Should white male Conservative Christians be a protected group now?

Should white male Conservative Christians be a protected group now?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 46.2%
  • No

    Votes: 7 53.8%

  • Total voters
    13
Pastors having a tat means nothing. No sane paroshoner cares.
 
Conservative "men" really are the biggest pansies to ever walk the planet. They so badly need to be weepy victims.

This is why I constantly advocate for free testosterone supplements for conservative "men". If we could inject a little courage into them, if we could make them less afraid of kittens and their own shadows, we could almost instantly eliminate the pathology of conservatism.

We especially need to point this out to young conservatives. Women are disgusted by weakness and blubbering, so being a conservative means they'll never find a wife.
 
I can say under Fair Housing Laws that "white", "male", and "Christian" are already protected ... "conservative" is a political position and that's not covered under rental laws ... a landlord can refuse tenancy to registered Democrats for example ...

I don't know about steering conservatives towards conservative neighborhoods ... or whether employers can dismiss voting Republicans ...

Skin color, sex, and religion are protected classes ... political affiliation isn't ...
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
You clearly don't understand your Founders based on this post let alone Canadas.
I understand them far better than you. Your country has a miserable history with the First Nations as they are called up there and thats why your government has done this:


And understand this Canuck, I know the complete history of America, not the white supremacist lies you have spewed today.

Sixty-four men are credited with the “founding” of America. Out of the 64 so-called founders, 49 owned slaves. The slave owners were:

George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, James Monroe, John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, John Marshall, Samuel Chase, John Hancock, Benjamin Harrison, John Dickinson, William Floyd, George Mason, Joseph Hewes, John Penn, Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll, George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton, Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, George Taylor, Caesar Rodney, George Read, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris, Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark, Josiah Bartlett, William Hooper, William Whipple, Stephen Hopkins , and Oliver Wolcott.

And don't tell me how they were just a product of their time because the record shows how the people of that time assessed “today’s” standards on themselves.

“Why keep alive the question of slavery? It is admitted by all to be a great evil.”
-Charles Carroll, Signer of the Declaration

“I am glad to hear that the disposition against keeping negroes grows more general in North America. Several pieces have been lately printed here against the practice, and I hope in time it will be taken into consideration and suppressed by the legislature.”
-Benjamin Franklin, Signer of the Declaration, Signer of the Constitution, President of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society

“That men should pray and fight for their own freedom and yet keep others in slavery is certainly acting a very inconsistent, as well as unjust and perhaps impious.”
-John Jay, President of Continental Congress, Original Chief Justice U. S. Supreme Court

I hope we shall at last, and if it so please God I hope it may be during my life time, see this cursed thing [slavery] taken out. . . . For my part, whether in a public station or a private capacity, I shall always be prompt to contribute my assistance towards effecting so desirable an event.”
-William Livingston, Signer of the Constitution; Governor of New Jersey

“The whole commerce between master and slave is a perpetual exercise of the most boisterous passions, the most unremitting despotism on the one part, and degrading submissions on the other. . . . And with what execration [curse] should the statesman be loaded, who permitting one half the citizens thus to trample on the rights of the other. . . . And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever.”
-Thomas Jefferson

David Barton, The Founding Fathers and Slavery, The Founding Fathers and Slavery - Patriot Academy

List of the Founding Fathers who Owned Slaves, https://slaveryadvocate.com/list-of-founding-fathers-who- owned-slaves/
 
Last edited:
All i can say is im glad im not wealthy. Mattew 19:24.
 
They are clearly being targeted for their beliefs…so they should be protected and if you kill one it is extra bad and they are extra dead and you should get extra death penaltied.
How about let's give EVERYONE treatment based on the content of their character instead of any other reason.

It's called "Equal protection under the law "
 

Should white male Conservative Christians​

Finally I'm being paid attention. To. I check all four(4) boxes. What is your beef?

be a protected group now?​


Say what now? Like the Spotted Owl? Nah, man, I'm good, I know how to read, I'm killing it over here. It's not like being really, really white doesn't have it's problems...

Recently I was informed that DeWalt no longer sells 18vdc NiCad batteries. But then I worked and made cash and bought a 20vdc to 18vdc adapter and my old $h!t works great. All this only worked out for me because I am White. And know how to read. My White parents forced me to learn to read. My Mommy when I was a little boy would read books to me. So would my Daddy. If that is White privilege then my babies are gonna rule the Earth.

They are clearly being targeted for their beliefs…

Yes I am. That's a mistake. Sooner or later it's my turn.

so they should be protected

Again with the they?

and if you kill one it is extra bad and they are extra dead and you should get extra death penaltied.



-

So maybe my White Azz doesn't need protecting.
 

Should white male Conservative Christians be a protected group now?​

They are clearly being targeted for their beliefs…so they should be protected and if you kill one it is extra bad and they are extra dead and you should get extra death penaltied.

I'm going to have to vote yes, though I really don't want to. Whites, males and Christians have been targeted so much and for so long while everyone else: blacks, gays, etc., have all been elevated to special status, that I think it would send a good message to now make white, male Christians and all Christians in fact a protected class!

What is good for the goose, right?

Just think of the anarchy for the Left if suddenly anything they did targeting white people, males, or Christians suddenly became a felony. Remember the bakery who the FBI took to court for not baking a disgusting birthday cake?

Fight fire with fire; imagine if suddenly the Left found themselves in a litany of federal lawsuits over every little thing they did that adversely affected, directly or indirectly, anyone white, male or Christian?

F A F O.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to have to vote yes, though I really don't want to. Whites, males and Christians have been targeted so much and for so long while everyone else: blacks, gays, etc., have all been elevated to special status, that I think it would send a good message to now make white, male Christians and all Christians in fact a protected class!

What is good for the goose, right?

Just think of the anarchy for the Left if suddenly anything they did targeting white people, males, or Christians suddenly became a felony. Remember the bakery who the FBI took to court for not baking a disgusting birthday cake?

Fight fire with fire; imagine if suddenly the Left found themselves in a litany of federal lawsuits over every little thing they did that adversely affected, directly or indirectly, anyone while, male or Christian?

F A F O.

As a white male Christian I have never been targeted by anyone. Maybe it's because I don't do it to others first unlike so many others.
 
I can take care of myself.
Beagle9 response - Might want to ask Charlie how to do that..

Nah on a serious note, if laws aren't quickly enacted in order to directly address the problem's, otherwise to make certain activities illegal that has led to the problem, then this country has become totally feckless in it's ability to lead itself out of danger, and therefore danger will increase exponentially in this nation as it tries to sort itself out in a chaotic and anarchist mayhem kind of way.
 
😆... Might want to ask Charlie how to do that..

Nah on a serious note, if laws aren't quickly enacted in order to directly address the problem's, otherwise to make certain activities illegal that has led to the problem, then this country has become totally feckless in it's ability to lead itself out of danger, and therefore danger will increase exponentially in this nation as it tries to sort itself out in a chaotic and anarchist mayhem kind of way.

What activities?
 
15th post
Nah on a serious note, if laws aren't quickly enacted in order to directly address the problem's, otherwise to make certain activities illegal that has led to the problem, then this country has become totally feckless in it's ability to lead itself out of danger, and therefore danger will increase exponentially in this nation as it tries to sort itself out in a chaotic and anarchist mayhem kind of way.
Meh, when someone kills someone or gets busted on a serious felony around here they are held till trial without bail.

Move to a better place that takes the laws already on the books seriously.

The laws are there, they just need to be applied.....Anyplace that has cashless bail is a place to move away from most rinky-tink.

Pretty simple stuff really.
 
They are clearly being targeted for their beliefs…so they should be protected and if you kill one it is extra bad and they are extra dead and you should get extra death penaltied.
No, for two reasons:

1) No one should be a "protected groups," implying that other groups will not get the same protection, even though they pay the same taxes. "Equal protection" is a thing.

1) If there were to be certain "protected groups," it should be groups that are struggling to take care of themselves. White Male Christians* do very well with that. We do well for the same reason that Jews and Asians often do even better: a culture that values work, self-reliance, and education, and more importantly, stigmatizes those who refuse opportunities for any of those.


*By "Christians" I mean people who would list Protestant, Catholic, or Mormon as their religion if ever that question is asked anymore, not that they attend church a minimum number of times per year, or any other standard someone might set to be a "real Christian."
 
Meh, this white male agnostic can defend himself.
On a serious note, if laws aren't quickly enacted in order to directly address the problem's, otherwise to make certain activities illegal that has led to the problem, then this country has become totally feckless in it's ability to lead itself out of danger, and therefore danger will increase exponentially in this nation as it tries to sort itself out in a chaotic and anarchist mayhem kind way.
you shall not make any cuts on your body for the dead or tattoo yourself, I am the Lord.

Leviticus 19:28
True, but like everything sin is redeemable thank God, and what's done is done as long as it's meaning has changed within the heart.
 
Back
Top Bottom