So what is the big deal if the representatives disagree to spending cuts? Dems are thinking the disagreement will lead to shutting down government when nothing gets funded. Why not keep sending through a combination of spending packages until they get enough votes to carry.
So what is the big deal if the representatives disagree to spending cuts? Dems are thinking the disagreement will lead to shutting down government when nothing gets funded. Why not keep sending through a combination of spending packages until they get enough votes to carry.
Let it shut down.
Ever let a kid having tantrum scream till it shut up?
Or rather...an entity whose time has come and gone. Their message was received early in the movement and there are laws now that protect workers.
All we see now is residual greed.
Sorry, but if just doesn't work that way. The Senate will propose that the House pass an emergency allocation to allow the government to operate for a month or so until a deal is struck. If the House refuses, which they won't, then they will shoulder the responsibility of a government shutdown.
No, this is different. In Wisconsin the democrats did act childish. In this instance the GOP is saying, in essence, "We will not waste any more of the taxpayers money, need to lower taxes to get the economy moving as Obama's spending put us on the edge of bankruptcy, and if the democrats want to sell allowing government to shut down if they cannot raise taxes as an issue to the American people in 2012, be our guest." That's what's happening here and the GOP should NOT blink or they'll be no distinction between them, which is what the democrats want after November. Don;t blink. If shutting down is what not blinking means, shut it down, full down, all the way, and let the democrats take the heat, because Americans want lower taxes, not higher taxes. The GOP should stand 100% firm. This is a winner. 100%
Sorry, but if just doesn't work that way. The Senate will propose that the House pass an emergency allocation to allow the government to operate for a month or so until a deal is struck. If the House refuses, which they won't, then they will shoulder the responsibility of a government shutdown.Just like the Democrats did in Wisconsin....Is that what you mean
No, this is different. In Wisconsin the democrats did act childish. In this instance the GOP is saying, in essence, "We will not waste any more of the taxpayers money, need to lower taxes to get the economy moving as Obama's spending put us on the edge of bankruptcy, and if the democrats want to sell allowing government to shut down if they cannot raise taxes as an issue to the American people in 2012, be our guest." That's what's happening here and the GOP should NOT blink or they'll be no distinction between them, which is what the democrats want after November. Don;t blink. If shutting down is what not blinking means, shut it down, full down, all the way, and let the democrats take the heat, because Americans want lower taxes, not higher taxes. The GOP should stand 100% firm. This is a winner. 100%
For those that keep saying shut it down, they do not realize the political consequences.
Or rather...an entity whose time has come and gone. Their message was received early in the movement and there are laws now that protect workers.
All we see now is residual greed.
Ahh, selective greed goings on here.
The working class has suffered with flat wages for decades as noted by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics @ this link: http://www.workinglife.org/wiki/Wages+and+Benefits:+Real+Wages+(1964-2004)
Yet during that time period businesses have seen great growth and more wealth has been concentrated within the upper percentile as noted in this piece:
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998 (
Quarterly Journal of Economics)
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913
Facts are facts. No one can disprove that wages have been flat and they can't disprove the result of flat wages in a profitable environment is a growing gap in wealth and the continuation of wage inequality.
Yet to some, the working class are the greedy ones and are leaches of society, yet they make up a majority of society. Many of those who defend wage inequality are actually themselves victims of wage inequality, they are so blinded by their ideology, they don't see the reality of the wage inequality environment.
Why is it that unions are called thief's, when in fact it's the upper wealth percentile who are holding down wage growth in a profitable environment?
Or rather...an entity whose time has come and gone. Their message was received early in the movement and there are laws now that protect workers.
All we see now is residual greed.
Ahh, selective greed goings on here.
The working class has suffered with flat wages for decades as noted by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics @ this link: http://www.workinglife.org/wiki/Wages+and+Benefits:+Real+Wages+(1964-2004)
Yet during that time period businesses have seen great growth and more wealth has been concentrated within the upper percentile as noted in this piece:
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998 (
Quarterly Journal of Economics)
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913
Facts are facts. No one can disprove that wages have been flat and they can't disprove the result of flat wages in a profitable environment is a growing gap in wealth and the continuation of wage inequality.
Yet to some, the working class are the greedy ones and are leaches of society, yet they make up a majority of society. Many of those who defend wage inequality are actually themselves victims of wage inequality, they are so blinded by their ideology, they don't see the reality of the wage inequality environment.
Why is it that unions are called thief's, when in fact it's the upper wealth percentile who are holding down wage growth in a profitable environment?
Followed by Class warfare BS.
How quaint. NOT
Gee...All that started in the magical year of 1913?....Coincidence?
Or rather...an entity whose time has come and gone. Their message was received early in the movement and there are laws now that protect workers.
All we see now is residual greed.
Ahh, selective greed goings on here.
The working class has suffered with flat wages for decades as noted by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics @ this link: http://www.workinglife.org/wiki/Wages+and+Benefits:+Real+Wages+(1964-2004)
Yet during that time period businesses have seen great growth and more wealth has been concentrated within the upper percentile as noted in this piece:
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998 (
Quarterly Journal of Economics)
Income Inequality in the United States, 1913
Facts are facts. No one can disprove that wages have been flat and they can't disprove the result of flat wages in a profitable environment is a growing gap in wealth and the continuation of wage inequality.
Yet to some, the working class are the greedy ones and are leaches of society, yet they make up a majority of society. Many of those who defend wage inequality are actually themselves victims of wage inequality, they are so blinded by their ideology, they don't see the reality of the wage inequality environment.
Why is it that unions are called thief's, when in fact it's the upper wealth percentile who are holding down wage growth in a profitable environment?
