Should Liz Cheney be shot?

[The Sage of Main Street]

Look, liars gotta lie. Honest folks know what he said.
If you advocate for warfare, for military action, for putting young men’s lives in jeopardy without being willing to put yourself at the same risk, YOU are a piece of shit.
This sentiment isn’t new, a number of us here have expressed it for years, going back as far as the Shrub Bush wars.
All the mendacious responses over his statement leaves me with no respect, no good will, for those advancing them.

Do Your Duty or We're Done For

Anyone who opposes bringing back the draft is a Chickenhawk. The Lizardtarian sissy academic, Milton Friedman, talked Nixon into ending it, maliciously comparing it to Statist slavery. The same selfish and dishonest reasoning is preached by Conscientious Objectors, whose privilege to commit sanctimonious treason must also be abolished.

 

[Lesh]

I mean look at the thread title

“Should Liz Cheney be shot?”

Not “should Liz Cheney go to war?”

Not “should Liz Cheney face combat”?

Nope

“Be shot”


Nine barrels

 

[eagle1462010]

Tell us… who describes combat as “nine barrels shooting at you”?

Why Trump just did so. Didnt you read the Op.

Bless Your Heart

 

[Couchpotato]

Alright, fair point, but he sure seem to like to talk about violence against people that oppose his candidacy.

Except in this case certainly he’s saying that all these people like Cheney who support these wars don’t have to fight them and fang if they did they might not be so eager to start/ get involved in them.

 

[Woodznutz]

I mean look at the thread title

“Should Liz Cheney be shot?”

Not “should Liz Cheney go to war?”

Not “should Liz Cheney face combat”?

Nope

“Be shot”


Nine barrels

Then the thread is no more than a troll.

Should Liz Cheney be shot (at) if she goes the front lines of a war that she supported. That is what is being asked.

 

[Lesh]

Why Trump just did so. Didnt you read the Op.

Bless Your Heart

Actually he was describing a firing squad

Has anyone ELSE described combat like that?

 

[Couchpotato]

I mean look at the thread title

“Should Liz Cheney be shot?”

Not “should Liz Cheney go to war?”

Not “should Liz Cheney face combat”?

Nope

“Be shot”


Nine barrels

Stormy Daniels is Donald Trump? How long have you known this?

 

[eagle1462010]

Actually he was describing a firing squad

Has anyone ELSE described combat like that?

LIAR

You have left sanity behind and are now a USED CAR SALESMAN

 

[Lesh]

Well?

 

[Couchpotato]

Have you ever heard combat described like that?

“Nine barrels” is pretty specific

Have you ever been in combat?

 

[Lesh]

Have you ever been in combat?

Irrelevant

 

[eagle1462010]

Well?

Well what

Get your skinny as to Ukraine and count guns.

Liz wants you there

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Sage, what's to disagree with?

Hanoi Hannah in Our Homeland

We wouldn't have survived very long without artillery. The enemy could swarm all over us at any time if it weren't for that shield of shells. That's what made them engage in mostly hit-and-run fighting.

We could have beaten the VC as quickly as MacArthur beat the NoKos. It was the deadly Rules of Engagement and the failure to have a ground invasion of North Vietnam (which Moshe Dayan said was the only way America could win) that caused this stabbed in the back disaster.

The hidden purpose of the Vietnam War was to kill off or take the fight out of the bravest sons of the White working class. Mission Accomplished.

 

[White 6]

"Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK?" Those are Donald Trump's words about Liz Cheney. This, coming from the person who says that other people are engaging in violent rhetoric. So, what do you think? Should she be shot?


https://www.politico.com/live-updat...dates-analysis/trump-rips-liz-cheney-00186693

Donny, sure won't pick up a weapon to do it, because he is a coward, needing others to shoot his enemies. If he had the balls to try, any Cheney could take him, with ease.

 

[eagle1462010]

Donny, sure won't pick up a weapon to do it, because he is a coward, needing others to shoot his enemies. If he had the balls to try, any Cheney could take him, with ease.

TDS is HUGE with this one

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[progressive hunter]

Donny, sure won't pick up a weapon to do it, because he is a coward, needing others to shoot his enemies. If he had the balls to try, any Cheney could take him, with ease.

why would he??hes against wars,,

and why arent you holding warhawks like the cheneys to the same standards youre having against trup??

 

[Kondor3]

Down-Don We Now Our Gay Apparel
Kamalalala, Lalalala!


Attacking him with a faggoty flock of sissying singers is a far greater mistake in presenting your case.

Immaterial... it's a sign of utter disdain and contempt for your Baboon-God with his oh-so-flawed character...

 

[eagle1462010]

Immaterial... it's a sign of utter disdain and contempt for your Baboon-God with his oh-so-flawed character...

Hey I heard your HO candidate was out doing blows for votes.

 

[22lcidw]

I mean look at the thread title

“Should Liz Cheney be shot?”

Not “should Liz Cheney go to war?”

Not “should Liz Cheney face combat”?

Nope

“Be shot”


Nine barrels

What this means is the National Socialist Progressive Communist Party is now in the pockets of the War Mongers. You will go to war now for any reason. It is incredible how agendas change. There were a good percentage of Republican voters who were not war mongers. Watching the war mongers leave Trump was a sign. Watching war monger magazine ghouls change sides was a sign. Sometimes you's like to see the little guy win. To watch many of these self-important demigods get their just desserts would make up for a lot of the turmoil we have seen.