Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 15,114
- 6,457
- 208
Abortions happen spontaneously.Isn't that pretty much the thinking regarding the right to abortion?
Are you saying God is in favor of abortion?
Maybe stick to the topic?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Abortions happen spontaneously.Isn't that pretty much the thinking regarding the right to abortion?
And when you have nothing to say, why not say that?When you are profoundly ignorant about something, of course it seems simple
Especially when one knows the lies they have told themselves. Their models are flawed. They amplify the radiative forcing effect of CO2 by 500% which is totally contrary to the fact that the GHG effect of all gases would be 75C instead of 33C if not for convective currents for an effective efficiency of 44%. So they would have us believe that 120 ppm of CO2 is more efficient than the entire GHG spectrum of the entire atmosphere. By an order of magnitude more efficient. Just on this one fact alone they should be laughed out of any room they enter.It seems fairly simple to me.
Actually it was spot on in pointing out the hypocrisy.Nope. Not even close. Let me know if you are still confused.![]()
I find it easier to separate science and politics like I do religion and politics.I find the prospect of global warming, the possibility of a second Trump administration and the demise of a republican party concerned with responsible governance all a bit depressing. But then I think "I'll be dead before it gets really bad".
It was a fair point about the hypocrisy of Magnus' position being selective. And it is.Maybe stick to the topic?
Yeah, why care about our descendants and their lives? Fuck them, amIright? It's not like we owe any responsibilities to them.
Nope. Again, not even close. But hey, prove your point. Go.Actually it was spot on in pointing out the hypocrisy.
They will suffer the consequences of our inaction. Many will die but many more will suffer. The cost will beggar nations.
Beggar them today, so that China can still increase their CO2.
Sounds like typical leftist economics.
the old Midas commercials
"You can pay me now or pay me later"
And later will cost a lot more.
A few degrees delta and the US midwest stops being the breadbasket of the world and becomes the Great American Desert. If you've been in Kansas during a drought you know what I mean.
View attachment 857097
Meanwhile warming of the oceans will will kill many of the food species and reefs resulting in a big decrease in seafood availability.
View attachment 857101
Now you may think that we can use new technologies to overcome this but that's what they were saying 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago. But, when any new technology is opposed politically as solar and wind, when lifestyle changes are opposed because you want yours, well, I'm sure you can see where this ends.
Still, who gives a damn. We've jerked around the last 40 years pretending there isn't a problem or that we'll be able to solve it but, It is doubtful, absent a major killoff of 30-40% of humanity within the next 20 years, that the earth will be capable of supporting large mammal life much beyond 2100.
But wh cares as long as we get ours, right?
Hellokitty already made it. It's done.Nope. Again, not even close. But hey, prove your point. Go.
I've never been able to figure out why anyone would want the planet to be colder in the middle of an ice age.The Planet doesn't mind the CO2 increase,
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds
April, 2016
Excerpt:
From a quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.
An international team of 32 authors from 24 institutions in eight countries led the effort, which involved using satellite data from NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer instruments to help determine the leaf area index, or amount of leaf cover, over the planet’s vegetated regions. The greening represents an increase in leaves on plants and trees equivalent in area to two times the continental United States.
LINK
Nope, she didn't. And it looks like you too cannot. That's what I figured. Thanks for being predictable.Hellokitty already made it. It's done.
I'm not going to argue with you about your blind spot. Of course you aren't going to see it. It's a blind spot for crying out loud.Nope, she didn't. And it looks like you too cannot. That's what I figured. Thanks for being predictable.![]()
You want to talk about predictable? Predictable surprises are outcomes of normalization of deviance. So you might want to be careful with that smugness cause it is likely going to bite you in the ass IRL.Thanks for being predictable.
Sure i did. You need to explain how its different.Nope, she didn't. And it looks like you too cannot. That's what I figured. Thanks for being predictable.![]()
the old Midas commercials
"You can pay me now or pay me later"
And later will cost a lot more.
A few degrees delta and the US midwest stops being the breadbasket of the world and becomes the Great American Desert. If you've been in Kansas during a drought you know what I mean.
View attachment 857097
Meanwhile warming of the oceans will will kill many of the food species and reefs resulting in a big decrease in seafood availability.
View attachment 857101
Now you may think that we can use new technologies to overcome this but that's what they were saying 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago. But, when any new technology is opposed politically as solar and wind, when lifestyle changes are opposed because you want yours, well, I'm sure you can see where this ends.
Still, who gives a damn. We've jerked around the last 40 years pretending there isn't a problem or that we'll be able to solve it but, It is doubtful, absent a major killoff of 30-40% of humanity within the next 20 years, that the earth will be capable of supporting large mammal life much beyond 2100.
But wh cares as long as we get ours, right?
Why we are where we are today.That’s silly.
The world has gone through cycles of heating and cooling in the past and will do so again in the future.
If Kansas tuns into a desert, that will mean more arable land further north in Canada. In the sea, fish will migrate further north as oceans warm.
I’m not saying global warming isn’t bad, but this idea that it is a calamity for humanity is utterly ridiculous.
I'm not going to argue with you about your blind spot. Of course you aren't going to see it. It's a blind spot for crying out loud.
Blah…blah…blah.. I would have thought instead of yapping, you would explain your point of view and…You want to talk about predictable? Predictable surprises are outcomes of normalization of deviance. So you might want to be careful with that smugness cause it is likely going to bite you in the ass IRL.
You did what? All you did was make a statement…Sure i did. You need to explain how its different.
Isn't that pretty much the thinking regarding the right to abortion?