Zone1 Should A Handful Of Billionaires Own More Wealth Than The Bottom 50% Of All Americans?

[Red Front]

There aren't any protests because it's not the problem you are trying to make it out to be.

There are protests, just not in mass as in "Occupy Wall Street"11 years ago. I posted some videos of recent protests.

 

[ding]

He is a communist he thinks employers are evil people.

Yep.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion.

 

[ding]

There are protests, just not in mass as in occupying wall street 11 years ago. I posted some videos of recent protests.

None. Nada. Zip. You are a one man crusade, Don Quixote.

 

[Red Front]

He is a communist he thinks employers are evil people.

No, employers are not necessarily evil, but the system of capitalism is evil. Not all slave owners in the south were "evil", but the institution of slavery was evil. Capitalism is evil, and people are just stuck in the system. Forced to play the game in order to survive.

 

[Red Front]

Yep.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion.

So you're for totalitarianism in the workplace? No elections?

 

[Red Front]

None. Nada. Zip. You are a one man crusade, Don Quixote.

Hmm, OK, then how do you explain this away:

Belarus protests: Striking workers walk off the job | DW news

All recent. There are protests all over the place. It's not like Occupy Wallstreet in 2011, but things are getting worse and will eventually lead to mass protests.
​

 

[ding]

So you're for totalitarianism in the workplace? No elections?

How did you make that leap in logic?

 

[ding]

Hmm, OK, then how do you explain this away:

Belarus protests: Striking workers walk off the job | DW news

All recent. There are protests all over the place. It's not like Occupy Wallstreet in 2011, but things are getting worse and will eventually lead to mass protests.
​

None, nada, zip. You are a one man protest.

 

[ding]

The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.

 

[Red Front]

How did you make that leap in logic?

You are for elections in the workplace? Workers electing their managers or at least the board of directors (who then choose the managerial staff). Are you for that?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

So you're for totalitarianism in the workplace? No elections?

LOL there has to be a boss projects and business dont work on votes it works on rules and a single voice telling everyone what to do to accomplish the mission.

 

[Red Front]

The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure.

Not all communists are atheists. You don't have to be an atheist to be a communist. The first Christians were communists, and so were the 12 apostles. My religion is being as ethical as I can and fighting for what is just.

 

[ding]

You are for elections in the workplace? Workers electing their managers or at least the board of directors (who then choose the managerial staff). Are you for that?

I would love to see you pull that off.

Thus proving... there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach.

 

[ding]

Not all communists are atheists. You don't have to be an atheist to be a communist. The first Christians were communists, and so were the 12 apostles. My religion is being as ethical as I can and fighting for what is just.

Do you have a job?

 

[Red Front]

LOL there has to be a boss projects and business dont work on votes it works on rules and a single voice telling everyone what to do to accomplish the mission.

Sure, there has to be a boss, but that boss should be elected. We have leaders in government, but those leaders should be elected by the people. Leaders are accountable to their subordinates through elections. The workplace should be no different. More, the people that work in the business should own the business together. If a capitalist wants to leech off of the labor of others, that's exploitative and wrong. No parasite or unelected human bosses should be tolerated.

 

[Red Front]

Do you have a job?

Yes I do.

 

[ding]

Yes I do.

Are you being exploited by your employer?

 

[Red Front]

I would love to see you pull that off.

Thus proving... there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach.

That's what the kings and feudal lords told the Republicans back in the 1600s, that parliaments were a rosy pipe dream. Well, where are the kings and feudal lords now? How much power do they have? The Republicans eventually defeated them and established governments with elections. We can do the same in the workplace.

 

[Red Front]

Are you being exploited by your employer?

No, because my job consists of programming. I have clients, not bosses.

 

[ding]

That's what the kings and feudal lords told the Republicans back in the 1600s, that parliaments were a rosy pipe dream. Well, where are the kings and feudal lords now? How much power do they have? The Republicans eventually defeated them and established governments with elections. We can do the same in the workplace.

Good luck with that. Seems delusional to me though.