Smile please ! IDF death squad caught on camera again


Oh dear . When does thee peace fire start ?
This isnt even in the strip. Its in the West Bank that Israel is trying to steal.
If they arent careful they will get a reputation worse than trump.
Still the IDF are investigating this policy decision. So thats OK.
Israel kills terrorists whats wrong with that. They should take the west bank and send them back to Jordan where they belong
 
Some Palestinians have, they still have the Deeds to property on the West Bank now stolen and occupied by foreign Colonialists.
That's what happens when you lose wars. Many French lost their lands in Algeria when they lost their war. Many Germans lost their land when Germany lost WW1 and large swaths of Germany had been taken by France. Same for French who lost wars to Germany in the nineteenth century. Same to the Vietnamese, Cambodians and Laotians when they lost their wars with the communists. Same to the Ukrainians who live in the occupied oblasts, although the Russians usually simply kill those they dispossess.
 
Last edited:
That's what happens when you lose wars. Many French lost their lands in Algeria when they lost their war. Many Germans lost their land when Germany lost WW1 and large swaths of Germany had been taken by France. Same for French who lost wards to Germany in the nineteenth century. Same to the Vietnamese, Cambodians and Laotians when they lost their wars with the communists. Same to the Ukrainians who live in the occupied oblasts, although the Russians usually simply kill those they dispossess.
The Arabs on the West Bank are from Jordan. King Hussein expelled them because they were violent and tried to overthrow his kingdom. Israel wont allow them in so the west bank was created.
 
No right of return for Arabs but you are ok with a Polish or American Jew who has never been there having a right of so called return?
There is no right of return for the Eastern Europeans forced off their land in the nineteenth century and forced to immigrate to the USA to survive, ditto for the Irish who were starved off their lands by newly appointed British absentee landlords and the Scots who had the same experience. You and those like you are holding the Israelis to a standard different from every other people and nation in history. How about the Jews who were expelled from their homes in other Muslim countries with only the clothes on their backs in the years following the creation of Israel. Do they have the right to return and repossess their property and goods?
 
Last edited:
Ther is no right of return for the Eastern Europeans forced off their land in the nineteenth century and forced to immigrate to the USA to survive, ditto for the Irish who were starved off their lands by newly appointed British absentee landlords and the Scots who had the same experience. You and those like you are holding the Israelis to a standard different from every other people and nation in history. How about the Jews who were expelled from their homes in other Muslim countries with only the clothes on their backs in the years following the creation of Israel. Do they have the right to return and repossess their property and goods?
There is rigght of return for Arabs. They can return to Egypt and Jordan where they came from
 
Some Palestinians have, they still have the Deeds to property on the West Bank now stolen and occupied by foreign Colonialists.

Those lazy Arab squatters never owned that land. Not under the Ottomans, not under the British and not under the Jordanians.
 
So is the UK.
Right on brother: The Celts arrived and took land from the earlier inhabitants of Britain. Later, the Anglo-Saxons displaced much of the Celtic population, and the Normans imposed their will on the Saxons after 1066. Of course, there were conquerors long before the Celts. By modern standards, this might be called “stolen land,” but at the time conquest was considered legitimate. Woodrow Wilson worked to end the right of conquest, arguing that if nothing is gained from war, wars are less likely. His reasoning shifted us into a new reality, where conquest is no longer accepted as a lawful way to own land. However, to retroactively consider all lands as “stolen land” is illegitimate, because people lived in a different reality at that time.
 
Right on brother: The Celts arrived and took land from the earlier inhabitants of Britain. Later, the Anglo-Saxons displaced much of the Celtic population, and the Normans imposed their will on the Saxons after 1066. Of course, there were conquerors long before the Celts. By modern standards, this might be called “stolen land,” but at the time conquest was considered legitimate. Woodrow Wilson worked to end the right of conquest, arguing that if nothing is gained from war, wars are less likely. His reasoning shifted us into a new reality, where conquest is no longer accepted as a lawful way to own land. However, to retroactively consider all lands as “stolen land” is illegitimate, because people lived in a different reality at that time.
Well if that is your logic Hitler took most of Europe.
 
There is no right of return for the Eastern Europeans forced off their land in the nineteenth century and forced to immigrate to the USA to survive, ditto for the Irish who were starved off their lands by newly appointed British absentee landlords and the Scots who had the same experience. You and those like you are holding the Israelis to a standard different from every other people and nation in history. How about the Jews who were expelled from their homes in other Muslim countries with only the clothes on their backs in the years following the creation of Israel. Do they have the right to return and repossess their property and goods?
What about the ones who came last week?
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom