Did our education system produce better results before or after the department was created? That's the bottom line.
I work in IT. If I convince the leadership of a company that they would be better served with a massively expensive new computer architecture and their mission critical software ran slower than it did and had more bugs causing problems than before, do I get a promotion or get fired? Does the leadership of the company sneer contemptuously at the architecture they had before, claiming they would go back to cave man days if they trashed the expensive, unwieldly, poorly performing architecture I convinced them to adopt, or would they immediately move to jettison the problem?
Or would they, like the usual suspects on here, be so emotionally welded to the new architecture that they would refuse any attempts to streamline it, debug it, and increase performance, to the point of replacing the whole thing?