So I looked up Richard Spencer

[Votto]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

Racial Loyalist. Racial Socialism. Look it up. D'Souza is a pathetic CUCK Civil Nationalist...whiny little ***** more worried about money than race...**** him. I tried reading that garbage he calls a book and he just WHINES oh my the democrats are the real wacists wahhhhh man up grow a set and accept what's RIGHT!

Instead of insulting him and accusing him of being greedy, why not give us a critique on what he gets wrong?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

What nanny state did the British Empire have in the mid- late 1800's?

They killed up to 60 million by famine alone in India.

They killed another 1 million by famine in Ireland.

They killed off Tasmanian Aborigines to near extinction.

Come to think about it, considering the scale of conquests of the British empire, I wouldn't really doubt that 100 million would have died by it's actions.

Just the Brits did a great job of hiding it, and pretending their sh*t don't stink.

 

[mdk]

It’s funny watching people tie themselves into knots so they can pretend Spencer is some lefty loon.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

Is he and/or his followers currently members of the Democrat, or Republican party?

What is their current party affiliation?

Which party's members currently follow Richard Spencer, et al?

I've heard Trump condemn racism, although he was criticized for not condemning white supremacists fast and hard enough in Virginia.

But it's not enough. No amount of condemnation apparently is. The Left will still brand him a racist.

However, on the other isle, we have Maxine Waters who snuggles up to a racist like Louis Farrakhan who calls white people white devils and Jews vermin.

Yet the media never says anything about it.

So I will ask you, who is the bigger racist, Maxine or Trump?

Yup Farrakhan is racist --- it is almost sick the type of power he wields on the Democrat party -- how he was able to get them to push policies to exterminate Jews, how he was able to implement sentencing polices that unfairly targeted whites -- and Maxine Waters sat back and did nothing

She is just as bad as David Duke and all of the other racists...they are all on the democrat plantation -- just like Jews who vote for democrats are in the democrat gas cham-- oh wait, that genocide analogy only plays well when you target it at black people...never mind.

 

[Preacher]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

Racial Loyalist. Racial Socialism. Look it up. D'Souza is a pathetic CUCK Civil Nationalist...whiny little ***** more worried about money than race...**** him. I tried reading that garbage he calls a book and he just WHINES oh my the democrats are the real wacists wahhhhh man up grow a set and accept what's RIGHT!

Instead of insulting him and accusing him of being greedy, why not give us a critique on what he gets wrong?

Simple as that and YES I know he isn't white but he should stand up for HIS people not MONEY which is ALL he is worried about. Civic nationalism is as sick as liberalism. Conservatism is as well...Liberalism at least puts nonwhites over whites,conservatism does NEITHER they just worry about MONEY!

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

pssstt....Germany had socialized medicine before all of that -- in fact as a direct result of WW1, they implemented a stronger form of national healthcare years before Hitler was thought about

In other words, they addressed a need of its citizens, because that is what most governments do -- not because they wanted to exterminate Jews

 

[Votto]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

When have you ever heard me say that minorities don't deserve government?

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Currently, I know of zero cases where blacks or any other race of people are forced to have abortions. I do know in the past there was a push to sterilize black folks -- that isn't abortion, but don't let that distinction stop you from feigning concern for black children -- because, if you don't know it, that is what happens to these fetuses that you are so concerned about, they become children -- for some reason, concern for black babies ends when they are born for most conservatives.

What policies made white Americans in this country put up with genocide here for hundreds of years? What nanny state was greasing the wheels to keep Jim Crow in effect for so long?


Sorry, your attempts to try to link social security and Medicare for All to Hitler is pathetic and desperate on two fronts --- first, it tells me you don't know what you are talking about --- second, it tells me that you have no better alternatives or else that would be what you advocate, instead you fearmonger, which means you have no better alternatives...

Progressives at the turn of the century were heavily into eugenics and racism

Margaret Sanger, was the cheerleader. Here is what she had to say.

[We should] apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring

Or this:

We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right

There are also examples of proposals and some implimintation of mandatory sterilization at that time. In fact, Hitler paid attention to it as well and was heavily influence by it all.

But alas, Hitler kind of put a damper on their eugenic fantasies.

In fact, Hitler just looked to science and Charles Darwin who said:

“With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man himself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.

The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the social instincts, but subsequently rendered, in the manner previously indicated, more tender and more widely diffused. Nor could we check our sympathy, if so urged by hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of our nature. The surgeon may harden himself whilst performing an operation, for he knows that he is acting for the good of his patient; but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with a certain and great present evil. Hence we must bear without complaining the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely the weaker and inferior members of society not marrying so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased, though this is more to be hoped for than expected, by the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage.”
― Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man

So Hitler reads this and decides, what is this talk about being noble and helping the inferior and weak gene pool? What does being noble have to do with science? Why not just breed human beings like farmers do cattle so that you get the biggest and best genetically?

 

[Votto]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

pssstt....Germany had socialized medicine before all of that -- in fact as a direct result of WW1, they implemented a stronger form of national healthcare years before Hitler was thought about

In other words, they addressed a need of its citizens, because that is what most governments do -- not because they wanted to exterminate Jews

Did I say that government run health care caused the Holocaust? No I did not. What I said was, the massive nanny state had a cumulative effect on people looking the other way when it came to injustices within society such as genocide

As for government run health care in Germany today, I know of a woman who went there on vacation and she had a bowel obstruction and needed emergency surgery. To make a long story short, the surgery did not relieve the problem, so they took the attitude that since she was 70 years old and they had already performed and expensive surgery, they would just let nature take its course.

Luckily for her, her son was a doctor in the US and he flew over to raise hell and made them perform another surgery and they did.

That was some 10 years ago and she is now doing just fine.

That is another difference. Once the state takes over they tend to look at dollar signs rather than human value.

And trust me, they will make it much, much cheaper. And now you know why.

 

[dudmuck]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they started rounding up Jews. In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively. The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for "illegal socialist activity" in 1936.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they started rounding up Jews. In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively. The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for "illegal socialist activity" in 1936.

The rivalry was more political than ideological.

 

[Votto]

It’s funny watching people tie themselves into knots so they can pretend Spencer is some lefty loon.

Ok, what makes him otherwise?

 

[Votto]

D’Souza Gets White Supremacist Richard Spencer To Admit Being A Socialist Progressive

In the new Dinish D'Souza film, "Death of a Nation", Richard Spencer is interviewed. For those who don't know, Spencer is credited for founding the "alt.right" movement and is a loud and proud white supremacist

However, as D'Souza begins to talk to him in the interview, he sounds more and more like a flaming progressive. All of his favorite Presidents were racist democrat presidents, he does not believe in innate right, rather rights come from the collective state, and he is a socialist.

But the press keeps pounding in everyone's head the notion that the Nazi socialists, along with Spencer, are really right wing Republican conservatives. I assume it is based upon the premise that the GOP loves wars abroad and hates minorities, which is false. I know I am tired of the endless wars like Libya and Iraq, and I don't hate minorities.

But as seen in this interview, the Nazi mentality, along with Spencer, is not conservative at all. In fact, it mirrors Progressive ideology more than anything. Those the promote identity politics and wars abroad and just increasing the size and scope of government at all are the ones who mirror Nazi and white supremacist ideology.

Can the truth really reach society devoid of such media propaganda?

You are not very smart.

Most white supremacists have no problem with social programs -- their problem is when those programs benefit minorities -- The fact 1930's Germany had national healthcare or whatever social program you hate - that wasn't the reason Nazis are hated -- you idiots keep leaving that part out.

But it is common knowledge for decades that most white supremacists believed that the government is supposed to serve THEM not others -- that is the reason you always hear this BS about "they (minorities) don't deserve it"

That is the reason you can see racists and conservatives in general gladly accepting government handouts because they feel "THEY DESERVE IT"

What you fail to realize is, the reason the German people put up with mass genocide and wars abroad, was that the nanny state was greasing their wheels.

Essentially the average citizen had a better standard of living than those in other countries. Hitler simply bought them all off.

Money has a tendency to make you look the other way when it comes to issue like genocide.

Speaking of which, Margaret Sanger created Planned Parenthood on the premise that it would decrease the number of unwanted poor black folk.

To date, there have been more black abortions than births. After all, children are expensive.

Why do Americans put up with it's mass murder / wars abroad?

America has killed some 14 - 30 million since 1945, an amount similar to the Nazis.

Yet, Americans hardly care, or even support it.

How come?

Complacency and the nanny state.

So long as people are taken care of by the state, and dependent upon the state, the state is then free to unleash any amount of injustice it sees fit on the world at large, knowing that the populace will not rise up.

This is why Hitler embraced socialism He was fearful of uprisings due to poor living standards in Germany during WW1.

Hitler and the Nazis outlawed socialism, and executed socialists and communists en masse, even before they started rounding up Jews. In 1933, the Dachau concentration camp held socialists and leftists exclusively. The Nazis arrested more than 11,000 Germans for "illegal socialist activity" in 1936.

Explain Hitler saying this then

We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are determined to destroy this system under all conditions.
more Adolf Hitler quotes

I'll give you a clue. Hitler did not advocate the state owning industry in name, rather, he only wanted to control over them.

He knew that running industry was better for the nation if the experts did it rather than a bunch of stupid bureuacrats. This is why the Nazi type of socialism was superior than Stalin's.

In addition, Hitler knew that the biggest threat to him was Stalin since both ran a totalitarian collectivist system, which meant both were great war machines. As it was, most of the fighting occurred between Hitler and Stalin, so his concerns were justified, which is why he went after socialists whom he thought were allies of Stalin.

Hitler once said, "Why nationalize industry when you can nationalize the people?"

Makes perfect sense.

Now the true definition of socialism is that the state takes over industry, but people who label themselves socialist, like Hitler or Bernie Sanders, do not advocate industry being taken over by the state completely, so it's kind of a lie

That makes it a bit confusing, which is what they like.

 

[mdk]

It’s funny watching people tie themselves into knots so they can pretend Spencer is some lefty loon.

Ok, what makes him otherwise?

I know it must be hard for you to make peace with, but racist assholes do exist on the right. Spencer is one of them.

 

[whitehall]

Americans are lulled by the mainstream media into taking radical crazy political factions at face value. If a crazy radical demonstrator wears a MAGA hat he must be a Trump supporter right? Think again. Politicians have been playing dirty tricks like that since there were politicians and democrats happen to be better at it than republicans.

 

[Votto]

It’s funny watching people tie themselves into knots so they can pretend Spencer is some lefty loon.

Ok, what makes him otherwise?

I know it must be hard for you to make peace with, but racist assholes do exist on the right. Spencer is one of them.

Again, what makes someone "right" or "left" in your opinion?

If you watch the media, they would have you believe that all the racists are on the right and the right encompasses everyone that opposes the DNC

 

[Votto]

Americans are lulled by the mainstream media into taking radical crazy political factions at face value. If a crazy radical demonstrator wears a MAGA hat he must be a Trump supporter right? Think again. Politicians have been playing dirty tricks like that since there were politicians and democrats happen to be better at it than republicans.

I can understand why racists like Richard may like Trump at first. After all, he wants to build a wall to keep "brown" skins folks out.

But this is not why I favor building a wall. My issue is illegal immigration and the cost of allowing this to continue in terms of both dollars and our safety and the safety of those folks making the perilous journey where God only knows how many are killed or worse.

But the Left exploits this commonality and would lead everyone to believe that favoring a wall is based on racism only.

 

[whitehall]

Va. governor Terry McAuliffe is a long time democrat insider. It was his responsibility to safeguard the lives of the people in Charlottesville but he invited or sanctioned (or both) bus loads of demonstrators who pretended to be Trump supporters but were hired by the dirty tricks democrats. When the shit hit the fan the media was quick to blame Trump while McAuliffe hid under his desk until the dust cleared. That's how the system works and Americans need to be aware of it.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

White racists are part of the right. Black racists are part of the left. Black racists have much more influence on the left than white racists have on the right

When people start these conversations, they are indulging in identity politics. In this case, however, the identity is based upon being left or being right. They are just protecting their turf by refusing to acknowledge that the tribe they have joined includes some unsavory people.

If people approached politics as an individual and according to values rather than as a member of a group and loyalty to the group, they would understand a whole lot more than they do.

 

[Votto]

White racists are part of the right. Black racists are part of the left. Black racists have much more influence on the left than white racists have on the right

When people start these conversations, they are indulging in identity politics. In this case, however, the identity is based upon being left or being right. They are just protecting their turf by refusing to acknowledge that the tribe they have joined includes some unsavory people.

If people approached politics as an individual and according to values rather than as a member of a group and loyalty to the group, they would understand a whole lot more than they do.

So that is your political spectrum? White racists and black racists opposing each other?

Really?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

White racists are part of the right. Black racists are part of the left. Black racists have much more influence on the left than white racists have on the right

When people start these conversations, they are indulging in identity politics. In this case, however, the identity is based upon being left or being right. They are just protecting their turf by refusing to acknowledge that the tribe they have joined includes some unsavory people.

If people approached politics as an individual and according to values rather than as a member of a group and loyalty to the group, they would understand a whole lot more than they do.

So that is your political spectrum? White racists and black racists opposing each other?

Really?

No.

How you arrived at that is anybody's guess.