Should Kamala give a platform to failing Trump?

[jotathought]

He is stamping his feet making odd demands for this debate but I think she would be better served feeding her cats and leaving the wierdo to stew.

Ar the least she should insist on instant fact checking.

Stamping his feet? Trump has already demonstrated he has the balls to meet with confrontational audiences and interviews. Meanwhile, the presumptive nominee for president hasn't even had a press conference or high-profile interview where she would be expected to answer tough questions ... like .. As the point person selected by Biden, how was your success in managing the border crisis under the Biden / Harris administration?

Is Harris too scared to be challenged and demonstrate her inability to effectively articulate thought? She challenged Trump to a debate, and he accepted by establishing one.

 

[marvin martian]

You people are really weird.

 

[there4eyeM]

She actuallu holds office. He has been kicked from office. He should show respect to his betters.

Have you not understood that the strategy is to keep the "not Trump" candidate from speaking at all? Mr. T., we are in a terrible state. Two unthinkable candidates are dueling by one that won't shut up and one that won't say anything. Both embarrass themselves when they open their mouths. One's followers eat it up, the other's followers can't stand the embarrassment. Either way, Americans lose, the duopoly continues in firm control.

 

[playtime]

You people are really weird.

you sound like a snowflake.

 

[Rambunctious]

Failing Trump??? the economy for the first time this year topped the list of concerns for the American people and immigration is now second...
Trump leads Kamala by 12 points on the economy and by 15 on the border....
Failing Trump... LMAO

 

[PeanutGallery]

The two sides did agree on a platform. The orange loser is just playing for time since he is scared to debate her. This is the guy who boasted - "any time, any place". Of course, now it is changed to "any place - as long as it is Fox News".

The guy needs Fox news as a warm blanky to feel safe to debate Kamala. Poor orange sod.

Can you produce a link where the Harris campaign and the Trump campaign agreed to debate on ABC on Sept. 10th? I know that the Trump and Biden campaigns agreed to debate on ABC on Sept. 10th. If you can, I'll definitely refer to Trump as being cowardly. If you can't produce the link, then you need to explain where the deal is. Harris' either stupid or naive to think that just because she took Biden's spot that she's automatically entitled to Biden's deal.

If there's a deal between A & B, B leaves, and C comes along, it's up to A to decide to keep the same deal or declare new terms.

Can someone explain to me why a person who was talked about just last year needing to be replaced so Biden will have a better chance to win reelection is suddenly this political wonder girl that has Trump scared to be on the same stage as her?

 

[Magnus]

Can you produce a link where the Harris campaign and the Trump campaign agreed to debate on ABC on Sept. 10th? I know that the Trump and Biden campaigns agreed to debate on ABC on Sept. 10th. If you can, I'll definitely refer to Trump as being cowardly. If you can't produce the link, then you need to explain where the deal is. Harris' either stupid or naive to think that just because she took Biden's spot that she's automatically entitled to Biden's deal.

If there's a deal between A & B, B leaves, and C comes along, it's up to A to decide to keep the same deal or declare new terms.

Can someone explain to me why a person who was talked about just last year needing to be replaced so Biden will have a better chance to win reelection is suddenly this political wonder girl that has Trump scared to be on the same stage as her?

LOL All that rigmarole to get out of debating.

A debate was set up between the Republican and the Democrat party. When Biden stepped out and Kamala took his place, your orange loser claimed he would debate "Any Time; Any Place".

Remember that? What happened to that boast? I'll tell you what happened. Your douchebag got cold feet and started clucking like a chicken.

Thoughts & prayers.

 

[John09]

The rules for the ABC debate did not name any candidate - Biden or Trump.

 

[ThisIsMe]

then trump should really show her a thing or two, show up to the ABC debate & tear her a new one.

if he doesn't do that, then he's running scared.

He already gave a debate to Biden on a silver platter, why won’t Harris do that?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

The rules for the ABC debate did not name any candidate - Biden or Trump.

Donny is an old man and there are a lot of those word things in that statement.

 

[PeanutGallery]

LOL All that rigmarole to get out of debating.

A debate was set up between the Republican and the Democrat party. When Biden stepped out and Kamala took his place, your orange loser claimed he would debate "Any Time; Any Place".

Remember that? What happened to that boast? I'll tell you what happened. Your douchebag got cold feet and started clucking like a chicken.

Thoughts & prayers.

I don't see a link there, Magnus. What's up with that? And no, the democrat and republican parties didn't set up debates. The Trump and Biden campaigns set up debates. LINK Once Biden left, the deal left with him. BTW, Trump made the comment of "Any Time, Any Place" in reference to debating Biden. Show a link where he said that AFTER Biden dropped out. I can show you the quote where he said it about debating Biden.

"It is important for the Good of our Country, that Joe Biden and I Debate issues that are so vital to American, and the American people," Trump wrote on the Truth Social media platform. "Therefore, I am calling for Debates, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, ANYPLACE!" LINK

Right now, Trump is the frontrunner, so he has leverage. He was willing to go to a "hostile" environment to debate Biden. If Harris is bold enough to call out Trump to "say it to her face", then why would the location of where Trump says it is all that important? Harris needs to have this debate more than Trump does. Also, ABC News would be the moderators. Trump has an active lawsuit against ABC News.

P.S. I didn't vote for Trump for 2020, so I fail to see how Trump is anything to me but a politician running for President.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Kamala does not have the courage to go in front of FOX controlled debate. The two FOX commentators to be used are not stone-cold conservatives either. Hannity, Watters and Ingraham should be considered. It's you Progs who raise Kamala up as this greatness. And now you are saying she cannot do it.

They’re already scheduled for a debate on September 10th – all Trump needs to do is show up.

 

[Weatherman2020]

He is stamping his feet making odd demands for this debate but I think she would be better served feeding her cats and leaving the wierdo to stew.

Ar the least she should insist on instant fact checking.

What failing looks like:

 

[Auld Phart]

They’re already scheduled for a debate on September 10th – all Trump needs to do is show up.

They’re already scheduled for a debate on September 10th –

between Joe and Trump.

 

[g5000]

What failing looks like:
View attachment 990949

qFP

 

[Magnus]

I don't see a link there, Magnus. What's up with that? And no, the democrat and republican parties didn't set up debates. The Trump and Biden campaigns set up debates. LINK Once Biden left, the deal left with him. BTW, Trump made the comment of "Any Time, Any Place" in reference to debating Biden. Show a link where he said that AFTER Biden dropped out. I can show you the quote where he said it about debating Biden.

"It is important for the Good of our Country, that Joe Biden and I Debate issues that are so vital to American, and the American people," Trump wrote on the Truth Social media platform. "Therefore, I am calling for Debates, ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, ANYPLACE!" LINK

Right now, Trump is the frontrunner, so he has leverage. He was willing to go to a "hostile" environment to debate Biden. If Harris is bold enough to call out Trump to "say it to her face", then why would the location of where Trump says it is all that important? Harris needs to have this debate more than Trump does. Also, ABC News would be the moderators. Trump has an active lawsuit against ABC News.

P.S. I didn't vote for Trump for 2020, so I fail to see how Trump is anything to me but a politician running for President.

No, it didn't. That's not how it works. What if the situation was reversed? What if Kamala went back on the debate with the exact same explanation? Since the debate was Biden vs Trump, she would not be participating?

What would you call her? You would call her the same thing we are calling Trump—a chicken.

What part of that is difficult to get?

 

[PeanutGallery]

No, it didn't. That's not how it works. What if the situation was reversed? What if Kamala went back on the debate with the exact same explanation? Since the debate was Biden vs Trump, she would not be participating?

What would you call her? You would call her the same thing we are calling Trump—a chicken.

What part of that is difficult to get?

You're a poor mind reader, Magnus. If the situation was reversed, I'd say the EXACT SAME THING because I'm not a partisan hack like you are. A deal is a deal, and when the debate deal was made, Harris's campaign didn't have a seat at the table. So, if the situation was reversed, I'd say that Harris is in the right to change the terms of the debate, if she chose to do so. After all, the person that she would've agreed to debate isn't running anymore. So, either Biden and Trump debate on ABC on Sept. 10th, or the two campaigns need to talk it out and set for a debate date, time, location and network.

I said in my first post that I wondered who was either naive or ignorant enough to believe that Harris could just waltz and feel entitled to the same deal as Biden did in my first post. You DEFINITELY fall in that category.

 

[Magnus]

You're a poor mind reader, Magnus. If the situation was reversed, I'd say the EXACT SAME THING because I'm not a partisan hack like you are. A deal is a deal, and when the debate deal was made, Harris's campaign didn't have a seat at the table. So, if the situation was reversed, I'd say that Harris is in the right to change the terms of the debate, if she chose to do so. After all, the person that she would've agreed to debate isn't running anymore. So, either Biden and Trump debate on ABC on Sept. 10th, or the two campaigns need to talk it out and set for a debate date, time, location and network.

I said in my first post that I wondered who was either naive or ignorant enough to believe that Harris could just waltz and feel entitled to the same deal as Biden did in my first post. You DEFINITELY fall in that category.

Actually, you are a cultist. You would accept anything your fuhrer dishes out.

How do I know? By the fact that you accept everything good or bad about your orange fuhrer. Take my party. When Biden stumbled, we replaced him.

Compare that with your orange loser. Not only did he lose the last one, but he was also instrumental in helping to lose Congress seats for the Republicans. As if that wasn't enough, he is a convicted criminal felon who encouraged his retard followers to storm the Capitol and nearly lynch his own VP because he couldn't bear the thought of being called a loser.

And you retards happily cater to his ego. Ergo - you belong to a cult.

Let me know if you are still confused.

 

[PeanutGallery]

Actually, you are a cultist. You would accept anything your fuhrer dishes out.

Oh where to begin with this response. Might as well start here. I'm not a republican, so what am I supposed to accepting from Trump or any other politician? I can't vote in my state until November so what they party does their business and hold their votes is their business. I dared to agree with Trump on something? OMG!!! You totally avoided talking about your scenario about if the roles were reversed, and I said that I would back Harris if Trump tried the same thing. Sounds like a reasonable and consistent response, but that's not good enough for someone like you.

How do I know? By the fact that you accept everything good or bad about your orange fuhrer. Take my party. When Biden stumbled, we replaced him.

Who's "we"? Do you have a mouse in your pocket? You didn't do jack except go to the voting place and vote for Biden as the Presidential nominee. The powers within the democrat party/donors saw that he was LOSING to Trump, and forced him out to increase their chances of winning. Your party can do what it wants. However, don't come talking to me about "voter suppression" and "protecting democracy" when your party literally discarded every primary voter's vote and decided on its own to install someone because they didn't see a pathway to victory with the person that the people voted for. Both sides want power, and this was a clear, naked power grab. All you're doing is sitting back and accepting everything the democrat party says and does. Don't you find it the least bit odd that the person who, last year, had stories done (NYT, WaPo, New York Magazine) on her and segments on the news networks (CNN & MSNBC) talking about replacing Harris with someone else as VP to bolster Biden's chances to win in 2024 is now talked about as some political dynamo and welcome to Karmalot? What exactly changed between last year and this year that makes Kamala so appealing other than the fact the powers-that-be told you so?

Compare that with your orange loser. Not only did he lose the last one, but he was also instrumental in helping to lose Congress seats for the Republicans. As if that wasn't enough, he is a convicted criminal felon who encouraged his retard followers to storm the Capitol and nearly lynch his own VP because he couldn't bear the thought of being called a loser.

And you retards happily cater to his ego. Ergo - you belong to a cult.

Let me know if you are still confused.

I'm good, thank you. I'm laughing at you though because you seem to lack situational awareness. The thing about being in a cult is that people sometimes don't even realize that they're in one. They think that their cause is noble, just and right. You're definitely a "vote blue no matter who" person. So, on that alone, that makes you a cultist. It doesn't take much thought to vote the same way EVERY TIME regardless of who the person is. What's you're doing is pure projection. Since I'm not in full lockstep in hatred for Trump then I must be a cultist. I know I'm a LOT more balanced in my opinions here than you are. So, come back with some pithy response full of "cute" nicknames for Trump and accuse me of everything evil under the moon and the stars.

 

[playtime]

He already gave a debate to Biden on a silver platter, why won’t Harris do that?

kamala was going to debate JD had she remained the VP nominee... now that changed & she has no problems changing opponents. SHE'S not scared ... SHE'S not a coward.

but donny is.