Should Churches be forced to accomodate for homosexual weddings?

[Syriusly]

How Much Child Molestation is Homosexual?
Do homosexuals disproportionately molest children? Gay activists vehemently deny it, yet the empirical evidence says otherwise. The key concept is proportionality. Probably a numerical majority of child molestations involve a male adult and a female child, but given the small fraction of homosexual practitioners, the number of homosexual molestations is disproportionate to the percentage of homosexuals. This briefing summarizes some of the key evidence.
l

Is that even supposed to mean something?

Look at this BS Probably a numerical majority of child molestations involve a male adult and a female child

Probably?

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

Your facts and figures start off with innuendo that perhaps most child abuse is not on girls- why would that be- other than because homophobes don't care if girls are molested.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children and it shouldn't be lost on anyone that the majority of child sexual abuse cases are committed by heterosexuals, not homosexuals. It should also be pointed out that white people are disproportionately more likely to molest children than any other race, but we're not going to talk about that, are we?

I'm opposed to homosexuality because I think it's wrong. But I won't go so far as to exaggerate, make things up, or play inane statistics games to demonize them. It's the difference between conscientious objection and outright hatred. The latter Christians are not called to.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I get it... after all I'm not dead.

They are what they are and there's no getting around it, but when we lead into their strengths, we dilute our leadership. Leadership 101 scamp.

Lead, Follow, or get the hell out of the way.

I've no dispute with any of your reference resources... just some constructive criticism, common to 'style'.

No soak up those tears and continue. You're doin' fine.

What part of **** off asshole did you not understand??
I got your tears hanging, Buba ......................

ROFL! Well... there's no accountin' for the idiots.
But at least you demonstrate that even the blind nuts can find a squirrel now and then.

Rest assured scamp, that in no universe will you ever become equal to me in any endeavor and I will reign over you, in every endeavor... but as sad as you are, even YOU can see that homosexuality deviates from the standard established by human physiology and aren't afraid to speak out on it, in unapologetic terms, pointing out that such abnormal reasoning is indicative of a threat to the public at large.

Good for you scamp. Good for you.

 

[Syriusly]

How Much Child Molestation is Homosexual?
Do homosexuals disproportionately molest children? Gay activists vehemently deny it, yet the empirical evidence says otherwise. The key concept is proportionality. Probably a numerical majority of child molestations involve a male adult and a female child, but given the small fraction of homosexual practitioners, the number of homosexual molestations is disproportionate to the percentage of homosexuals. This briefing summarizes some of the key evidence.
l

Is that even supposed to mean something?

Look at this BS Probably a numerical majority of child molestations involve a male adult and a female child

Probably?

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

Your facts and figures start off with innuendo that perhaps most child abuse is not on girls- why would that be- other than because homophobes don't care if girls are molested.

Depending on age- girls are the victims of child sexual abuse by men between 69%-91% of the time.

Men make up 50% of the population, but commit up to 99% of the child sex abuse.

But homophobes only care about child sex abuse when they can claim that it is a homosexual doing the abuse.

Why not the rest of the abuse?

Because they don't care about kids.

They don't care about whether girls are molested.

They don't care whether a boy is molested by his stepfather or grandfather.

All they care about is saying "Homosexuals are the problem"

Homophobes who do this put all children at more risk.

 

[Syriusly]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children and it shouldn't be lost on anyone that the majority of child sexual abuse cases are committed by heterosexuals, not homosexuals. It should also be pointed out that white people are disproportionately more likely to molest children than any other race, but we're not going to talk about that, are we?

I'm opposed to homosexuality because I think it's wrong. But I won't go so far as to exaggerate, make things up, or play inane statistics games to demonize them. It's the difference between conscientious objection and outright hatred. The latter Christians are not called to.

thank you.

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

That link does not contain that fact you lying ****** ..................................
Reverse Google it, if that article contained that phrase, you could Google it and your link would appear at the top of the list, hint(it ain't in the results) ....................

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children ...

Well lets' see if we can work through your beliefs... and sort out the rational elements of such, from the irrational.

Now lemme ask ya...

Do you believe that a nail, which is constructed within the standard suitable to and otherwise applied in the fabrications of nails, is more likely or less likely to cause injury to those using a nail, than a nail of the abnormal variety?

Which is to say a nail that deviates from the standard established in the creation of nails? Such standards might include, 'straightness' for instance... .

So which is it? Do you 'believe' that a normal nail is MORE or less likely to cause injury to the user of nails?

 

[Syriusly]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children ...

Well lets' see if we can work through your beliefs... and sort out the rational elements of such, from the irrational.

Now where lemme ask ya...

Do you believe that a nail, which is constructed within the standard suitable to and otherwise applied in the fabrications of nails, is more likely or less likely to cause injury to those using a nail, than a nail of the abnormal variety?

Which is to say a nail that deviates from the standard established in the creation of nails? Such standards might include, 'straightness' for instance... .

So which is it? Do you 'believe' that a normal nail is MORE or less likely to cause injury to the user of nails?

This is the end of a very good article on the issue

Are Gays a Threat to Our Children

A Firmly Established Tactic

Yet anti-gay activists insist on spreading this misinformation. Dr. Timothy Dailey (PhD, religion) of the Family Research Council quoted Dr. Freund’s statement of “199 offenders against female children and 96 offenders against male children. This would indicate a proportional prevalence of 32 percent of homosexual offenders against children.” 29 30313233343536 37

And while this lie is horribly libelous to gay men and women, that’s only a small part of the damage. The real harm is to our children. As long as we remain suspicious of the wrong people, predators will continue to have free reign to abuse innocent children. If they remain free from scrutiny because everyone else is focusing on gays and lesbians, more young lives will continue to be shattered and more parents will suffer the agonizing heartache of learning that they trusted someone who destroyed their child’s future. We must not allow the far right to cynically jeopardize our children’s safety to further their agenda. The consequences are far too severe for the next generation.

 

[JakeStarkey]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

step off, wherermykeys, now!

You are the type of natural moralist who would have supported Hitler's Ger.many

 

[Syriusly]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

That link does not contain that fact you lying ****** ..................................
Reverse Google it, if that article contained that phrase, you could Google it and your link would appear at the top of the list, hint(it ain't in the results) ....................

Well reading comprehension is clearly not a strong point of cretinous bigots like yourself

Right there in Table 2.

You can find it with the same magnifying glass you use to find your dick with.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Nothing comin' to mind?

Well... LOL! That doesn't bode well for the authority inherent in those 'beliefs', now does it?

 

[Syriusly]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

That link does not contain that fact you lying ****** ..................................
Reverse Google it, if that article contained that phrase, you could Google it and your link would appear at the top of the list, hint(it ain't in the results) ....................

Well reading comprehension is clearly not a strong point of cretinous bigots like yourself

Right there in Table 2.

You can find it with the same magnifying glass you use to find your dick with.

I guess another way to put the argument of the homophobes is:

"We can't allow homosexuals to marry because most child molesters are heterosexual"

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nothing comin' to mind?

Well... LOL! That doesn't bode well for the authority inherent in those 'beliefs', now does it?

You have been so spanked in this thread, wherermykeys, it makes my American heart watch your fascism rebuked.

Trot along.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children ...

Well lets' see if we can work through your beliefs... and sort out the rational elements of such, from the irrational.

Now lemme ask ya...

Do you believe that a nail, which is constructed within the standard suitable to and otherwise applied in the fabrications of nails, is more likely or less likely to cause injury to those using a nail, than a nail of the abnormal variety?

Which is to say a nail that deviates from the standard established in the creation of nails? Such standards might include, 'straightness' for instance... .

So which is it? Do you 'believe' that a normal nail is MORE or less likely to cause injury to the user of nails?

And yet, more children are molested by heterosexuals. It kinda puts the damper on your nail analogy. Do you actually have gay friends or do you just talk about them amongst others who don't have gay friends and are just as ignorant as you?

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

That link does not contain that fact you lying ****** ..................................
Reverse Google it, if that article contained that phrase, you could Google it and your link would appear at the top of the list, hint(it ain't in the results) ....................

Well reading comprehension is clearly not a strong point of cretinous bigots like yourself

Right there in Table 2.

You can find it with the same magnifying glass you use to find your dick with.

NO comprehension seems to be your biggest issue, as demonstrated by either ignorance or just lack of reading ability, but the 69% is for FEMALES < 6 abused, the 91% is for FEMALES 12-17 abused, no reference is made to abusers sex.

Look at the bottom of the chart, broken down by abuser status, family member, acquaintance, stranger ............... no statistics are given for abuser sexual status ............

Not only are you a foggot, but you are an awful dumb ****** ...............................

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

Hey Jake, see above post, and don't follow that one over the cliff ...................

 

[DrDoomNGloom]

Just to make sure we are on the same page, we are talking "Frog Protection", right??

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children ...

Well lets' see if we can work through your beliefs... and sort out the rational elements of such, from the irrational.

Now lemme ask ya...

Do you believe that a nail, which is constructed within the standard suitable to and otherwise applied in the fabrications of nails, is more likely or less likely to cause injury to those using a nail, than a nail of the abnormal variety?

Which is to say a nail that deviates from the standard established in the creation of nails? Such standards might include, 'straightness' for instance... .

So which is it? Do you 'believe' that a normal nail is MORE or less likely to cause injury to the user of nails?

And yet, more children are molested by heterosexuals. It kinda puts the damper on your nail analogy. Do you actually have gay friends or do you just talk about them amongst others who don't have gay friends and are just as ignorant as you?

So you can't speak to your 'beliefs'? So bereft of reason are those beliefs, that you cannot even profess a judgment on which of a normal nail and abnormal nail would be more likely to injure the users of nails?

A NAIL~

Yet... you have no problem, 'believing' that abnormal human beings, are the same as NORMAL human beings in their propensity for injuring others? Despite the certainty that human beings and their 'use' is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE MORE COMPLEX, thus where abnormal they're EXPONENTIALLY MORE likely to cause injury.

GOLLY... THAT is a glaring demonstration of that which is: IRRATIONAL!

What's more... due to the nature of the manufacturing of nails there are very few irregular examples of such and where such are found, they are usually tossed aside and discard. BUT, where an abnormal nail is used, it is quite likely that it will cause injury to those who foolishly attempted to use it.


Same with the lowly homosexual... tolerating their addled desire to be seen as normal is a threat to every free individual... they represent abnormal reasoning, which provides for the likelihood that where given the opportunity, they will 'choose' to set aside cultural mores and standards and satisfy their base desires... THIS IS THE NATURE OF SEXUAL ABNORMALITY.

And with that said, your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Syriusly]

69%-91% of all child molestation involves a male adult and a female child
http://www.drryanhall.com/Articles/pedophiles.pdf

That link does not contain that fact you lying ****** ..................................
Reverse Google it, if that article contained that phrase, you could Google it and your link would appear at the top of the list, hint(it ain't in the results) ....................

Well reading comprehension is clearly not a strong point of cretinous bigots like yourself

Right there in Table 2.

You can find it with the same magnifying glass you use to find your dick with.

NO comprehension seems to be your biggest issue, as demonstrated by either ignorance or just lack of reading ability, but the 69% is for FEMALES < 6 abused, the 91% is for FEMALES 12-17 abused, no reference is made to abusers sex.

Look at the bottom of the chart, broken down by abuser status, family member, acquaintance, stranger ............... no statistics are given for abuser status ............

Not only are you a foggot, but you are an awful dumb ****** ...............................

Like I said before- use the magnifying glass you use to find your dick and read the report.

Table 2 shows the percentage of females who have been molested by age.

Page 458- female molesters are reported at 1% or 6% of total molesters.

Do the math- that means adjusting for potential female abusers that the number of females molested by men makes the huge transition from 69% to either 68% or 65% but doesn't change at all the concept- that the vast majority of child sexual abuse is by men to girls.

The kind of molestation you don't care about.

Because its only girls.

Being molested by men.

And even within the doublespeak of the cretinous homophobes, you can't make that the fault of homosexuals.

 

[Syriusly]

I don't believe that gays are more likely to molest children ...

Well lets' see if we can work through your beliefs... and sort out the rational elements of such, from the irrational.

Now lemme ask ya...

Do you believe that a nail, which is constructed within the standard suitable to and otherwise applied in the fabrications of nails, is more likely or less likely to cause injury to those using a nail, than a nail of the abnormal variety?

Which is to say a nail that deviates from the standard established in the creation of nails? Such standards might include, 'straightness' for instance... .

So which is it? Do you 'believe' that a normal nail is MORE or less likely to cause injury to the user of nails?

And yet, more children are molested by heterosexuals. It kinda puts the damper on your nail analogy. Do you actually have gay friends or do you just talk about them amongst others who don't have gay friends and are just as ignorant as you?

So you can't speak to your 'beliefs'? So bereft of reason are those beliefs, that you cannot even profess a judgment on which of a normal nail and abnormal nail would be more likely to injure the users of nails?

A NAIL~

Yet... you have no problem, 'believing' that abnormal human beings, are the same as NORMAL human beings in their propensity for injuring others? Despite the certainty that human beings and their 'use' is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE MORE COMPLEX, thus where abnormal they're EXPONENTIALLY MORE likely to cause injury.

GOLLY... THAT is a glaring demonstration of that which is: IRRATIONAL!

What's more... due to the nature of the manufacturing of nails there are very few irregular examples of such and where such are found, they are usually tossed aside and discard. BUT, where an abnormal nail is used, it is quite likely that it will cause injury to those who foolishly attempted to use it.


Same with the lowly homosexual... tolerating their addled desire to be seen as normal is a threat to every free individual... they represent abnormal reasoning, which provides for the likelihood that where given the opportunity, they will 'choose' to set aside cultural mores and standards and satisfy their base desires... THIS IS THE NATURE OF SEXUAL ABNORMALITY.

Bat guano crazy.