fraction who caused it.​

Goes to show what an idiot you are. I've condemned, and continue to condemn, such violence. Lock 'em up.​

Nope, I would sing the same song. I condemn the violence committed by BLM and I condemn storming the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the election.​

I don't agree with any violence coming out of it nor do I believe they had a right to be violent. I've condemned their violence repeatedly and continue to do so. I've said anyone involved in the violence should be arrested and I continue to say that. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.​

View attachment 509764

But you're lying about it all so there was not point in expending the effort because you approve of the murder that happened on the 6th of January 2021 at the Capitol.

It was the shot around the Capitol that brought pleasure to your heart as you put up statues of a woman abusing drug addict.

So you might as well honor your hero with a medal of valor and put a statue up and honor the Capitol murderer also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Nope, it was no lie as I said I condemned that violence and I proved it. It wasn't much effort either as I've posted that list before so just had to copy & paste it.

As far as your lie that I lied because I approve of extinguishing the pathetic existence of a traitor who attacked the seat of our government, again, it was not murder just because you lie to yourself that it was. And again, murder is the illegal killing of another and his shoot was investigated and determined not to be illegal. So no, not murder.

View attachment 509772

Of course you're lying and have deluded yourself into believing your own lies so you made up some posts to make it seem like you're sincere because you can't accept the murder that happened at the Capitol because your ego and ID are in conflict. This all leads back to your inability to have functional sexual relations with females and therefore you must approve of what was done at the Capitol that day.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

That's quite the scheme you've dreamed up there. Those posts all have links to them showing I've always condemned that violence. According to your delusions? It's all part of a scheme to fool you tonight.

And no, no matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be murder. Murder is the illegal killing of another person and that cop was investigated and found that his shoot was not illegal.

You can't talk common sense with Republicans. They are programmed to believe the opposite of whatever you believe. They can't help themselves. I ran into one of these programmed Republicans on another thread about dogs. Immediately he started accusing me of lying about my dog. Lying about the experiences I've had with my dog while hunting and he kept accusing me of lying about my Ebike. Things no one would lie about, he couldn't fathom that I was not lying. Because he's programmed this way. They all are.

And look at what they do to their own if they dare stray off the plantation. Any Republican who believes the election was fair is a RINO Deep state globalist.

 

[sealybobo]

I am curious to read his exact verbiage, in context, relative to fighter jets and nukes to quell insurrections. How about you providing that verbiage in context for the readers.

View attachment 509573

The context was pretty clear that he intends to use fighter jets and nukes against United States citizens if people disagree with him.

Live with it.

*****SMILE*****

If it is ok with you, I will live with the truth. Obviously, you have a vivid imagination. Show me.
"Live with it" is a stupid response like many right-wing responses.

View attachment 509600

There! There! Now! Didn't your white sheets come back from the cleaners died black so you could go out and burn, loot, and murder, on the trust fund left to you?

*****SMILE*****

There! there! Now! Didn't Mummy and Daddy teach you to be truthful with your gibberish?

Here's the difference between us and them. A police officer, who they supposedly respect, is a murderer and if we release his name they might kill him. But George Zimmerman is a hero who didn't murder Trevon Martin. And George walks the streets free today and no one bothers him.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

It doesn't have any credibility either way.

Pelosi's a lunatic fascist & psychopath.

IOW, a Democrat.

It doesn't have any credibility either way.

Yep. That’s the line anyway. That was always gonna be the play when rejecting the bipartisan commission. Kick it to a partisan committee and then cry partisanship. What a bunch of dickless twats.

Democrats certainly seem like dickless twats, yes, but there are those rumors about Michelle...

Democrats certainly seem like dickless twats, yes, but there are those rumors about Michelle...

A dumbfuck retort only serves to make you a dumbfuck. Carry on.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

 

[Faun]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

It doesn't have any credibility either way.

Pelosi's a lunatic fascist & psychopath.

IOW, a Democrat.

It doesn't have any credibility either way.

Yep. That’s the line anyway. That was always gonna be the play when rejecting the bipartisan commission. Kick it to a partisan committee and then cry partisanship. What a bunch of dickless twats.

Democrats certainly seem like dickless twats, yes, but there are those rumors about Michelle...

Were those like the rumors about Melanie Trump?

Melanie Trump? The roller skate girl?

No, Donald Trump's porn star wife.

 

[sealybobo]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

I don't know about him but I don't take anyone seriously if they say they believe Trump really won and if they defend the traitors on insurrection day.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

So? You think something I posted doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?? Yeah, I can believe you're that stupid. Too stupid to even use the search feature to test if I'm lying.

Don't have to because you are lying.

And the only reason one of you deranged freaks hasn't plugged that cop yet is because they won't tell you who he is. Never forget this... they're smarter than you.

Already know who he is so what difference does it make to you?

Oh that right it's because you're one of those fearful lying cowards who won't honor their heroes.

View attachment 509755

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

Uh, no, not lying. You're just an idiot who could have found that out for himself if you weren't so mentally lazy.

​

**** you, ya raving lunatic. I condemned the BLM and Antifa riots.​

I've condemned those.​

Dumbfuck, I condemned the violence committed by Antifa, BLM & Trump's insurgents.​

You're an idiot, Marty. I condemned BLM and Antifa violence.​

And BTW, I have condemned the violence and riots by BLM and Antifa.​

Nope, those are not ok and I've condemned them.​

No, dumbfuck, no riots are good. All should be condemned.​

That's a lie, others also condemned the violence committed by BLM and Antifa, myself included.​

You're such a putz, ShortBus. I was able to show I condemned the riots you idiotically doubted I expressed outrage over.​

I have condemned the looting, rioting send murders.​

"Finally, do you condemn BLM and Antifa or not."​

​

Asked and answered.​

I condemn murders committed by BLM.​

I condemn their violence.​

I condemn such attacks.​

I've denounced Antifa.​

I condemn those murders.​

I condemned the violence of BLM and Antifa and never made excuses based on the fraction who caused it.​

Goes to show what an idiot you are. I've condemned, and continue to condemn, such violence. Lock 'em up.​

Nope, I would sing the same song. I condemn the violence committed by BLM and I condemn storming the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the election.​

I don't agree with any violence coming out of it nor do I believe they had a right to be violent. I've condemned their violence repeatedly and continue to do so. I've said anyone involved in the violence should be arrested and I continue to say that. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.​

View attachment 509764

But you're lying about it all so there was not point in expending the effort because you approve of the murder that happened on the 6th of January 2021 at the Capitol.

It was the shot around the Capitol that brought pleasure to your heart as you put up statues of a woman abusing drug addict.

So you might as well honor your hero with a medal of valor and put a statue up and honor the Capitol murderer also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Nope, it was no lie as I said I condemned that violence and I proved it. It wasn't much effort either as I've posted that list before so just had to copy & paste it.

As far as your lie that I lied because I approve of extinguishing the pathetic existence of a traitor who attacked the seat of our government, again, it was not murder just because you lie to yourself that it was. And again, murder is the illegal killing of another and his shoot was investigated and determined not to be illegal. So no, not murder.

View attachment 509772

Of course you're lying and have deluded yourself into believing your own lies so you made up some posts to make it seem like you're sincere because you can't accept the murder that happened at the Capitol because your ego and ID are in conflict. This all leads back to your inability to have functional sexual relations with females and therefore you must approve of what was done at the Capitol that day.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

That's quite the scheme you've dreamed up there. Those posts all have links to them showing I've always condemned that violence. According to your delusions? It's all part of a scheme to fool you tonight.

And no, no matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be murder. Murder is the illegal killing of another person and that cop was investigated and found that his shoot was not illegal.

You can't talk common sense with Republicans. They are programmed to believe the opposite of whatever you believe. They can't help themselves. I ran into one of these programmed Republicans on another thread about dogs. Immediately he started accusing me of lying about my dog. Lying about the experiences I've had with my dog while hunting and he kept accusing me of lying about my Ebike. Things no one would lie about, he couldn't fathom that I was not lying. Because he's programmed this way. They all are.

And look at what they do to their own if they dare stray off the plantation. Any Republican who believes the election was fair is a RINO Deep state globalist.

So true.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

 

[sealybobo]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

In other words no amount of evidence will change your mind. You know we will never be able to give you multiple unbiased sources since you think everything except Rush and Fox are liberal. Eat a dick dummy.

 

[sealybobo]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

No amount of evidence would convince Dave Chappelle the juror that R Kelly did what he did.



You're just like a black on the R Kelly jury or OJ jury. Watch this video and tell us that isn't you defending Trump. Spot on!

 

[sealybobo]

What would it take? If you saw a tape of R Kelly pissing on a girl, and the girl had 2 forms of government id's, 4 or 5 of his buddies taking notes, R Kelly's grandmother has to be there to confirm his identity and the police would have to be there. The burden of proof is on the state. LOL

 

[LeftofLeft]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

In other words no amount of evidence will change your mind. You know we will never be able to give you multiple unbiased sources since you think everything except Rush and Fox are liberal. Eat a dick dummy.

Multiple can simply mean “more than one”. Rush is dead. I do watch Fox News but I watch NBC and CBS more.

 

[sealybobo]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

In other words no amount of evidence will change your mind. You know we will never be able to give you multiple unbiased sources since you think everything except Rush and Fox are liberal. Eat a dick dummy.

Multiple can simply mean “more than one”. Rush is dead. I do watch Fox News but I watch NBC and CBS more.

So if NBC and CBS said it you would consider them unbiased sources?

 

[sealybobo]

LOLOL

So? You think something I posted doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?? Yeah, I can believe you're that stupid. Too stupid to even use the search feature to test if I'm lying.

Don't have to because you are lying.

And the only reason one of you deranged freaks hasn't plugged that cop yet is because they won't tell you who he is. Never forget this... they're smarter than you.

Already know who he is so what difference does it make to you?

Oh that right it's because you're one of those fearful lying cowards who won't honor their heroes.

View attachment 509755

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

Uh, no, not lying. You're just an idiot who could have found that out for himself if you weren't so mentally lazy.

​

**** you, ya raving lunatic. I condemned the BLM and Antifa riots.​

I've condemned those.​

Dumbfuck, I condemned the violence committed by Antifa, BLM & Trump's insurgents.​

You're an idiot, Marty. I condemned BLM and Antifa violence.​

And BTW, I have condemned the violence and riots by BLM and Antifa.​

Nope, those are not ok and I've condemned them.​

No, dumbfuck, no riots are good. All should be condemned.​

That's a lie, others also condemned the violence committed by BLM and Antifa, myself included.​

You're such a putz, ShortBus. I was able to show I condemned the riots you idiotically doubted I expressed outrage over.​

I have condemned the looting, rioting send murders.​

"Finally, do you condemn BLM and Antifa or not."​

​

Asked and answered.​

I condemn murders committed by BLM.​

I condemn their violence.​

I condemn such attacks.​

I've denounced Antifa.​

I condemn those murders.​

I condemned the violence of BLM and Antifa and never made excuses based on the fraction who caused it.​

Goes to show what an idiot you are. I've condemned, and continue to condemn, such violence. Lock 'em up.​

Nope, I would sing the same song. I condemn the violence committed by BLM and I condemn storming the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the election.​

I don't agree with any violence coming out of it nor do I believe they had a right to be violent. I've condemned their violence repeatedly and continue to do so. I've said anyone involved in the violence should be arrested and I continue to say that. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.​

View attachment 509764

But you're lying about it all so there was not point in expending the effort because you approve of the murder that happened on the 6th of January 2021 at the Capitol.

It was the shot around the Capitol that brought pleasure to your heart as you put up statues of a woman abusing drug addict.

So you might as well honor your hero with a medal of valor and put a statue up and honor the Capitol murderer also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Nope, it was no lie as I said I condemned that violence and I proved it. It wasn't much effort either as I've posted that list before so just had to copy & paste it.

As far as your lie that I lied because I approve of extinguishing the pathetic existence of a traitor who attacked the seat of our government, again, it was not murder just because you lie to yourself that it was. And again, murder is the illegal killing of another and his shoot was investigated and determined not to be illegal. So no, not murder.

View attachment 509772

Of course you're lying and have deluded yourself into believing your own lies so you made up some posts to make it seem like you're sincere because you can't accept the murder that happened at the Capitol because your ego and ID are in conflict. This all leads back to your inability to have functional sexual relations with females and therefore you must approve of what was done at the Capitol that day.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

That's quite the scheme you've dreamed up there. Those posts all have links to them showing I've always condemned that violence. According to your delusions? It's all part of a scheme to fool you tonight.

And no, no matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be murder. Murder is the illegal killing of another person and that cop was investigated and found that his shoot was not illegal.

You can't talk common sense with Republicans. They are programmed to believe the opposite of whatever you believe. They can't help themselves. I ran into one of these programmed Republicans on another thread about dogs. Immediately he started accusing me of lying about my dog. Lying about the experiences I've had with my dog while hunting and he kept accusing me of lying about my Ebike. Things no one would lie about, he couldn't fathom that I was not lying. Because he's programmed this way. They all are.

And look at what they do to their own if they dare stray off the plantation. Any Republican who believes the election was fair is a RINO Deep state globalist.

So true.

GOP Lawmaker Sued Over Inciting Insurrection: Trump White House Made Me Do It​

Rep. Mo Brooks, who spoke at the Trump rally before the attack, claims he did it only because the White House asked him to.

This is how Trump gets idiots to do his dirty work

“Today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass,” Brooks said at the rally. He repeated Trump’s baseless claims that the November presidential election had been stolen and asked if those in the crowd were ready to fight.

GOP Lawmaker Sued Over Inciting Insurrection: Trump White House Made Me Do It

Rep. Mo Brooks, who spoke at the Trump rally before the attack, claims he did it only because the White House asked him to.

www.huffpost.com

Trump made me do it. LOL That's what Michael Cohen said.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This police officer felt so threatened he needed to use deadly force
From the dems purview he should be given a medal....right
We all know how scary women are. You know that sex that has to have men run the races for them.
Remember this guy saved American democracy but you won't here a peep from the dems. In fact I'm betting on the opposite
Oh and here's a link. Like anything these dumb @@@@;s know means anything

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-introduces-legislation-that-would-establish-select-committee-to-probe-jan-6-capitol-attack/2021/06/28/1d40b2c8-d852-11eb-9bbb-37c30dcf9363_story.html

So you don’t support the police?

The one time out of how many that the Left is supporting the police and justifying opening fire on an unarmed perpetrator because the officer’s life was threatened? The only reason is because this fits a larger agenda.

In the crush of the crowd breaking thru the window, do you think the officer who could tell if someone was armed or not?

"Shoot first, ask questions later" - the new Democrat motto.

Unless the shootee is a Black felon of course.

No wonder they're regarded by sane/decent people as 21st century Nazis.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican.

the Left looks so full of shit on this one. 1/6 barely lasted a day. Our Democracy was never threatened that day. Contrast that to 9/11 or when the Leftist radicals threatened to blow up the Capitol or when the Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on half of Congress because they were Republican

The committee will get to the truth of who in the Trump admin was giving the stand down orders when the requests for the NG went unanswered for hours. This ain’t some CIA annex in Benghazi. It’s the US Capitol. Heads will roll.

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Someone in the Trump White House gave stand-down orders to Congress that was trying to protect itself?? It was the Democrats, the media, and DC Mayor telling everyone there could be unrest. Your theory is that these same people on Capitol Hill from the opposing party requested reinforcements and it was shot down by the Trump Administration? Wouldn’t that be confirmed almost immediately following the event and not digging for details and confirmation 6 months later?

Don’t be more of a dumbfuck than is necessary.

Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol - FactCheck.org

On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy those troops.

www.factcheck.org

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Your FactCheck.Org piece fails to answer why and how Democrats were concerned but did not push harder or insist for more back up despite the timelines. We already knew all of that. Again, have your hearings. Your side’s goal is really not about preventing another 1/6 event as much as it is to hinder Republicans and punish Trump. That’s it.

Because the Dems had nothing to do with giving the order to deploy troops on 1/6, dope.

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

Because the Dems have something to cover up. If someone in the White House did a stand down or deny, it would be out by now. Don’t you think?

No Because “the Dems” are not in the chain of command of the NG, dope. McCarthy himself said he directly requested the WH order the NG to intervene several times. As did others. Some even directly to the DOD. Someone certainly was hesitant to give the order.
Stop being a dumbfuck.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans.

All the more reason it would be out and confirmed… who, where, when. Here we are 6 months later and the Democrats need the Republicans

It is out, dope. We know the requests went out immediately and were ignored for hours. We also know that Flynn’s brother was involved at the DOD. There will be testimony before the select committee. The truth will be known. That it was conceived and orchestrated by Trump and his minions with support from members of Congress.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Your name calling is not helping your case and is arguably clouding what little logic you have displayed. You have provided nothing but an opinion piece from biased FactCheck and you contradict yourself here by saying “It is out” and “the truth will be known”. So, which is it???

Also, what other sources do you have besides FactCheck.

Name calling in no way alters the validity of my claims. It is only a description of your behavior, dope. I’ve given you plenty to investigate. Carry on.

Validity claims don’t mean shit without empirical and verifiable data from multiple unbiased sources correlating to the same trend.

In other words no amount of evidence will change your mind. You know we will never be able to give you multiple unbiased sources since you think everything except Rush and Fox are liberal. Eat a dick dummy.

Multiple can simply mean “more than one”. Rush is dead. I do watch Fox News but I watch NBC and CBS more.

So if NBC and CBS said it you would consider them unbiased sources?

It depends since both sources have a proven history of altering facts or leaving them out of a story to fit an agenda. Further, bash Fox all you want yet they admit their bias and have more opposing views on their programs than do the rest.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

LOLOL

So? You think something I posted doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?? Yeah, I can believe you're that stupid. Too stupid to even use the search feature to test if I'm lying.

Don't have to because you are lying.

And the only reason one of you deranged freaks hasn't plugged that cop yet is because they won't tell you who he is. Never forget this... they're smarter than you.

Already know who he is so what difference does it make to you?

Oh that right it's because you're one of those fearful lying cowards who won't honor their heroes.

View attachment 509755

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

Uh, no, not lying. You're just an idiot who could have found that out for himself if you weren't so mentally lazy.

​

**** you, ya raving lunatic. I condemned the BLM and Antifa riots.​

I've condemned those.​

Dumbfuck, I condemned the violence committed by Antifa, BLM & Trump's insurgents.​

You're an idiot, Marty. I condemned BLM and Antifa violence.​

And BTW, I have condemned the violence and riots by BLM and Antifa.​

Nope, those are not ok and I've condemned them.​

No, dumbfuck, no riots are good. All should be condemned.​

That's a lie, others also condemned the violence committed by BLM and Antifa, myself included.​

You're such a putz, ShortBus. I was able to show I condemned the riots you idiotically doubted I expressed outrage over.​

I have condemned the looting, rioting send murders.​

"Finally, do you condemn BLM and Antifa or not."​

​

Asked and answered.​

I condemn murders committed by BLM.​

I condemn their violence.​

I condemn such attacks.​

I've denounced Antifa.​

I condemn those murders.​

I condemned the violence of BLM and Antifa and never made excuses based on the fraction who caused it.​

Goes to show what an idiot you are. I've condemned, and continue to condemn, such violence. Lock 'em up.​

Nope, I would sing the same song. I condemn the violence committed by BLM and I condemn storming the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the election.​

I don't agree with any violence coming out of it nor do I believe they had a right to be violent. I've condemned their violence repeatedly and continue to do so. I've said anyone involved in the violence should be arrested and I continue to say that. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.​

View attachment 509764

But you're lying about it all so there was not point in expending the effort because you approve of the murder that happened on the 6th of January 2021 at the Capitol.

It was the shot around the Capitol that brought pleasure to your heart as you put up statues of a woman abusing drug addict.

So you might as well honor your hero with a medal of valor and put a statue up and honor the Capitol murderer also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Nope, it was no lie as I said I condemned that violence and I proved it. It wasn't much effort either as I've posted that list before so just had to copy & paste it.

As far as your lie that I lied because I approve of extinguishing the pathetic existence of a traitor who attacked the seat of our government, again, it was not murder just because you lie to yourself that it was. And again, murder is the illegal killing of another and his shoot was investigated and determined not to be illegal. So no, not murder.

View attachment 509772

Of course you're lying and have deluded yourself into believing your own lies so you made up some posts to make it seem like you're sincere because you can't accept the murder that happened at the Capitol because your ego and ID are in conflict. This all leads back to your inability to have functional sexual relations with females and therefore you must approve of what was done at the Capitol that day.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

That's quite the scheme you've dreamed up there. Those posts all have links to them showing I've always condemned that violence. According to your delusions? It's all part of a scheme to fool you tonight.

And no, no matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be murder. Murder is the illegal killing of another person and that cop was investigated and found that his shoot was not illegal.

View attachment 509776

Ah!!! So you support the Castle Doctrine Amendment being added to the United States Constitution. Do feel free to write your congressperson as many others are doing at the encouragement of Damaged Eagle.

Thank you for your support.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Of course I support the Castle Doctrine. It need not be amended to the Constitution as many states, if not most, already have such laws.

View attachment 509779

Oh no! You've already so much as said it's good enough for our congresspersons and if all men are equal then all persons should have the same right to slay someone if they feel threatened on their property across this great nation without reprisal from some state or local government.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

You're deranged. The Castle Doctrine does not apply in this case. Ordinary self defense does. The cop had a duty to protect the lives of lawmakers and their staff who were still holed up in the House chamber when that violent mob began breaking through the doors. He had no resource other that lethal force to keep them out as he was the last thing between the violent mob and the lawmakers they were after. Once they breached the doors, it was shooting time and Ashli Targetpractice just happened to be the first, and only, to breach their barricade on the other side of the doors they were smashing in.

View attachment 509781

They were in a building which is property of the United States government were congresspersons work.

So yes castle doctrine does apply and a Castle Doctrine Amendment should be enacted making it the right of all persons nationwide. But to appease your sensibilities the proposed Castle Doctrine Amendment also incorporates the right to stand your ground and concealed carry.

*****SMILE*****

Styx - Castle Walls

StyxCastle WallsGrand Illusion

www.youtube.com

No, retard, D.C. does not have a Castle Doctrine so no, it doesn't apply. And adding a constitutional amendment won't help in this case as it would only apply to any future cases. So again, ordinary self defense is applicable here which D.C. does have on the books.

Nope! Not a suitable answer your hero cop murdered the young lady and like most progressives you support it which means you've been lying about all the other stuff that's happened over the last few years and supported it also.

That goes for all your little friends that have shown up too.

After all you're all a bunch of woman abusing drug addict Floyd supporters.

Additionally you're all a bunch of insurrectionists who should be on the FBI list.

*****SMILE*****

Kansas - Angels Have Fallen (HQ)

Monolith (1979)Tracklist:1. On the Other Side2. People of the South Wind3. Angels Have Fallen4. How My Soul Cries Out5. A Glimpse of Home6. Away From You7. S...

www.youtube.com

 

[sealybobo]

LOLOL

So? You think something I posted doesn't exist just because you haven't seen it?? Yeah, I can believe you're that stupid. Too stupid to even use the search feature to test if I'm lying.

Don't have to because you are lying.

And the only reason one of you deranged freaks hasn't plugged that cop yet is because they won't tell you who he is. Never forget this... they're smarter than you.

Already know who he is so what difference does it make to you?

Oh that right it's because you're one of those fearful lying cowards who won't honor their heroes.

View attachment 509755

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

Uh, no, not lying. You're just an idiot who could have found that out for himself if you weren't so mentally lazy.

​

**** you, ya raving lunatic. I condemned the BLM and Antifa riots.​

I've condemned those.​

Dumbfuck, I condemned the violence committed by Antifa, BLM & Trump's insurgents.​

You're an idiot, Marty. I condemned BLM and Antifa violence.​

And BTW, I have condemned the violence and riots by BLM and Antifa.​

Nope, those are not ok and I've condemned them.​

No, dumbfuck, no riots are good. All should be condemned.​

That's a lie, others also condemned the violence committed by BLM and Antifa, myself included.​

You're such a putz, ShortBus. I was able to show I condemned the riots you idiotically doubted I expressed outrage over.​

I have condemned the looting, rioting send murders.​

"Finally, do you condemn BLM and Antifa or not."​

​

Asked and answered.​

I condemn murders committed by BLM.​

I condemn their violence.​

I condemn such attacks.​

I've denounced Antifa.​

I condemn those murders.​

I condemned the violence of BLM and Antifa and never made excuses based on the fraction who caused it.​

Goes to show what an idiot you are. I've condemned, and continue to condemn, such violence. Lock 'em up.​

Nope, I would sing the same song. I condemn the violence committed by BLM and I condemn storming the Capitol to stop Congress from certifying the election.​

I don't agree with any violence coming out of it nor do I believe they had a right to be violent. I've condemned their violence repeatedly and continue to do so. I've said anyone involved in the violence should be arrested and I continue to say that. They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.​

View attachment 509764

But you're lying about it all so there was not point in expending the effort because you approve of the murder that happened on the 6th of January 2021 at the Capitol.

It was the shot around the Capitol that brought pleasure to your heart as you put up statues of a woman abusing drug addict.

So you might as well honor your hero with a medal of valor and put a statue up and honor the Capitol murderer also.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Nope, it was no lie as I said I condemned that violence and I proved it. It wasn't much effort either as I've posted that list before so just had to copy & paste it.

As far as your lie that I lied because I approve of extinguishing the pathetic existence of a traitor who attacked the seat of our government, again, it was not murder just because you lie to yourself that it was. And again, murder is the illegal killing of another and his shoot was investigated and determined not to be illegal. So no, not murder.

View attachment 509772

Of course you're lying and have deluded yourself into believing your own lies so you made up some posts to make it seem like you're sincere because you can't accept the murder that happened at the Capitol because your ego and ID are in conflict. This all leads back to your inability to have functional sexual relations with females and therefore you must approve of what was done at the Capitol that day.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

That's quite the scheme you've dreamed up there. Those posts all have links to them showing I've always condemned that violence. According to your delusions? It's all part of a scheme to fool you tonight.

And no, no matter how many times you repeat it, it will never be murder. Murder is the illegal killing of another person and that cop was investigated and found that his shoot was not illegal.

View attachment 509776

Ah!!! So you support the Castle Doctrine Amendment being added to the United States Constitution. Do feel free to write your congressperson as many others are doing at the encouragement of Damaged Eagle.

Thank you for your support.

*****CHUCKLE*****

Of course I support the Castle Doctrine. It need not be amended to the Constitution as many states, if not most, already have such laws.

View attachment 509779

Oh no! You've already so much as said it's good enough for our congresspersons and if all men are equal then all persons should have the same right to slay someone if they feel threatened on their property across this great nation without reprisal from some state or local government.

*****CHUCKLE*****

LOL

You're deranged. The Castle Doctrine does not apply in this case. Ordinary self defense does. The cop had a duty to protect the lives of lawmakers and their staff who were still holed up in the House chamber when that violent mob began breaking through the doors. He had no resource other that lethal force to keep them out as he was the last thing between the violent mob and the lawmakers they were after. Once they breached the doors, it was shooting time and Ashli Targetpractice just happened to be the first, and only, to breach their barricade on the other side of the doors they were smashing in.

View attachment 509781

They were in a building which is property of the United States government were congresspersons work.

So yes castle doctrine does apply and a Castle Doctrine Amendment should be enacted making it the right of all persons nationwide. But to appease your sensibilities the proposed Castle Doctrine Amendment also incorporates the right to stand your ground and concealed carry.

*****SMILE*****

Styx - Castle Walls

StyxCastle WallsGrand Illusion

www.youtube.com

No, retard, D.C. does not have a Castle Doctrine so no, it doesn't apply. And adding a constitutional amendment won't help in this case as it would only apply to any future cases. So again, ordinary self defense is applicable here which D.C. does have on the books.

View attachment 509872

Nope! Not a suitable answer your hero cop murdered the young lady and like most progressives you support it which means you've been lying about all the other stuff that's happened over the last few years and supported it also.

That goes for all your little friends that have shown up too.

After all you're all a bunch of woman abusing drug addict Floyd supporters.

Additionally you're all a bunch of insurrectionists who should be on the FBI list.

*****SMILE*****

Kansas - Angels Have Fallen (HQ)

Monolith (1979)Tracklist:1. On the Other Side2. People of the South Wind3. Angels Have Fallen4. How My Soul Cries Out5. A Glimpse of Home6. Away From You7. S...

www.youtube.com

Racist nut rant of the day.

 

[wamose]

It's an obvious political witch hunt. It doesn't matter who they call. Anyway, Pelosi lost her credibility a long time ago.