Zone1 signs and events/ proofs of Islam

[toty5]

Christians claim that in the birth of Jesus, there occurred the miracle of the incarnation of God in the form of a human being. To say that God became truly a human being invites a number of questions. Let us ask the following about the man-God Jesus. What happened to his foreskin after his circumcision (Luke 2:21)?





Did it ascend to heaven, or did it decompose as with any human piece of flesh? During his lifetime what happened to his hair, nails, and blood shed from wounds? Did the cells of his body die as in ordinary human beings? If his body did not function in a truly human way, he could not be truly human as well as truly God. Yet, if his body functioned exactly in a human way, this would nullify any claim to divinity. It would be impossible for any part of God, even if incarnate, to decompose in any way and still be considered God. The everlasting, one God, in whole or in part, does not die, disintegrate, or decompose: ‘For I the Lord do not change.’ (Malachi 3:6)





Did Jesus’ flesh dwell in safety after his death?

Unless Jesus’ body never underwent ‘decay’ during his lifetime he could not be God, but if it did not undergo ‘decay’ then he was not truly human.







Speakers Corner: If Christ is God and his body not divine then who died for you? -Part 1







Speakers Corner: If Christ is God and his body not divine then who died for you? Part 2









Christian Compelled To Admit This | Hashim and Intelligent Christian | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park





Jesus is God's Servant not His co-equal | Hashim vs Christian Preacher | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park






2-






The Early Christians



Historically there were many sects in early Christianity who had a range of beliefs regarding Jesus[. Some believed Jesus was God, others believed Jesus was not God but partly divine, and yet others believed he was a human being and nothing more. Trinitarian Christianity which is the belief that God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are one in three persons became the dominant sect of Christianity, once it was formalized as the state religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th Century. Christians who denied Jesus being God were persecuted by the Roman Authorities From this point onwards the Trinitarian belief became widespread amongst Christians. There were various movements in early Christianity which denied the Trinity, among the more well known of them is Adoptionism and Arianism.



Dr Jerald Dirks who is an expert on early Christianity had this to say on the subject: Early Christianity was quite conflicted about the issue of the nature of Jesus. The various Adoptionist positions within early Christianity were numerous and at times dominate. One can even speculate that Arian and Nestorian Christianity might well be an extremely sizable source within Christianity today, if it were not for the fact that these two branches of Christianity, which were located primarily in the middle east and in North Africa were so similar to the Islamic teaching regarding the nature of Jesus that they quite naturally were absorbed into Islam at the beginning of the seventh century.”



Since there were so many sects in early Christianity, each with different beliefs about Jesus and with their own versions of the Bible, which one can we say was following the true teachings of Jesus?



It doesn’t make sense that God sends countless Prophets like Noah, Abraham and Moses to tell people to believe in one God, and then suddenly sends a radically different message of the Trinity which contradicts his previous Prophets teachings. It is clear that the sect of Christianity who believed Jesus to be a human Prophet and nothing more, were following the true teachings of Jesus. This is because their concept of God is the same as that which was taught by the Prophets in the Old Testament.

Jesus in Islam



The Islamic belief about Jesus demystifies for us who the real Jesus was. Jesus in Islam was an extraordinary individual, chosen by God as a Prophet and sent to the Jewish people. He never preached that he himself was God or the actual son of God. He was miraculously born without a father, and he performed many amazing miracles such as healing the blind and the lepers and raising the dead – all by God’s permission. Muslims believe that Jesus will return before the day of Judgement to bring justice and peace to the world. This Islamic belief about Jesus is similar to the belief of some of the early Christians. In the Quran, God addresses the Christians about Jesus in the following way:



O People of the Book, do not commit excesses in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary and a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His Messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’– stop [this], that is better for you– God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust. [4:171]



Islam is not just another religion. It is the same message preached by Moses, Jesus and Abraham. Islam literally means ‘submission to God’ and it teaches us to have a direct relationship with God. It reminds us that since God created us, no one should be worshipped except God alone. It also teaches that God is nothing like a human being or like anything that we can imagine. The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as:



“Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.” (Quran 112:1-4)[4]



Becoming a Muslim is not turning your back to Jesus. Rather it’s going back to the original teachings of Jesus and obeying him.

 

[toty5]

Christ and Muhammad, the prophets of God, will not bear the sins of people

Only God the Father will judge our deeds on the Day of Resurrection

Jesus, peace be upon him, was not killed, nor was he crucified, and he will not bear the sins of people



The most common belief among Christians is the belief that Jesus died for our sins, but the question is:

Who said that Jesus died for our sins?



Actually when we look at the verses Christians use to prove this belief, we find that 95% of these verses are from Paul’s epistles, and the verses used to prove this belief from the Gospels are very few, which puts a question mark on its source and whether Jesus really told that he would die on the cross for our sins.





we as Muslims don’t need to believe that God needs to be a man or to be crucified for our sins, because God is mightier than that, we actually believe that this is a blasphemy and an insult against God. For sin to be forgiven by God, mans should repent faithfully to God, and acknowledge his sins, and God is the All Forgiver and All Merciful who will forgive him if He really knew he is really intending to repent and stop the sin:



110. And whoever does a wrong or wrongs himself but then seeks forgiveness of Allāh will find Allāh Forgiving and Merciful. ( Holy Quran 4:110)

Doesn’t God forgive sins without Jesus dying?



No need for all that so that God forgives my sins, and this is what is also said by the Old Testament:



Eze 18:21″But if a wicked person turns away from all his sins that he has committed and keeps all my statutes and does what is just and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die.



Eze 18:22None of the transgressions that he has committed shall be remembered against him; for the righteousness that he has done he shall live.

Did Jesus know that he came to die for our sins?





God only punishes the guilty in Islam and does not harm the innocent

Muslims do not believe in blood sacrifice and they do not believe that a holy man like Jesus should die such a cruel and humiliating death. He bears the sins of mankind while he is innocent



It is better for God to forgive without bloodshed, because He is able to do so, as in Islam, God forgives without killing an innocent person and shedding blood.

God only punishes those who commit a sin, and does not punish the oppressed







Logically, rationally and scientifically, sin is not inherited from the father to his son because it is one of the acquired actions that are not inherited. If your father committed a sin, do you inherit his sin as you inherit the color of his eyes. ? If the father chose to be a criminal, does this mean that his son will inherit from him this nature that is in the father? Likewise, if the father is good, it does not necessarily mean that the son will be so, because he inherited the nature of his father





The belief the inherited sin. contradicts divine justice. This is because the just God punishes a person for what he did, not for what his father or grandparents did. The Bible says in Ezekiel 18/20-21: The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them.



This text indicates the responsibility of each individual for his sin and thus denies the inherited sin.



And in Matthew 16-27: and then he will reward each person according to what they have done.

. Christ Himself decides that each person will be rewarded according to his deeds. This contradicts inherited sin and salvation by crucifixion, because the text indicates that salvation is through work and not by crucifixion

The Deen Show: Did Jesus die for the sins of the world? ( 1 of 2 )​

The Deen Show: Did Jesus die for the sins of the world? ( 2 of 2 )​

And I have already mentioned before that all that John said was not said by Christ according to the words of the scholars



Forged books? In the Bible?



Why are we not surprised? After all, even the gospel authors are unknown. In fact, they’re anonymous. Biblical scholars rarely, if ever, ascribe gospel authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. As Ehrman tells us, “Most scholars today have abandoned these identifications, and recognize that the books were written by otherwise unknown but relatively well-educated Greek-speaking (and writing) Christians during the second half of the first century.”[ Graham Stanton affirms, “The gospels, unlike most Graeco-Roman writings, are anonymous. The familiar headings which give the name of an author (‘The Gospel according to …’) were not part of the original manuscripts, for they were added only early in the second century.”



So what, if anything, did Jesus’ disciples have to do with authoring the gospels? Little or nothing, so far as we know. But we have no reason to believe they authored any of the books of the Bible. To begin with, let us remember Mark was a secretary to Peter, and Luke a companion to Paul. The verses of Luke 6:14-16 and Matthew 10:2-4 catalogue the twelve disciples, and although these lists differ over two names, Mark and Luke don’t make either list. So only Matthew and John were true disciples. But all the same, modern scholars pretty much disqualify them as authors anyway.

Why?



Good question. John being the more famous of the two, why should we disqualify him from having authored the Gospel of “John”?

Umm … because he was dead?



Multiple sources acknowledge there is no evidence, other than questionable testimonies of second century authors, to suggest that the disciple John was the author of the Gospel of “John.”[Perhaps the most convincing refutation is that the disciple John is believed to have died in or around 98 CE.[However, the Gospel of John was written circa 110 CE.[ So whoever Luke (Paul’s companion), Mark (Peter’s secretary), and John (the unknown, but certainly not the long-dead one) were, we have no reason to believe any of the gospels were authored by Jesus’ disciples



Luke was not one of the twelve disciples of Christ, so that in the introduction to his gospel, the Gospel of Luke mentions that he transmits what he writes about those whom he described as eyewitnesses and servants of the word. There is no mention of Luke in the four Gospels, but he was mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles and in several letters to Paul In the Acts of the Apostles, we find that Luke was with Paul on his second journey from Troas.



New Testament of the Bible regarding Jesus by Yusha ...

 

[Clyde 154]

Christ and Muhammad, the prophets of God, will not bear the sins of people

Only God the Father will judge our deeds on the Day of Resurrection

Jesus, peace be upon him, was not killed, nor was he crucified, and he will not bear the sins of people



The most common belief among Christians is the belief that Jesus died for our sins, but the question is:

Who said that Jesus died for our sins?



Actually when we look at the verses Christians use to prove this belief, we find that 95% of these verses are from Paul’s epistles, and the verses used to prove this belief from the Gospels are very few, which puts a question mark on its source and whether Jesus really told that he would die on the cross for our sins.





we as Muslims don’t need to believe that God needs to be a man or to be crucified for our sins, because God is mightier than that, we actually believe that this is a blasphemy and an insult against God. For sin to be forgiven by God, mans should repent faithfully to God, and acknowledge his sins, and God is the All Forgiver and All Merciful who will forgive him if He really knew he is really intending to repent and stop the sin:



110. And whoever does a wrong or wrongs himself but then seeks forgiveness of Allāh will find Allāh Forgiving and Merciful. ( Holy Quran 4:110)

Doesn’t God forgive sins without Jesus dying?



No need for all that so that God forgives my sins, and this is what is also said by the Old Testament:



Eze 18:21″But if a wicked person turns away from all his sins that he has committed and keeps all my statutes and does what is just and right, he shall surely live; he shall not die.



Eze 18:22None of the transgressions that he has committed shall be remembered against him; for the righteousness that he has done he shall live.

Did Jesus know that he came to die for our sins?





God only punishes the guilty in Islam and does not harm the innocent

Muslims do not believe in blood sacrifice and they do not believe that a holy man like Jesus should die such a cruel and humiliating death. He bears the sins of mankind while he is innocent



It is better for God to forgive without bloodshed, because He is able to do so, as in Islam, God forgives without killing an innocent person and shedding blood.

God only punishes those who commit a sin, and does not punish the oppressed







Logically, rationally and scientifically, sin is not inherited from the father to his son because it is one of the acquired actions that are not inherited. If your father committed a sin, do you inherit his sin as you inherit the color of his eyes. ? If the father chose to be a criminal, does this mean that his son will inherit from him this nature that is in the father? Likewise, if the father is good, it does not necessarily mean that the son will be so, because he inherited the nature of his father





The belief the inherited sin. contradicts divine justice. This is because the just God punishes a person for what he did, not for what his father or grandparents did. The Bible says in Ezekiel 18/20-21: The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them.



This text indicates the responsibility of each individual for his sin and thus denies the inherited sin.



And in Matthew 16-27: and then he will reward each person according to what they have done.

. Christ Himself decides that each person will be rewarded according to his deeds. This contradicts inherited sin and salvation by crucifixion, because the text indicates that salvation is through work and not by crucifixion

The Deen Show: Did Jesus die for the sins of the world? ( 1 of 2 )​

The Deen Show: Did Jesus die for the sins of the world? ( 2 of 2 )​

And I have already mentioned before that all that John said was not said by Christ according to the words of the scholars



Forged books? In the Bible?



Why are we not surprised? After all, even the gospel authors are unknown. In fact, they’re anonymous. Biblical scholars rarely, if ever, ascribe gospel authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. As Ehrman tells us, “Most scholars today have abandoned these identifications, and recognize that the books were written by otherwise unknown but relatively well-educated Greek-speaking (and writing) Christians during the second half of the first century.”[ Graham Stanton affirms, “The gospels, unlike most Graeco-Roman writings, are anonymous. The familiar headings which give the name of an author (‘The Gospel according to …’) were not part of the original manuscripts, for they were added only early in the second century.”



So what, if anything, did Jesus’ disciples have to do with authoring the gospels? Little or nothing, so far as we know. But we have no reason to believe they authored any of the books of the Bible. To begin with, let us remember Mark was a secretary to Peter, and Luke a companion to Paul. The verses of Luke 6:14-16 and Matthew 10:2-4 catalogue the twelve disciples, and although these lists differ over two names, Mark and Luke don’t make either list. So only Matthew and John were true disciples. But all the same, modern scholars pretty much disqualify them as authors anyway.

Why?



Good question. John being the more famous of the two, why should we disqualify him from having authored the Gospel of “John”?

Umm … because he was dead?



Multiple sources acknowledge there is no evidence, other than questionable testimonies of second century authors, to suggest that the disciple John was the author of the Gospel of “John.”[Perhaps the most convincing refutation is that the disciple John is believed to have died in or around 98 CE.[However, the Gospel of John was written circa 110 CE.[ So whoever Luke (Paul’s companion), Mark (Peter’s secretary), and John (the unknown, but certainly not the long-dead one) were, we have no reason to believe any of the gospels were authored by Jesus’ disciples



Luke was not one of the twelve disciples of Christ, so that in the introduction to his gospel, the Gospel of Luke mentions that he transmits what he writes about those whom he described as eyewitnesses and servants of the word. There is no mention of Luke in the four Gospels, but he was mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles and in several letters to Paul In the Acts of the Apostles, we find that Luke was with Paul on his second journey from Troas.



New Testament of the Bible regarding Jesus by Yusha ...

Your false religion meets all the criteria that defines the quint essential Antichrist doctrine. The most obvious. You present supposed evidence from your flawed Holy Books called the quarn and declare it truth even though the objective evidence demonstrates that your so called prophet of God........failed in his prophecies time and time again. Then you have the arrogance to declare the N.T. is false in proving that Jesus is not a prophet but the only begotten Son of the Father........without proving one passage of scripture to be false through any objective testing such as Applied Science or History Actual.

Simple test and I will convert to Islam. Do you accept Christ Jesus as the Messiah of Prophecy and Equal to God? If not why not? Muhammad has been proven to be a fraud time and time again. The Holy Scriptures declare without ambiguity that Jesus was not a Prophet but the Son of God and equal to God.


"Who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God; but made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself, and became obedient even unto death, even the death of the cross." -- Phil. 2:6-8

Your major flaws in defending the quran? The content of the O.T.

Jesus was born according to O.T. prophecy, but no where is there any record of prophecy found in predicting Muhammad in the O.T. record. These prophecies concerning Jesus are found throughout the O.T., some 3,348 verses that are prophecies of Christ. The record in the N.T. confirms though O.T. history and the many signs and wonders preformed by Jesus...that the Messiah (the Son of God) was on the earth in the 1st century. (Matthew 5:17-19, Luke 24:44, 1 Peter 1:20-12)...all demonstrate that Jesus came to fulfill the O.T. prophecies.

Its easy to see why you must call the N.T. lies........the truth contradicts your false religion whose mission is not conveying men into the Spiritual Kingdom of God.....but to literally establish a world wide physical kingdom at the point of a sword when required.

You do not practice equality as does the Christ, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female for you are all one in Christ." -- Gal 3:28

Even today, the female is considered less than a man in public.........slavery is still practiced throughout the majority of the regions where Islam is practiced.......in battle the men hide behind the innocent (women and children) to protect the supposed holy warriors of allah.

Having served in the US military..........we had a saying, "The only moderate Muslim is one that has run out of ammo....."

 

[toty5]

The Prophet Muhammad did not say a single prophecy that was wrong, unlike the historically and scientifically fake Bible, according to scholars.
see here

You will be shocked



Debate: Dr. Zakir Naik vs. Dr William Campbell - The Quran and the Bible in the Light of Science







القرآن يذهل العالم ويكشف 10 أسرار تاريخية عن الفراعنة ومصر القديمة لم تُكتشف إلا حديثاً











كيف عرف النبي ذلك؟! - حدث تاريخي مفصل يذكره القرآن بدقة ويفشل الكتاب المقدس في ذكره






Prophet Muhammad in the Old and New Testament





Prophesies of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the Jewish Scriptures - Dr Zakir Naik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yn0SZCvdVwQ

Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Prophesied in the Bible in the Gospel of John - Dr Zakir Naik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2lE5FLaYdg

Muhammad in the Bible محمد في الكتاب المقدس

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nCFYefCyiac

أحمد ديدات - ماذا يقول الكتاب المقدس عن محمد

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVyDQZh2FdI

2-


Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men; and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient [even] unto death, yea, the death of the cross. Wherefore also God highly exalted him, and gave unto him the name which is above every name; that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of [things] in heaven and [things] on earth and [things] under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil. 2.5-11).



That is a rather dubious translation of that passage in Phillipians, concerning the "equality with God", since the Greek word isos means similar, not equal.





If the Father is not the only true God (as you suggest) then YOU are the one making Jesus out to be a liar!



Thank you for that testimony of Christian division and hypocrisy, Churchwork!



The Quran, by the way, agrees with Jesus' statements in the Bible that Allah (the Father) is "his God and our God", and "the only true God":



5:72 They do blaspheme who say: "(Allah) is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.5:117 (Jesus is quoted) "Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit, 'worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.

19:36 Verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord: Him therefore serve ye: this is a Way that is straight.



3-

Son of God
what does “Son of God” mean? And if Jesus Christ has exclusive rights to the term, why does the Bible record, “...for I (God) am a father to Israel, and Ephraim (i.e. Israel) is my firstborn” (Jeremiah 31:9) and, “...Israel is My son, even my firstborn” (Exodus 4:22)? Taken in the context of Romans 8:14, which reads, “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God,” many scholars conclude that “Son of God” is metaphorical and, as with christos, doesn’t imply exclusivity. After all, The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion confirms that in Jewish idiom “Son of God” is clearly metaphorical. To quote, “Son of God, term occasionally found in Jewish literature, biblical and post-biblical, but nowhere implying physical descent from the Godhead.”[1] Hasting’s Bible Dictionary comments:

In Semitic usage “sonship” is a conception somewhat loosely employed to denote moral rather than physical or metaphysical relationship. Thus “sons of Belial” (Jg 19:22 etc.) are wicked men, not descendants of Belial; and in the NT the “children of the bridechamber” are wedding guests. So a “son of God” is a man, or even a people, who reflect the character of God. There is little evidence that the title was used in Jewish circles of the Messiah, and a sonship which implied more than a moral relationship would be contrary to Jewish monotheism.[2]

And in any case, the list of candidates for “son of God” begins with Adam, as per Luke 3:38: “...Adam, which was the son of God.”

Those who rebut by quoting Matthew 3:17 (“And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, ‘This is My beloved son, in whom I am well pleased’”) have overlooked the point that the Bible describes many people, Israel and Adam included, as “sons of God.” Both II Samuel 7:13-14 and I Chronicles 22:10 read, “He (Solomon) shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his Father, and he shall be My son.”

Entire nations are referred to as sons, or children of God. Examples include:

Genesis 6:2, “That the sons of God saw the daughters of men…”

Genesis 6:4, “There were giants on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men…”

Deuteronomy 14:1, “Ye are the children of the Lord your God.”

Job 1:6, “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD…”

Job 2:1, “Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD…”

Job 38:7, “When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?”

Philippians 2:15, “that you may become blameless and harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation…”

1 John 3:1-2, “Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! … Beloved, now we are children of God…”












4-

Christ is not crucified

Your scripture in which you believe says that the disciples (followers of the Messiah) did not see the crucifixion; rather on that day they were fleeing and hiding from their enemies, so how could they be eyewitnesses to something that they did not see?


We will quote from your scripture and the words of your scholars words to prove that:

Mark says:

“Some women were watching from a distance. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joseph, and Salome.

In Galilee these women had followed him and cared for his needs. Many other women who had come up with him to Jerusalem were also there”

Mark 15:40-41.

Matthew says something similar (Matthew 27:55-56).

Luke says:

“But all those who knew him, including the women who had followed him from Galilee, stood at a distance, watching these things”

[Luke 23:49].

John says:

“Near the cross of Jesus stood his mother, his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene”

[John 19:23].

John Fenton says: The disciples fled when Jesus was arrested, and even though Peter had followed him from afar to the courtyard of the high priest, we do not hear anything more about him, after he denied Jesus.

Matthew, Mark and Luke tell us that the witnesses to the crucifixion were women who had followed Jesus from Galilee to Jerusalem; they saw his burial and discovered the tomb empty on the Sunday morning, and they met Jesus after his resurrection.

The scholars commented on what John said about Mary, the mother of the Messiah, being present at the cross by saying: That is not possible at all, that the relatives and friends of Jesus would be allowed to stand near the cross.

Similarly, the Encyclopaedia Britannica says, commenting on the differences in the gospels concerning those who witnessed the crucifixion: We find in the (three) synoptic Gospels that only the women followed Jesus, and that the list which was written very carefully and in precise detail did not include his mother – and that they were watching from afar.

But in John, we find that his mother Mary stood with the two other Marys and the “beloved disciple” beneath the cross, and from that time, the beloved disciple took this story to his close friends.

At the same time, his mother does not appear in Jerusalem – according to the ancient texts – except just before the feast of Pentecost, when she is accompanied by his brothers (Acts 1:14).

End quote from Munaazarah bayna al-Islam wa’n-Nasraaniyyah [Debate between Islam and Christianity] (p. 107).

So, according to what your scripture says, none of the disciples of the Messiah were present at the crucifixion at all; rather those who were present were some of the women, although the Gospels differ as to their number and identity.

How Can you Prove Jesus was not Crucified, Dr. Zakir Naik Question and Answer​

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

 

[toty5]

5-
You are just brainwashed by fake media about Muslims
The customs, traditions and cultures of peoples have nothing to do with the teachings of Islam that respect women

Someone told me

Some Islamophobes on this forum (and elsewhere) say Islam is suppressive towards women.

Yet, it has been conclusively proven that 70% of all new converts to Islam both in the USA and in Europe are women. This would be indicative that it is not suppressive but highly solicitous of women.

What do you say to those critics who insist that Islam suppresses women in light of that fact?

If I read you correctly, you are saying that Islam provides spiritual comforts and dimensions that other religions/teachings do not. That it is more than religious teaching but includes lifestyle alteration and attitudes which is what appeals to women.

One things for sure, Islam's critics have no answer for why so many women convert to it despite all the allegations that it is a contrarian religion.


while women have undeniably gained freedom, in the West, in recent decades, equality is still far away and the commercial world has never really stopped exploiting its image in a manner always degrading in order to sell a certain model of society.


The woman is too often represented there as a sexual slave, a symbol of desire, a piece of meat or even a brainless jug reduced to a simple object of consumption. Believe me, the image of the real woman is not at the heart of their considerations..


Western society falsely claims to have uplifted womenWestern talk of women’s liberalization is nothing but a disguised form of exploitation of her body, degradation of her soul and deprivation of her honour. Western society claims to have ‘uplifted’ women. On the contrary it has actually degraded them to the status of concubines, mistresses and society butterflies who are mere tools in the hands of pleasure seekers and sex marketeers, hidden behind the colourful screen of ‘art’ and ‘culture






6-

A comparison between the status of women in the Qur’an and the Bible



مقارنة بين وضع المراة فى القران والانجيل

Christians claim that women should be subjugated to men in islam

and that Islam is cruel towards women. Below are the comparisons of issues on women between the Bible and the Qur’an I leave it to you to decide which Book is the one which truly gives freedom to women and elevate their status and which Book is the hypocritical one.



1. The Bible convicts women as the original sinners (i.e. Eve picking from the forbidden tree) (Genesis 2:4-3:24)



The Qur’an clarifies that it was both Adam and Eve at fault, equally. For example, in Sura’ al-Baqarah, Allaah says:



“fa azallaHUMAA ash-shayTaan..” meaning “And Satan caused them (DUAL) to err..”



The same is found in Qur’an 7:19-25 wherein it says:



“fa-waswasa laHUMAA ash-shayTaan..” meaning “So Satan whispered to them (DUAL)”.



Both the man and woman were equally to blame. Thus, in Islam there is equity in rights as well as blame.



2. The Bible says “the birth of a daughter is a loss”. (Ecclesiasticus 22:3)

The Qur’an says both are an equal blessing (Qur’an 42:49)



3. The Bible forbids women from speaking in church (I Corinthians 14:34-35)

The Qur’an says women can argue with the Prophet (Qur’an 58:1)



4. In the Bible, divorced Women are labeled as an adulteress, not men (Matthew 5:31-32)

The Qur’an does not have Biblical double standards (Qur’an 30:21)



5. In the Bible, widows and sisters do not inherit any property or wealth, only men do (Numbers 27:1-11)

The Qur’an abolished this male greediness (Qur’an 4:22) and God protects all.



6. The Bible allows multiple wives. (I Kings 11:3)

In the Qur’an God limits the number to 4 only under certain situations (with the wife’s permission) and prefers that you marry only one wife (Qur’an 4:3). The Qur’an gives the woman the right to choose who to marry.



NOTE: Nowhere in the Bible does it forbid polygamy, or says that the male must marry one woman. Single marriage is a Greco-Roman tradition – one of the many influences on the true teachings of Jesus. Jesus lived for 33 years among a nation that practiced polygamy and he never prohibited, nor even ever talked about it in his teachings.



7. “If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl’s father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives” (Deuteronomy 22:28-30)



One must ask a simple question here, who is really punished, the man who raped the woman or the woman who was raped? According to the Bible, you have to spend the rest of your life with the man who raped you, and therefore had obviously low morals.



However, even before the marriage women in Islam are given right to choose their husband, and they can even reject if they are forced to marry somebody. In a hadith narrated by Aisha’, the Prophet said, “It is essential to have the consent of a virgin (for the marriage)”.



Other similar hadith are as follows:



Narrated Abu Hurairah r.a, that the Prophet said, “A divorcee cannot be forced to marry before she agrees, and a virgin cannot be forced to marry before her permission is obtained. The Sahaba’ asked “How can we obtain her permission?” The Prophet said, “Her permission is when she keeps quiet.” (Muslim)



Ibn Abbas reported that a girl came to the Messenger of Allah Muhammad and she reported that her father had forced her to marry without her consent. The Messenger of Allah gave her the choice (between accepting the marriage and invalidating it). (Ibn Hanbal)



Would the Christian men reading this prefer the women they know to be Christian or Muslim?



8. The Bible also asks women to wear veils as in Islam (I Corinthians 11:3-10)



9. Women were given rights to vote less than a 100 years ago in the U.S. while the Qur’an gave women voting rights almost 1400 years ago.



In a hadith narrated by Abu Huraira, the Apostle of God said, “Treat women nicely, for a women is created from a rib, and the most curved portion of the rib is its upper portion, so, if you should try to straighten it, it will break, but if you leave it as it is, it will remain crooked. So treat women nicely.” (Sahih Bukhari)

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

7-



Attitude of the Christians towards slaves:

Christianity confirmed slavery as it had been affirmed beforehand by Judaism. There is no text in the Gospels that prohibits or denounces slavery. It is remarkable that the historian William Muir criticized our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) for not immediately abolishing slavery, whilst overlooking the attitude of the Gospels concerning slavery, as there is no report from the Messiah, or from the Disciples, or from the churches concerning this issue.

Rather, in his Epistles, Paul advised that slaves should be loyal to their masters, as he says in his Epistle to the Ephesians, where he enjoins slaves to obey their masters as they would obey the Messiah:

“5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ.

6 Obey them not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but like slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.

7 Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not men,

8 because you know that the Lord will reward everyone for whatever good he does, whether he is slave or free”

(Ephesians 6:5-9).

In Grand Larousse encyclopédique, it says: It comes as no surprise that slavery has continued among Christians until today; the official representatives of the faith have affirmed its validity and accepted its legitimacy.

… to sum up: the Christian religion approved fully of slavery and still does so today. It is very difficult for anyone to prove that Christianity strove to abolish slavery.

The saints affirmed that nature makes some people slaves.

Churchmen did not prevent slavery or oppose it; rather they supported it, to such an extent that the philosopher saint Thomas Aquinas supported the philosophical view that agreed with the view of religious leaders, and he did not object to slavery, rather he praised it because – according to the view of Aristotle – it is one of the conditions in which some people are created naturally, and it does not contradict faith for a man to be content with the lowest position in life.

Haqaa’iq al-Islam by al-‘Aqqaad (p. 215).

In the Dictionary of the Bible by Dr. George Yousuf it says: Christianity did not object to slavery for political or economic reasons, and it did not urge believers to oppose their generation’s views with regard to slavery, or even debate it, and it did not say anything against the rights of slave owners or motivate the slaves to seek independence; it did not discuss the harm or harshness of slavery and it did not enjoin the immediate release of slaves.

It did not change anything in the nature of the relationship between master and slave; on the contrary, it affirmed the rights and duties of both parties.

 

[The Original Tree]

The Prophet Muhammad talked about the tall buildings that the Arabs had not known before, and this is a future miracle for the Arabs

Babel Tower has nothing to do with the prophecy of the Messenger Muhammad, may God bless him and grant him peace


God mentioned Jerusalem is a holy place, the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, prayed in Jerusalem, and The prophets prayed behind the Messenger Muhammad.


God in Islam
The noble Qur`an corrected the belief in trinity and the belief that Jesus (peace be upon him) is "God"

We admire and venerate the noble Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) as the last Messenger of God sent to all mankind, while you and the Catholics worship a noble Messenger of God (meaning: Jesus, peace be upon him) as "God Himself"

We believe that Allah - the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth - alone has the right to decide what is lawful and what is unlawful.
The Prophets and Messengers of God inform their people regarding God's commands and prohibitions for them.

As for giving this right to the creation, then this is taking them as Lords besides God in the Islamic understanding.

This means that in our view Christians are guilty of declaring a Messenger of God as "God Himself" and as taking their priests / scholars as Lords besides God:

{ They have taken their scholars and monks as lords besides Allāh, and [also] the Messiah, the son of Mary. And they were not commanded except to worship one God; there is no deity except Him. Exalted is He above whatever they associate with Him. }

[English interpretation of the Aya 9:31 of the noble Qur`an]


2-


what does your Bible teach ?


It teaches that God murdered all those of two years old and less in Egypt to show that he was boss.

It teaches that God instructed his tribe to murder the women and children of his tribe. What message does that send to Christians about the treatment of their enemies? Do you wonder why Christian Germany ended up in murdering millions of Jews who they regarded as enemies?

It teaches that Jesus instructed his followers to forsake parents, siblings, friends etc as a necessity to follow him (Jesus).




When it comes to talking about the violence of the sacred texts, the hypocrisy is brought to a head by Christians. Their doctrine claims that their book is filled with Love, that their teachings are filled with Love, and that their divinity is Love. Now we will see the myth behind this design and remind them of the famous Christ saying:

Why do you see the straw that's in your brother's eye, and don't you see the beam that's in your eye?

(Matthew 7,3)


Here are the “10 commandments of biblical Jihad” that the Eternal - JESUS of the N.T. - laid in his infinite Love:

1) Prepare for war!
2) Cursed be he who takes his sword away from the Carnaaaaaaaaage!
3) Slay the enemy to the last: "Kill them wherever you find them"!
4) Do not spare women, old people, oxen, sheep and donkeys!
5) But take the Loot from time to time ...
6) Rape the little girls of enemies!
7) Don't forget to burn the city down after that!

The javelin verse!
9) The verse of the stone!
10) The verse of the ax, the harrows, the saws!


God in Islam does not order the killing of innocent people, but killing is for self-defense

يقول النصارى أن آية الله خير المخادعين من صفاته؟ هل الله مخادع
Christians say Ayah 'Allah is the best of deceivers' is one of His attributes? Is Allah a deceiver?


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\


3-



If the Prophet Muhammad was a liar, what would be his fruits and actions:

1- Denying the existence of Christ
2- Corruption on earth
3- Erroneous teachings that lead society to its downfall
4- The spread of obscenity and the ruin of the minds of all who followed the religion
5- His defeat is a crushing defeat in the course of the propagation of Islam

So did all this happen? No, that did not happen. It is rather the opposite of all this that happened, which is the respect of our Prophet Muhammad for Christ and Mary the Virgin, peace be upon her.

The Prophet Muhammad forbade fornication, usury, gambling, drinking wine and other evils of society

And all this is done by Christians contrary to the teachings of Christ

and the consumption of wine, which Christians now drink. And He advised Paul to drink wine under the guise of cure.

Muhammad came to ban this pagan thought, which is the use of alcohol, under the guise of treatment.





And science came to prove the correctness of what the Prophet of God, Muhammad, the best of creation and the best of them said

Prophet Muhammad in the Old and New Testament


Prophesies of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the Jewish Scriptures - Dr Zakir Naik




Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Prophesied in the Bible in the Gospel of John - Dr Zakir Naik




Muhammad in the Bible محمد في الكتاب المقدس



أحمد ديدات - ماذا يقول الكتاب المقدس عن محمد

There were already tall buidings at the time of false prophet, Moohummer's "the servant of Satan" false prophecy.

Tall Buildings Prophecy

Hadith records that Muhammad was asked about the signs of the “Last Hour” and amongst other things, said: Muslims claim this is a very precise & specific prediction prophesying the phenomena we…

medium.com

Moohummer also denies Jesus The Christ, Melchizadek, The Prince of Peace and God The Son of God. This makes Moohummer a liar condemned to Hell.

Many of allah's 99 names are direct references to Satan. Allah is Lucifer, the false light.
You are therefore deceived by the greatest deceiver of all, allah. The Quran itself calls allah a liar. It is Satan that is the father of lies.

Allah, the Best Deceiver (Qur'an 3:54)

wikiislam.net

All of Islam is condemned to an eternal Hell, and only those Arabs that flee that counterfeit and accept the salvation of God will be spared from The Pit of Hell.

Allah The Greatest Deceiver of them All

JOHN 3

14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,

15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.

17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son.

19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.

20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.

21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."

 

[JustAGuy1]

Good lord.

 

[toty5]

Don't speak ignorantly and lie because people laugh at you
There were no tall buildings among the Arabs at that time
There were tents
and small buildings




The Prophet, mohmmed peace be upon him, is perfect in human perfection, and as for absolute perfection, it is for God alone, and none of his creatures can share in it, no matter who he is, neither a close angel nor a prophet , and all creatures suffer from imperfection.

Human perfection is one of the attributes of the prophets and messengers, they are the best of creation at all. God chose them from among all of His creation because they are distinguished by the attributes of human perfection. The best of them in morals, the noblest in lineage, they have conscious minds and preponderant
They are the most beautiful people in body and physical strength



The Prophet Muhammad,peace be upon him, warned against giving him some attributes of divinity.



Muhammad, like Jesus, never claimed divine status. He called people to worship Almighty Allah alone, and he continually emphasized his humanity. In order to prevent his deification, Prophet Muhammad always said to refer to him as "Allah's slave and messenger". He said – “Do not adulate me as the Christians adulated Jesus son of Mary. I am Allah's slave and messenger.”
And Jesus is the Messenger of God.




The Bible has been corrupted and destroyed by unknown writers Very few true verses mentioned by the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him, are consistent with the sayings of the previous prophets and Islam



25 And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.”
Mk-11-25

34 Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.”[a] And they divided up his clothes by casting lots.


Lk-23-34

Christ did not say, I forgive you, and you must ask forgiveness from the Father, and Christ taught the disciples and believers in his message to ask for forgiveness from the Father




You are as wrong as Peter

Christ described Peter as a demon,

Peter believed that Christ forgives sins

but Christ is not God to forgive sins

He said to him: 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be[a] bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.”

Can a person forgive with a word, and the Lord of man is unable to do so?!

How do people's minds think?


The Father alone is the one who forgives the sins of all people
The Prophet Muhammad and the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon them, ask God for forgiveness, and they will not bear the sins of people, because each person is responsible for his actions, as Christ said

تناقضات واضحة في العهد الجديد: جدل مثير - رجل مسيحي مقابل الإمام عثمان بن فاروق

Clear Contradictions in the New Testament: An Exciting Controversy - A Christian Man vs. Imam Uthman Ibn Farouk



تناقضات الكتاب المقدس فى نسب المسيح فاروق عثمان
نصراني يدعي أن الكتاب المقدس ليس فيه تناقضات ففاجأه ش.عثمان بن فاروق






2-






So what, if anything, did Jesus’ disciples have to do with authoring the gospels? Little or nothing, so far as we know. But we have no reason to believe they authored any of the books of the Bible. To begin with, let us remember Mark was a secretary to Peter, and Luke a companion to Paul. The verses of Luke 6:14-16 and Matthew 10:2-4 catalogue the twelve disciples, and although these lists differ over two names, Mark and Luke don’t make either list. So only Matthew and John were true disciples. But all the same, modern scholars pretty much disqualify them as authors anyway.
Why?

Good question. John being the more famous of the two, why should we disqualify him from having authored the Gospel of “John”?
Umm … because he was dead?

Multiple sources acknowledge there is no evidence, other than questionable testimonies of second century authors, to suggest that the disciple John was the author of the Gospel of “John.”Perhaps the most convincing refutation is that the disciple John is believed to have died in or around 98 CE.However, the Gospel of John was written circa 110 CE. So whoever Luke (Paul’s companion), Mark (Peter’s secretary), and John (the unknown, but certainly not the long-dead one) were, we have no reason to believe any of the gospels were authored by Jesus’ disciples

Luke was not one of the twelve disciples of Christ, so that in the introduction to his gospel, the Gospel of Luke mentions that he transmits what he writes about those whom he described as eyewitnesses and servants of the word. There is no mention of Luke in the four Gospels, but he was mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles and in several letters to Paul In the Acts of the Apostles, we find that Luke was with Paul on his second journey from Troas.


New Testament of the Bible regarding Jesus by Yusha ...

 

[toty5]

3-

32 Christian scholars accompanied by 50 religious groups



These scholars discovered that words like "begotten" (begotten) or "only son" are impostures:



"16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.. "[The Bible, John 3:16]



“Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, ."[The Bible, 1st epistle of John 5: 1]











This verse has been deleted in the standard version revised and corrected by Christian scholars. This verse was deleted and considered a forgery.



And also



John 5:7

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.



Delete the Trinity from the Bible - Ahmed Didat

Trinity does not exist in the Bible ** Sheikh Ahmed Deedat





Scholars and the Committee omitted the word “Bodily Born”



because



It is impossible for a child to come except through marriage, so Mary must have become God’s wife, and this is not permissible.



Because God does not have a wife



And because the Prophet Jesus, peace be upon him, his birth was a miracle from God without a father



What is meant by deletion is the physical meaning of the word born



and Paying attention to the figurative meaning of the word born



All this shows that in the language of the authors of the Gospels, “God’s begotten son” is expressed for every righteous and righteous person who is closely related to God and who is close to God, whom God loves and takes care of and makes him one of his own and his loved ones.







In all of these texts, the expressions: Son of God, children of God, , were used, with that figurative meaning that was mentioned above.

 

[toty5]

qibla change in islam
There are 2 billion Muslims in the world, and each time they pray, they turn their faces in one direction, towards Mecca. The Islamic term for this direction is qibla. When a Muslim prepares to pray, no matter where he is, he turns towards the qibla, the direction of the Kaba. The Kaba is a small cube shaped building in the courtyard of the mosque known as Masjid Al Haram, in the city of Mecca, in the country of Saudi Arabia.

“For every nation there is a direction to which they face (in their prayers). So hasten towards all that is good. Wheresoever you may be, God will bring you together (on the Day of Resurrection). Truly, God is Able to do all things. And from wheresoever you start forth (for prayers), turn your face in the direction of Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Mecca), that is indeed the truth from your Lord. And God is not unaware of what you do.” (Quran 2:148-149)

Muslims do not worship the Kaba, or its contents, it is simply a focal point. Muslims worship One God, the Most Merciful, and the Most Wise. God decreed that when Muslims pray they all face one direction. It is a sign of unity that encapsulates the unity embedded in the religion of Islam.

The Arabic word for prayer is salah and it demotes a connection between the believer and God; when all believers face the same direction it adds an extra dimension to the connection. The prayer connects the believers to God and the qibla connects the believers to one another. It has been said that if one could observe all the Muslims at prayer we would be able to see lines of worshippers bowing and prostrating like the petals of a flower opening and closing in unison.

The qibla was not always oriented towards Mecca. The first Muslims prayed towards the al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. Around sixteen months after Prophet Muhammad and his followers migrated from Mecca to the city of Medina, the qibla was changed to the Kaba. According to accounts by Prophet Muhammad's companions, the change happened very suddenly. During the noon prayer, Prophet Muhammad, may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him, received a revelation from God instructing him to, "Turn your face towards the Masjid al Haram".

“Thus, we have made you real believers in Islamic Monotheism, true followers of Prophet Muhammad and his legal ways, a just nation, witnesses over mankind and the Messenger a witness over you. And We made the Qibla (prayer direction towards Jerusalem) which you used to face, only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (i.e. disobey the Messenger). Indeed, it was great (heavy) except for those whom God guided. And God would never make your prayers to be lost (i.e. your prayers offered towards Jerusalem). Truly, God is full of kindness, the Most Merciful towards humankind.”

“Verily! We have seen the turning of your (Muhammad) face towards the heaven. Surely, We shall turn you to a Qibla (prayer direction) that shall please you, so turn your face in the direction of Al-Masjid- al-Haram (at Mecca). And wheresoever you people are, turn your faces (in prayer) in that direction...” (Quran 2:143-144)

Changing the direction of prayer establishes Mecca as the fixed central point for worship. It establishes a common sense or purpose.

Throughout the centuries, mathematicians and astronomers have established correct ways to determine the qibla (direction) from any point on the earth’s surface. There are two precise moments each year when the sun is directly above the Kaba, thus the direction of shadows in any sunlit place will point away from the qibla. There are also two moments per year when the sun is directly over the exact opposite position of the Kaba, thus pointing towards the qibla.

It is important the Muslims make every effort to face the right direction when praying; however, slight deviations do not invalidate a person’s prayer. Prophet Muhammad said, “What is between the east and the west is qibla”.[1] Nowadays it is easy to locate the qibla. It is a simple matter to look at a map and draw a line between your location and the city of Mecca. Compasses and computer programs that locate the qibla are readily available and most mosques throughout the world have a niche in the wall to indicate the qibla.

Islam is a religion of unity. Muslims are united by their belief in One God. They are one brotherhood united in the language and ritual of prayer and united by the direction of their worship. The qibla is not only about degrees of latitude or longitude it is about unity. It is about humankind united in the worship of the One God, Creator, and Sustainer of the universe

مسيحي يتحدى المسلمين أن يروه نبوءات لسيدنا محمد فجاءه الرد




Change Of Qibla From Jerusalem To Kaaba By Nouman Ali





Christians say Ayah 'Allah is the best of deceivers' is one of His attributes? Is Allah a deceiver?


DID MUHAMMAD (PBUH) AUTHOR THE QUR'AN FOR STATUS, FAME OR LEADERSHIP? DR ZAKIR NAIK


difference between Islam and Christian Dr Zakir Naik a debate

 

[toty5]

Removal of modesty.




I think most believers realize a large part of feminism is getting woman to remove her clothing.

If you look at feminism's role the past 50 years the signs are clear. After all it started with the burning of the bra. Sure, many (here at least) will deny this and i find for the most part, they are atheist / agnostic. Not upon any Abrahamic direction. It's not worth debating, woman certainly wears less today then yesterday. The question is why?


We live in a world where children get access to pornographic material by 7, 8 years of age. Even if you refuse to get your own child a cellphone

guaranteed one of there friends has one. This even happens in schools today.

Modern day nude beaches are common across the globe.

Where does all of this lead? What kind of society do you think we are moving into when the above is becoming the every day norm?



fornication

This hasn't happened on my street, so its not wide spread yet. But it is happening today.

What do you think its gonna look like in 5 more years, 10? What will you do when you see this happening on your street?



The Prophet of Islam has never been wrong because he doesn't speak from himself. He has only revealed revelation from the Almighty.

Indeed the hour is close. When it strikes a woman who is carrying a child will have a miscarriage. A child's hair will literally turn grey. You can't fathom the horror.

هاشم يضحك ضحكت عمره _ ركن المتحدثين Speakers corner



شمسي و فتاة بريطانية عبقرية في حوار ممتع | (ركن المتحدثين - Speakers corner)



المسيحي الذكي الذي يحاور المسلم فسأله سؤال ولم يستطع الرد



هاشم يعطي الخلاصة لمبشرة انجليزية وأتباع هاتون _ ركن المتحدثين

 

[toty5]

بطل العالم في الملاكمة تايسون فيوري يعلن إسلامه وسط ترحيب مسلمي أمريكا - Tyson Fury Becomes a Muslim




بطل كاراتيه أوروبي يشهر إسلامه وينقذ عائلته بعدما طردته أمه Karate champion becomes a Muslim


New Brother Convert to Islam رجل إعتنق الإسلام في آستراليا




An American Special Forces Pilot Converts to Islam Despite Attempts to Stop Him From Working - American Pilot Becomes a Muslim

 

[Clyde 154]

Christians claim that in the birth of Jesus, there occurred the miracle of the incarnation of God in the form of a human being. To say that God became truly a human being invites a number of questions. Let us ask the following about the man-God Jesus. What happened to his foreskin after his circumcision (Luke 2:21)?





Did it ascend to heaven, or did it decompose as with any human piece of flesh? During his lifetime what happened to his hair, nails, and blood shed from wounds? Did the cells of his body die as in ordinary human beings? If his body did not function in a truly human way, he could not be truly human as well as truly God. Yet, if his body functioned exactly in a human way, this would nullify any claim to divinity. It would be impossible for any part of God, even if incarnate, to decompose in any way and still be considered God. The everlasting, one God, in whole or in part, does not die, disintegrate, or decompose: ‘For I the Lord do not change.’ (Malachi 3:6)





Did Jesus’ flesh dwell in safety after his death?

Unless Jesus’ body never underwent ‘decay’ during his lifetime he could not be God, but if it did not undergo ‘decay’ then he was not truly human.







Speakers Corner: If Christ is God and his body not divine then who died for you? -Part 1







Speakers Corner: If Christ is God and his body not divine then who died for you? Part 2









Christian Compelled To Admit This | Hashim and Intelligent Christian | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park





Jesus is God's Servant not His co-equal | Hashim vs Christian Preacher | Speakers Corner | Hyde Park






2-






The Early Christians



Historically there were many sects in early Christianity who had a range of beliefs regarding Jesus[. Some believed Jesus was God, others believed Jesus was not God but partly divine, and yet others believed he was a human being and nothing more. Trinitarian Christianity which is the belief that God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are one in three persons became the dominant sect of Christianity, once it was formalized as the state religion of the Roman Empire in the 4th Century. Christians who denied Jesus being God were persecuted by the Roman Authorities From this point onwards the Trinitarian belief became widespread amongst Christians. There were various movements in early Christianity which denied the Trinity, among the more well known of them is Adoptionism and Arianism.



Dr Jerald Dirks who is an expert on early Christianity had this to say on the subject: Early Christianity was quite conflicted about the issue of the nature of Jesus. The various Adoptionist positions within early Christianity were numerous and at times dominate. One can even speculate that Arian and Nestorian Christianity might well be an extremely sizable source within Christianity today, if it were not for the fact that these two branches of Christianity, which were located primarily in the middle east and in North Africa were so similar to the Islamic teaching regarding the nature of Jesus that they quite naturally were absorbed into Islam at the beginning of the seventh century.”



Since there were so many sects in early Christianity, each with different beliefs about Jesus and with their own versions of the Bible, which one can we say was following the true teachings of Jesus?



It doesn’t make sense that God sends countless Prophets like Noah, Abraham and Moses to tell people to believe in one God, and then suddenly sends a radically different message of the Trinity which contradicts his previous Prophets teachings. It is clear that the sect of Christianity who believed Jesus to be a human Prophet and nothing more, were following the true teachings of Jesus. This is because their concept of God is the same as that which was taught by the Prophets in the Old Testament.

Jesus in Islam



The Islamic belief about Jesus demystifies for us who the real Jesus was. Jesus in Islam was an extraordinary individual, chosen by God as a Prophet and sent to the Jewish people. He never preached that he himself was God or the actual son of God. He was miraculously born without a father, and he performed many amazing miracles such as healing the blind and the lepers and raising the dead – all by God’s permission. Muslims believe that Jesus will return before the day of Judgement to bring justice and peace to the world. This Islamic belief about Jesus is similar to the belief of some of the early Christians. In the Quran, God addresses the Christians about Jesus in the following way:



O People of the Book, do not commit excesses in your religion, and do not say anything about God except the truth: the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, was nothing more than a messenger of God, His word, directed to Mary and a spirit from Him. So believe in God and His Messengers and do not speak of a ‘Trinity’– stop [this], that is better for you– God is only one God, He is far above having a son, everything in the heavens and earth belongs to Him and He is the best one to trust. [4:171]



Islam is not just another religion. It is the same message preached by Moses, Jesus and Abraham. Islam literally means ‘submission to God’ and it teaches us to have a direct relationship with God. It reminds us that since God created us, no one should be worshipped except God alone. It also teaches that God is nothing like a human being or like anything that we can imagine. The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as:



“Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.” (Quran 112:1-4)[4]



Becoming a Muslim is not turning your back to Jesus. Rather it’s going back to the original teachings of Jesus and obeying him.

There is a simple scriptural test to demonstrate and reveal FALSE DOCTRINES. Do you accept Jesus Christ as the Messiah of prophecy, the Son of God, and equal to God? If not.......you are propagating an antichrist doctrine and should be ignored as far a your cult presenting any TRUTH as proven when you search the scriptures. Your cult must declare the Holy Bible to be filled with errors in order to propagate the false doctrine than an illiterate man that once in a paganistic fashion worshiped stone monuments.....somehow recorded a supposed divine Book after ALL TRUTH had been delivered to the Apostle of Christ in the 1st century.....over 500 years after the perfect law of liberty (the N.T. covenant of Christ was established once -- Jude 3)

I look at the Koran the same way I look at the Book of Mormom.......both fake as hell, and written by men, not God. Both are filled with documented historical errors and scientific contradictions.



All these things are easily explained when you read the Holy Scriptures in context and allow the book, chapter and verse to self interpret based upon the SUBJECT MATTER. When you read the actual content of the Holy Bible your cult is defined as a false cult that propagates an ANTICHRIST DOCTRINE in the fact your cult denies the divine nature of Jesus in being the Son of God......equal to the other 2 members of the Godhead, the Father and the Holy Ghost. The Apostle John defines the antichrist doctrine as any doctrine or peoples that deny that Jesus is the Messiah of Prophecy and divine (1 John 2:18, John 2:22, 4:3, 2 Jon 1:7).

When Jesus was born, He was born of woman and born under the law (Gal. 4:4)........i.e, He was a Son of Man and a direct descendant of the first man ADAM, with His lineage going through Abraham, and David....(Matthew 1, Luke 3). Thus, the disposal of the foreskin would comply with Jewish Law, as Jesus was born a Jew, lived as a Jew and died as a Jew........He lived His entire life under the terms of Jewish law and the Covenant of Moses, yet even tempted as are all men..........Jesus sinned not (2 Cor. 5:21)

Jesus' Ministry was but 3 years of His adult life (beginning at age 30)........Jesus preformed no miracles before the Holy Spirit fell upon Him in the form of a dove after He was baptized by John the Baptist (Luke 3:21....37). It was at this time God declared, This is My Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased..........The Father (God) then gave Jesus the kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 16, 28:18-19). And FYI: THE WORD was JESUS (John 1). All authority in heaven and earth was given to Jesus by the Father......thus, Jesus was more than a prophet, He was God incarnate as described in scripture.......... One must be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son (i.e, the Word) and the Holy Ghost in order to be transferred into the kingdom of God...i.e, the N.T. church of Christ (Col. 1:13-14, Acts 2:38)

Was Jesus equal to God the Father? The scriptures declare.......YES. "Let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus, Who being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men (Jesus was born as an ordinary man.........He gave up His divine nature at birth....to become the Son of Man), and being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to the point of death, even the death of the cross. (The scriptures go on to declare that Jesus is to be worshiped as God)............Therefore God has exalted Him and given Him the name above every name (to include Allah) THAT AT THE NAME OF JESUS EVERY KNEE SHOULD BOW, OF THOSE IN HEAVEN, AND THOSE ON EARTH, AND THOSE UNDER THE EARTH (the dead in hades)......THAT EVERY TONGUE (even Muslism tongues) SHOULD CONFESS THAT JESUS IS LORD, TO THE GLORY OF THE FATHER." Phil. 2:5-11

 

[toty5]

1-


Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men; and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient [even] unto death, yea, the death of the cross. Wherefore also God highly exalted him, and gave unto him the name which is above every name; that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of [things] in heaven and [things] on earth and [things] under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil. 2.5-11).



That is a rather dubious translation of that passage in Phillipians, concerning the "equality with God", since the Greek word isos means similar, not equal.





If the Father is not the only true God (as you suggest) then YOU are the one making Jesus out to be a liar!



Thank you for that testimony of Christian division and hypocrisy, Churchwork!



The Quran, by the way, agrees with Jesus' statements in the Bible that Allah (the Father) is "his God and our God", and "the only true God":


The truth is that Jesus preached the same message that the Prophets in the Old Testament preached. There is a passage in the Bible which really emphasizes his core message. A man came to Jesus and asked “Which is the first commandment of all?”Jesus answered, “The first of all the commandments is Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.’’[Mark 12:28-29]. So the greatest commandment, the most important belief according to Jesus is that God is one. If Jesus was God he would have said ‘I am God, worship me’, but he didn’t. He merely repeated a verse from the Old Testament confirming that God is One.

Some people claim that Jesus came to die for the sins of the world. But consider the following statement of Jesus: This is eternal life: to know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you sent. I have glorified you on earth by finishing the work you gave me to do.[John 17:3-4]




5:72 They do blaspheme who say: "(Allah) is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.5:117 (Jesus is quoted) "Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit, 'worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.

19:36 Verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord: Him therefore serve ye: this is a Way that is straight.








2-






Islam is not pagan, but there are rituals and rituals in Islam

Because a Muslim worships only one God (the Father)

But Christianity is pagan because you worship a human being, who is Christ, and you do not worship the Lord of Christ (the Father).



good qualities and virtues reached ultimate perfection and were firmly established in him, which no one else can attain except the prophets whom Allah has protected and guided. This combination of perfect qualities is one of the greatest proofs of the truth of his Prophethood (peace and blessings be upon him). He acquired his knowledge direct from Allah. He was not taught by any human being, but he was the “City of Knowledge”



. Allah says: (And thou (O Muhammad) wast not a reader of any scripture before it, nor didst thou write it with thy right hand, for then might those have doubted, who follow falsehood.) (Al-`Ankabut 29: 48) He also says: (Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them …) (Al-A`raf 7: 157) The first verse indicates that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was an illiterate, knowing neither how to read or write, before the Glorious Qur’an started to be revealed to him. The second verse indicates that the People of the Book, i.e., the Christians and Jews, knew of the Prophet’s illiteracy in their Divine Books and this is a well-known matter. The wisdom in his illiteracy as shown in the verses is to avoid the disbelievers’ accusing him of having copied or transformed the Qur’an from another human being or excerpted it from the previous books.



Mohammad (pbuh) in the Bible

Muhammad (SAW) is prophesied in the books of Isaiah:



It is mentioned in the book of Isaiah, chapter 29 verse 12:



“And the book is given to him who cannot read, saying: Read this, I pray you, and he said: I cannot read. "



When Archangel Gabriel commanded Muhammad (peace_be_upon_him) saying Iqra - “Read”, he replied, “I cannot read




The Qur’an is the only book that is subject to scientific tests and proven correct by scholars


The Holy Qur’an speaks only about scientific facts not myths so the researcher must know that the discovered scientific fact which is a miracle in Qur’an or Sunnah should not be known when Qur’an was descended. On the other hand we have to know that there are many known facts in Qur’an from past times like benefits of honey which is a known fact from thousands of years, but He Almighty included this fact in the Holy book of Qur’an as a proof that this book includes only right facts because people during years of civilizations used to mix facts with myths and legends. Therefore if Qur’an is a human made, we might find mixes of right and wrong facts inside it.



The scientific miracle is appropriate for the Western mentality. The Church’s control over matters in Europe, until it imposed its vision on scientific facts, and set a ceiling that these facts could not exceed, had a bad impact on Western man in his relationship with Christianity, and in his view of all religions. The Western mind became a material mind, believing in the senses and not giving weight to the unseen or “metaphysics,” as he calls it.

Hence, it was necessary to take into account this mentality ; It is better that we establish for them the evidence for the correctness of Islam, and the safety of the Qur’an from distortion,

That is why Professor Abdullah Allison says: “The scientific facts in Islam are the best method in islam



New articles have been recently issued as their writers are wondering: if these cosmic and scientific facts existed in the Qur'an 1400 years ago, then why were you waiting for the West scientists to discover them and you say that the Qur'an has preceded them in the speech about these facts? Moreover, you bear on the Qur'anic text what it cannot bear of interpretation and explanation?

The answer of these questions is found in the same verses that spoke about the coincidence between the science and the Qur'an. That is because these verses are basically directed for the disbelievers who do not believe in the Qur'an. Allah (Exalted is He) has directed those verses towards them because they who will see the cosmic facts and they who ill discover them.

Therefore, we find the divine eloquence addressing them while saying: "We will soon show them Our signs in the horizons and in themselves until it is evident to them that it is the Truth. And does it not suffice as to your Lord that He is The Ever-Present Witness over everything?" Surat Fussilat (Expounded) verse no.53

This clear verse is addressing those who suspect the Qur'an. It says that Allah will guide them to see His signs and miracles to realize and know foe certainty that the Qur'an is the truth and it is the book of Allah (Exalted is He). He is also addressing and calling them while saying: Will they not then contemplate the Qur’an? And if it had been from (any where) other than the Providence of Allah, indeed they would have found in it many difference (s). Surat An-Nisa (Women) verse no.82

Thus if the Qur'an has been sent by a humanbeing i.e. by anyone rather than Allah, we will see in it the differences and the contrasts. But if we see it agreeing and coinciding with the new science and doesn’t contradict with it, then this is a scientific evidence that it is coming from Allah (Exalted and Blessed is He) Who is the Creator of the universe and the revelator of the Qur'an.

This is the aim of the scientific miracle, to see in the Qur'an this symmetry in every thing and not to find any disturbance, mistake or contrast. That is because those are the characteristics of the book of Allah (Exalted is He). Whereas the books written by people however their writers write them perfectly, they still have contrast, disturbance or mistake.

The greatest evidence of the truth of this qur'anic fact is that the scientists started to change their cosmic terms, for example they change the term “space” to “building”. Thus they have discovered that they are mistaken in using this term so they left it and used what is more accurate and correct after their discovery of the dark matter.

But the Qur'an, which is descended by Allah Who knows the secrets of Heavens and Earth, has given us the accurate expression directly. Thus Allah has described his book saying: "Untruth does not come up to it before (Literally: between its two hands) it nor from behind it; a successive sending down from (One) Ever-Wise, Ever-Praiseworthy". Surat Fussilat (Expounded) verse no.42

Concerning the disbeliever, who denies the Qur'an and disbelieves the message of Islam, he should look and contemplate to reach convincingly to the faith of Islam and to realize from these facts the truthfulness of this religion and the truthfulness of the Seal of the Prophets i.e. Mohammad (May the best prayers and peace be upon him).

Scientists' comments on Quran


Scientists' comments on Quran

عثمان بن فاروق يجيب عن سؤال: ما الفرق بين الكتاب المقدس والقرآن؟​

القرآن الكريم والعلم الحديث كاملة The Quran and Modern Science full Zakir naik youtube











\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




3-




There is no trinity in bible















God is only the Father



Christ is the Messenger of God



The Holy Spirit is an angel to transmit revelation to the prophets







“Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go.







17When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.







18Then Jesus came to them and said, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.







19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them inthe name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,







20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.’”







Matthew 28:16-20







Now let us discuss these verses which are inserted into the text and are not original to it.







Dr. Munqidh al-Saqqaar (may Allah guide him) said:







The first criticism that may be directed towards this passage is that despite its importance, it is not mentioned in the other three Gospels which all narrate the story of Christ entering Jerusalem riding on a donkey. Is his riding on the donkey more important than mentioning the trinity, which is not mentioned by anyone apart from Matthew?







Indeed, the final chapter of the Gospel of Mark mentions the advice that he gave to the disciples, but it does not mention the trinity that is mentioned only in Matthew, as Mark says:



“He said to them, ‘Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.







16Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned’”







Mark 16:15







This indicates that the idea of the trinity has been inserted and is not original.







This passage is something that has been added, according to the views of Western scholars also:







1.







Wells says: “It is not proof that the disciples of Christ embraced belief in the Trinity.”







2.







Adolf Harnack says in his book The History of Dogma:







“This concept of trinity which speaks of the “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” is something strange that was never uttered on Christ’s lips. It did not exist at the time of the Apostles. … Moreover, it was never mentioned until a later stage in the development of Christian teachings and Christ never spoke of it when he was preaching and teaching after he rose from the dead. Paul knew nothing of that either, because he did not quote anything that he attributed to Christ that urged spreading Christianity among other nations.”







3.







The fact that this idea was not an original one is confirmed by Bible scholars and historians of Christianity, as was stated by Archbishop Cyril Salim Bustros -- the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baalbek and environs -- who said:







“The Bible scholars think it most likely that this injunction which the Gospel says was spoken by Jesus did not come from Jesus himself; rather it was the formula spoken to prepare people for Baptism in Greek society. Baptism in the early years of Christianity was given ‘in the name of Jesus Christ’ [Acts 2:38; 10:48] or ‘in the name of the Lord Jesus’ [Acts 8:16; 19:5]. Hence historians regard it as more likely that the Trinitarian baptismal formula was a brief summary for preparing for baptism. Thus they went further and included with the name of Jesus ‘God the Father and the Holy Spirit’.”







Al-Laahoot al-Maseehi wa’l-Insaan al-Mu‘aasir (Christian Divinity and Modern Man), Archbishop Cyrille Salim Bustros, 2/48







4.







When the historian Eusebius of Caesarea quoted this passage from the Gospel of Matthew, he did not mention therein “the Father” or “the Holy Spirit”; rather he said: “They went to all nations to spread the Gospel, relying on the power of Christ who said to them: ‘Go and teach all nations in my name.’”







Tareekh al-Kaneesah (Ecclesiastical History), Eusebius of Caesarea, p. 100







5.







Another matter that confirms that is the fact that in the recently-discovered Hebrew manuscript of the Gospel of Matthew -- which was originally written in Hebrew -- this text is not present. This was regarded by Dr G. Reckart, Professor of Theology at the Apostolic Theological Bible College of Kaufman, Texas, as definitive evidence that this text has been added to the Gospel of Matthew. He said: “The Catholic Church has willingly lied about Matthew 28:19 and the Catholics in general (including the Eastern Orthodox) have lied to the world. Everyone who was baptized with this false baptism has died lost and without salvation.”

Mathew 28:19 Fraud Exposed

Response to the text in the Gospel of Matthew which is keeping him from becoming Muslim - Islam Question & Answer

islamqa.info

Dr Zakir Naik uses Bible to prove Trinity is a Lie















Delete the Trinity from the Bible - Ahmed Didat



Trinity does not exist in the Bible ** Sheikh Ahmed Deedat





\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




4-

The Qur'an and the Bible deny crucifixion


, you follow Paul and your personal interpretations and whims only
without reliable evidence

Do not lie to Christ and the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon them

Christ did not die for our sins

see here



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpdrcQ55Zxw




watch this video

DEBATE : WAS CHRIST (PBUH) REALLY CRUCIFIED? | TALK + REBUTTAL + Q & A | DR ZAKIR NAIK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5TBPBj4Z5k

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\



5-

God is the father only

Jesus is the Prophet of God

The Holy Spirit is an angel who transmits the revelation from the Father to the Prophets





22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’







To whom does Jesus say this phrase to the Jews or to the Muslims?? Or for the Christians who say that we cast out demons in the name of God?





Of course,

the Christians who say that we cast out demons in the name of God





they are neither Muslims nor Jews, because they do not consider Christ a God or son of god

see here

أحمد ديدات عودة المسيح وأسبابها



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e3C_S2H95M&t=36s

Christ rejects Christians on the Day of Resurrection...! Hashem in conversation with a Christian woman - Speakers Corner - (Hyde Park - London)
المسيح يرفض النصارى يوم القيامة ...! هاشم في حوار مع سيدة مسيحية - ركن المتحدثين - (هايد بارك - لندن)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5abJ2w3TEr4

 

[Clyde 154]

1-


Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men; and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient [even] unto death, yea, the death of the cross. Wherefore also God highly exalted him, and gave unto him the name which is above every name; that in the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of [things] in heaven and [things] on earth and [things] under the earth, and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father" (Phil. 2.5-11).



That is a rather dubious translation of that passage in Phillipians, concerning the "equality with God", since the Greek word isos means similar, not equal.





If the Father is not the only true God (as you suggest) then YOU are the one making Jesus out to be a liar!



Thank you for that testimony of Christian division and hypocrisy, Churchwork!



The Quran, by the way, agrees with Jesus' statements in the Bible that Allah (the Father) is "his God and our God", and "the only true God":


The truth is that Jesus preached the same message that the Prophets in the Old Testament preached. There is a passage in the Bible which really emphasizes his core message. A man came to Jesus and asked “Which is the first commandment of all?”Jesus answered, “The first of all the commandments is Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.’’[Mark 12:28-29]. So the greatest commandment, the most important belief according to Jesus is that God is one. If Jesus was God he would have said ‘I am God, worship me’, but he didn’t. He merely repeated a verse from the Old Testament confirming that God is One.

Some people claim that Jesus came to die for the sins of the world. But consider the following statement of Jesus: This is eternal life: to know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you sent. I have glorified you on earth by finishing the work you gave me to do.[John 17:3-4]




5:72 They do blaspheme who say: "(Allah) is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.5:117 (Jesus is quoted) "Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit, 'worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.

19:36 Verily Allah is my Lord and your Lord: Him therefore serve ye: this is a Way that is straight.








2-






Islam is not pagan, but there are rituals and rituals in Islam

Because a Muslim worships only one God (the Father)

But Christianity is pagan because you worship a human being, who is Christ, and you do not worship the Lord of Christ (the Father).



good qualities and virtues reached ultimate perfection and were firmly established in him, which no one else can attain except the prophets whom Allah has protected and guided. This combination of perfect qualities is one of the greatest proofs of the truth of his Prophethood (peace and blessings be upon him). He acquired his knowledge direct from Allah. He was not taught by any human being, but he was the “City of Knowledge”



. Allah says: (And thou (O Muhammad) wast not a reader of any scripture before it, nor didst thou write it with thy right hand, for then might those have doubted, who follow falsehood.) (Al-`Ankabut 29: 48) He also says: (Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (which are) with them …) (Al-A`raf 7: 157) The first verse indicates that the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) was an illiterate, knowing neither how to read or write, before the Glorious Qur’an started to be revealed to him. The second verse indicates that the People of the Book, i.e., the Christians and Jews, knew of the Prophet’s illiteracy in their Divine Books and this is a well-known matter. The wisdom in his illiteracy as shown in the verses is to avoid the disbelievers’ accusing him of having copied or transformed the Qur’an from another human being or excerpted it from the previous books.



Mohammad (pbuh) in the Bible

Muhammad (SAW) is prophesied in the books of Isaiah:



It is mentioned in the book of Isaiah, chapter 29 verse 12:



“And the book is given to him who cannot read, saying: Read this, I pray you, and he said: I cannot read. "



When Archangel Gabriel commanded Muhammad (peace_be_upon_him) saying Iqra - “Read”, he replied, “I cannot read




The Qur’an is the only book that is subject to scientific tests and proven correct by scholars


The Holy Qur’an speaks only about scientific facts not myths so the researcher must know that the discovered scientific fact which is a miracle in Qur’an or Sunnah should not be known when Qur’an was descended. On the other hand we have to know that there are many known facts in Qur’an from past times like benefits of honey which is a known fact from thousands of years, but He Almighty included this fact in the Holy book of Qur’an as a proof that this book includes only right facts because people during years of civilizations used to mix facts with myths and legends. Therefore if Qur’an is a human made, we might find mixes of right and wrong facts inside it.



The scientific miracle is appropriate for the Western mentality. The Church’s control over matters in Europe, until it imposed its vision on scientific facts, and set a ceiling that these facts could not exceed, had a bad impact on Western man in his relationship with Christianity, and in his view of all religions. The Western mind became a material mind, believing in the senses and not giving weight to the unseen or “metaphysics,” as he calls it.

Hence, it was necessary to take into account this mentality ; It is better that we establish for them the evidence for the correctness of Islam, and the safety of the Qur’an from distortion,

That is why Professor Abdullah Allison says: “The scientific facts in Islam are the best method in islam



New articles have been recently issued as their writers are wondering: if these cosmic and scientific facts existed in the Qur'an 1400 years ago, then why were you waiting for the West scientists to discover them and you say that the Qur'an has preceded them in the speech about these facts? Moreover, you bear on the Qur'anic text what it cannot bear of interpretation and explanation?

The answer of these questions is found in the same verses that spoke about the coincidence between the science and the Qur'an. That is because these verses are basically directed for the disbelievers who do not believe in the Qur'an. Allah (Exalted is He) has directed those verses towards them because they who will see the cosmic facts and they who ill discover them.

Therefore, we find the divine eloquence addressing them while saying: "We will soon show them Our signs in the horizons and in themselves until it is evident to them that it is the Truth. And does it not suffice as to your Lord that He is The Ever-Present Witness over everything?" Surat Fussilat (Expounded) verse no.53

This clear verse is addressing those who suspect the Qur'an. It says that Allah will guide them to see His signs and miracles to realize and know foe certainty that the Qur'an is the truth and it is the book of Allah (Exalted is He). He is also addressing and calling them while saying: Will they not then contemplate the Qur’an? And if it had been from (any where) other than the Providence of Allah, indeed they would have found in it many difference (s). Surat An-Nisa (Women) verse no.82

Thus if the Qur'an has been sent by a humanbeing i.e. by anyone rather than Allah, we will see in it the differences and the contrasts. But if we see it agreeing and coinciding with the new science and doesn’t contradict with it, then this is a scientific evidence that it is coming from Allah (Exalted and Blessed is He) Who is the Creator of the universe and the revelator of the Qur'an.

This is the aim of the scientific miracle, to see in the Qur'an this symmetry in every thing and not to find any disturbance, mistake or contrast. That is because those are the characteristics of the book of Allah (Exalted is He). Whereas the books written by people however their writers write them perfectly, they still have contrast, disturbance or mistake.

The greatest evidence of the truth of this qur'anic fact is that the scientists started to change their cosmic terms, for example they change the term “space” to “building”. Thus they have discovered that they are mistaken in using this term so they left it and used what is more accurate and correct after their discovery of the dark matter.

But the Qur'an, which is descended by Allah Who knows the secrets of Heavens and Earth, has given us the accurate expression directly. Thus Allah has described his book saying: "Untruth does not come up to it before (Literally: between its two hands) it nor from behind it; a successive sending down from (One) Ever-Wise, Ever-Praiseworthy". Surat Fussilat (Expounded) verse no.42

Concerning the disbeliever, who denies the Qur'an and disbelieves the message of Islam, he should look and contemplate to reach convincingly to the faith of Islam and to realize from these facts the truthfulness of this religion and the truthfulness of the Seal of the Prophets i.e. Mohammad (May the best prayers and peace be upon him).

Scientists' comments on Quran


Scientists' comments on Quran

عثمان بن فاروق يجيب عن سؤال: ما الفرق بين الكتاب المقدس والقرآن؟​

القرآن الكريم والعلم الحديث كاملة The Quran and Modern Science full Zakir naik youtube











\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




3-




There is no trinity in bible















God is only the Father



Christ is the Messenger of God



The Holy Spirit is an angel to transmit revelation to the prophets







“Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go.







17When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.







18Then Jesus came to them and said, ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.







19Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them inthe name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,







20and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.’”







Matthew 28:16-20







Now let us discuss these verses which are inserted into the text and are not original to it.







Dr. Munqidh al-Saqqaar (may Allah guide him) said:







The first criticism that may be directed towards this passage is that despite its importance, it is not mentioned in the other three Gospels which all narrate the story of Christ entering Jerusalem riding on a donkey. Is his riding on the donkey more important than mentioning the trinity, which is not mentioned by anyone apart from Matthew?







Indeed, the final chapter of the Gospel of Mark mentions the advice that he gave to the disciples, but it does not mention the trinity that is mentioned only in Matthew, as Mark says:



“He said to them, ‘Go into all the world and preach the good news to all creation.







16Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned’”







Mark 16:15







This indicates that the idea of the trinity has been inserted and is not original.







This passage is something that has been added, according to the views of Western scholars also:







1.







Wells says: “It is not proof that the disciples of Christ embraced belief in the Trinity.”







2.







Adolf Harnack says in his book The History of Dogma:







“This concept of trinity which speaks of the “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” is something strange that was never uttered on Christ’s lips. It did not exist at the time of the Apostles. … Moreover, it was never mentioned until a later stage in the development of Christian teachings and Christ never spoke of it when he was preaching and teaching after he rose from the dead. Paul knew nothing of that either, because he did not quote anything that he attributed to Christ that urged spreading Christianity among other nations.”







3.







The fact that this idea was not an original one is confirmed by Bible scholars and historians of Christianity, as was stated by Archbishop Cyril Salim Bustros -- the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baalbek and environs -- who said:







“The Bible scholars think it most likely that this injunction which the Gospel says was spoken by Jesus did not come from Jesus himself; rather it was the formula spoken to prepare people for Baptism in Greek society. Baptism in the early years of Christianity was given ‘in the name of Jesus Christ’ [Acts 2:38; 10:48] or ‘in the name of the Lord Jesus’ [Acts 8:16; 19:5]. Hence historians regard it as more likely that the Trinitarian baptismal formula was a brief summary for preparing for baptism. Thus they went further and included with the name of Jesus ‘God the Father and the Holy Spirit’.”







Al-Laahoot al-Maseehi wa’l-Insaan al-Mu‘aasir (Christian Divinity and Modern Man), Archbishop Cyrille Salim Bustros, 2/48







4.







When the historian Eusebius of Caesarea quoted this passage from the Gospel of Matthew, he did not mention therein “the Father” or “the Holy Spirit”; rather he said: “They went to all nations to spread the Gospel, relying on the power of Christ who said to them: ‘Go and teach all nations in my name.’”







Tareekh al-Kaneesah (Ecclesiastical History), Eusebius of Caesarea, p. 100







5.







Another matter that confirms that is the fact that in the recently-discovered Hebrew manuscript of the Gospel of Matthew -- which was originally written in Hebrew -- this text is not present. This was regarded by Dr G. Reckart, Professor of Theology at the Apostolic Theological Bible College of Kaufman, Texas, as definitive evidence that this text has been added to the Gospel of Matthew. He said: “The Catholic Church has willingly lied about Matthew 28:19 and the Catholics in general (including the Eastern Orthodox) have lied to the world. Everyone who was baptized with this false baptism has died lost and without salvation.”

Mathew 28:19 Fraud Exposed

Response to the text in the Gospel of Matthew which is keeping him from becoming Muslim - Islam Question & Answer

islamqa.info

Dr Zakir Naik uses Bible to prove Trinity is a Lie















Delete the Trinity from the Bible - Ahmed Didat



Trinity does not exist in the Bible ** Sheikh Ahmed Deedat





\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\




4-

The Qur'an and the Bible deny crucifixion


, you follow Paul and your personal interpretations and whims only
without reliable evidence

Do not lie to Christ and the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon them

Christ did not die for our sins

see here



The Deen Show: Did Jesus die for the sins of the world? ( 2 of 2 )




watch this video

DEBATE : WAS CHRIST (PBUH) REALLY CRUCIFIED? | TALK + REBUTTAL + Q & A | DR ZAKIR NAIK

DEBATE : WAS CHRIST (PBUH) REALLY CRUCIFIED? | TALK + REBUTTAL + Q & A | DR ZAKIR NAIK

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\



5-

God is the father only

Jesus is the Prophet of God

The Holy Spirit is an angel who transmits the revelation from the Father to the Prophets





22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’







To whom does Jesus say this phrase to the Jews or to the Muslims?? Or for the Christians who say that we cast out demons in the name of God?





Of course,

the Christians who say that we cast out demons in the name of God





they are neither Muslims nor Jews, because they do not consider Christ a God or son of god

see here

أحمد ديدات عودة المسيح وأسبابها



Ø£ØÙد دÙدات عÙدة اÙÙسÙØ ÙأسبابÙا

Christ rejects Christians on the Day of Resurrection...! Hashem in conversation with a Christian woman - Speakers Corner - (Hyde Park - London)
المسيح يرفض النصارى يوم القيامة ...! هاشم في حوار مع سيدة مسيحية - ركن المتحدثين - (هايد بارك - لندن)
اÙÙسÙØ ÙرÙض اÙÙصار٠ÙÙ٠اÙØساب ...! Ùاش٠ÙÙ ØÙار Ùع ÙصراÙÙØ© - رÙ٠اÙÙتØدثÙÙ - ( ÙاÙد بار٠- ÙÙد٠)

Reply? The 'first thing you presented was an attempt to discredit the Holy Bible".........as predicted, why? You must first attempt to discredit the actual content of the Holy Scriptures that directly contradicts your false antichrist doctrine. Why should any person of intelligence accept the words of a book that was written over 500 years removed from the time period of Christ Jesus? Especially when Jesus declared that His personally appointed Apostles would be lead into ALL TRUTH by the Spirit of Truth.....i.e, the Holy Ghost (John 16:13) How can anything be added to "ALL TRUTH"? It cannot, as the Apostle declared that the miraculous revelations coming from the Spirit of Truth would FAIL when the Holy Scriptures were complete (1 Cor. 13) Remaining would be the only gifts of the Spirit....Faith, Hope, and Charity/Love (1 Cor. 13:13)

Which begs to ask.....Just where did Mohammad receive the authorization for His supposed mircaluous book...........over 500 years removed from the time period the last Apostle of Christ died? He did not......its a fake religion based upon man made lies. The Koran is filled with historical errors with no scientific evidences of its truthfulness.

Those same scriptures describe the Holy Bible as the "PERFECT LAW OF LIBERTY" (James 1:25) How can perfection be added unto? The scriptures also declare that we as humans have everything that pertains to life and godliness through the knowledge of Christ Jesus. (2 Peter 1:3) Who needs Mohammad and Islam if we have already been directed into ALL TRUTH? As the apostle declared, God, "Who would have all men be saved, and come unto the knowledge of the truth" -- 1 Tim. 2:4-6


And what about accepting false doctrines that differ from the message presented by the Apostles of Christ? The Bible declares that you are under a Curse from God. "But though we (the apostles of Christ), or an angel from heaven, peach any other gospel unto you other than that which we preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED." -- Gal 1:8

 

[frigidweirdo]

Tall buildings
He asked the Prophet: "When will the Hour be?' He (saw) said: 'The one who is being asked about it does not know more than the one who is asking.'
He asked: 'Then what are its signs?' he said: when you see barefoot, naked, destitute shepherds competing in constructing tall buildings.


1400 years ago an illiterate man in the desert claimed we'd see the bedouins competing in building tall buildings.

If we take a look at
Arabia roughly 100 years ago we don't see tall buildings.


For more then a millennia after the Prophet there were no tall buildings in
Arabia.




Recently, in our own lifetimes tall buildings have appeared all over the desert.




Today
Dubai has many skyscrapers, 74 listed with the oldest one being built in 1999 according to Wikipedia.






Dubai built the tallest building in the world in 2010.
The Burj Khalifa



' he said: when you see barefoot, naked, destitute shepherds competing in constructing tall buildings.

This is a sign we have seen come true in our own lifetime



عثمان بن فاروق يجيب عن سؤال: ما الفرق بين الكتاب المقدس والقرآن؟




جندي امريكي يريد إعتناق الإسلام لكنه يخشى عائلته | عثمان بن فاروق مترجم

Literally making things fit.

You can bet when they said "tall buildings" they didn't mean skyscrappers.
But I guess people will whatever they want to see, no matter how ridiculous.

 

[Red Front]

Reply? The 'first thing you presented was an attempt to discredit the Holy Bible".........as predicted, why? You must first attempt to discredit the actual content of the Holy Scriptures that directly contradicts your false antichrist doctrine. Why should any person of intelligence accept the words of a book that was written over 500 years removed from the time period of Christ Jesus? Especially when Jesus declared that His personally appointed Apostles would be lead into ALL TRUTH by the Spirit of Truth.....i.e, the Holy Ghost (John 16:13) How can anything be added to "ALL TRUTH"? It cannot, as the Apostle declared that the miraculous revelations coming from the Spirit of Truth would FAIL when the Holy Scriptures were complete (1 Cor. 13) Remaining would be the only gifts of the Spirit....Faith, Hope, and Charity/Love (1 Cor. 13:13)

Which begs to ask.....Just where did Mohammad receive the authorization for His supposed mircaluous book...........over 500 years removed from the time period the last Apostle of Christ died? He did not......its a fake religion based upon man made lies. The Koran is filled with historical errors with no scientific evidences of its truthfulness.

Those same scriptures describe the Holy Bible as the "PERFECT LAW OF LIBERTY" (James 1:25) How can perfection be added unto? The scriptures also declare that we as humans have everything that pertains to life and godliness through the knowledge of Christ Jesus. (2 Peter 1:3) Who needs Mohammad and Islam if we have already been directed into ALL TRUTH? As the apostle declared, God, "Who would have all men be saved, and come unto the knowledge of the truth" -- 1 Tim. 2:4-6


And what about accepting false doctrines that differ from the message presented by the Apostles of Christ? The Bible declares that you are under a Curse from God. "But though we (the apostles of Christ), or an angel from heaven, peach any other gospel unto you other than that which we preached unto you, LET HIM BE ACCURSED." -- Gal 1:8

Your response to this Muslim is so stupid that no one can read more than one or two sentences before they start puking. The Jews can say the exact same thing about Christianity. It was written over 1300 years after Moses, why should the Jews listen to Jesus or his apostles? Appealing to revelatory chronology, claiming that a revelation is wrong on account of being revealed after another supposed revelation, is just plain stupid, especially when that argument is used by a Christian. If the Muslims are wrong, it's not because their religion was revealed after Christianity. Your little brain just can't accept that fact.

 

[Clyde 154]

Your response to this Muslim is so stupid that no one can read more than one or two sentences before they start puking. The Jews can say the exact same thing about Christianity. It was written over 1300 years after Moses, why should the Jews listen to Jesus or his apostles? Appealing to revelatory chronology, claiming that a revelation is wrong on account of being revealed after another supposed revelation, is just plain stupid, especially when that argument is used by a Christian. If the Muslims are wrong, it's not because their religion was revealed after Christianity. Your little brain just can't accept that fact.

My posts are not intended for those with little to no cognitive connection to reason and logic........I can understand why you can't read them might alone comprehend the Holy Scriptures.......you reason with "feminine emotionalism".....you have been instructed/indoctrinated to walk 3 paces behind your female superiors.

More signs of your intelligence? Total ignorance of the Holy Scriptures, yet you attempt to instruct others? The continued subjective ad hominem bull shit personal attack..........again, are you in middle school? Can't stand to have your ass handed to you? WUZ your little feelings hurted? Why is the N.T. revelations different? Because of the documented eyewitness accounts (2 Peter 1:16), that you are yet to disprove through any objective and reproducible evidences.

Your main problem? You have never read, might less, studied the Word of God. It's clear that you don't comprehend that the O.T. law of Moses was specifically for Biblical Israel.......only, the Law of Moses was never intended for the gentile nations on earth. Deut. 4,5

In fact the Jews were told by God of a coming New Covenant, unlike the one written on stone like the one delivered on Mt. Sinai......a covenant the JEWS were continually breaking......this new covenant would be written in the heart not on stone. (Jer. 31:31-34

WHY CAN'T THE JEWS SAY THE SAME ABOUT THE N.T. OF CHRIST JESUS.........because even the O.T. confirms the messages of truth taught by Jesus Christ, the Jews can say what they want, but they can't back up their bigotry toward Christianity via their own Holy Book.

 

[there4eyeM]

Signs and events have shown that what is in "Islam" is at best all metaphoric, a fact that it shares with the religions of which it is derivative.

 

[toty5]

What does it matter if it was six and a half centuries later... Judaism is much older than Christianity but Allah sent Jesus (AS) to correct their ways as they had strayed from their true religion... But the Christians also erred seriously when they attributed to Jesus (AS) divinity.







your bible was recorded years after Jesus (peace be uon him) was gone.



But the Quran was recorded during the time of God's last messenger, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him - sallallahu alayhi wa sallam).



Thus Allah (SWT) revealed the Quran and another Prophet (SAW) to the whole universe in order to preach the true message that all the other Prophets preached which was : Worship ONE GOD.

You know the Quran isn't a "rewrite of the Bible 600 years later" , it just contains the information needed to bring the straying sheep of Christianity back into the submission that the life of Jesus so greatly exemplified.



Hopefully more of them will take heed to the blessed counsel of the Most High which He made available to us through the Quran.


Conclusion is not the number of years, because the New Testament was written 400 years after the Old Testament

God sends the messengers because people distorted the previous messages and followed their whims


God sent the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him, with the Qur’an to correct the previous books


. WAS THE QUR'AN COPIED FROM THE BIBLE? - DR ZAKIR NAIK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpH9ISKdCug

---------------------------------------------------




2-



, Paul wasn’t Jesus’ ‘second-in-command.’ In fact, they never even met, yet after he was gone, Paul claimed to speak in Jesus’ name, and the people in power took what he said and canonized it. But that doesn’t make it true. Every tenet of Trinitarian Christianity is based on the teachings of Paul, even though Jesus never said he was God, partner with God, or even God’s son. Nowhere did Jesus teach the doctrines of the Trinity, Crucifixion, Resurrection and Atonement. All of these tenets came from Paul, or from the Pauline theologians who followed in lockstep. The teachings of Paul, in fact, contradict the teachings of Jesus, much in the same way that the New Testament informs us of Paul’s conflict with James, Peter and Barnabas.



For example, Jesus taught Old Testament Law. Paul negated it. Jesus declared himself the ‘son of man.’ Eighty-eight times. Pauline theologians labeled him the ‘son of God.’ Jesus taught the oneness of God, and prayer to him alone. Paul suggested the Trinity and elevated Jesus





Nowhere in the scriptures can we deduce that the One God is an association of 3 Gods. On the contrary, the Catholic Creed clearly tells us that there is only one God: the Almighty Father, Creator of Heaven and Earth.

It is a heretical interpretation that was developed from the 3rd century that turned the One God into an association of three Gods...which is not in the scriptures. The Scriptures never refer to the Holy Spirit, the Angel of the Eternal, the Logos or the Son as being other Gods!

Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Matthew 28:19



fake text

It does not exist in ancient Greek manuscripts before the sixteenth century

Therefore, this text has been omitted from most translations and recent editions in most languages of the world









Second: We find that all the apostles and disciples of Christ, including Peter, the beloved of Christ... and Paul, who claimed without evidence to be the messenger of Christ to the Gentiles... as well as the writers of the Gospel and their testimonies all... We find that all of them were not baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

They were only baptizing in the name of Christ...



Did they violate the teachings of Christ or were they ignorant of them?









It doesn’t make sense that God sends countless Prophets like Noah, Abraham and Moses to tell people to believe in one God, and then suddenly sends a radically different message of the Trinity which contradicts his previous Prophets teachings. It is clear that the sect of Christianity who believed Jesus to be a human Prophet and nothing more, were following the true teachings of Jesus. This is because their concept of God is the same as that which was taught by the Prophets in the Old Testament




Paul is considered the first person to have corrupted the religion of the Nasaara. Between 51 and 55 CE, the first council of the disciples - the Jerusalem Council – was held and was headed by Ya‘qoob ibn Yoosuf An-Najjaar, who was stoned to death in 62 CE. During this meeting they decided that in order to obtain a greater benefit they should exempt all non-Jews from being committed to the Sharee'ah of the Tawraah (Torah). They did so as this was the only way to convert them from worshipping idols, as a preliminary step, before compelling them to follow the Sharee'ah of the Tawraah. Furthermore, they approved of the prohibition of adultery, eating animals killed by strangling, blood and that which is sacrificed for idols. However, they permitted the consumption of alcoholic drinks, the flesh of swine and usury although these things are forbidden in the Tawraah.




Later on, Paul returned to Antioch in the company of Barnabas. They stayed together for a relatively long period of time then parted after they had a disagreement about Paul’s declaration of nullifying the rulings of the Tawraah and his claim that these rulings were a curse that were now discarded forever.

He claimed that ‘Eesa may Allaah exalt his mention was sent to replace the Old Testament with another one, and that he adopted of incarnation by way of the word or the son of God or the Holy Spirit. Based on this idea, he initiated the creed of the crucifixion, salvation, the resurrection of ‘Eesa may Allaah exalt his mention and his ascension to heaven in order to sit on the right of the Lord so as to make Judgment.

Likewise, Paul did the same with Peter who attacked him and departed from him and all this provoked the people against him. Therefore, Paul wrote the epistle to the Galatians explaining his creed and principles. Then, he continued his missionary trips in the company of his disciples to Europe and Asia Minor until he finally died in Rome in 65 CE during the reign of Nero.

Throughout the first three centuries of Christianity, there was strong resistance against Paul's beliefs. During the second century CE Hippolytus of Rome, Vitus and Origen denied that Paul was an apostle. During the third century, Paul of Samosata appeared and was followed by the Paulicians but they only had a limited effect. Thus, began the abandonment of the Sharee'ah of the Tawraah and the spread of paganism and the concept of the Trinity in Christianity.

If Jesus said God is One, why does the trinity exist? - Q&A - Yusha Evans​

.

لماذا ناقض بولس التلاميذ في قوانين الطعام والشريعة؟​

Why did Paul contradict the disciples in the laws of food and the law?



\\\\\\\\\\\\\




3-



Any words in the Bible by any writer that contradict the words of Christ are not taken into account



Christ was not abolished the law of the ancient prophets, but rather followed their religion, and Christ did not see the New Testament



Read this text

“3 Tell them that this is what the Lord, the God of Israel, says: ‘Cursed is the one who does not obey the terms of this covenant—’”” Jeremiah 3:11



so

You are cursed


Those who forsake instruction praise the wicked,
but those who heed it resist them. . Proverbs 28:4

16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

II Timothy 3 - Books 16-17


Here Paul was talking about the Old Testament because the New Testament had not yet been written.

Also, the New Testament does not contain anything about marriage laws (unlike the Old Testament). If a Christian claims that he does not follow the Old Testament, then in this case he has the right to marry his mother or sister because nothing in the New Testament forbids that!



Despite this, we find that Paul has a different special law
About the law of Christ and about the Jewish law, which is
The Sharia that is now followed by the Christians, and we mention some of his sayings
by which the law openly rejects, saying,


“17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come:[a] The old has gone, the new is here!” 2 Corinthians 5:17

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

Matthew 5:18
The Prophet Jesus peace be upon him,
came to complete the law of the ancient prophets
Without decrease or increase


. And Jesus himself was very clear about the Old Testament, the prophets, and the primary laws
Jesus was very clear that he would not change any of the teachings of the laws in the Old Testament. Rather, he adds to that by saying that Christians have to follow these laws literally, until the Day of Judgment.




That was in the time of Christ

But now the Old Testament and the New Testament are corrupted





How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us’? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie (Jeremiah 8:8, quoted from the New American Standard Bible). Here the Prophet Jeremiah is scolding the Israelites that their corrupt scribes have made the Law of the Lord (that is the Torah) into a lie by their lying pen (that is the pen they used to change the verses). This proof in the Book, the People of the Book are carrying, clearly establishes that their Book has been corrupted by their own scribes.







Jesus own language of Aramaic, which is a Semitic language, an eastern language similar to Hebrew and Arabic. The original extant copies of the gospels are in Greek, a western language. Now there are four gospels, supposed to have been written by four of the disciples of Jesus: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Was Jesus quoting, from these Greek books, written many years after his disappearance when he was addressing his people? Certainly not! He was quoting from the Book he received from God, which was the original Bible in the language of his own people. The argument that God revealed his Bible to Jesus in Greek is like saying that God revealed the Qur’an to Muhammad in English!





So the original Gospel was not in Greek, it was in the language Jesus and his people spoke and understood. We have no record or evidence to indicate that; this original Gospel was written down by scribes under Jesus’s own supervision. I repeat: We have no original Gospel existing now as a single volume, in the original language. Every educated Christian must know this fact! (Those who are in doubt can go to the Jerome Biblical Commentary, or any authentic book by genuine scholars that deal with the subject. Nevertheless, missionaries give the impression that this is only a baseless charge by Muslims. Instead of the original Gospel, we have four books written by persons who are supposed to have been Jesus’s disciples. I say supposed,





because modern scholars who have done research on the subject, question the claim that these were the disciples of Jesus, in the first place. These four books called the Gospels are placed at the beginning of some 27 books, bound together into one volume, called The New Testament. Out of these 27 books, thirteen were written by a man called St. Paul. This Paul was not a disciple of Jesus, nor has Jesus met him, as he himself testifies. Modern Christians are ardent followers of St. Paul, even in cases where Paul clearly contradicts Jesus!



The Islamic request to Christians is for them to please follow Jesus, and not to follow Paul, who preaches a different gospel! The Islamic belief about the present Book, which the Christians use as the word of God, called the New Testament is that it is not the Gospel of Jesus mentioned in the Qur’an. Still, Muslims believe that the Gospels in the bible contain some teachings of Jesus, as well as the interpretations of the writers of those books, whoever they might have been.

What Islam says about the Bible - IslamOnline

The article treats the Qur'anic position about the Torah and Bible

islamonline.net

Hundreds of American prisoners convert to Islam after their senior repents and converts to Islam - American prisoners become Muslims




American wrestling champion converts to Islam after a wonderful story - US. Champion Wrestler becomes a Muslim




The King of Russian Rap Converts Thousands of Viewers to Islam - Russian Rap Singer becomes a Muslim