So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

[JoeB131]

I don't get this game, Joe, but you're the one who wants to play it. So keep playing it or don't. But don't be a whining clueless baby about it

Guy, you are the one who gets on here every day and defends the Orange Shitgibbon.... who you totally don't support, but whatever.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

 

[kaz]

I don't get this game, Joe, but you're the one who wants to play it. So keep playing it or don't. But don't be a whining clueless baby about it

Guy, you are the one who gets on here every day and defends the Orange Shitgibbon.... who you totally don't support, but whatever.

You're the one who voted for Trump and defense his policies all day long. Orange is your favorite color, isn't it?

 

[kaz]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

Yes, you were cheering when your hero Putin and his sock puppet Trump prevented millions of black voters, or as you call them porch monkeys, from voting, didn't you, Grand Wizard? Or as you said it, you didn't care if Clinton won, you just didn't want the negroes to put her there. You just want to live in a country where white people decide who our leaders are

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

Yes, you were cheering when your hero Putin and his sock puppet Trump prevented millions of black voters, or as you call them porch monkeys, from voting, didn't you, Grand Wizard? Or as you said it, you didn't care if Clinton won, you just didn't want the negroes to put here there. You just wanted white people to decide

/----/ Please post a link to verify that Blacks were prevented from voting. With millions to choose from, it should be easy for you to back up your claim. TIA

 

[kaz]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

Yes, you were cheering when your hero Putin and his sock puppet Trump prevented millions of black voters, or as you call them porch monkeys, from voting, didn't you, Grand Wizard? Or as you said it, you didn't care if Clinton won, you just didn't want the negroes to put here there. You just wanted white people to decide

/----/ Please post a link to verify that Blacks were prevented from voting. With millions to choose from, it should be easy for you to back up your claim. TIA
View attachment 183476

You don't recognize someone doing to Joe what he does to everyone else? Seriously?

 

[MordechaiGoodbud]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

If he would have been considered a standard Republican, why did the Republicans spent $3 million dollars and send Trump, Pence, and Trump jr. to try and beat him?

That only Democrats are saying he was a good Republican candidate pretty much shoots down your crap, doesn't it? And don't make up another lie that is Monday morning quarterbacking, that was the concern from the outset.

And the Democrat ran as a non-Democrat. It's hilarious you think that's proof people want Democrats

Trying writing a little more coherently. I can't make heads or tails out of your post.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

Yes, you were cheering when your hero Putin and his sock puppet Trump prevented millions of black voters, or as you call them porch monkeys, from voting, didn't you, Grand Wizard? Or as you said it, you didn't care if Clinton won, you just didn't want the negroes to put here there. You just wanted white people to decide

/----/ Please post a link to verify that Blacks were prevented from voting. With millions to choose from, it should be easy for you to back up your claim. TIA
View attachment 183476

You don't recognize someone doing to Joe what he does to everyone else? Seriously?

/----/ Sometimes the nuances can get lost in a thread.

 

[kaz]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

If he would have been considered a standard Republican, why did the Republicans spent $3 million dollars and send Trump, Pence, and Trump jr. to try and beat him?

That only Democrats are saying he was a good Republican candidate pretty much shoots down your crap, doesn't it? And don't make up another lie that is Monday morning quarterbacking, that was the concern from the outset.

And the Democrat ran as a non-Democrat. It's hilarious you think that's proof people want Democrats

Trying writing a little more coherently. I can't make heads or tails out of your post.

My post is clear if you know the story I am commenting on and read the posts I was responding to. I do agree I did not explain the story if you're only superficially aware of the special election I'm commenting on

 

[rshermn]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

[/QUOTE]

Thanks, me republican con troll. You posted EXACTLY as those who know you expected. And your post will help thinking that will cause wholesale losses in November.

 

[rshermn]

It's hilarious and quite surprising. Repugs have cheated in Pennsylvania by using gerrymandering for years, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled recently that the House districts in the state must be redrawn. However, Repugs STILL lost district PA-18 to Democrat Conor Lamb, despite it being one of the reddest districts in the state. Trump won this district by 20% in 2016.

Repugs have got to be very nervous about the 2018 election. Even "safe" red districts could be up for grabs. They better get Putin on the phone quickly and get more help.

So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.

Yup. That is how stupid they were.

 

[rshermn]

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

Yes, this is better than porn for you, watching the horrified reactions of women and minorities that Trump stole the election.

Point is, the GOP shouldn't have lost either of these elections... but they did.

Yes, you were cheering when your hero Putin and his sock puppet Trump prevented millions of black voters, or as you call them porch monkeys, from voting, didn't you, Grand Wizard? Or as you said it, you didn't care if Clinton won, you just didn't want the negroes to put here there. You just wanted white people to decide

/----/ Please post a link to verify that Blacks were prevented from voting. With millions to choose from, it should be easy for you to back up your claim. TIA
View attachment 183476

You don't recognize someone doing to Joe what he does to everyone else? Seriously?

/----/ Sometimes the nuances can get lost in a thread.

Wow. Nothing like picking a truly partial source, me boy. The heritage foundation is a nut case crazy con web site, and never looks at things with a nonpartial view. So, I did not read it. I would not post a piece from MoveOn, because I have integrity. Asking anyone to read slanted con drivel is bad form, me boy, and proves you to be trivial. Thanks for that.

 

[rshermn]

Well, you're the one who voted for Trump. You must be a racist then

I think you are losing it... but never mind.

I think you are stupid ... but never mind.

Kaz: I'm not a Trump supporter, didn't vote for him, I oppose his tariffs, he's not free trade, I want out of the middle east not deeper in, he's a pig to women and unlike you leftists who worship the sexual predator Clintons, I care.

Joe: You're a Trump supporter

Joe: You're a Trump supporter

Joe: You're a Trump supporter

Joe: You're a Trump supporter

Kaz: You're a Trump supporter

Joe: WTF? Where did that even come from? You're insane, I didn't vote for Trump. Why would you even think that?

Idiot

Go worship your orange God, Trump lover.

I don't get this game, Joe, but you're the one who wants to play it. So keep playing it or don't. But don't be a whining clueless baby about it

What is funny, me boy, is that as a con tool, you can not stay on subject. Whatever the issue, you make sure you bring up some issue with a dem, either a Clinton or Obama. Because you can not discuss republican issues on their own merit. Makes you look low on integrity, and without any ability to argue a point.

 

[rshermn]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

If he would have been considered a standard Republican, why did the Republicans spent $3 million dollars and send Trump, Pence, and Trump jr. to try and beat him?

That only Democrats are saying he was a good Republican candidate pretty much shoots down your crap, doesn't it? And don't make up another lie that is Monday morning quarterbacking, that was the concern from the outset.

And the Democrat ran as a non-Democrat. It's hilarious you think that's proof people want Democrats

How silly. Thinking any dem could win in this district. Lets see, you repubs should be working hard at making excuses. Ah, yes. You are indeed. But the excuses make no difference. Net is, repubs and repub con trolls like yourself, LOST.

 

[rshermn]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

If he would have been considered a standard Republican, why did the Republicans spent $3 million dollars and send Trump, Pence, and Trump jr. to try and beat him?

Because he is in the Democrat party. He'll likely vote their way on some issues if he wants their support. However if we are going to lose to somebody, it might as well be him.

Great rationalization, me con troll. Keep using it as the repub seats in congress decrease, one after the other. Soon we will see speaker Ryan following Boehner's lead, and getting out of dodge.

 

[rshermn]

Oh please. You only wish this had anything to do with Trump. And wouldn't the answer to your question be that gerrymandering isn't why you people lose elections?

The Republicans barely lost to a DINO. If he ran on the Republican ticket, he would have been considered your standard Republican.

Keep projecting. It's what you did before you lost Congress, the Senate, the White House, and most of the governorships across the country. In spite of all the MSM brainwashing, our country has never been better. Lower taxes, most wage earners bringing home more in their paychecks, unemployment at the lowest levels in almost a half-century, Raises and bonuses being handed out, consumer and corporate confidence at record levels, NK begging for relief and ISIS out of Iraq that DumBama Fd up. WTF would people have to vote against when it comes to Republicans?

If he would have been considered a standard Republican, why did the Republicans spent $3 million dollars and send Trump, Pence, and Trump jr. to try and beat him?

That only Democrats are saying he was a good Republican candidate pretty much shoots down your crap, doesn't it? And don't make up another lie that is Monday morning quarterbacking, that was the concern from the outset.

And the Democrat ran as a non-Democrat. It's hilarious you think that's proof people want Democrats

Yup. And there goes another Republican seat they used to occupy in the House. Say goodby, me boy.

 

[rshermn]

It's hilarious and quite surprising. Repugs have cheated in Pennsylvania by using gerrymandering for years, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled recently that the House districts in the state must be redrawn. However, Repugs STILL lost district PA-18 to Democrat Conor Lamb, despite it being one of the reddest districts in the state. Trump won this district by 20% in 2016.

Repugs have got to be very nervous about the 2018 election. Even "safe" red districts could be up for grabs. They better get Putin on the phone quickly and get more help.

So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.

Wrong. Lamb received more votes than Saccone. Clinton received more votes than did Trump.

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.
This time it was the Republicans who ran an unlikable, low-energy candidate.

Yes. The elections since Trump won have been no huge boon for Republicans for sure. But they have been no such justification for a "blue wave" either. Both parties have mostly won what they should have won. Alabama was a sick **** and this district was an unpopular Republican versus a Democrat party disavowing Democrat. Hardly clear signals either. I haven't seen a clear signal yet either way in any election.

That Democrats think a Democrat who ran as a non-Democrat proves that people want a blue wave is as laughable as this though.

You are a con troll. You ALWAYS see blue skies for repubs when a storm is approaching. So, please, do happily wave goodbye to that republican house seat. Maybe a can of red paint and change the color back to red, eh, me boy?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's hilarious and quite surprising. Repugs have cheated in Pennsylvania by using gerrymandering for years, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled recently that the House districts in the state must be redrawn. However, Repugs STILL lost district PA-18 to Democrat Conor Lamb, despite it being one of the reddest districts in the state. Trump won this district by 20% in 2016.

Repugs have got to be very nervous about the 2018 election. Even "safe" red districts could be up for grabs. They better get Putin on the phone quickly and get more help.

So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.

Yup. That is how stupid they were.

Yup, stupid Dems.
You think they'll nominate brittle Hillary again?

 

[rshermn]

It's hilarious and quite surprising. Repugs have cheated in Pennsylvania by using gerrymandering for years, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled recently that the House districts in the state must be redrawn. However, Repugs STILL lost district PA-18 to Democrat Conor Lamb, despite it being one of the reddest districts in the state. Trump won this district by 20% in 2016.

Repugs have got to be very nervous about the 2018 election. Even "safe" red districts could be up for grabs. They better get Putin on the phone quickly and get more help.

So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.

Yup. That is how stupid they were.

Yup, stupid Dems.
You think they'll nominate brittle Hillary again?

Did the Dems loose that seat, me boy. Dems were stupid when they ran Hillary, repubs are just plain stupid. But, in this case those dems gained a seat, and those stupid repubs lost one.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's hilarious and quite surprising. Repugs have cheated in Pennsylvania by using gerrymandering for years, which is why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled recently that the House districts in the state must be redrawn. However, Repugs STILL lost district PA-18 to Democrat Conor Lamb, despite it being one of the reddest districts in the state. Trump won this district by 20% in 2016.

Repugs have got to be very nervous about the 2018 election. Even "safe" red districts could be up for grabs. They better get Putin on the phone quickly and get more help.

So How Did Repubs Lose A House Race In A District They Gerrymandered To Be Democrat-Proof???

The same way Hillary lost to a guy who never ran for office before.

Yup. That is how stupid they were.

Yup, stupid Dems.
You think they'll nominate brittle Hillary again?

Did the Dems loose that seat, me boy. Dems were stupid when they ran Hillary, repubs are just plain stupid. But, in this case those dems gained a seat, and those stupid repubs lost one.

No, the Dems did not run an unlikable "Hillary candidate" for that seat.