Since the left enjoy extinguishing representations of Confederacy and Slavery

[Robert W]

Why do you think they've avoided the Democrat party itself, considering it was the Democrats whose roots were slavery, they fought for slavery, the confederates fought for the Democrats for slavery, and 100 years after slavery the Democrats even voted against civil rights?

All while the Republicans fought against slavery, and overwhelmingly supported civil rights.

They do not have good teachers. The Teachers union hides the crimes committed by the Democrats.

 

[Flash]

Why do you think they've avoided the Democrat party itself, considering it was the Democrats whose roots were slavery, they fought for slavery, the confederates fought for the Democrats for slavery, and 100 years after slavery the Democrats even voted against civil rights?

All while the Republicans fought against slavery, and overwhelmingly supported civil rights.

Since these stupid Moon Bats are butt hurt over this then they need to understand that the US flag is the flag of slavery.

It was legal at the Federal level to have slaves in the US 70 years before the Civil War, during the Civil War and for almost a year after the Civil War.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the US, despite what the Negroes and Moon Bats were taught in the Jr High School History class. It did not apply to the US, only occupied territories in the Confederacy. Even then exemptions were given to places like New Orleans.

 

[initforme]

Slave owners were awful people. They tried to justify owning another human because they believed cheap labor was needed when really slaves weren't needed to help run a antation.

 

[Robert W]

Another bullshit thread from the OP.

Conservatives practiced chattel slavery. That used to be democrats. Now it’s republicans.

They evolved...the GOP regressed.

You have been fucked over by some very very poor history books. They lied to you.

People, we all expect to read such con jobs by Democrats and guess why? They were taught history by Democrats. Democrats are well known liars. And once a person is a liar, it is very hard for them to kick the habit.

 

[Robert W]

Slave owners were awful people. They tried to justify owning another human because they believed cheap labor was needed when really slaves weren't needed to help run a antation.

Back in those days, the entire nation we call the USA believed in slavery. It was not considered bad. Very very few such as John Brown, (Hung by the Feds) were anti slavery. It was the law of the USA. It was later an amendment changing the law. So it was not just slave owners, it was an entire country that was awful. 13 presidents owned slaves. It was that awful.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why do you think they've avoided the Democrat party itself, considering it was the Democrats whose roots were slavery, they fought for slavery, the confederates fought for the Democrats for slavery, and 100 years after slavery the Democrats even voted against civil rights?

All while the Republicans fought against slavery, and overwhelmingly supported civil rights.

So your entire premise relies on utter, abject ignorance of history.

Nice work.

 

[DukeU]

Back in those days, the entire nation we call the USA believed in slavery. It was not considered bad. Very very few such as John Brown, (Hung by the Feds) were anti slavery. It was the law of the USA. It was later an amendment changing the law. So it was not just slave owners, it was an entire country that was awful. 13 presidents owned slaves. It was that awful.

The entire planet owned slaves and some still do.

Guess which ones.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Another bullshit thread from the OP.

Conservatives practiced chattel slavery. That used to be democrats. Now it’s republicans.

They evolved...the GOP regressed.

Just think, the Democrats are now Republicans because guys like Candycorn say so. Guess we'll just have to take your word for it.

And chicks have dicks now too, just ask a leftist. everyday is opposite day. Their only progressive practice is all definitions are subject to change, hourly.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

More democrats voted for civil rights than republicans. A Democratic president advocated for the law, and after the law was passed, Republicans nominated a presidential candidate that voted against civil rights.

Ah, neat way to mislead everyone with fuzzy numbers. The OP didn't skip, you skipped the facts, because you can't handle them.

With a little research, the actual voting record for both Houses of Congress shows that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed the Senate on a 73-to-27 vote. The Democratic supermajority in the Senate split their vote 46 (69%) for and 21 (31%) against. The Republicans, on the other hand, split their vote 27 for (82%) and 6 against (18%). Thus, the no vote consisted of 78% Democrats. Further, the infamous 74-day filibuster was led by the Southern Democrats, who overwhelmingly voted against the act.

An examination of the House vote shows a similar pattern. The House voted 290 to 130 in favor. Democrats split their vote 152 (61%) to 96 (39%) while Republicans split theirs 138 (80%) to 34 (20%). The no vote consisted of 74% Democrats. Clearly, the 1964 Civil Rights Act could not have been passed without the leadership of Republicans such as Everett Dirksen and the votes of Republicans. As the online Wall Street Journal so aptly subtitled Mr. Steele's article, "Trent Lott jeopardizes the very productive ideas his party stands for."

I'll dumb it down so a leftist can understand it.

Senate:
31% of the Democrats voted NO. Just think, more than 3 of 10 Democracks voted NO.
18% of the Republicans voted NO.

Democracks represented 78% of the NO vote.

Congress:
39% of the Democrats voted NO. Just think, 4 of 10 Democracks voted NO.
20% of the Republicans voted NO.

Democracks represented 74% of the NO vote.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

So your entire premise relies on utter, abject ignorance of history.

Nice work.

This is where leftists say up is down, and anyone that doesn't believe so is a liar.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

The entire planet owned slaves and some still do.

Guess which ones.

Me me me me me....................Blacks

But since Democrats are really Republicans & vise versa, then blacks are really white & vise versa. That's just how shit works, in progressive.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

Democrats owned slaves. Lets burn down all Democrat statues starting with George Floyd.

 

[marvin martian]

Why do you think they've avoided the Democrat party itself, considering it was the Democrats whose roots were slavery, they fought for slavery, the confederates fought for the Democrats for slavery, and 100 years after slavery the Democrats even voted against civil rights?

All while the Republicans fought against slavery, and overwhelmingly supported civil rights.

I've said it for years. The DemoKKKrat party is the most racist organization in American history and should be disbanded and banned permanently.

 

[Mac-7]

Another bullshit thread from the OP.

Conservatives practiced chattel slavery. That used to be democrats. Now it’s republicans.

They evolved...the GOP regressed.

Repubs own slaves that used to be owned by democrats?

Thats news

Where did you hear that?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

And we don't need to "ask" if we can destroy Democratic statues, we should just DO IT, like the Democrats have done by DESTROYING 41 statues thus far.

 

[Robert W]

More democrats voted for civil rights than republicans. A Democratic president advocated for the law, and after the law was passed, Republicans nominated a presidential candidate that voted against civil rights.

A larger number of Democrats said hell no to civil rights. But though Republicans had the smaller number, the largest percentage of their votes was for civil rights.

What is interesting is the nay votes by Republicans was that the States should make the decision and not the Feds. But they still were all for civil rights. It is very similar to the Roe v Wade decision where it was Republicans who changed the law so states can make the decision.

He is smearing Senator Barry Goldwater that turned down civil rights based on his belief as a Major General in the Air Force reserves held out for states rights.

Who supported states rights?


When the Federalists passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison secretly wrote the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, which provide a classic statement in support of states' rights and called on state legislatures to nullify unconstitutional federal laws.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Repubs own slaves that used to be owned by democrats?

Thats news

Where did you hear that?

 

[Robert W]

Repubs own slaves that used to be owned by democrats?

Thats news

Where did you hear that?

She is trying the con job that Democrats truly supported civil rights and jumped ship to we Republicans. I find one or two who actually jumped off the democrats lack of civil rights support bandwagon.

 

[Robert W]

The Democrats had the greater numbers in 1964 and 1965 for civil rights

Every southern GOP senator and representative voted against the CRA and the VA, including Goldwater.

Our kids are carefully parsed on this, because of the GOP lies.

There was not even one Democrat from the South that voted for the Civil Rights laws. In fact it was primarily due to the actions by a Republican Senator that got it voted into law. Everett Dirksen in fact.

 

[eagle7-31]

She is trying the con job that Democrats truly supported civil rights and jumped ship to we Republicans. I find one or two who actually jumped off the democrats lack of civil rights support bandwagon.

3 of the dems that voted against the 1964 act are Sam Ervin, William Fulbright and Al Gore Sr. They became icons of the left later in the 1970's so they were forgiven of their 1964 sin. BTW Goldwater voted for the 1957 civil rights act that only passed after LBJ watered it down so to speak.