Siberia burning

Heat and forest fires are as much a part of the natural environment as anything else. Some folks in Siberia finally get warm and they bitch about it. Go figger.
And that's what i'll say when a wildfire consumes your house. After all, you didn't believe in global warming as caused by humans, and so, you deserve what you get. Unfortunately, tens of millions of other victims do not.
 
The vast majority of Siberia is unpopulated so there is no one to fight the fires, and almost no roads to act as fire breaks.
So once a fire starts in the forests of Siberia, it's just going to burn until it starts raining or the winter snow starts. ... :cool:
What a plan! So your solution to everything is likely, "Do nothing." Yeah, you're a real nothing-doer.
 
It's natural so it's not an issue. If "climate scientists" knew much of anything we wouldn't have had "global ice age"; no,"global warming"; no, "climate change" panic for the last 50 yrs. with no real noticeable change in the weather which they still can't seem to predict reliably 3 days ahead of time.
because scientist can't control the climate while saying they can. It's truly remarkable how stupid demofk warmers are.
 
but we could say that the current changes are not "natural", since they're being caused by industrial emissions.
you have no evidence of that. If you did, you could tell us how hot 120 PPM of CO2 is.
 
What a plan! So your solution to everything is likely, "Do nothing." Yeah, you're a real nothing-doer.
your plan destroys nations. ain't you the man. A plan, BTW, that can't be tested because you can't answer how hot 120PPM of CO2 is.
 
And how long ago was that, traitor boy?

You hunt whom? Try it, boy. Seriously. A treasonous fascist like you is nothing but vermin to me.

Your violent terrorist proclamations online have earned you a HS file, little incel dweeb! Way to go, halfwit!
what the fuck are you talking about??
 
Please indicate how much science you've studied? Did you pass 5th-grade science? 6th?

It is climate change. The earth is warming. Glaciers are disappearing. The evidence is clear. Only white-right corporate-cloned political hacks disagree.
The post sarcasm, you are correct. PA got tornadoes yesterday, the first time ever.
 
And that's what i'll say when a wildfire consumes your house. After all, you didn't believe in global warming as caused by humans, and so, you deserve what you get. Unfortunately, tens of millions of other victims do not.
What you or I think about it has nothing to do with what is natural. It is what it is.
 
Lol...an area burning that is the size of Florida’s is not normal any where.
I agree. I don't really believe that it is man made to the extent we are being told but even if it is... the U.S. being made to pay the lion's share of the costs while India and China - some of the biggest offenders - do nothing, is not something I'll ever support. Nature will take care of itself. If that means ending the lives of a few billion of us, then so be it.
 
The word "normal" is problematic, but we could say that the current changes are not "natural", since they're being caused by industrial emissions. And the results will be catastrophic. Yet, we know how to ameliorate this, but can't do it adequately due to the opposition of corporate-cloned Qtip heads.

RepubliQans are about to be responsible for a lot of death.. more even than they've caused from COVID

How do we know they're not "natural"? If we don't know what should be, we can't tell if what exists is what should be or not.

It's like walking into a room and seeing the color of the wall and saying "this isn't the color it should have been", but we have no idea what the color was to start with.
 
No it is YOUR failure to answer a simple question, you replied with a cut aqnd paste but no actually answer the question which as the following:

"nope, someone may be doing that experiment, but there is no way to know anything for another thousand years. You still are posting with data that doesn't exist. stop it already. Still waiting for you to answer CrusaderFrank's question, how hot is 120 PPM of CO2?"

===


How hot is the increase of 120 ppm?

Isn't that an easy question to understand?
Still waiting for you to say something that actually shows an indication of intelligence. Now we have major fires in Turkey, and 91 fires here in the West. There will be more by this evening. The only places in the West at present that do not have fires or the potential for large fires are now flooding.
 
How do we know they're not "natural"? If we don't know what should be, we can't tell if what exists is what should be or not.

It's like walking into a room and seeing the color of the wall and saying "this isn't the color it should have been", but we have no idea what the color was to start with.
That is silly. We can measure the limits of past floods, they leave ample evidence of their passage. And, since most areas of this nation have been occupied by people keeping records for at least 200 years, we have pretty good records for that period.
 
It's natural so it's not an issue. If "climate scientists" knew much of anything we wouldn't have had "global ice age"; no,"global warming"; no, "climate change" panic for the last 50 yrs. with no real noticeable change in the weather which they still can't seem to predict reliably 3 days ahead of time.
Gotta love the dummies that know so damned little about the science of geology or climatology, but thing they know it all. Classic Dunning-Kruger.
 
That is silly. We can measure the limits of past floods, they leave ample evidence of their passage. And, since most areas of this nation have been occupied by people keeping records for at least 200 years, we have pretty good records for that period.

The problem is 200 years is a pretty small time frame for climate. We're in a 100,000 year cycle with ice ages followed by a huge spike in temperatures for a short period of time.

But we don't even know if we're still in this 100,000 year cycle or not, the cycle has only lasted about 400,000 years, maybe it's over. Maybe it's not.

"silly" is to make assumptions.
 
Still waiting for you to say something that actually shows an indication of intelligence. Now we have major fires in Turkey, and 91 fires here in the West. There will be more by this evening. The only places in the West at present that do not have fires or the potential for large fires are now flooding.
Your dodging the replies indicate you have no answer to offer.

The Satellite data shows NO increase in world wide fires since 2000:

1628032427155.png

LINK

Cheers.
 
The problem is 200 years is a pretty small time frame for climate. We're in a 100,000 year cycle with ice ages followed by a huge spike in temperatures for a short period of time.

But we don't even know if we're still in this 100,000 year cycle or not, the cycle has only lasted about 400,000 years, maybe it's over. Maybe it's not.

"silly" is to make assumptions.



Untrue. This last period of glaciation began 2.6 million years ago.
 
Gotta love the dummies that know so damned little about the science of geology or climatology, but thing they know it all. Classic Dunning-Kruger.





Pot, meet kettle. All you trot out are opinions and lies. You are the poster child for D-K.
 

Forum List

Back
Top