Zander
Platinum Member
I think it was a mistake. The entire "containment" strategy was a failure. Communism doesn't need to be "contained", it always fails on it's own.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True enough, however not before MASS devastation and some sort of genocide is committed. The overall point is we defended an ally.I think it was a mistake. The entire "containment" strategy was a failure. Communism doesn't need to be "contained", it always fails on it's own.
And the Jesuits got it from their Master and Lord: Jesus Christ! Brotherly love and altruism is the ultimate definition of Communism! Materialism is the antithesis of that you capitalist devils,heh heh heh!No they didn't. Karl Marx was just the first to identify it and give it a name.Jews started communism
The Jesuits are the ones that created communism. Marex and Engels were coached and directed by jesuit priests.
I'm going to make this short.
The French were in Indochina for economic reasons, tea and latex from rubber trees. They united a number of warring ethnic factions.
As usual, at the end of WWII, politicians with absolutely not idea of the realities of the region, came to agreements that would eventually lead to turmoil.
Ho Chi Mihn actually tried to get the western allies to allow him to fight for them against the emerging Chinese Communists who he felt would try to take over the whole region.
Rubber was considered a vital product for industrialization and was exactly why we became involved even though Ike strongly advised against it. Once the French got their butts kicked (as usual), the USA stepped in to fill the void and stop the commies - which Ho Chi Mihn ended up turning to in order to save the integrity of the country he wanted independent of foreign rule.
The US politicians never allowed the military to actually win the war. As they do today in Afghanistan and did in Iraq, they constantly put obstacles in the way of winning the conflict. Refusal to cut off supplies along the Ho Chi Mihn Trail and - just like in Korea - restrictions on activities north of the DMZ.
Ironically, it was the billions in weaponry we left behind that allowed Vietnam to fight off incursions from China and to protect its borders from Cambodia.
So, instead of spouting off without the slightest idea of what you're talking about, take the time to READ the history of the entire area!
I'm going to make this short.
The French were in Indochina for economic reasons, tea and latex from rubber trees. They united a number of warring ethnic factions.
As usual, at the end of WWII, politicians with absolutely not idea of the realities of the region, came to agreements that would eventually lead to turmoil.
Ho Chi Mihn actually tried to get the western allies to allow him to fight for them against the emerging Chinese Communists who he felt would try to take over the whole region.
Rubber was considered a vital product for industrialization and was exactly why we became involved even though Ike strongly advised against it. Once the French got their butts kicked (as usual), the USA stepped in to fill the void and stop the commies - which Ho Chi Mihn ended up turning to in order to save the integrity of the country he wanted independent of foreign rule.
The US politicians never allowed the military to actually win the war. As they do today in Afghanistan and did in Iraq, they constantly put obstacles in the way of winning the conflict. Refusal to cut off supplies along the Ho Chi Mihn Trail and - just like in Korea - restrictions on activities north of the DMZ.
Ironically, it was the billions in weaponry we left behind that allowed Vietnam to fight off incursions from China and to protect its borders from Cambodia.
So, instead of spouting off without the slightest idea of what you're talking about, take the time to READ the history of the entire area!
I know exactly what I am talking about. The oligarchs that control this world allowed China to turn communist and they funded the communists in Russia as well. All wars are banker wars...period. It's not fucking complicated at all and it's very depressing when you come to the realization that there is too much power and wealth in too few hands controlling the fates of billions but that is the reality we live in. BTW, I don't trust one fucking thing I was taught in school when it comes to our history because I have found it to be utter bullshit from beginning to end.
No they didn't. Karl Marx was just the first to identify it and give it a name.Jews started communism
The Jesuits are the ones that created communism. Marex and Engels were coached and directed by jesuit priests.
Do you continually wallow in the more of stupidity?
I know better than to suggest that you actually come up with FACTS to back up your drivel.
I'm going to make this short.
The French were in Indochina for economic reasons, tea and latex from rubber trees. They united a number of warring ethnic factions.
As usual, at the end of WWII, politicians with absolutely not idea of the realities of the region, came to agreements that would eventually lead to turmoil.
Ho Chi Mihn actually tried to get the western allies to allow him to fight for them against the emerging Chinese Communists who he felt would try to take over the whole region.
Rubber was considered a vital product for industrialization and was exactly why we became involved even though Ike strongly advised against it. Once the French got their butts kicked (as usual), the USA stepped in to fill the void and stop the commies - which Ho Chi Mihn ended up turning to in order to save the integrity of the country he wanted independent of foreign rule.
The US politicians never allowed the military to actually win the war. As they do today in Afghanistan and did in Iraq, they constantly put obstacles in the way of winning the conflict. Refusal to cut off supplies along the Ho Chi Mihn Trail and - just like in Korea - restrictions on activities north of the DMZ.
Ironically, it was the billions in weaponry we left behind that allowed Vietnam to fight off incursions from China and to protect its borders from Cambodia.
So, instead of spouting off without the slightest idea of what you're talking about, take the time to READ the history of the entire area!
I know exactly what I am talking about. The oligarchs that control this world allowed China to turn communist and they funded the communists in Russia as well. All wars are banker wars...period. It's not fucking complicated at all and it's very depressing when you come to the realization that there is too much power and wealth in too few hands controlling the fates of billions but that is the reality we live in. BTW, I don't trust one fucking thing I was taught in school when it comes to our history because I have found it to be utter bullshit from beginning to end.
It must be tough to live in a world filled with so many conspiracies. Do you check under your bed every night before climbing into it? And run an electronic check for bugs?
No, I want you to tell me how YOUR definition alters this one:And the Jesuits got it from their Master and Lord: Jesus Christ! Brotherly love and altruism is the ultimate definition of Communism! Materialism is the antithesis of that you capitalist devils,heh heh heh!No they didn't. Karl Marx was just the first to identify it and give it a name.Jews started communism
The Jesuits are the ones that created communism. Marex and Engels were coached and directed by jesuit priests.
Obviously you do not know much about what the jesuits are all about.
Is that what we should have done? Allowed the commies to spread around the world and overrun our allies?
Just in case you want to know what truly offended the left in this country.
Let us know what we should have done. Let us hear your plan. Not defend our allies like we did with South Korea (make no mistake, the left still think we were wrong for defending South Korea from the COMMUNISTS.)?
I say it is not that we defended the South Vietnam from the scumbag murdering communists. It is that we conducted the war from a political angle. We allowed the scumbags here to dictate foreign policy that eventually led to the killing fields and slaughter of millions. That, was what was immoral.
To me.
Lets hear it left wingers. Should America have not got involved at all and allowed the vietcong to just take over and murder our allies? Should we have allowed the spread of communism with out ANY sort of defense of any of our allies?
Go ahead and please explain it. Behold the double talk everyone.
No, I want you to tell me how YOUR definition alters this one:And the Jesuits got it from their Master and Lord: Jesus Christ! Brotherly love and altruism is the ultimate definition of Communism! Materialism is the antithesis of that you capitalist devils,heh heh heh!No they didn't. Karl Marx was just the first to identify it and give it a name.Jews started communism
The Jesuits are the ones that created communism. Marex and Engels were coached and directed by jesuit priests.
Obviously you do not know much about what the jesuits are all about.
Jesuit |ˈjeZHəwətˈjezəwət| nouna member of the Society of Jesus, a Roman Catholic order of priests founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, St. Francis Xavier, and others in 1534, to do missionary work. The order was zealous in opposing the Reformation. Despite periodic persecution it has retained an important influence in Catholic thought and education.
*`generic dictionary*
Is that what we should have done? Allowed the commies to spread around the world and overrun our allies?
Just in case you want to know what truly offended the left in this country.
Let us know what we should have done. Let us hear your plan. Not defend our allies like we did with South Korea (make no mistake, the left still think we were wrong for defending South Korea from the COMMUNISTS.)?
I say it is not that we defended the South Vietnam from the scumbag murdering communists. It is that we conducted the war from a political angle. We allowed the scumbags here to dictate foreign policy that eventually led to the killing fields and slaughter of millions. That, was what was immoral.
To me.
Lets hear it left wingers. Should America have not got involved at all and allowed the vietcong to just take over and murder our allies? Should we have allowed the spread of communism with out ANY sort of defense of any of our allies?
Go ahead and please explain it. Behold the double talk everyone.
If you knew history, you wouldn't need to have anything explained, and might understand why the worlds is as it is today.
State of Vietnam referendum, 1955 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1956 in the Vietnam War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You also might look into how the CIA & DOD interfered in Iran during the Eisenhower Administration.
Are you an absolute nutjob on every issue?LBJ never gave a damn about Vietnam.
But he was not going to let it fall to the Communists on his watch. His advisors told him that if he would just send in 100,000 more boys we would be home by Christmas. Then another 100,000 and another and another
We ended up with 60,000 dead for no reason
As usual, you don't have a fucking clue. It was because of LBJ that they went in to Vietnam in the first place.
Are you an absolute nutjobs on every issue?LBJ never gave a damn about Vietnam.
But he was not going to let it fall to the Communists on his watch. His advisors told him that if he would just send in 100,000 more boys we would be home by Christmas. Then another 100,000 and another and another
We ended up with 60,000 dead for no reason
As usual, you don't have a fucking clue. It was because of LBJ that they went in to Vietnam in the first place.
We were already there
LBJ listened to the "commie menace" advisors and believed they could be quickly dispatched. He did not want to be the President that Vietnam turned commie on
Are you an absolute nutjobs on every issue?LBJ never gave a damn about Vietnam.
But he was not going to let it fall to the Communists on his watch. His advisors told him that if he would just send in 100,000 more boys we would be home by Christmas. Then another 100,000 and another and another
We ended up with 60,000 dead for no reason
As usual, you don't have a fucking clue. It was because of LBJ that they went in to Vietnam in the first place.
We were already there
LBJ listened to the "commie menace" advisors and believed they could be quickly dispatched. He did not want to be the President that Vietnam turned commie on
100 percent UTTER bullshit. This is a topic that never fails to piss me off because I know the truth and idiots like you lack the intellectual properties to put the pieces of this puzzle in place. There would not have been ANY communist threat had it not been for the power brokers that run the banks and Wall Street and the same goes for Nazism in Germany. All of it was planned and funded by these pieces of shit.
Are you an absolute nutjobs on every issue?LBJ never gave a damn about Vietnam.
But he was not going to let it fall to the Communists on his watch. His advisors told him that if he would just send in 100,000 more boys we would be home by Christmas. Then another 100,000 and another and another
We ended up with 60,000 dead for no reason
As usual, you don't have a fucking clue. It was because of LBJ that they went in to Vietnam in the first place.
We were already there
LBJ listened to the "commie menace" advisors and believed they could be quickly dispatched. He did not want to be the President that Vietnam turned commie on
100 percent UTTER bullshit. This is a topic that never fails to piss me off because I know the truth and idiots like you lack the intellectual properties to put the pieces of this puzzle in place. There would not have been ANY communist threat had it not been for the power brokers that run the banks and Wall Street and the same goes for Nazism in Germany. All of it was planned and funded by these pieces of shit.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste
Yours is past saving
Fabian?Are you an absolute nutjobs on every issue?LBJ never gave a damn about Vietnam.
But he was not going to let it fall to the Communists on his watch. His advisors told him that if he would just send in 100,000 more boys we would be home by Christmas. Then another 100,000 and another and another
We ended up with 60,000 dead for no reason
As usual, you don't have a fucking clue. It was because of LBJ that they went in to Vietnam in the first place.
We were already there
LBJ listened to the "commie menace" advisors and believed they could be quickly dispatched. He did not want to be the President that Vietnam turned commie on
100 percent UTTER bullshit. This is a topic that never fails to piss me off because I know the truth and idiots like you lack the intellectual properties to put the pieces of this puzzle in place. There would not have been ANY communist threat had it not been for the power brokers that run the banks and Wall Street and the same goes for Nazism in Germany. All of it was planned and funded by these pieces of shit.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste
Yours is past saving
Coming from a Fabian socialist piece of shit like you? That's beyond fucking funny..,...
Is that what we should have done? Allowed the commies to spread around the world and overrun our allies?
Just in case you want to know what truly offended the left in this country.
Let us know what we should have done. Let us hear your plan. Not defend our allies like we did with South Korea (make no mistake, the left still think we were wrong for defending South Korea from the COMMUNISTS.)?
I say it is not that we defended the South Vietnam from the scumbag murdering communists. It is that we conducted the war from a political angle. We allowed the scumbags here to dictate foreign policy that eventually led to the killing fields and slaughter of millions. That, was what was immoral.
To me.
Lets hear it left wingers. Should America have not got involved at all and allowed the vietcong to just take over and murder our allies? Should we have allowed the spread of communism with out ANY sort of defense of any of our allies?
Go ahead and please explain it. Behold the double talk everyone.