Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope, but we should have let Patton have his way after Germany fell.To destroy and obliterate Stalin and communism ??
Did we attack the wrong the nation.
We could have dealt with Germany after ??
There is a school of thought, as I recall from my college days, that Patton and many others who were more...lets say...career minded (that can be taken two ways) knew that there would likely never be this critical mass of industrial capacity, political will, zero opposition of scale, and in all modesty and candor--tactical brilliance ever assembled again. And that if we didn't pull opposition out by the root at that moment in history, we would never be able to do it again. Not because of capability limits but because of political will to rally the homeland to the cause. I can't say that he was wrong in that argument.
I would say though that the Russian frontier is unlike any other in the world in terms of length and conditions. Those supply lines would be stretched pretty thin and winters over there aren't too comfortable. It may have been a case of biting off more than we could chew.
What isn't in doubt in my mind is that if we were ever going to "be able to chew it" it would have been the summer of 1945.
Actually...I suspect that, alone in history, the US Army of 1944-45 actually COULD have kept the troops supplied even in Russia. Yes, American logistics really were THAT good.
Actually, directly from no less than Marshal Zhukov and General Secretary Stalin, without American supplies, the Soviets would have collapsed.hahhahaaa
German population about 70 million
Russian population over 100 million
refer to the map I posted
even without Lend Lease, Germany is not winning
Stalin should have been destroyed
Actually the Soviets wouldn't have stayed in the war if it hadn't been for the British relief supplies arriving when they did; contrary to myth, the Soviets couldn't just keep retreating forever, most of their rail networks and infrastructure was in the western regions, all either overrun by Germans or well within striking distance. Their losses were severe, they were down to less than 500 tanks along the entire front, and the only thing that stopped the German advances was the deep mine fields, in some place 25 miles deep. The 125 British tanks that got to the Moscow theater of operations allowed the winter counter-attacks. Though a small shipment by later Lend-Lease standards they made the biggest difference relatively. They were only possible because the U.S. was shipping commodities to Britain, which in turn allowed Britain to ship arms and supplies to Stalin.
Actually, directly from no less than Marshal Zhukov and General Secretary Stalin, without American supplies, the Soviets would have collapsed.hahhahaaa
German population about 70 million
Russian population over 100 million
refer to the map I posted
even without Lend Lease, Germany is not winning
I would fight those god damn Germans after they finished StalinStalin should have been destroyed
And replaced with what? The reality is almost every government in the world reflects the people it rules over. It is just as likely his replacement would have been worse.
I would fight those god damn Germans after they finished StalinStalin should have been destroyed
And replaced with what? The reality is almost every government in the world reflects the people it rules over. It is just as likely his replacement would have been worse.
Just as a side note to “sweeten the deal “..we could have deported NY Jews to GermanyI would fight those god damn Germans after they finished StalinStalin should have been destroyed
And replaced with what? The reality is almost every government in the world reflects the people it rules over. It is just as likely his replacement would have been worse.
That would be the ideal, yes. Germany and Japan didn't leave it up to us, though, they attacked us instead.
Actually...I suspect that, alone in history, the US Army of 1944-45 actually COULD have kept the troops supplied even in Russia. Yes, American logistics really were THAT good.
UK had the best navy in the war
USA the best Airforce
Germany best army
USA naval power probably caught up to UK at end of war as our army did with Germany
I would fight those god damn Germans after they finished StalinStalin should have been destroyed
And replaced with what? The reality is almost every government in the world reflects the people it rules over. It is just as likely his replacement would have been worse.
What was weapons grade stupid is wasting hundreds of thousands of American lives and $trillions in treasure to defend the UK and the USSR from Germany. Germany was no threat to US national security.This is weapon-grade stupid.We certainly shouldn't have armed the UK after they declared war against Germany. Instead of arming the UK we should have annexed Canada.To destroy and obliterate Stalin and communism ??
Did we attack the wrong the nation.
We could have dealt with Germany after ??
While the UK was busy defending themselves due to the aggressive war they started against Germany, they would not have had the resources to fight the USA at the same time.
And many Canadians, especially in Quebec, weren't too happy about their children being enslaved by King George to be used as royal cannon fodder again.
We could have easily taken Canada from the UK, probably without firing a shot.
Instead, FDR decided to enslave millions of Americans in violation of the 13th amendment and get hundreds of thousands of Americans killed fighting for the Soviet commies and the monarchy that sacked, looted and burned Washington D.C.
FDR was an evil traitor.
Sorry but I see them everyday at work and they drive me “ bat shit crazy “USA naval power probably caught up to UK at end of war as our army did with Germany
As you know, the USA had military superiority over every other military in the world.
There are quite a number of excellent documentaries on TV today.