Am presuming it is merely a rhetorical question.
Divided we fail.
Forced integration is never good for a people.
Killing all the commies, commie sympathizers, and commie enablers (sorry Libertarians but you get the rope too). I still don't see it as a permanent solution, but it would improve the situation.
Preferably by mutual agreement. The US could be split into roughly 10 different countries, along cultural lines. Details would have to be hammered out by representatives. Culture is a spectrum so the 10 number isn't set in stone. There's bound to be other considerations like access to resources, for example. There are historical examples of peaceful separation. In fact Southern secession had been peaceful until Lincoln refused to remove Yankee soldiers from Confederate territory.
No kidding? 10?
Depends on how they're divided. Somewhere in the current West Virginia would be nice. I currently live in New England and can hardly wait to get away from all the liberals. West Virginia has warmer winters without the sweltering summers. It avoids Hurricane Alley and Tornado Alley. Very White population. Low crime.
Forced segregation is actually worse.
Forced segregation is unnecessary because people naturally self-segregate. Forced integration is much worse than forced segregation. Forced integration puts people together who don't want to be together, which causes conflict and social discord.
Some of us thrive on conflict and social discord. You do you.
So move to the ghetto.
I am the ghetto.
Only the rebels shouldn't be honored. The Federals most definitely should be.
The January 6th insurrectionists are also traitors. And you are lying through your teeth when you say they didn't do much of anything.
As retired military, I believe our ensign should be respected and honored. But I also believe someone who burns the flag is entitled to do so under the First Amendment even if every fiber of my being wants to beat the living shit out of them.
That's easy. I would give the enemy dead a decent burial as a gesture of respect to a fellow combatant.All of that and then I read the following story and I wonder how the left feel about this. It is one of those "feel good" stories I found in the media. In fact, I must confess, the story made me feel good. But, the gist of the story is that we are helping honor an enemy who tried killing us and who fought against us to overthrow our democracy. So, I ask the lefties again how they feel about this feel good story. How can you reconcile being against those who fought in the civil war, etc. while "feeling good" about honoring this enemy who tried or even may have accomplished killing us, regarding a flag, nonetheless? Should we help him be honored? Was it the right thing to do?
It's a miracle, say family of Japanese soldier killed in WWII, as flag he carried returns from US
Toshihiro Mutsuda was only 5 years old when he last saw his father, who was drafted by Japan's Imperial Army in 1943 and killed in action. For him, his father was a bespectacled man in an old family photo standing by a signed good-luck flag that he carried to war. The flag, known as “Yosegaki...www.yahoo.com
Me wanting to bust up the US is based on sociological and political conditions, not my desire to move. I think the break up is inevitable though the timing is hard to predict. The US is an empire in decline and the foundations are too rotted for it to be rescued with cosmetic repairs. Either the house collapses or it's demolished.
