Why should a person with no kids have to pay more in taxes than a person who chooses to have kids?
Why should a person with no kids but who enjoys the absolutely essential benefit of producing more productive citizens pay less than a person who chooses to have kids and who takes on that vital responsibility from which all of society benefits?
The person with no kids shouldn't have to pay less taxes. He simply shouldn't have to pay more taxes.
Why?
He didn't request that the other guy have kids. The fact that the government put together a retirement system that works like a pyramid scheme and requires and ever-expanding base doesn't obligate me to support the creation of that base.
Neither does the fact that old people need extra care.
On top of all of this, people were shitting out kids long before anybody was offering them money to do it. You're not a martyr for ******* with no condom, and, like I told Pop, if you had told me you wanted me to pay you to do it, I'd have told you not to bother. At any rate, people don't need incentive to bust nuts or raise kids. THese are both things that humans take to naturally. The incentives for those are a biologically standard option.