You didn’t answer my question. None of their publications agree with her. None of the places that Lindzen workEd At agree with him. He’s 80 plus. He writes opinions that no one agrees with. He’s senile, like you. What they do now is post drivel, like you .
There are many many climates. Did you explain that to your scientist institutions?
You lie far too much.
Okay I had decided your trolling wasn't worth responding to. But even you could not be that ignorant.
You can’t be serious. Maybe your pilots license makes you an expert on nuclear energy ? Nah,
Since one more time you attack the professor of climatology,
I never posted a single word that says I want to fire off nuclear blasts to control hurricanes. And all Trump did was ask a question by a non nuclear expert.
Trump was the fucking president of the United States when he asked that question. He's got fucking top notch science advice available to him on a moment's notice. When he asks something like that to the press, he's saying "I think it'd be a good idea if we [fill-in-the-blank]" If he didn't know that would be the effect, maybe he shouldn't have been sitting in that office.
Trump did not propose using nuclear weapons to control hurricanes or anything else. He asked why can't we do that which is his way of asking "could we do that?" or maybe "What would happen if we did that?" It was a question to get information, not to suggest policy.
Trump is not a slick, polished, scripted, carefully crafted and groomed politician. He's a guy fully aware of what he doesn't know and he asks a LOT of questions according to his friends, staffers, colleagues.
Oh... perfect.
Then why didn't he ask his science advisor? Of, if he did, why didn't he accept his answer?
You mean he's not woke. He's not aware or attentive to important societal facts and issues. Got it.
Name one out-of-the-box, SUCCESSFUL solution he came up with during his term that others had not thought of or had dismissed - for any reason.
What was the context of his let's-drop-nukes-on-hurricanes conjecture that excuses him from having revealed the United States was being ruled by a complete imbecile?
That is true and it's also why I said mentioned. I did not say it was an actual proposal.
Severe weather such as hurricanes will typically greatly alarm those in danger. Trump was the president. Who do you think he was asking the question? By the time he got to his desk, his advisers would have advised him. Anyway, if you seriously plan to have man control climate, what would you do to manage global climate? When I read that man should or can control climate, now you know what I am thinking when reading those crazy solutions.
Have a nice day Crick. When you can actually read and comprehend and discuss what is being debated get back to me.
Robert brought up Trump and his nukes-for-hurricanes query talking with Dagosa. You jumped in to defend Trump. I jumped in to correct your misperceptions re Trump; an important issue at this point in time. See you on down the road, Jack.
If you had done that I wouldn't have criticized your response as non sequitur nonsense. I don't defend Trump. He doesn't need my defense. I do correct the indecent, evil, hateful, deliberately malicious crap that dishonest people accuse him of or misrepresent that he said.
Geesus, it doesn’t take an expert in nuclear energy to know anything about the results of a nuclear blast…especially if you’re the Fking commander in chief. And you’re humping for this buffoon ?
You can’t name one item that he’s been official accused of that isn’t as a result of a plethora of evidence. GEESUS, you‘d have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see it…..you got a mirror handy ?
Oh, you’re so put upon. Maybe Trump has another crying towel you could borrow.,Not everybody. Just the most dishonest and stupid ones.
